The Syndicate

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:05 am**

Hedgeowl wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Are you suggesting it's Hedgeowl and Mongoose then? I'm not getting baddie vibes from either. I wish we didn't have to lynch anyone.
I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.
It has to be someone though.
You are correct, we all have to be some role, but I am not a twin. I can't speak for Mongoose. I think at this point its hard to define baddie. There are no more NKs, therefore I think it more accurate to say that we each have our individual baddies. Meaning those who prevent our win condition.

While my win condition does not require anyone's death, I had forgotten about the lack of Night power if we dont vote. For this reason I am going to have to vote today, but I've been doing some rereading to help figure out who.

Have others received drinks by now? Is this a nightly thing?

I've received one drink at this point. I think it was during Night 3.

I am definitely not a twin. Twins are crazy. If I had gotten a twin role, I would insist my twin engage in an honor killing.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:07 am**

Snow Dog wrote:I don't know what to do. No vote equals random lynch I'm guessing. Or does it? Llama was deliberately unclear. Worth the gamble everyone?

I think llama's retaliation for a no-vote would be swift and painful. I'm really scared to miss it. He might just mod-kill us all since we are so close to Night 6 anyway.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:09 am**

Vompatti wrote:
Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Are you suggesting it's Hedgeowl and Mongoose then? I'm not getting baddie vibes from either. I wish we didn't have to lynch anyone.
I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.
It has to be someone though.

It does indeed. No offense, I think you are great, but why not you rather than me?

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:20 am**

Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Are you suggesting it's Hedgeowl and Mongoose then? I'm not getting baddie vibes from either. I wish we didn't have to lynch anyone.
I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.
It has to be someone though.
It does indeed. No offense, I think you are great, but why not you rather than me?

I think I would know if it was me. Therefore it must be someone else . . .

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:22 am**

Vompatti wrote:
Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Are you suggesting it's Hedgeowl and Mongoose then? I'm not getting baddie vibes from either. I wish we didn't have to lynch anyone.
I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.
It has to be someone though.
It does indeed. No offense, I think you are great, but why not you rather than me?
I think I would know if it was me. Therefore it must be someone else . . .

You've not said anything about being served a drink -- are you too busy giving away and spilling drinks to have been served a drink?

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:28 am**

I haven't had a drink. Which is odd for me.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:31 am**

I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:32 am**

Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Kate wrote:I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.
It has to be someone though.
It does indeed. No offense, I think you are great, but why not you rather than me?
I think I would know if it was me. Therefore it must be someone else . . .
You've not said anything about being served a drink -- are you too busy giving away and spilling drinks to have been served a drink?

All I can say is that I've received more free drinks in real life than in this game.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:37 am**

Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.

If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:41 am**

Vompatti wrote:
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.

I would think Danny can prove you're not wrong about him

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:43 am**

Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.
I would think Danny can prove you're not wrong about him

Really, how?

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 11:48 am**

Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.

This is an interesting statement. I have two people in mind to be a certain character. Was I wrong I wonder?

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:11 pm**

Snow Dog wrote:
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
This is an interesting statement. I have two people in mind to be a certain character. Was I wrong I wonder?

I'm wondering if I've been wrong about a person as well...

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:22 pm**

Bullzeye wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
This is an interesting statement. I have two people in mind to be a certain character. Was I wrong I wonder?
I'm wondering if I've been wrong about a person as well...

We are all now wondering... Hoo are you people?

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:24 pm**

A-ha! It's all falling intp place now!

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:28 pm**

Vompatti wrote:A-ha! It's all falling intp place now!

How's that?

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:33 pm**

Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:A-ha! It's all falling intp place now!
How's that?

Lol I dunno, I'm just as confused as anyone else.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:37 pm**

Vompatti wrote:
Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:A-ha! It's all falling intp place now!
How's that?
Lol I dunno, I'm just as confused as anyone else.

oh.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:39 pm**

If we could work out who is the hotel we could vote for that.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:43 pm**

Vompatti wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.
I would think Danny can prove you're not wrong about him
Really, how?

This response confuses me a bit.I think

I need no onedead, and I need one role alive. Based on several things, I. Think it is one of 3 people.

I will vote to protect those people if need be.

I'm a sad panda that all the talk in this thread happens while I am at work

linki x many

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:46 pm**

S~V~S wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.
I would think Danny can prove you're not wrong about him
Really, how?
This response confuses me a bit.I think

I need no onedead, and I need one role alive. Based on several things, I. Think it is one of 3 people.

I will vote to protect those people if need be.

