Re: The Rings of Power - Day Three
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:57 am
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://mafiathesyndicate.com/
How are you counting? From my PoV all of Thranduil, Narvi, Disa, Arondir, Cirdan, Amdir, Celebrian satisfy the condition you gave. That's seven. o:osieorb18 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:17 pm With the condition "No more than one 'a' in the recipient's role name, and the recipient's role name cannot begin with 'K'."
...we can look at the following list of Rolenames:
Town Rolenames -
Isildur
Thranduil
Celeborn
Narvi
Disa
Arondir
Elrond
Elendil
Durin IV
Cirdan
Amdir
Celebrimbor
Glorfindel
Bronwyn
Durin III (MacDougall)
Celebrian
Gil-Galad
Tar-Minastir
Elanor Brandyfoot
Mafia Rolenames -
Annatar
Khamul
Witch-King of Angmar (Hollowkatt)
Ar-Pharazon
%%%
None of the mafia names fulfill the condition, and only three town names do.
Yeah I was avoiding even talking about it because of FOMO and how sus it would look but I don’t really care anymoreosieorb18 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:17 pm With the condition "No more than one 'a' in the recipient's role name, and the recipient's role name cannot begin with 'K'."
...we can look at the following list of Rolenames:
Town Rolenames -
Isildur
Thranduil
Celeborn
Narvi
Disa
Arondir
Elrond
Elendil
Durin IV
Cirdan
Amdir
Celebrimbor
Glorfindel
Bronwyn
Durin III (MacDougall)
Celebrian
Gil-Galad
Tar-Minastir
Elanor Brandyfoot
Mafia Rolenames -
Annatar
Khamul
Witch-King of Angmar (Hollowkatt)
Ar-Pharazon
%%%
None of the mafia names fulfill the condition, and only three town names do.
There are further steps that could be taken in terms of claiming parts of the message from Moonwink to confirm enough town to win.
But beyond that, Scotty is one of the more suspicious people due to being in the three affected by Mar, and is EVEN MORE suspicious since he has studiously avoided making a claim about the message in Neighbour chat or in the thread, likely because it catches him out.
[VOTE: Scotty] aubergine
I think it’s a bad idea.
"no more than one a" means one a is okay, just not 2. That's why the "doesn't begin with k" is included.Moonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 12:08 pmHow are you counting? From my PoV all of Thranduil, Narvi, Disa, Arondir, Cirdan, Amdir, Celebrian satisfy the condition you gave. That's seven. o:osieorb18 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:17 pm With the condition "No more than one 'a' in the recipient's role name, and the recipient's role name cannot begin with 'K'."
...we can look at the following list of Rolenames:
Town Rolenames -
Isildur
Thranduil
Celeborn
Narvi
Disa
Arondir
Elrond
Elendil
Durin IV
Cirdan
Amdir
Celebrimbor
Glorfindel
Bronwyn
Durin III (MacDougall)
Celebrian
Gil-Galad
Tar-Minastir
Elanor Brandyfoot
Mafia Rolenames -
Annatar
Khamul
Witch-King of Angmar (Hollowkatt)
Ar-Pharazon
%%%
None of the mafia names fulfill the condition, and only three town names do.
It was just the quandary as to why Andres and not Porscha. HK's context set them in contention.Moonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 6:18 pm Wait, I know where I got confused. It was "no more than one a", but I forgot that also includes names WITHOUT and 'a', too. The seven I gave satisfy the condition one 'a', but doesn't start with K. That's why I'm getting more than 7 claims, but it makes sense now. My bad, lol.
Anyway, we can hammer Andres. I dunno why he hasn't been hammered? It looks like he's got enough votes.
(Though, I might actually read what Wilgy had to say about Andres before I add another vote on Andres.)
Well, for me, I remember Porsha saying some stuff at the beginning of D2, which puts here just slightly higher than Andres, but relative to the rest of the playerlist? They're pretty much in the same position. I was also interested in looking at Jack's and Creature's ISO again after the stuff you brought up, though in Jack's case, he was one of the people who receive my message last night. I thiiiiink I'd always go for Creature over Jack at this second? I dunno. I've been pretty lazy today -- launched Civ 5 up two nights ago, and I haven't been able to stop playing it.DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 6:24 pmIt was just the quandary as to why Andres and not Porscha. HK's context set them in contention.Moonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 6:18 pm Wait, I know where I got confused. It was "no more than one a", but I forgot that also includes names WITHOUT and 'a', too. The seven I gave satisfy the condition one 'a', but doesn't start with K. That's why I'm getting more than 7 claims, but it makes sense now. My bad, lol.
Anyway, we can hammer Andres. I dunno why he hasn't been hammered? It looks like he's got enough votes.
(Though, I might actually read what Wilgy had to say about Andres before I add another vote on Andres.)
I just remembered something.DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:18 pm Oh, also when looking at direct interactions.
JoH and Creature stand out.
The interaction between a tossed read on creature and a question poised by JoH that was responded to there's not much. If any avoidable interactions were forced, it was one of these two.
Unless someone tells me a reason otherwise.
Is this a W/W interaction though? Individually, I think Creature's post here can come from either alignment. His playstyle shares some similarities with mine, especially in regard to using random votes to poke around. I'm further inclined to think this was a case of that since he switched his vote to HK by the end of the day.Creature wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 4:14 pmStarting to think the same tbhJackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 3:56 pm I hate how most of my suspects are voting Screen.
