The Syndicate

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:46 pm**

Mint chocolate chip is thin mints in ice cream form. Why on god’s minty green earth would anyone dislike that?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:46 pm**

I kind of liked SVS's response to sig btw

something like "she thought her reasoning was clearly see through and obvious but sig not seeing it was weird but her reaction comes from an uninformed mindset instead of an informed one where she would've been pissed for sig's read on her, whereas here she's just genuinely confused as to why sig can't understand her" or something amongst those lines anyway

also disliked dys' entrance, especially the town read on Michelle

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:48 pm**

Fun fact: my first job was scooping ice cream at Friendly’s.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:49 pm**

someone pick strawberry with me though so i am not alone

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:52 pm**

tedxtr wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:49 pm someone pick strawberry with me though so i am not alone

[VOTE: Strawberry] aubergine
Its versatility is not far behind vanilla’s, and a good creamy strawberry ice cream is hard to beat on its own. I don’t care for it when it has chunks of freeze dried strawberries in it though.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:52 pm**

<3 sloonei

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:54 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:48 pm Fun fact: my first job was scooping ice cream at Friendly’s.

My first job was scooping ice cream at a cute lil indie shop that doesn't even exist anymore but had the best mint cookie crunch ice cream in the world.

Btw I loved the monster mash sundae as a kid.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:58 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:01 am Tex/Michelle are my early town read
Jay and nanook early meh reada

What is a meh read?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:59 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:55 am Jay gets the most undeserved townread of all time from me based on page 1 alone.

y

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:00 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:59 am Hot take of my own: This is three townies fighting over nonsense.

Tell me more, Jackofhearts2005. Tell me everything. Give me all of the juicy goss. Who's the third townie, and why are all the people townies?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:03 pm**

I read some of cats and dogs and this ain't the town jjj, chief

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:03 pm**

[mention]Sloonei[/mention], please share your feelings about Teddy X. T. Roosevelt.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:04 pm**

tedxtr wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:03 pm I read some of cats and dogs and this ain't the town jjj, chief

Thank god if I'm not that guy. That game was a miserable experience. What's your gripe?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:14 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:59 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:55 am Jay gets the most undeserved townread of all time from me based on page 1 alone.
y

Meta.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:00 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:59 am Hot take of my own: This is three townies fighting over nonsense.

Tell me more, Jackofhearts2005. Tell me everything. Give me all of the juicy goss. Who's the third townie, and why are all the people townies?

Also meta. If I'm wrong on one, it's Insomnia.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:15 pm**

ColinIsCool - nothing
Dom - nothing
Dragomir - nothing
Dyslexicon - plus
Epignosis - plus
G-Man - minus
Jackofhearts2005 - minus
juliets - plus
MacDougall - minus
Master Radishes - minus
Michelle - plus
NANOOK - minus
nutella - plus
S~V~S - plus
sabie12 - nothing
sig - minus
Sloonei - minus
speedchuck - plus
sprityo - plus
tedxtr - plus
TonyStarkPrime - minus
Tranq - minus
Turnip Head - plus

As a bonafide cool kid, I would like to propose that you "ama".

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:17 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:14 pmMeta.

Can I get some solid deets, or maybe a single deet if preferable, regarding this "meta" thing? How do Sloonei, Person #3 (need name), and I fit civilian metas as opposed to whatever you'd find suspicious?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:18 pm**

sprityo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:30 pm Is there any significance to Night 0 as oppose to Day 0? @Long Con @Black Rock

Night 0 just makes more sense to me. Day follows night. Plus it's 24 hours. Days are 48 hours in this game. I think I always do Night 0. Way cooler.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:20 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:03 pm Sloonei, please share your feelings about Teddy X. T. Roosevelt.

The initial point of concern has not vanished, but I am withholding judgment for now. He's been forthcoming with reads, at the very least.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:21 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:20 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:03 pm Sloonei, please share your feelings about Teddy X. T. Roosevelt.
The initial point of concern has not vanished, but I am withholding judgment for now. He's been forthcoming with reads, at the very least.

To be clear, is the point of concern that you feel he was pushing you away?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:21 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:17 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:14 pmMeta.
Can I get some solid deets, or maybe a single deet if preferable, regarding this "meta" thing? How do Sloonei, Person #3 (need name), and I fit civilian metas as opposed to whatever you'd find suspicious?

No.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:22 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:21 pmNo.

How about Person #3?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:23 pm**

Ted/Insomnia.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:25 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:23 pm Ted/Insomnia.

