Alison wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:21 am
Made wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:19 am
unless ur gaslighting them...
sorry y'all be we're pretty far from a towncore, and tbh it's a dangerous to imply otherwise
Esooa: I think X is false.
Alison: If we accept that X, then Y is a natural conclusion.
Esooa: I disagree with Y tbh.
Alison: Well yeah, obviously, you disagree with X, so you would have no reason to think Y was true.
X = "tutuu is town", Y = "JJJ is town".
This is not gaslighting and it's a reach to say so.
Why don't you believe in the towncore idea?
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:20 am
Made wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:19 am
unless ur gaslighting them...
sorry y'all be we're pretty far from a towncore, and tbh it's a dangerous to imply otherwise
nah it's fine, we go with it for a few days, if shit goes wrong we reevaluate
let's say it this way: If we mislynch, we should reevaluate everything.
I think Alison is shifty. yes, her/your if x then y makes sense, but what i'm saying is that's something that helps you/her, alison, to determine if she trust Esooa's read. it feels over explainy.
I think nutella is shifty because of interaction with JJJ who is my biggest scum read
I think i trust tutuu most, which is a 180 from where i was like 3 pages
I don't have enough trust in anyone to make a towncore, especially one based on mindmelds when they aren't alignment indicative.
I also also don't like how Alison positioned Mac (i think it was alison?) as a person who could break up towncore if he shows up and is bad. It implies that the only reason someone would have to break up a towncore would be because they're bad.
This all feels too fast and far too loose and i'm not liking none of it at towncore building stage