Re: Day 4: Attack on Titan Heist: The Battle of Trost
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:41 pm
Serge
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://mafiathesyndicate.com/
agleaminranks wrote:If anyone has been tunneling so far this game it's rabbit, even after the replacement. What's with the change of heart to Serge?
Something seems a little off.
I will vote for Zeebs if anyone else will?rabbit8 wrote:insertnamehere wrote:I am yet to vote, and don't want to vote for anyone who currently has a vote.rabbit8 wrote:Anyone got anything interesting to add?
I'm going to break this tie one way or the other. Is anyone else going to vote or change their vote?
Friend?
Serge? I have been rereading him. He is off to me. But I don't know about leetic. I have a strange feeling. But my radar needs tuning because of not playing in so long. So....
Nah.insertnamehere wrote:Could you elaborate on why you think that? I honestly don't know if you think we're teammates or on opposite teams.DrWilgy wrote:I feel that a Quin or INH lynch would reflect heavily on the other.
Why?DrWilgy wrote:Nah.insertnamehere wrote:Could you elaborate on why you think that? I honestly don't know if you think we're teammates or on opposite teams.DrWilgy wrote:I feel that a Quin or INH lynch would reflect heavily on the other.
Rabbit, I don't think voting Zebra is beuno right now. Perhaps we vote INH together?
Zebras playing too tame to be mafia. At least for now, I say we wait on her judegment.rabbit8 wrote:Why?DrWilgy wrote:Nah.insertnamehere wrote:Could you elaborate on why you think that? I honestly don't know if you think we're teammates or on opposite teams.DrWilgy wrote:I feel that a Quin or INH lynch would reflect heavily on the other.
Rabbit, I don't think voting Zebra is beuno right now. Perhaps we vote INH together?
I could get down with voting INH. I had a feeling he might be bad early. Maybe the damn town we are fraking up is shtick?
This post rings super false. You hope your vote helps get a baddie? Goes without saying. Nobody who wanted to lynch a civ would openly admit it. Appealing to 'town' to tell you what to do and rid you of accountability also doesn't look great. You seem to do the same again here:Serge wrote:People really do love voting for me. I really wish I could play these games on a PC, this whole phone thing is throwing my whole game out.
I'm not really sure who to vote for anymore. I hope my vote this time around helps nail a scum. Who do I vote for, town?
You want to vote INH because of Rabbit and Wilgy but if INH is civ then it's only Rabbit and Wilgy who are bad?Serge wrote:I think we should votr INH. If he's town, rabbit8 and DrWilgy are teammates. Boom.
Bullzeye wrote:This post rings super false. You hope your vote helps get a baddie? Goes without saying. Nobody who wanted to lynch a civ would openly admit it. Appealing to 'town' to tell you what to do and rid you of accountability also doesn't look great. You seem to do the same again here:Serge wrote:People really do love voting for me. I really wish I could play these games on a PC, this whole phone thing is throwing my whole game out.
I'm not really sure who to vote for anymore. I hope my vote this time around helps nail a scum. Who do I vote for, town?
You want to vote INH because of Rabbit and Wilgy but if INH is civ then it's only Rabbit and Wilgy who are bad?Serge wrote:I think we should votr INH. If he's town, rabbit8 and DrWilgy are teammates. Boom.
Yeah, but this sort of lynching people for information policy is scummy as all hell.Serge wrote:I think we should votr INH. If he's town, rabbit8 and DrWilgy are teammates. Boom.
agleaminranks wrote:Yeah, but this sort of lynching people for information policy is scummy as all hell.Serge wrote:I think we should votr INH. If he's town, rabbit8 and DrWilgy are teammates. Boom.
Serge and rabbit are both advocating lynching for information. I think they might be teammates and trying to distance. I'm voting for Serge today.
Even better, put the blame for your vote on someone dead. That way if MM is civ and dies, it's Leetic who was wrong and not you.Serge wrote:Oh wait, I'm going to fulfill leetic's last goal, to lynch Metalmarsh. This one's for you, leetic!
When have I blamed people for my votes?Bullzeye wrote:Even better, put the blame for your vote on someone dead. That way if MM is civ and dies, it's Leetic who was wrong and not you.Serge wrote:Oh wait, I'm going to fulfill leetic's last goal, to lynch Metalmarsh. This one's for you, leetic!
