All My Circuits the Mafia Game [GAME OVER]

[Creature]

realet: "i wont vote long because creature is in"

2 mins later...

realet: "ill vote dom where creature is in"

Actually ew

Don't want to be in a wagon with realet anymore

[Creature]

Next suspect:

[VOTE: Enrique] aubergine

[Rej]

going to sleep see ya later guys

[Creature]

At least move your vote to somewhere relevant

[Rej]

I don’t think a town would ever try and figure Creature out, like you just policy him day 3

This is pretty garbage and you should feel bad

its not garbage, I hosted Tedexter and I feel he is town here

Suggesting to policy lynch me anytime in the game is still garbage play

he said D3, this means he gives you a chance, he is either town or you both are mafia mates, I doubt latter one for now

is a policy lynch D3 even a policy lynch at that stage? with long intense DPs? I thought policy lynches occur quite early.

[Rej]

At least move your vote to somewhere relevant

it is, I have a good feeling with my vote and I dont mind moving it later when I am back

[Creature]

I suggest Enrique because he pretty much just voted me then farted out, but I could also do therealet if you vote there

[Creature]

I don’t think a town would ever try and figure Creature out, like you just policy him day 3

This is pretty garbage and you should feel bad

its not garbage, I hosted Tedexter and I feel he is town here

Suggesting to policy lynch me anytime in the game is still garbage play

he said D3, this means he gives you a chance, he is either town or you both are mafia mates, I doubt latter one for now

is a policy lynch D3 even a policy lynch at that stage? with long intense DPs? I thought policy lynches occur quite early.

Policy lynches should never happen

[Creature]

idk why is policy lynch ever acceptable when most of the players that actively harm town are the ones leading policy lynches

[Creature]

like someone voted me in LyLo when his scumread on me completely relied on someone else being scum rather than voting the latter.

[therealet]

[VOTE: unvote] aubergine
nobody caring whether dom is lynched or not is weird

[therealet]

GTH stance on both of us.

fairly wolfy the both of you
not w/w
leaning u being the baddy here

This is disingenuous.

The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."
even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy

every individual player this game has done both towny and wolfy shit
the towny outweighing the bad in most cases

[VOTE: macdougall] aubergine
sketchy entrance

This is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.
just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

or you can put it on host/non

even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy

Eh? How are you disagreeing with me? You answered nova's question and I called your response disingenuous.

youre going to make me look bad by ignoring the fact that i clearly stated i had already changed my mind? ok

just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone

So you don't mean the things you say.

That must come in handy when you're mafia.


youre strawmanning

Epi's town.

hes not towny at all

Never am.

I'm going to vote for Enrique.

How do you feel about that?

[VOTE: Enrique] aubergine

i dont have a read on then so its not an issue really

[therealet]

realet: "i wont vote long because creature is in"

2 mins later...

realet: "ill vote dom where creature is in"

yes i did such because dom was wolfier than u
i mostly just didnt like your tone so i was uncomfortable sitting on a wagon with u but at the time dom was a bigger priority than any vendetta i held

[therealet]

idk why is policy lynch ever acceptable when most of the players that actively harm town are the ones leading policy lynches

well when youre the suggested policy lynch target ofc thats how its going to look

[Epignosis]

fairly wolfy the both of you
not w/w
leaning u being the baddy here

This is disingenuous.

The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."
even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy

every individual player this game has done both towny and wolfy shit
the towny outweighing the bad in most cases

[VOTE: macdougall] aubergine
sketchy entrance

This is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.
just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone

or you can put it on host/non

even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy

Eh? How are you disagreeing with me? You answered nova's question and I called your response disingenuous.

youre going to make me look bad by ignoring the fact that i clearly stated i had already changed my mind? ok

just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone

So you don't mean the things you say.

That must come in handy when you're mafia.


youre strawmanning

Epi's town.

hes not towny at all

Never am.

I'm going to vote for Enrique.

