The Syndicate

Roxy wrote:I am not down for lynching splints - sorry.

An hour is a long time. I'm certainly keeping an open mind for now. Especially given Epi's last comment.

thellama73 wrote:

fingersplints wrote:I'm going back to my show. I'll still be around some but not like the first hour. I've had a really bad day and this is really a whole lot of drama I don't feel like dealing with. see you in a little while

I really hate when people try to guilt us into not voting for them.

vote me all you want I'm not trying to guilt trip you at all. I'm just giving warning for when I am accused of posting less.

fingersplints wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

fingersplints wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't know why people are saying I seem snarky. I'm not intending it, so sorry. I'm just trying to play the game. I can't fathom why splints thinks I'm worthy of a vote just because we disagree over something. Obviously we've had different experiences. And obviously I believe I'm right or else I wouldn't feel the way I do about low posters and randomizers, and obviously she feels the same.

I would have never voted for her for believing that, but I voted for her for thinking that somehow it makes me bad in this game right here.

You could have just said "no u" and saved yourself a lot of time. Right? Essentially you suspected me for suspecting you.

RIP Made.

No, I did not just suspect you for suspecting me.

I suspect you for having NO game-related reason to suspect me.

I'm more fine with people suspecting me, even if it is incorrect, so long as seems genuine and misguided and is actually based on my behavior. Not on whether someone disagrees with me on a fundamental issue about mafia in general.

I did have a game related reason to suspect you. Just because you are refusing to acknowledge it doesn't mean it isnt there

That's just not true.

1) I have had an experience with low posters and randomizing such that I firmly believe occurrences of players being heavily suspected or voted for over early game low poster voting occurs more often enough than players being heavily suspected or voted for over randomizing that I firmly believe declaring the intent of the former is less suspicious, in general, than the latter.

2) You disagree.

Please explain to me how this relates to THIS GAME specifically. Because it does not. It relates to different beliefs regarding what has occurred during past games that lend to different belief systems.

So essentially you voted for me because you've had a different experience than me which lends you to believe something.

It's not any different than you voting me because I'm Republican and you're Democrat (which isn't true, I hate both parties, and I don't intend to get political, it's just an example). Or because I think blue is better than green and you think green is better.

Green ftw

Roxy wrote:I am not down for lynching splints - sorry.

I am not necessarily for D2 either. I saw nothing else that warranted my attention more than her behavior on D1.

Still plenty of time for things to happen.

I find it notable (but not necessarily suspicious) that you're willing to defend her with that level of confidence at this time.

MovingPictures07 wrote: 1) I have had an experience with low posters and randomizing such that I firmly believe occurrences of players being heavily suspected or voted for over early game low poster voting occurs more often enough than players being heavily suspected or voted for over randomizing that I firmly believe declaring the intent of the former is less suspicious, in general, than the latter.

That sentence is one of the least comprehensible things I've ever tried to read. And I've read Hegel.

thellama73 wrote:

Roxy wrote:I am not down for lynching splints - sorry.

An hour is a long time. I'm certainly keeping an open mind for now. Especially given Epi's last comment.

Also I voted for Zeek to win since he is bigger than a newt, and probably wears shoes and can step on things.

S~V~S wrote:Green ftw

Of course we'd disagree. Blue is my favorite color.

MP - potay5oe pahtatoe you both did the same thing
How can she be guilty but not you? Makes no sense

I voted Zeek as well. I like the Brits.

thellama73 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote: 1) I have had an experience with low posters and randomizing such that I firmly believe occurrences of players being heavily suspected or voted for over early game low poster voting occurs more often enough than players being heavily suspected or voted for over randomizing that I firmly believe declaring the intent of the former is less suspicious, in general, than the latter.

That sentence is one of the least comprehensible things I've ever tried to read. And I've read Hegel.

Yes, sorry, I know it's structured terribly. I was in a rush to get my thoughts out and I'm not composing an essay.

Roxy wrote:MP - potay5oe pahtatoe you both did the same thing
How can she be guilty but not you? Makes no sense

Are you kidding me right now?

I was willing to let her believe what she wants. She was not. She voted me to be bad because of it.

Suck it, newt

MP, didn't you vote for her too?

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Roxy wrote:I am not down for lynching splints - sorry.

I am not necessarily for D2 either. I saw nothing else that warranted my attention more than her behavior on D1.

Still plenty of time for things to happen.

I find it notable (but not necessarily suspicious) that you're willing to defend her with that level of confidence at this time.

Why not? Until I see something that proves otherwise I will back her up against your "case"

zeek wrote:Suck it, newt

Wrong colour, sorry. I need to go to bed now.

S~V~S wrote:MP, didn't you vote for her too?

No, here's the difference.

She voted for me because she disagrees with me and thinks I'm worthy of a vote because of that disagreement.

I voted for her because I can't fathom why a civvie would believe that disagreeing over something like that indicates alignment.

I did NOT vote for her because I disagree with her. I may think she's wrong but that fact alone does not mean she's bad.

Odd choice. RIP MP

MovingPictures07 wrote:

S~V~S wrote:MP, didn't you vote for her too?

No, here's the difference.