*Votes Serge*
Your vote post. Right there. You say you are voting MM because Leetic (who also once suspected you, and who you helped get lynched) wanted him lynched. Earlier you said we should lynch INH and that if he's civ Rabbit/Wilgy should be held responsible. You don't take ownership of your own votes. You were also pretty quick to condemn Leetic's lynch as if you didn't have a hand in it yourself.Serge wrote:When have I blamed people for my votes?Bullzeye wrote:Even better, put the blame for your vote on someone dead. That way if MM is civ and dies, it's Leetic who was wrong and not you.Serge wrote:Oh wait, I'm going to fulfill leetic's last goal, to lynch Metalmarsh. This one's for you, leetic!
*Votes Serge*
Make note of those who voted for me when I eventually get lynched.
Serge wrote:Scum will try and get me lynched tomorrow. Or sig, if he's town. We're the easiest choices. Just remember that yesterday was a very easy lynch and I couldn't believe it went through. 3 players didn't vote and I'd be willing to wager at least one of those 3 is scum.
Bullzeye
Gleam
Metalmarsh
I'll be voting Metalmarsh tomorrow
Indirectly you blamed everyone who missed the vote (I was spending time with family I very rarely see and had neither time nor inclination to play mafia. I'm sure you'll frame this as a NO U but honestly I hadn't even thought about this post until after I voted you. My vote is based on your votes today). I never actually said you blamed anyone else though. What I said was you were quick to condemn it. After it happens you come out saying what an easy lynch it was and how surprised you are - as if you yourself don't hold a significant amount of the responsibility. You also make a pre-emptive NO U just to shrug off any potential suspicion that might come your way as a result of the lynch.Serge wrote:Who else did I blame for leetic's lynch? Quote me.
Serge wrote:Scum will try and get me lynched tomorrow. Or sig, if he's town. We're the easiest choices. Just remember that yesterday was a very easy lynch and I couldn't believe it went through. 3 players didn't vote and I'd be willing to wager at least one of those 3 is scum.
Bullzeye
Gleam
Metalmarsh
I'll be voting Metalmarsh tomorrow
So this is essentially a pure policy lynch because you don't like the way I play the game.DrWilgy wrote:Zebras playing too tame to be mafia. At least for now, I say we wait on her judegment.rabbit8 wrote:Why?DrWilgy wrote:Nah.insertnamehere wrote:Could you elaborate on why you think that? I honestly don't know if you think we're teammates or on opposite teams.DrWilgy wrote:I feel that a Quin or INH lynch would reflect heavily on the other.
Rabbit, I don't think voting Zebra is beuno right now. Perhaps we vote INH together?
I could get down with voting INH. I had a feeling he might be bad early. Maybe the damn town we are fraking up is shtick?
I had the same feeling, and I'm getting it again. I'll vote INH.
Pretty big preemptive NO U as someone said. I regret not making that point when I first replied to it because it most definitely crossed my mind but, whadderyagonado. Add that he was one of ?two? people who lynched leetic, I guess.Serge wrote:Scum will try and get me lynched tomorrow. Or sig, if he's town. We're the easiest choices. Just remember that yesterday was a very easy lynch and I couldn't believe it went through. 3 players didn't vote and I'd be willing to wager at least one of those 3 is scum.
Bullzeye
Gleam
Metalmarsh
I'll be voting Metalmarsh tomorrow
Sorry that my posts haven't made your brain release "civ-feeling" endorphins in your brain that make you want to not lynch me, unlike Zebra apparently who you want to protect due to past games you've played.DrWilgy wrote:Zebras playing too tame to be mafia. At least for now, I say we wait on her judegment.rabbit8 wrote:Why?DrWilgy wrote:Nah.insertnamehere wrote:Could you elaborate on why you think that? I honestly don't know if you think we're teammates or on opposite teams.DrWilgy wrote:I feel that a Quin or INH lynch would reflect heavily on the other.
Rabbit, I don't think voting Zebra is beuno right now. Perhaps we vote INH together?
I could get down with voting INH. I had a feeling he might be bad early. Maybe the damn town we are fraking up is shtick?