How do you feel about that?

[VOTE: Enrique] aubergine

i dont have a read on then so its not an issue really

Yeah, it's an issue.

You two are teammates.

[Creature]

idk why is policy lynch ever acceptable when most of the players that actively harm town are the ones leading policy lynches

well when youre the suggested policy lynch target ofc thats how its going to look

Same could be said about someone in the other end

[Creature]

Objectively policy lynches screwed town most of the time

[Epignosis]

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Spoiler: show

Just to see the poll.

This was at 12:06am EST.

therealet made nine posts after that.

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

I made that post at 1:11am.

Now there's a lull.

I'm in bed.

Nothing is going on.

At 4:26pm EST:

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

or you can put it on host/non

The disparity for me is that therealet didn't give a toss that I voted Long Con to see the poll, but there was expressed concern when I changed to Enrique.

More horseshit:

this game is a pain to read because of how much people think theyre right above others
myself included

This isn't a pain to read. I did in about 30 minutes.

Phony frustration.

partially voting creature for a policy lynch if im being entirely honest

therealet is not being honest at all. Hence the unnecessarily qualifier.

im hesitant to reread because of how painfully bad everybody was misunderstanding everybody else

Horseshit.

If everybody was misunderstanding everyone else, then you have a conclusion from the first read. The second reading should be to ensure you haven't missed anything.

"Painfully" is an adverb. Adverbs are qualifiers.

That you used "painfully bad" means have a clear conclusion that means you have no need to reread anyway.

You are mafia.

I'll stop there.

[VOTE: therealet] aubergine

[therealet]

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Spoiler: show

Just to see the poll.

This was at 12:06am EST.

therealet made nine posts after that.

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

I made that post at 1:11am.

Now there's a lull.

I'm in bed.

Nothing is going on.

At 4:26pm EST:

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

or you can put it on host/non

The disparity for me is that therealet didn't give a toss that I voted Long Con to see the poll, but there was expressed concern when I changed to Enrique.

More horseshit:

this game is a pain to read because of how much people think theyre right above others
myself included

This isn't a pain to read. I did in about 30 minutes.

Phony frustration.

partially voting creature for a policy lynch if im being entirely honest

therealet is not being honest at all. Hence the unnecessarily qualifier.

im hesitant to reread because of how painfully bad everybody was misunderstanding everybody else

Horseshit.

If everybody was misunderstanding everyone else, then you have a conclusion from the first read. The second reading should be to ensure you haven't missed anything.

"Painfully" is an adverb. Adverbs are qualifiers.

That you used "painfully bad" means have a clear conclusion that means you have no need to reread anyway.

You are mafia.

I'll stop there.

[VOTE: therealet] aubergine

m8 ur really thinking you nailed me here huh

i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

this game was certainly a pain to read from the gigantic clash of humongous egos, myself included, i still reread it though and youre missing that factor

[Epignosis]

Missing what factor?

[Epignosis]

That the game was a pain to read? That's the factor I'm missing?

[Epignosis]

There were no humongous egos here. Sorry. This was nothing. I read this in half an hour and digested it in half an hour and saw you for the mafia member you are in that span. And caught your teammate because you went out of your way for him.

[therealet]

a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts

[Epignosis]

And what's more:

i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

That isn't what happened. That's revisionism.

I voted LC to see the poll.

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Spoiler: show

Just to see the poll.

You said nothing.

I changed my vote not because I needed to "See the poll a second time" (what a silly accusation, since I could already see it), but because:

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

You didn't "point it out."

You gave me unnecessary advice while my vote was on Enrique:

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

or you can put it on host/non

You are mafia.

[Epignosis]

a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts

Which posts of yours have meaning then?

Please, point them out for me.

[therealet]

a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts

Which posts of yours have meaning then?

Please, point them out for me.

ur using a tinfoil and a read off my genuineness to pursue a read you are very confident in

[Epignosis]

a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts

Which posts of yours have meaning then?