She voted for me because she disagrees with me and thinks I'm worthy of a vote because of that disagreement.

I voted for her because I can't fathom why a civvie would believe that disagreeing over something like that indicates alignment.

I did NOT vote for her because I disagree with her. I may think she's wrong but that fact alone does not mean she's bad.

Posting on topic! Reported.

All righty then, bye MP

MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, ignore that. Apparently I'm dead.

Get the hell out of here, you lousy corpse!

zeek wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, ignore that. Apparently I'm dead.

Get the hell out of here, you lousy corpse!

Touche.

All right 2 civs down, not an auspicious start. We need to get a baddie today, or we're toast.

not expecting that - RIP MP sorry you're out so soon

S~V~S wrote:All right 2 civs down, not an auspicious start. We need to get a baddie today, or we're toast.

ANy thoughts? I know you are not aboard the splints train, and frankly this NK makes me tend to agree with you.

Epignosis wrote:Posting on topic! Reported.

What should I do about Boogs (and you), the fellow you replaced who posted OT.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Posting on topic! Reported.

What should I do about Boogs (and you), the fellow you replaced who posted OT.

Modkill them.

Well so I was wrong about MP being bad, but I still stand by that I am not wrong about what I believe based on my experience.
So I assume that NK was to set me up to look bad.
My head hurts from the last day, and I need to figure out where to look now :/
I'm trying to watch boardwalk while playing. I have a couple episodes to catch up on so I can watch the finale at the same time as keys

Bye MP - I still say you were both basically saying the same thing about your respective views and voted accordingly.

llama why do you think it was an odd choice?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Posting on topic! Reported.

What should I do about Boogs (and you), the fellow you replaced who posted OT.

Apologize for replacing him while he was eating supper?

I thought Splints sounded sincere~ she is sweeter & calmer when bad, I think. I think the point of that was to frame her. I also think Rox sounded sincere.

I think juliets or Epig are worth looking at. Epig seems a lot quieter and less opinionated then I am used to. I don't really have much a reason for juliets other than I think some of the baddies were hiding and letting me and MP go at it. I don't really recall her commenting on that either way.

Roxy wrote:Bye MP - I still say you were both basically saying the same thing about your respective views and voted accordingly.

llama why do you think it was an odd choice?

Because MP was sucking up oxygen and taking (at least one) votes. If I were bad, I would be content to lay back and let him continue to do so.

Either 1: Splints is being set up, or
2. Splints figured that there are few enough players that killing one of the people inclined to vote for her would be enough to allow her to scrape through.

zeek wrote:

zeek wrote:Suck it, newt

Wrong colour, sorry. I need to go to bed now.

If you were alive, I'd modkill you.

I have to eat now and get a drink and if there is time I will go pee be back asap

S~V~S wrote:I thought Splints sounded sincere~ she is sweeter & calmer when bad, I think. I think the point of that was to frame her. I also think Rox sounded sincere.

I always say my civvie game and baddie game are totally different. lol this is a prime example.

fingersplints wrote:I think juliets or Epig are worth looking at. Epig seems a lot quieter and less opinionated then I am used to. I don't really have much a reason for juliets other than I think some of the baddies were hiding and letting me and MP go at it. I don't really recall her commenting on that either way.

You know, people keep saying that about me. I'm always quieter and less opinionated than people are used to.

fingersplints wrote:I think juliets or Epig are worth looking at. Epig seems a lot quieter and less opinionated then I am used to. I don't really have much a reason for juliets other than I think some of the baddies were hiding and letting me and MP go at it. I don't really recall her commenting on that either way.

You're right I did not make a comment about what I thought. You each were seeing things from your own perspective and I couldnt add anything to that discussion.

I am not sure, but i also think, by poe, that one of Epi or Juliets are bad.

Epi & Juliets, what is your opinion on each other?

S~V~S wrote:I thought Splints sounded sincere~ she is sweeter & calmer when bad, I think. I think the point of that was to frame her. I also think Rox sounded sincere.

I think you're right, which is why I'm inclined to vote for you today. If it's not me, Roxy, or Splints, it must be two out of Epi, Juliets, and you. Juliets has been lurky lurky but I tend to believe her dinner cookery spiel. I remain unsure about Rob, but you have been talkative without saying much, and basically placed a No U vote on Made (who, it will be recalled, was civ.)

POE=Process of elimination

S~V~S wrote:I am not sure, but i also think, by poe, that one of Epi or Juliets are bad.

Epi & Juliets, what is your opinion on each other?

I always read Juliets as civilian, and I've been bad with her once. She plays the MOST consistent game of anyone I've ever witnessed- I can never read her. And I'm still mad about getting eaten by Smaug.

She is amazingly level, isn't she? Even when she is incensed, or when she is bad bad bad, she sounds like a lady

S~V~S wrote:I am not sure, but i also think, by poe, that one of Epi or Juliets are bad.

Epi & Juliets, what is your opinion on each other?

The comment about chatzy was weird. How did he know it was down? I don't think he ever answered that.

S~V~S wrote:She is amazingly level, isn't she? Even when she is incensed, or when she is bad bad bad, she sounds like a lady

I am still learning from her ways.