Golf wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:18 pm
I'm also concerned about the fact that Juliet is trying to imply they are Dr. Wilgy. Why? If it is Wilgyi would be inclined to think he is good, but if it is not actually Wilgy, I am inclined to think they are trying to appear as Wilgy to look more benign.
I do not know why you would assume that, or what relevance it would have on the alignment of Juliet. Catch up on your reading. I was the one who suggested gimmicks, and Juliet is following that, I think.
I am employing a gimmick as well, though a subtle one.
Why did you feel the need to say this? Isn't it implied that Golf would?
It is what it is, but I'm not super pleased about our one and only info opportunity being used as leverage to keep a single player alive instead of allowing for the possibility for the mafia to trip that wire and give the rest of us some context.
No I am not bad. But frankly I joined this game to help fill the game out, so lynch me if you want. I won't cry over it, especially given the fact that there are no flips. I think it's unlikely the civs can possibly win this so whatever. I'm pretty uninvested.
Also, why would I distance from teammates like that if there are no flips? This is what I was trying to decide about Kilo...
Golf wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:18 pm
I'm also concerned about the fact that Juliet is trying to imply they are Dr. Wilgy. Why? If it is Wilgyi would be inclined to think he is good, but if it is not actually Wilgy, I am inclined to think they are trying to appear as Wilgy to look more benign.
I do not know why you would assume that, or what relevance it would have on the alignment of Juliet. Catch up on your reading. I was the one who suggested gimmicks, and Juliet is following that, I think.
I am employing a gimmick as well, though a subtle one.
Why did you feel the need to say this? Isn't it implied that Golf would?
Baddie team is GIK or JIG
Thing-a-ma-JIG
So you get no information and you set up two more lynches based on lynching me, all while getting no results? You know what, please do lynch me. This game with no flips severely handicaps the civs. I do not wish to invest more time into a game I very likely cannot win.
I wouldn't mind giving my life to lynch India right now.
Lynch India today lynch me tomorrow? How's that sound?
Golf wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:45 pm
No I am not bad. But frankly I joined this game to help fill the game out, so lynch me if you want. I won't cry over it, especially given the fact that there are no flips. I think it's unlikely the civs can possibly win this so whatever. I'm pretty uninvested.
Also, why would I distance from teammates like that if there are no flips? This is what I was trying to decide about Kilo...
Complaining about game mechanics is dumb. I have played no flip games before. It is doable, though usually utilizes more power roles. Complaints should have happened when the game was proposed.
Foxtrot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:12 pm
India why didn't you respond? To my accusation before stating "She's scared of my hunting?"
India's comment towards G was very scummy. Instructing one to catch up is just needless coaching. It was an empty sentence that was disgenuine.
In my comment to G, I was referencing their seeming ignorance to the origin of the gimmicks, which is me.
These happened in the pages G missed, while their internet was gone.
I dislike explaining everything I do. Your line of suspicion is baseless.
"Was It genuine or not?" is the core of each mafia question. India you werent genuine there. You arent genuine in your response to me. Explaining what you do when asked is part of the game.
Calling my line of suspicion which is "you were not genuine" baseless is a dumb argument. How is it baseless?
Charlie wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:47 pm
Huh, poll is still screwed up and showing Kilo at one vote but both Bravo and I show up as voting for Kilo so it should be two.
@Hotel can you explain why you suspect me and why you suspect Foxtrot?
Could you and @Bravo move your votes off of and then back onto Kilo? That might fix it.
Charlie wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:47 pm
Huh, poll is still screwed up and showing Kilo at one vote but both Bravo and I show up as voting for Kilo so it should be two.
@Hotel can you explain why you suspect me and why you suspect Foxtrot?
Could you and @Bravo move your votes off of and then back onto Kilo? That might fix it.
Nope, didn't work. Showed zero and "Bravo, none" as the voters. So Bravo is "zero" apparently.
To be honest the attitude towards this lynch has made me lose my excitement a little. It seems like the more relevant choice now is whether we vote for "yes flips" or "no flips"
The game is intended for no flips. I'm ok with that.
I feel bad if mafia end up having a harder that promised time if we vote on this. There's also the issue of would a vote such as this provide info the civs wouldn't normally have?
I want to play the game Sprityo intended us to play, I think the unusual mechanics could be a fun challenge. If people are gonna be weird and negative the whole time about the game being too hard or whatever then that sounds like a bad time though.
Moved my vote again for self preservation. Though it is tempting to just leave it up to chance because I'm not invested, it's also not fair to the other civs to intentionally put myself in the noose.
Get someone else to voted there and I will. Right now a vote for India will leave me tied for the lead. I could be convinced to switch to Kilo, for the fact they parked their vote on me even though they voiced suspicion for Charlie voting there. Or to stay on Charlie.
I think your vote for India makes more sense than most people's votes in this game so far.
I think I will actually switch my vote to Kilo for the time being. I feel more comfortable voting for him instead of Charlie for the above mentioned reasons, I just overlooked him because of the weirdness going on with the poll.
Charlie wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 9:47 pm
Huh, poll is still screwed up and showing Kilo at one vote but both Bravo and I show up as voting for Kilo so it should be two.
@Hotel can you explain why you suspect me and why you suspect Foxtrot?
Just aren't sure if either of you is genuine. Foxtrot seems a bit OTT in a disingenuous way, and your posting seems... detached, for lack of a better word.
He basically was saying India was suspicious because her response to me was, "Catch up with the thread" which ftr was pointless because I was completely caught up. I was simply stating the couple things that stood out to me. Right or wrong, that was how Juliet read to me at the time. Did I sum that up pretty accurately, Fox?
Hotel wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:53 pm
I don't understand why I is suspicious. F, explain?
Your claim of who was good and bad had nothing behind it. It was empty.
I can work with it being tone as you described. What do you think triggered those tone reads?
Haha, I mean "I" the letter, not myself. But cool. FWIW I'm less sure about both of you since you've both posted recently and I've caught up than I was when I was reading posts. I just thought C seemed a bit nervous and detached in tone, and yours seemed supatown but in a fake way. I don't feel remotely confident in either of those assessments currently.
Golf wrote: ↑Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:58 pm
He basically was saying India was suspicious because her response to me was, "Catch up with the thread" which ftr was pointless because I was completely caught up. I was simply stating the couple things that stood out to me. Right or wrong, that was how Juliet read to me at the time. Did I sum that up pretty accurately, Fox?
Oh, okay. I must have missed that. Entirely possible since I read things super quickly. I could vote "I" as well then. Either that or "K".