I'm a sad panda that all the talk in this thread happens while I am at work linki x many

I am in exactly the same position as you strategy wise. But I may vote for one of those people not in my three. Just to avoid a random lynch. Don;'t worry you are one of the three I am protecting.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:47 pm**

if you were forced to vote. Who would it be. This is to everyone.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:11 pm**

Kate wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
One thing I do find notable is that S~V~S and Kate haven't said a word to each other about each other so far this game. What that means I have no idea, but it is kind of interesting. They both can read each other insanely well. I'm sure I could think of other such similar things, but I wouldn't say anything immediately comes to mind as SUSPICIOUS or notable in that sort of way. Just observations that don't really tell much currently. But we still have some more time.

I think she said she liked my avatar

Seriously though, how do you read someone in this game? Isn't it all kind of dumb luck? I don't really have an opinion on her because I can't tell her affiliation because from the way the game is explained she doesn't really have one, nor does anyone else. Here's my official read: I think she's a player with a role. I haven't seen any indication that she has a partner, and if she does, its not me. I am not a Grady twin. I don't want to be lynched.

From rereading Kate, I noticed she has never said anything openly about her win condition. In general she has said very little. This post makes me curious. I do not know if MP's suspicions are correct, but with so few of us left, I think this is pretty likely. I am not sure about SVS. She and Kate seem to be playing very different games, but SVS, whether lying or not has been very open about her win conditions not being a threat to anyone. With this in mind I am probably going to vote for Kate.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:20 pm**

Hedgeowl wrote:
Kate wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
One thing I do find notable is that S~V~S and Kate haven't said a word to each other about each other so far this game. What that means I have no idea, but it is kind of interesting. They both can read each other insanely well. I'm sure I could think of other such similar things, but I wouldn't say anything immediately comes to mind as SUSPICIOUS or notable in that sort of way. Just observations that don't really tell much currently. But we still have some more time.

I think she said she liked my avatar

Seriously though, how do you read someone in this game? Isn't it all kind of dumb luck? I don't really have an opinion on her because I can't tell her affiliation because from the way the game is explained she doesn't really have one, nor does anyone else. Here's my official read: I think she's a player with a role. I haven't seen any indication that she has a partner, and if she does, its not me. I am not a Grady twin. I don't want to be lynched.
From rereading Kate, I noticed she has never said anything openly about her win condition. In general she has said very little. This post makes me curious. I do not know if MP's suspicions are correct, but with so few of us left, I think this is pretty likely. I am not sure about SVS. She and Kate seem to be playing very different games, but SVS, whether lying or not has been very open about her win conditions not being a threat to anyone. With this in mind I am probably going to vote for Kate.

Please don't.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:22 pm**

Kate wrote:I don't need anyone specific to die, other than those that want to kill me, if any exist. So far the only person I know for sure who wants to kill people is you, MP. I'm sorry if that is annoying to you because you were "honest" about your conditions, but although I hate this saying...it is what it is.

Here you go Hedge.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:24 pm**

And here's something else, even if you vote for me...I will not vote for you.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:29 pm**

Kate wrote:And here's something else, even if you vote for me...I will not vote for you.

Why not?

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:37 pm**

Kate wrote:
Kate wrote:I don't need anyone specific to die, other than those that want to kill me, if any exist. So far the only person I know for sure who wants to kill people is you, MP. I'm sorry if that is annoying to you because you were "honest" about your conditions, but although I hate this saying...it is what it is.
Here you go Hedge.

Thank you for this! I kept trying to find a post. I wonder about your other statement as well. You have not seemed hesitant to lynch people this game, unlike others who seem to actively avoid it. So in that light if you are not going to revenge vote me, who are you going to vote for?

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:38 pm**

I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:45 pm**

Hedgeowl wrote:
Kate wrote:
Kate wrote:I don't need anyone specific to die, other than those that want to kill me, if any exist. So far the only person I know for sure who wants to kill people is you, MP. I'm sorry if that is annoying to you because you were "honest" about your conditions, but although I hate this saying...it is what it is.
Here you go Hedge.
Thank you for this! I kept trying to find a post. I wonder about your other statement as well. You have not seemed hesitant to lynch people this game, unlike others who seem to actively avoid it. So in that light if you are not going to revenge vote me, who are you going to vote for?

I'm not sure yet if no one votes, I may not vote at all but it seems as though everyone is even though they preach pacifism. It not not a revenge vote, I just think you are a safe role.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:50 pm**

Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.

It's not me. It's either Snow or Mongoose. I thought Snow was one of two roles, now Mongoose has made me wonder... I have no idea which I'd trust tbh.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:52 pm**

Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
It's not me. It's either Snow or Mongoose. I thought Snow was one of two roles, now Mongoose has made me wonder... I have no idea which I'd trust tbh.

