Vompatti wrote:Are you suggesting it's Hedgeowl and Mongoose then? I'm not getting baddie vibes from either. I wish we didn't have to lynch anyone.
I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.
It has to be someone though.
You are correct, we all have to be some role, but I am not a twin. I can't speak for Mongoose. I think at this point its hard to define baddie. There are no more NKs, therefore I think it more accurate to say that we each have our individual baddies. Meaning those who prevent our win condition.
While my win condition does not require anyone's death, I had forgotten about the lack of Night power if we dont vote. For this reason I am going to have to vote today, but I've been doing some rereading to help figure out who.
Have others received drinks by now? Is this a nightly thing?
I've received one drink at this point. I think it was during Night 3.
I am definitely not a twin. Twins are crazy. If I had gotten a twin role, I would insist my twin engage in an honor killing.
Snow Dog wrote:I don't know what to do. No vote equals random lynch I'm guessing. Or does it? Llama was deliberately unclear. Worth the gamble everyone?
I think llama's retaliation for a no-vote would be swift and painful. I'm really scared to miss it. He might just mod-kill us all since we are so close to Night 6 anyway.
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.
I would think Danny can prove you're not wrong about him
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.
I would think Danny can prove you're not wrong about him
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
This is an interesting statement. I have two people in mind to be a certain character. Was I wrong I wonder?
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
This is an interesting statement. I have two people in mind to be a certain character. Was I wrong I wonder?
I'm wondering if I've been wrong about a person as well...
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
This is an interesting statement. I have two people in mind to be a certain character. Was I wrong I wonder?
I'm wondering if I've been wrong about a person as well...
We are all now wondering... Hoo are you people?
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.
I would think Danny can prove you're not wrong about him
Really, how?
This response confuses me a bit.I think
I need no onedead, and I need one role alive. Based on several things, I. Think it is one of 3 people.
I will vote to protect those people if need be.
I'm a sad panda that all the talk in this thread happens while I am at work linki x many
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.
I would think Danny can prove you're not wrong about him
Really, how?
This response confuses me a bit.I think
I need no onedead, and I need one role alive. Based on several things, I. Think it is one of 3 people.
I will vote to protect those people if need be.
I'm a sad panda that all the talk in this thread happens while I am at work linki x many
I am in exactly the same position as you strategy wise. But I may vote for one of those people not in my three. Just to avoid a random lynch. Don;'t worry you are one of the three I am protecting.
MovingPictures07 wrote:
One thing I do find notable is that S~V~S and Kate haven't said a word to each other about each other so far this game. What that means I have no idea, but it is kind of interesting. They both can read each other insanely well. I'm sure I could think of other such similar things, but I wouldn't say anything immediately comes to mind as SUSPICIOUS or notable in that sort of way. Just observations that don't really tell much currently. But we still have some more time.
I think she said she liked my avatar
Seriously though, how do you read someone in this game? Isn't it all kind of dumb luck? I don't really have an opinion on her because I can't tell her affiliation because from the way the game is explained she doesn't really have one, nor does anyone else. Here's my official read: I think she's a player with a role. I haven't seen any indication that she has a partner, and if she does, its not me. I am not a Grady twin. I don't want to be lynched.
From rereading Kate, I noticed she has never said anything openly about her win condition. In general she has said very little. This post makes me curious. I do not know if MP's suspicions are correct, but with so few of us left, I think this is pretty likely. I am not sure about SVS. She and Kate seem to be playing very different games, but SVS, whether lying or not has been very open about her win conditions not being a threat to anyone. With this in mind I am probably going to vote for Kate.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
MovingPictures07 wrote:
One thing I do find notable is that S~V~S and Kate haven't said a word to each other about each other so far this game. What that means I have no idea, but it is kind of interesting. They both can read each other insanely well. I'm sure I could think of other such similar things, but I wouldn't say anything immediately comes to mind as SUSPICIOUS or notable in that sort of way. Just observations that don't really tell much currently. But we still have some more time.
I think she said she liked my avatar
Seriously though, how do you read someone in this game? Isn't it all kind of dumb luck? I don't really have an opinion on her because I can't tell her affiliation because from the way the game is explained she doesn't really have one, nor does anyone else. Here's my official read: I think she's a player with a role. I haven't seen any indication that she has a partner, and if she does, its not me. I am not a Grady twin. I don't want to be lynched.
From rereading Kate, I noticed she has never said anything openly about her win condition. In general she has said very little. This post makes me curious. I do not know if MP's suspicions are correct, but with so few of us left, I think this is pretty likely. I am not sure about SVS. She and Kate seem to be playing very different games, but SVS, whether lying or not has been very open about her win conditions not being a threat to anyone. With this in mind I am probably going to vote for Kate.
Please don't.
Andrew wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2013 6:47 pm
I'm voting llama again because I think I heard him say something that looks like proof.