I would have assumed nutella, so neat super great

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:26 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:21 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:20 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:03 pm Sloonei, please share your feelings about Teddy X. T. Roosevelt.
The initial point of concern has not vanished, but I am withholding judgment for now. He's been forthcoming with reads, at the very least.
To be clear, is the point of concern that you feel he was pushing you away?

It was that he seemed to be trying to dodge the responsibility of answering a generic Day 0 prod. Or night 0, whatever this is. I'm willing to give him time and space to settle into the game on his own terms, though.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:27 pm**

I'm waiting until near the end of D1 to give my 100% accurate Nutella read.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:31 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:26 pm It was that he seemed to be trying to dodge the responsibility of answering a generic Day 0 prod. Or night 0, whatever this is. I'm willing to give him time and space to settle into the game on his own terms, though.

Cool beans. Similarly, I feel that you've shied away from my accusation of you. Whaddap wit dat?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:36 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:31 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:26 pm It was that he seemed to be trying to dodge the responsibility of answering a generic Day 0 prod. Or night 0, whatever this is. I'm willing to give him time and space to settle into the game on his own terms, though.
Cool beans. Similarly, I feel that you've shied away from my accusation of you. Whaddap wit dat?

It doesn't move me very much. You'll see Town Sloon soon enough, and I can develop a read on you without it. If you have a specific point you'd like me to address, give it.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:38 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:27 pm I'm waiting until near the end of D1 to give my 100% accurate Nutella read.

nutella is town

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:46 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:36 pm It doesn't move me very much. You'll see Town Sloon soon enough, and I can develop a read on you without it. If you have a specific point you'd like me to address, give it.

An accusation of you doesn't move you?

JJJ dissing Sloonei is inherently unusual and would on its own power seem to demand some kind of interchange -- one I wouldn't expect to have to press for. You suggested ted was sort of dodging you; I didn't get that impression. I saw him pose a philosophical question of general strategy (i.e. "how much can you really glean from X?") without a dismissive tone. Folks often don't know what to do with your questions, Sloonbeard, it's something that has gotten you into trouble.

Moreover, my initial spark of suspicion came as a product of "do you not want me to ask questions?". That is itself hardly an accusation, but it seems as though you bear some degree of suspicion of ted. That was unclear to me until I asked just now. Clarity is not something I am used to lacking with Sloonei.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:47 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:38 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:27 pm I'm waiting until near the end of D1 to give my 100% accurate Nutella read.
nutella is town

show me yours and I'll show you mine

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:48 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:58 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:01 am Tex/Michelle are my early town read
Jay and nanook early meh reada
What is a meh read?

Meh: you're just kinda meh, guess if I had to classify it in your archaic way I'd say mafia lean.

Pending a massive scum slip I'd say there's no real way to have a strong read this early in the game. So I am a bit antsy on the people who are throwing town reads like candy.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:49 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:48 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:58 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:01 am Tex/Michelle are my early town read
Jay and nanook early meh reada
What is a meh read?
Meh: you're just kinda meh, guess if I had to classify it in your archaic way I'd say mafia lean.

Pending a massive scum slip I'd say there's no real way to have a strong read this early in the game. So I am a bit antsy on the people who are throwing town reads like candy.

Did ted and Michelle earn their candy?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:58 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:46 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:36 pm It doesn't move me very much. You'll see Town Sloon soon enough, and I can develop a read on you without it. If you have a specific point you'd like me to address, give it.
An accusation of you doesn't move you?

JJJ dissing Sloonei is inherently unusual and would on its own power seem to demand some kind of interchange -- one I wouldn't expect to have to press for. You suggested ted was sort of dodging you; I didn't get that impression. I saw him pose a philosophical question of general strategy (i.e. "how much can you really glean from X?") without a dismissive tone. Folks often don't know what to do with your questions, Sloonbeard, it's something that has gotten you into trouble.

Moreover, my initial spark of suspicion came as a product of "do you not want me to ask questions?". That is itself hardly an accusation, but it seems as though you bear some degree of suspicion of ted. That was unclear to me until I asked just now. Clarity is not something I am used to lacking with Sloonei.