I was under the impression that you and snowy trusted each other? If that's not the case that changes everything.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:53 pm**

Vompatti wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
It's not me. It's either Snow or Mongoose. I thought Snow was one of two roles, now Mongoose has made me wonder... I have no idea which I'd trust tbh.
I was under the impression that you and snowy trusted each other? If that's not the case that changes everything.

I trusted Snow until Mongoose hinted at being who I thought he had claimed to be. Now I'm interested to hear from both of them about it.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:53 pm**

Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.

Everything is up in the air now it seems.

Sometimes who you thought was your ally was really your adversary the whole time. The whole "keep your enemies closer" strategy.

I think it would be a great tactic to get players to infer you are an ultra-good character early in the game so they will trust you and not suspect you, and you are gaining useful information the whole time. It is quite insidiously crafty!

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:55 pm**

Vompatti wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
It's not me. It's either Snow or Mongoose. I thought Snow was one of two roles, now Mongoose has made me wonder... I have no idea which I'd trust tbh.
I was under the impression that you and snowy trusted each other? If that's not the case that changes everything.

I trust Bullz. Then it seemed that S~V~S was hinting at a role that could fit. And then Mongoose recently said something that interested me. Those three I can't afford to see die. I think I trust you too.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:00 pm**

How about we just all count to three and just vote. We can all hold hands and jump into the swimming pool at the same time.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:13 pm**

Mongoose wrote:How about we just all count to three and just vote. We can all hold hands and jump into the swimming pool at the same time.

Challenge accepted!

Ready....go!

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:15 pm**

Hedgeowl wrote:
Mongoose wrote:How about we just all count to three and just vote. We can all hold hands and jump into the swimming pool at the same time.

Challenge accepted!

Ready....go!

DON'T DO IT IT'S A TRAP!11!1!

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:17 pm**

Thank you for your reply Kate. I am still not getting a great read on you, but appealing to my sweeter side, by not voting me is an excellent strategy. I have to vote today, so am still going to go for it.

Votes Kate.

Linki- too late.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:20 pm**

We could give evryone one vote thus avoiding any penalties. Still might and as a random lynch though

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:23 pm**

Voting Vompers, as I think he has BTSC with someone. That's why I asked him earlier about his views on pacifism. I thought his answer sounded mightily canned. I am not sure I have a good candidate for who that might be, but I have like 8 suspects.

No, it's not a brilliant reason, but it's the best I've got right now.

Linki - Hedge Sorry! I had this typed up and then people started bothering me at work.

Linki- Snowy - I was thinking something similar.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:23 pm**

Hedgeowl wrote:Thank you for your reply Kate. I am still not getting a great read on you, but appealing to my sweeter side, by not voting me is an excellent strategy. I have to vote today, so am still going to go for it.

Votes Kate.

Linki- too late.

no u. votes Hedge.

lol...just kidding.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:27 pm**

Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.

I am not sure what you are getting at here, but these are two of the people I think I would like to seee alive.

So voting Vomp, on break, gotta vote now.

Multi linki~

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:31 pm**

Today is difficult now, there's only one person I trust any more and even then I could be wrong.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:35 pm**

Whoa.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:37 pm**

Bullzeye wrote:Today is difficult now, there's only one person I trust any more and even then I could be wrong.

me?

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:37 pm**

We can spread the vote out like Snow Dog said and then maybe the hotel will see we are a united front. Let's take back our power!

And we should all probably never be in a lifeboat together.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:40 pm**

Two votes for Vomps? Did I miss a clue about him? He has been unusually helpful I suppose. I mean vocal more than helpful. He trusts me for a start. Don't think he ever did that before.

I'm confused.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:41 pm**

Mongoose wrote:We can spread the vote out like Snow Dog said and then maybe the hotel will see we are a united front. Let's take back our power!

And we should all probably never be in a lifeboat together.

Too late for that, Vomps has two votes. I hope he isn't the one.

Posted: **Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:43 pm**

Mongoose wrote:We can spread the vote out like Snow Dog said and then maybe the hotel will see we are a united front. Let's take back our power!

And we should all probably never be in a lifeboat together.

Word as much as I like ya'll, never entrusting you with my life. Remember the two tie votes that Snow survived? Llama said ties are decidedly randomly, so someone will be lynched. I guess we can lynch without guilt, but sadly someone will be gone.

Also, 11 minutes till this vote ends.

Linki - Snow said it.

The Syndicate

The Shining: Night 6

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Night 2

Re: The Shining: Night 2

Re: The Shining: Day 4

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 4

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 4

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5

Re: The Shining: Day 5