Kate wrote:I don't need anyone specific to die, other than those that want to kill me, if any exist. So far the only person I know for sure who wants to kill people is you, MP. I'm sorry if that is annoying to you because you were "honest" about your conditions, but although I hate this saying...it is what it is.
Here you go Hedge.
Andrew wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2013 6:47 pm
I'm voting llama again because I think I heard him say something that looks like proof.
Kate wrote:I don't need anyone specific to die, other than those that want to kill me, if any exist. So far the only person I know for sure who wants to kill people is you, MP. I'm sorry if that is annoying to you because you were "honest" about your conditions, but although I hate this saying...it is what it is.
Here you go Hedge.
Thank you for this! I kept trying to find a post. I wonder about your other statement as well. You have not seemed hesitant to lynch people this game, unlike others who seem to actively avoid it. So in that light if you are not going to revenge vote me, who are you going to vote for?
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Kate wrote:I don't need anyone specific to die, other than those that want to kill me, if any exist. So far the only person I know for sure who wants to kill people is you, MP. I'm sorry if that is annoying to you because you were "honest" about your conditions, but although I hate this saying...it is what it is.
Here you go Hedge.
Thank you for this! I kept trying to find a post. I wonder about your other statement as well. You have not seemed hesitant to lynch people this game, unlike others who seem to actively avoid it. So in that light if you are not going to revenge vote me, who are you going to vote for?
I'm not sure yet if no one votes, I may not vote at all but it seems as though everyone is even though they preach pacifism. It not not a revenge vote, I just think you are a safe role.
Andrew wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2013 6:47 pm
I'm voting llama again because I think I heard him say something that looks like proof.
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
It's not me. It's either Snow or Mongoose. I thought Snow was one of two roles, now Mongoose has made me wonder... I have no idea which I'd trust tbh.
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
It's not me. It's either Snow or Mongoose. I thought Snow was one of two roles, now Mongoose has made me wonder... I have no idea which I'd trust tbh.
I was under the impression that you and snowy trusted each other? If that's not the case that changes everything.
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
It's not me. It's either Snow or Mongoose. I thought Snow was one of two roles, now Mongoose has made me wonder... I have no idea which I'd trust tbh.
I was under the impression that you and snowy trusted each other? If that's not the case that changes everything.
I trusted Snow until Mongoose hinted at being who I thought he had claimed to be. Now I'm interested to hear from both of them about it.
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
Everything is up in the air now it seems.
Sometimes who you thought was your ally was really your adversary the whole time. The whole "keep your enemies closer" strategy.
I think it would be a great tactic to get players to infer you are an ultra-good character early in the game so they will trust you and not suspect you, and you are gaining useful information the whole time. It is quite insidiously crafty!
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
It's not me. It's either Snow or Mongoose. I thought Snow was one of two roles, now Mongoose has made me wonder... I have no idea which I'd trust tbh.
I was under the impression that you and snowy trusted each other? If that's not the case that changes everything.
I trust Bullz. Then it seemed that S~V~S was hinting at a role that could fit. And then Mongoose recently said something that interested me. Those three I can't afford to see die. I think I trust you too.
Thank you for your reply Kate. I am still not getting a great read on you, but appealing to my sweeter side, by not voting me is an excellent strategy. I have to vote today, so am still going to go for it.
Votes Kate.
Linki- too late.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Voting Vompers, as I think he has BTSC with someone. That's why I asked him earlier about his views on pacifism. I thought his answer sounded mightily canned. I am not sure I have a good candidate for who that might be, but I have like 8 suspects.
No, it's not a brilliant reason, but it's the best I've got right now.
Linki - Hedge Sorry! I had this typed up and then people started bothering me at work.
Hedgeowl wrote:Thank you for your reply Kate. I am still not getting a great read on you, but appealing to my sweeter side, by not voting me is an excellent strategy. I have to vote today, so am still going to go for it.
Votes Kate.
Linki- too late.
no u. votes Hedge.
lol...just kidding.
Andrew wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2013 6:47 pm
I'm voting llama again because I think I heard him say something that looks like proof.
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
I am not sure what you are getting at here, but these are two of the people I think I would like to seee alive.
So voting Vomp, on break, gotta vote now.
Multi linki~
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
Two votes for Vomps? Did I miss a clue about him? He has been unusually helpful I suppose. I mean vocal more than helpful. He trusts me for a start. Don't think he ever did that before.
Mongoose wrote:We can spread the vote out like Snow Dog said and then maybe the hotel will see we are a united front. Let's take back our power!
And we should all probably never be in a lifeboat together.
Word as much as I like ya'll, never entrusting you with my life. Remember the two tie votes that Snow survived? Llama said ties are decidedly randomly, so someone will be lynched. I guess we can lynch without guilt, but sadly someone will be gone.
Also, 11 minutes till this vote ends.
Linki - Snow said it.
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
linki x many