A Day 0 poo fling from Jay is a very usual thing. But since we're here:

Spoiler: show

Each of the bottom two paragraphs here struck me as suggesting discomfort from ted. You highlighted the first paragraph, which I acknowledge could be a response from a player who is not accustomed to my aggressive style of questioning. But the bottom paragraph resonated more strongly with me. "I just wanted to throw my suspicions out and let people know who I'm observing." The wording suggests that my light pressure has put him in a spot that he does not want to be in. Whether he doesn't want to be in that spot because his reads are bogus, or because he's not accustomed to providing so much detail this early on, I do not know.

ted was town in All My Circuits and sprit's wacky social experiment thing. I should review those games.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:01 pm**

These two posts gave me good feelings about nutella:

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:27 am Sloonei is totes mafia tho jus sayin.

nutella wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:28 am And I know I say that every game sloo but I mean it this time

She's right that she says this every game, but the observation I've made is that Town nutella is more casual and flippant about her suspicion of Sloonei, while Mafia nutella can be a bit rigid about it. These two posts in quick succession struck me as merry read-vomiting nutella.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:08 pm**

It would be ideal if ted could expand as we've already said. I'll interpret from there.

Generally agreed re: nutella. I liked her demand that you (Sloonei) and I stop beep booping as she perceived it. Her reception of my beef with you also rang authentic.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:18 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:15 pm ColinIsCool - nothing
Dom - nothing
Dragomir - nothing
Dyslexicon - plus
Epignosis - plus
G-Man - minus
Jackofhearts2005 - minus
juliets - plus
MacDougall - minus
Master Radishes - minus
Michelle - plus
NANOOK - minus
nutella - plus
S~V~S - plus
sabie12 - nothing
sig - minus
Sloonei - minus
speedchuck - plus
sprityo - plus
tedxtr - plus
TonyStarkPrime - minus
Tranq - minus
Turnip Head - plus

As a bonafide cool kid, I would like to propose that you "ama".

Why is SVS a plus? Why is sig a minus?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:19 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:39 pm And juliet is 3p she picked sorbet which isn't ice cream its sorbet.

Lol sig, look at the poll question: "Which flavor is your favorite?" not "Which flavor ice cream is your favorite?" Someone brought this up earlier.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:23 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:18 pm Why is SVS a plus? Why is sig a minus?

I appreciated the approach S~V~S opened with to check in with juliets, specifically juliets, about the meaning of the Day 0 poll. Given her time away from the game, old-school Syndicate norms, and her relationships with the players on this roster (many of whom I figure she does not know), that made sense to me. It looked like real brainstuff.

sig's "meh" reads on Nanook and I seemed arbitrary. The vagueness of "meh" aside, the inclusions of the reads at all struck me as off. [mention]sig[/mention] why are Nanook and I meh?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:24 pm**

juliets wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:19 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:39 pm And juliet is 3p she picked sorbet which isn't ice cream its sorbet.
Lol sig, look at the poll question: "Which flavor is your favorite?" not "Which flavor ice cream is your favorite?" Someone brought this up earlier.

That's just what someone who's third party would say.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:25 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:23 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:18 pm Why is SVS a plus? Why is sig a minus?
sig's "meh" reads on Nanook and I seemed arbitrary. The vagueness of "meh" aside, the inclusions of the reads at all struck me as off. @sig why are Nanook and I meh?

Good question. The answer? Reasons. What reasons you may ask? The reasonable type of course.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:26 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:25 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:23 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:18 pm Why is SVS a plus? Why is sig a minus?
sig's "meh" reads on Nanook and I seemed arbitrary. The vagueness of "meh" aside, the inclusions of the reads at all struck me as off. @sig why are Nanook and I meh?
Good question. The answer? Reasons. What reasons you may ask? The reasonable type of course.

minus

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:29 pm**

I have an additional beef with sig that might be petty and insignificant, but I want to get it out there if for no other reason than to state a philosophical disagreement.

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:48 pm Pending a massive scum slip I'd say there's no real way to have a strong read this early in the game. So I am a bit antsy on the people who are throwing town reads like candy.

It seems like a big leap to equate "strong reads" to reads that are "thrown out like candy." The latter suggests the opposite of strength. This strikes me as a reverse-engineered basis for suspicion.

caveat: this is sig

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:29 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:49 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:48 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:58 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:01 am Tex/Michelle are my early town read
Jay and nanook early meh reada
What is a meh read?
Meh: you're just kinda meh, guess if I had to classify it in your archaic way I'd say mafia lean.

Pending a massive scum slip I'd say there's no real way to have a strong read this early in the game. So I am a bit antsy on the people who are throwing town reads like candy.
Did ted and Michelle earn their candy?

First they're still leans. I'm not singing their praising or locking them people are already trying to form a town core which is all well and good until you accidentally town core mafia and they get away with sleazy stuff until it's to late. Which happens all the time.