I had the same feeling, and I'm getting it again. I'll vote INH.
If you were to describe DrWilgy in one word...insertnamehere wrote:incomprehensible.
I hate these basic-ass reasons for voting someone. And this is not just directed at Serge, although it definitely applies here. Yes, I use the chance for possible information as a deciding factor to jump on, but it's usually secondary to y'know, actual facts and shit.Serge wrote:I think we should votr INH. If he's town, rabbit8 and DrWilgy are teammates. Boom.
And then you try to lynch another very active player for the same NO U reasons.Serge wrote:I feel like I made a mess in this game and it has gotten one of the most active players lynched.
So, to summarize, you didn't list me as one of the three people you think are bad, but you've encouraged voting for me, and people are using you voting for me (which you haven't actually done) as reason to vote for me.rabbit8 wrote:No, I want to lynch sig because I think he's bad. I also want to vote for serge who I think is bad. I also want to vote for Zeebs who I think is bad.
I placed my vote where it would likely help one of those three get lynched, today..... Serge....
rabbit8 wrote:I also never encouraged anyone to vote for you.
Wigs did.
Thought I might help you out with that assumption.
This is what I was referencingrabbit8 wrote:I could get down with voting INH. I had a feeling he might be bad early. Maybe the damn town we are fraking up is shtick?
insertnamehere wrote:The problem with 5 people getting involved in an intense, heated discussion is that it means there are 10 people all on the down low. That's 2/3rds of the group. I'll have to go back and re-read some of the low post players, but most of what they've posted is standard Day 0 stuff without a whole lot of content to pick apart. I want to hear more from the silent majority is what I really meant, because as you said yourself, I am tentatively town-reading most of the people heavily involved in the Day 0 fracas.MovingPictures07 wrote:Hey INH, unless I missed it (if so, I apologize), you haven't yet addressed this and I'd be interested to hear a response:
Thanks!MovingPictures07 wrote:Alright, so let's move the conversation in a more productive direction. I'm tired of being upset over the current discussion myself, and I'm accomplishing nothing.insertnamehere wrote:Can we address the fact that the baddies are probably sitting back and laughing their asses off right now?
If you think this statement is true, then it can be surmised that you're tentatively town-reading the active members of discussion (you, me, Silverwolf, and ika), yeah? That means you potentially have already narrowed a d1 voting window. Do any of the players currently sitting back warrant specific attention? If so, who?
I know, no where did I encourage your lynch.insertnamehere wrote:rabbit8 wrote:I also never encouraged anyone to vote for you.
Wigs did.
Thought I might help you out with that assumption.This is what I was referencingrabbit8 wrote:I could get down with voting INH. I had a feeling he might be bad early. Maybe the damn town we are fraking up is shtick?
I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were specifically testing Wilgy and not saying your own opinions.rabbit8 wrote:I know, no where did I encourage your lynch.insertnamehere wrote:rabbit8 wrote:I also never encouraged anyone to vote for you.
Wigs did.
Thought I might help you out with that assumption.This is what I was referencingrabbit8 wrote:I could get down with voting INH. I had a feeling he might be bad early. Maybe the damn town we are fraking up is shtick?
I did however get the reaction from wigs I wanted.
I forgive you.insertnamehere wrote:Sorry that my posts haven't made your brain release "civ-feeling" endorphins in your brain that make you want to not lynch me, unlike Zebra apparently who you want to protect due to past games you've played.
I've never played with you before Wilgy. You don't really have a civ and scum baseline to judge me with, so I honestly find your vote kind of incomprehensible.
I'll watch you (if you know what I mean).sig wrote:Wilgy has also been kind off fluffy, he does get more serious when someone leans on him though which might be good, but could also be a scummy move. I agree with whoever said we should watch him.
I have to go and do some college stuff, but I should be back on before the deadline.I'll finish my skims tomorrow when I don't have so much to do.
I agree with this #savesergeSerge wrote:I just want to point out that before the day ends that if the number of votes for one person almost reaches the remaining townie population then there is probably something wrong. Well, good luck town.
DrWilgy wrote:I agree with this #savesergeSerge wrote:I just want to point out that before the day ends that if the number of votes for one person almost reaches the remaining townie population then there is probably something wrong. Well, good luck town.