The Syndicate

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:21 pm

Smoke 'em if ya got 'em

[mention]sprityo[/mention] , you going to give us a team to vote on?

Huh. Somehow I expected that.

Was it you, Golden? Or was Edjou hiding in the back for the first team?

It’s possible. I think it’s one of them, but not both of them. I’d suggest a team with me, Daisy and MP

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 10:55 pm Huh. Somehow I expected that.

Was it you, Golden? Or was Edjou hiding in the back for the first team?

It’s possible. I think it’s one of them, but not both of them. I’d suggest a team with me, Daisy and MP

Fuck that, no.

DH, your little list about “burned” players makes no sense. Why are we “burned”?

I think he meant that one of you is a baddie, so it's best to eliminate all of you from the possible roster. Because we don't know who the baddie is.

By that logic four of the other group are baddies.

That is true... plus the increasing number of jurors is a factor.

Can I not put myself on a team?

Scotty wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 11:06 pm DH, your little list about “burned” players makes no sense. Why are we “burned”?

You failed a mission, bud.

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:22 am By that logic four of the other group are baddies.

A mission without any of the previous members is less likely to fail, by a considerable margin. Especially since they need two people for this one to fail.

sprityo wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 5:44 am Can I not put myself on a team?

You can put anyone you want, including yourself, on a team.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 8:18 am

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:22 am By that logic four of the other group are baddies.

A mission without any of the previous members is less likely to fail, by a considerable margin. Especially since they need two people for this one to fail.

This guy trolls

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:13 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 8:18 am

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:22 am By that logic four of the other group are baddies.

A mission without any of the previous members is less likely to fail, by a considerable margin. Especially since they need two people for this one to fail.

This guy trolls

Says the guy who thinks putting 3 people from a failed mission on a 5 man team is a good idea.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:36 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:13 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 8:18 am

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:22 am By that logic four of the other group are baddies.

A mission without any of the previous members is less likely to fail, by a considerable margin. Especially since they need two people for this one to fail.

This guy trolls

Says the guy who thinks putting 3 people from a failed mission on a 5 man team is a good idea.

All we did was add golden. You think 2 people from Mission 1 were floating both the first mission and possibly the 2nd?

Your math doesn’t add up. By not taking anyone on that last mission, you’re assuming all 5 bad guys were on that mission.

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:54 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:36 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 9:13 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 8:18 am

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:22 am By that logic four of the other group are baddies.

A mission without any of the previous members is less likely to fail, by a considerable margin. Especially since they need two people for this one to fail.

This guy trolls

Says the guy who thinks putting 3 people from a failed mission on a 5 man team is a good idea.

All we did was add golden. You think 2 people from Mission 1 were floating both the first mission and possibly the 2nd?

Your math doesn’t add up. By not taking anyone on that last mission, you’re assuming all 5 bad guys were on that mission.

Here's math for you:

3 out of 5 is a majority. If you take 3 out of five people from a failed mission, you're more likely to have the Criminal(s) from that group than you are to have the Civilians. so all those 3 people need to do is grab one more Criminal.

Since we KNOW there is at least 1 criminal, possibly more, in that group of 5, removing all 5 from this mission means you need to get 2 criminals cleanly on this mission.

Which you won't be able to do.

No one from the failed mission should go on the next mission. Anyone who votes otherwise, wants this mission to fail.

If we eschew scumreads, DH has a point. Mafia can coordinate, so any number of floaters could be on the team so far. Literally the only hard information we have is that the previous team did not have zero scum in it.

Tbh I think the most logical conclusion is that Golden is bad and the others are fine, but if that's not the case and one or more of them floated in round 2 then we're pretty sunk. I don't like DH's thinking, it makes sense in a smaller game of the resistance I guess but with the numbers we have here it basically guarantees we get a baddie or three on the next team. Basically we're kind of trapped.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:09 am If we eschew scumreads, DH has a point. Mafia can coordinate, so any number of floaters could be on the team so far. Literally the only hard information we have is that the previous team did not have zero scum in it.

hmm true

nutella wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:10 am

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:09 am If we eschew scumreads, DH has a point. Mafia can coordinate, so any number of floaters could be on the team so far. Literally the only hard information we have is that the previous team did not have zero scum in it.

hmm true

If we eschew scumreads

Any team that has 3 members from a failed mission is going to fail.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:27 am Any team that has 3 members from a failed mission is going to fail.

Unless they’re all good. Which they mathematically could be, and I believe are

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:45 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:27 am Any team that has 3 members from a failed mission is going to fail.

Unless they’re all good. Which they mathematically could be, and I believe are

Yeah but no.

For somebody who gives a shit about math and strategy you seem to be really biffing it here man.


Also, glad to see you still have a fixation on putting MP onto your teams. That's not suspicious at all, and you guys are for sure good and not Criminals.

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:51 am

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:45 am

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 11:27 am Any team that has 3 members from a failed mission is going to fail.

Unless they’re all good. Which they mathematically could be, and I believe are

Yeah but no.

For somebody who gives a shit about math and strategy you seem to be really biffing it here man.


Also, glad to see you still have a fixation on putting MP onto your teams. That's not suspicious at all, and you guys are for sure good and not Criminals.

The first step is acceptance. Proud of you

It doesn't take two criminals to sink a mission, it only takes one. Let's get a jury proposed so we can vote on it.

My team proposition is

Sprityo
Luna
DH
Speedchuck
Disgruntledporcupine

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:02 pm It doesn't take two criminals to sink a mission, it only takes one. Let's get a jury proposed so we can vote on it.

Actually, this 4th team requires 2

sprityo wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:05 pm My team proposition is

Sprityo
Luna
DH
Speedchuck
Disgruntledporcupine

[VOTE: Disapprove] aubergine

sprityo wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:05 pm My team proposition is

Sprityo
Luna
DH
Speedchuck
Disgruntledporcupine

[VOTE: Approve] aubergine

Very good team.

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:02 pm It doesn't take two criminals to sink a mission, it only takes one. Let's get a jury proposed so we can vote on it.

You'd know this team needed 2 fails if you didn't rush into things.

I need to vote to approve my own team right?

[VOTE: approve] aubergine

Ed and DP I see yall goofin' off over there. Approve this team so we can win the game please.

EdJou wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:16 pm [VOTE: DISAPPROVE ] aubergine

First off, how dare you.

It has me on it, so sure.

[VOTE: approve] aubergine

I’m goin to reject any team with DH on it

Oh shit I didn't even realize I was on this team tbqh.

Speedchuck, what do you think of this mission?

DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:27 pm Oh shit I didn't even realize I was on this team tbqh.

You and LC both need glasses and tape to control that trigger finger

This looks like a fresh take. [VOTE: approve] aubergine

Got something in your eye, Scotty?

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:27 pm Speedchuck, what do you think of this mission?

It has three of my favorite people on it.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:33 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:27 pm Speedchuck, what do you think of this mission?

It has three of my favorite people on it.

I'm touched by this and I love and respect you.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:33 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:27 pm Speedchuck, what do you think of this mission?

It has three of my favorite people on it.

Can’t tell if serious or..

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:36 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:33 pm

Scotty wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 12:27 pm Speedchuck, what do you think of this mission?

It has three of my favorite people on it.

Can’t tell if serious or..

Kinda sketchy that the people that failed the last mission want to get back on the team huh