Please, point them out for me.

ur using a tinfoil and a read off my genuineness to pursue a read you are very confident in

I don't even know what I just read.

[therealet]

And what's more:

i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

That isn't what happened. That's revisionism. it is exactly what happened and this entire post does nothing but explain it for me

I voted LC to see the poll.

[VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

Spoiler: show

Just to see the poll.

You said nothing.

I changed my vote not because I needed to "See the poll a second time" (what a silly accusation, since I could already see it), but because: i never said 'to see the poll a second time', your original goal was just to view the poll, and since long con had 2 votes you switched to enrique as to keep viewing the poll

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

You didn't "point it out." i did, look at the last post u quoted

You gave me unnecessary advice while my vote was on Enrique:

Moved my vote to Enrique so LC doesn't have two votes.

or you can put it on host/non

You are mafia.

[therealet]

a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts

Which posts of yours have meaning then?

Please, point them out for me.

ur using a tinfoil and a read off my genuineness to pursue a read you are very confident in

I don't even know what I just read.

im genuinely not enjoying talking to you when you cherrypick information you want to respond to and just grab those that help your agenda
its not fun
and im not going to continue

[Epignosis]

i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

i never said 'to see the poll a second time'

[Epignosis]

a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts

Which posts of yours have meaning then?

Please, point them out for me.

ur using a tinfoil and a read off my genuineness to pursue a read you are very confident in

I don't even know what I just read.

im genuinely not enjoying talking to you when you cherrypick information you want to respond to and just grab those that help your agenda
its not fun
and im not going to continue

You don't mean what you say, so you're no fun to talk to either.

Bye.

[therealet]

i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

i never said 'to see the poll a second time'

first post is a bad phrasing referring to you voting enrique to retain yourself seeing the poll

[Epignosis]

i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

i never said 'to see the poll a second time'

first post is a bad phrasing referring to you voting enrique to retain yourself seeing the poll

If it's bad phrasing on your part, then why accuse me of having an agenda and "cherry picking?"

Can't you accept some responsibility for your own communication?

[Dom]

catching up.

I actually might be down with lynching Dom. I don't like the things he's focusing on. It's nothing substantiated, only things that are taken at face value. Superficial stuff. Like talking about activity. Sure, devoid of any context, that's scummy. But does that alone make someone scum though? hm.

Let's talk about this post.
I have a clarification to make and a question to ask.
Clarification: I did not comment on led's activity. I commented on his pre-excuses for activity. I don't like it. You don't owe any of us shit. Play the game as you can. That kind of excuse making reeks of "I might go into hiding later as a strategy and I now have an excuse!"

Question: What is substantial about this comment?

[Dom]

Finally @Dom
tries to be funny, but there was nothing contributive in his posts on page 4, basically fluff. I have familair (townish) vibes from that, but as I am bad with meta reads, I will let others judge it for me.

You always rude when you're bad?

I think sabie is one scum

Could see this.

I don’t believe you at all, lol.

Just caught up. Rej is obviously bad. Creature is probably their teammate. I’m really annoyed by this trend of making a million posts and then accusing others of posting “fluff”. Slow down pls.

Hi friend-- miss u

[Dom]

I actually might be down with lynching Dom. I don't like the things he's focusing on. It's nothing substantiated, only things that are taken at face value. Superficial stuff. Like talking about activity. Sure, devoid of any context, that's scummy. But does that alone make someone scum though? hm.

I'm down to give sabie a town read as well, she has to put more work in to get a conclusive read.

I think I'm good sitting at nova - et - sabie town for now. With the further explanation that sabie is town for weak reasoning, I don't want my legacy to be "yeah, sabie is locked town". She doesn't really seem that interested in solving the game and I don't know whether that's influenced by IRL or because she has TMI. She seems more excited engaging in off-topic stuff then actually writing stuff out and figuring the game.