Second:
Michelle is mainly based off of gut
Ted is based off previous games this is well within his civ meta. Everything from jumping in, to his semi aggressiveness and all that jazz. Now it's still early easy to fake meta, but I'm confident in those two loans.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:31 pm**

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:29 pm I have an additional beef with sig that might be petty and insignificant, but I want to get it out there if for no other reason than to state a philosophical disagreement.

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:48 pm Pending a massive scum slip I'd say there's no real way to have a strong read this early in the game. So I am a bit antsy on the people who are throwing town reads like candy.
It seems like a big leap to equate "strong reads" to reads that are "thrown out like candy." The latter suggests the opposite of strength. This strikes me as a reverse-engineered basis for suspicion.

caveat: this is sig

People are throwing out strong reads like candy?

I guess one could argue they're not strong if they're throwing them out, but unilaterally declaring multiple town read without giving much information seems to be giving a strong read.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:31 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:29 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:49 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:48 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:58 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:01 am Tex/Michelle are my early town read
Jay and nanook early meh reada
What is a meh read?
Meh: you're just kinda meh, guess if I had to classify it in your archaic way I'd say mafia lean.

Pending a massive scum slip I'd say there's no real way to have a strong read this early in the game. So I am a bit antsy on the people who are throwing town reads like candy.
Did ted and Michelle earn their candy?
First they're still leans. I'm not singing their praising or locking them people are already trying to form a town core which is all well and good until you accidentally town core mafia and they get away with sleazy stuff until it's to late. Which happens all the time.

Who is doing this, sig?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:32 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:29 pm First they're still leans. I'm not singing their praising or locking them people are already trying to form a town core which is all well and good until you accidentally town core mafia and they get away with sleazy stuff until it's to late. Which happens all the time.

Who would you say has been doing this?

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:32 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:26 pm
sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:25 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:23 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:18 pm Why is SVS a plus? Why is sig a minus?
sig's "meh" reads on Nanook and I seemed arbitrary. The vagueness of "meh" aside, the inclusions of the reads at all struck me as off. @sig why are Nanook and I meh?
Good question. The answer? Reasons. What reasons you may ask? The reasonable type of course.
minus

Minus is good right? Like your subtracting how scummy you think I am.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:32 pm**

Well that's a nice mark, Sloonei.

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:34 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 1:16 pm
S~V~S wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 11:28 am OK, sig, I’m gonna explain this to you.

My question to Jules was a two fold question. Maybe even three fold. First, it served to help me sort her out. I like to know what I think of Jules pretty fast, and I find that gauging her answer to a direct question not directly related to her helps me with that. If she is bad, I don’t think she’s on a team with any of the vanilla voters, and I am leaning civ. I might ask G-Man a direct question, too Second, it correlates to the two posts I quoted above it, from Chuck and Jack. Of the 5 vanilla voters, they put no thoughts into the thread about their votes, Chuck moreso than Jack; Chuck just dropped his vote without any reason or discussion. If Zero polls with meaning are not common anymore, then maybe their votes mean nothing in particular. If they were more common, though, I would not expect a whole team to vote for them. Same would go for the three Pistacio voters. So, third, it’s a good way to start discussion on this topic, since I seem not to be the only one whose eye was caught by the vanilla voters.

Not sure why trying to start discussion is “fluffy”, but OK.
The type of discussion makes you present, but overall didn't seem to contribute much.

Though it's been a very long time since we played together may just be your style.

OK. You have a tendency to suspect me early and often, and that's cool. I just wanted to remind you that I do pay attention to you. Sometimes you treat your own observations as throw aways, and I wanted to see if this was that.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:18 pm

Why is SVS a plus?

SVS is always a plus

Posted: **Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:34 pm**

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:31 pm
Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 3:29 pm I have an additional beef with sig that might be petty and insignificant, but I want to get it out there if for no other reason than to state a philosophical disagreement.

sig wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 2:48 pm Pending a massive scum slip I'd say there's no real way to have a strong read this early in the game. So I am a bit antsy on the people who are throwing town reads like candy.
It seems like a big leap to equate "strong reads" to reads that are "thrown out like candy." The latter suggests the opposite of strength. This strikes me as a reverse-engineered basis for suspicion.

caveat: this is sig
People are throwing out strong reads like candy?

I guess one could argue they're not strong if they're throwing them out, but unilaterally declaring multiple town read without giving much information seems to be giving a strong read.

Perhaps you are reading strength into other people's reads. I do not believe that I am one of the people this statement is directed at, but I've been faced with this criticism plenty of times in the past. Throwing out early reads like candy is a strategy certain players follow. Those do not need to be strong reads at all.

The Syndicate

Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]

Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 0]