I'm going on et's hand with the sabie town read, although something holds me back from accepting it 100%.

+1 on the dom stuff
its like hes focusing on useless points as a way to force content

"I need to have an opinion, so here it is"

[Dom]

No, I think Dom is scummy because of reasons already mentioned, but Et’s vote is worse in and of itself. That plus Epi’s remark on et kind of adds up in that uncertainty. The vote from et felt really opportunistic, it feels like he jumped on voting dom by using my post more than him having an actual reasoning, et was at 2 votes and Dom was sitting at 2, et just made him top lynch candidate with that vote.

Point is if Dom flips green then Et is probably scum. Weird dichotomy but I think at least one of them is scum. I am aware I’m wrong on one of them but I don’t know who.

bruh...
How do you know you're wrong about one of us?

[Epignosis]

Good- Dom, nova, Tedexter

Bad - Enrique, therealet

[Creature]

[VOTE: therealet] aubergine

[Creature]

Wtf thought the poll closed

[Dom]

[VOTE: unvote] aubergine
nobody caring whether dom is lynched or not is weird

why do you care about that?

realet: "i wont vote long because creature is in"

2 mins later...

realet: "ill vote dom where creature is in"

yes i did such because dom was wolfier than u
i mostly just didnt like your tone so i was uncomfortable sitting on a wagon with u but at the time dom was a bigger priority than any vendetta i held

what the fridge is this saying?

a free for all of everybody fighting because they think theyre right is most definitely a clash of egos

even though i said i was hesitant to reread that doesnt mean i didnt do it
you are digging so deep into very meaningless posts

Which posts of yours have meaning then?

Please, point them out for me.

ur using a tinfoil and a read off my genuineness to pursue a read you are very confident in

I don't even know what I just read.

lol-ing

i can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out

i never said 'to see the poll a second time'

first post is a bad phrasing referring to you voting enrique to retain yourself seeing the poll

If it's bad phrasing on your part, then why accuse me of having an agenda and "cherry picking?"

Can't you accept some responsibility for your own communication?

lol-ing more.

[Epignosis]

Wtf thought the poll closed

Oh you did, did you?

[Dom]

Wtf thought the poll closed

has it been the 23 hours or summat from what i just read?

[Epignosis]

Spoiler: show

Who's responsible for this mess?

Poll runs till Sat Jan 04, 2020 6:00 pmPlease note that if you vote, your vote will be visible.
You may select 1 option

Creature
2
15%


Voters: Enrique, NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME

Dom
1
8%


Voters: Tedexter

Enrique
0
No votes


Voters: None

Epignosis
0
No votes


Voters: None

Long Con
0
No votes


Voters: None

Macdougall
0
No votes


Voters: None

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME
0
No votes


Voters: None

novaselinenever
1
8%


Voters: Rej

Rej
1
8%


Voters: TonyStarkPrime

sabie12
0
No votes


Voters: None

sig
0
No votes


Voters: None

sprityo
0
No votes


Voters: None

Tedexter
1
8%


Voters: novaselinenever

therealet
3
23%


Voters: Epignosis, Dom, Creature

TonyStarkPrime
0
No votes


Voters: None

[No Lynch]
1
8%


Voters: sprityo

Society (Host/Mod/non)
3
23%


Voters: juliets, therealet, Sloonei


Total votes: 13

[Dom]

yawn @ this argument.

[Epignosis]

Creature, explain your move from Enrique to therealet.

[Creature]

Wtf thought the poll closed

has it been the 23 hours or summat from what i just read?

The check thing moved to the right side and I didn't notice at first

[Creature]

Creature, explain your move from Enrique to therealet.

Moving a wagon to three votes looks more entertaining than parking on a vanity wagon

[Dom]

I will never understand you, Creature...

[Epignosis]

Creature, explain your move from Enrique to therealet.

Moving a wagon to three votes looks more entertaining than parking on a vanity wagon

That's not what I hoped you would say, but it sounds honest.