I’m kinda entirely serious about cleaning out the three low posters.
[VOTE: Andresmvp] aubergine
Hmm... I just noticed again that Osie and Andres are voting with each other on Scotty. I know I was on the wagon with them for some time, but I don't remember how long we were all on it together. The reason why it's interesting to me, though, is that maybe Creature was reacting to Osie's and Andres votes on Scotty? Scotty, who could be Creature's partner? The only thing against this though is, as I quoted above, Creature has been kinda pushing on Andres since yesterday?Moonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:31 pmIs this a W/W interaction though? Individually, I think Creature's post here can come from either alignment. His playstyle shares some similarities with mine, especially in regard to using random votes to poke around. I'm further inclined to think this was a case of that since he switched his vote to HK by the end of the day.Creature wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 4:14 pmStarting to think the same tbhJackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 26, 2022 3:56 pm I hate how most of my suspects are voting Screen.
I’m kinda entirely serious about cleaning out the three low posters.
[VOTE: Andresmvp] aubergine
If he is scum though, that probably means he abandoned the Andres wagon to bus his partner HK. Today, it looked like he abandoned his attempt to wagon Osie to vote for Andres. In this scenario though, I think Andres is town? Because Creature would still get towncred for bussing a partner as long as Andres get chopped at some point? I also think Osie would be town in this case, too, because there was a lot of resistance (including me) against voting Osie today.
I dunno though.
Besides the fact that mafia seemingly don’t have any way of killing besides corruption and NK, that’s the only way it could happen. Mafia definitely used that ring on HK.Moonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:13 pmI just remembered something.DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:18 pm Oh, also when looking at direct interactions.
JoH and Creature stand out.
The interaction between a tossed read on creature and a question poised by JoH that was responded to there's not much. If any avoidable interactions were forced, it was one of these two.
Unless someone tells me a reason otherwise.
At the end of D1, when we were close to voting HK over, Jack chose to vote for me in the last five minutes of the day instead of helping the people wagoning HK with another vote on him. He explained it away be saying that being open to vote for anyone is bad, and that his vote on me was a symbolic one.
However, he ends up voting for HK by the end of D2. Furthermore, didn't someone suggest that a ring might have been used on HK to get him to survive through the vote until the start of D3? Or was his delayed death caused by the mechanics of Doom's ring use?
Clarity stuck the councilor's mind the moment they left the forum. Is this the power of the Rings? Are a person's thoughts so easily muddled? Regardless, corrective action must be taken. A certain somebody was meant to die yesterday.
You seem to like to preemptively clear people.
Okay, this is what I thought. This is kiiiinda why I'm a little more hesitant to townread the people on HK's wagon from D2 than I am from D1. If the ring was used on HK, scum probably knew it, and might have been okay with HK getting yeeted since his death would get delayed a night.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:39 pmBesides the fact that mafia seemingly don’t have any way of killing besides corruption and NK, that’s the only way it could happen. Mafia definitely used that ring on HK.Moonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:13 pmI just remembered something.DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:18 pm Oh, also when looking at direct interactions.
JoH and Creature stand out.
The interaction between a tossed read on creature and a question poised by JoH that was responded to there's not much. If any avoidable interactions were forced, it was one of these two.
Unless someone tells me a reason otherwise.
At the end of D1, when we were close to voting HK over, Jack chose to vote for me in the last five minutes of the day instead of helping the people wagoning HK with another vote on him. He explained it away be saying that being open to vote for anyone is bad, and that his vote on me was a symbolic one.
However, he ends up voting for HK by the end of D2. Furthermore, didn't someone suggest that a ring might have been used on HK to get him to survive through the vote until the start of D3? Or was his delayed death caused by the mechanics of Doom's ring use?
This is why I got prickly with nook’s statement when he came out saying that D2. But we’ll get to that laterMoonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:43 pmOkay, this is what I thought. This is kiiiinda why I'm a little more hesitant to townread the people on HK's wagon from D2 than I am from D1. If the ring was used on HK, scum probably knew it, and might have been okay with HK getting yeeted since his death would get delayed a night.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:39 pmBesides the fact that mafia seemingly don’t have any way of killing besides corruption and NK, that’s the only way it could happen. Mafia definitely used that ring on HK.Moonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:13 pmI just remembered something.DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:18 pm Oh, also when looking at direct interactions.
JoH and Creature stand out.
The interaction between a tossed read on creature and a question poised by JoH that was responded to there's not much. If any avoidable interactions were forced, it was one of these two.
Unless someone tells me a reason otherwise.
At the end of D1, when we were close to voting HK over, Jack chose to vote for me in the last five minutes of the day instead of helping the people wagoning HK with another vote on him. He explained it away be saying that being open to vote for anyone is bad, and that his vote on me was a symbolic one.
However, he ends up voting for HK by the end of D2. Furthermore, didn't someone suggest that a ring might have been used on HK to get him to survive through the vote until the start of D3? Or was his delayed death caused by the mechanics of Doom's ring use?
I like clearing people because I've found that it can influence what mafia does sometimes. If they keep me around, I tend to find that they'd rather not also bring someone I trust and can work with. Does that make any sense?
Yeah that makes sense. Usually when I hear the word clear, I expect it to be some undeniable mech thing, but looking at it as like ‘clear to me’ makes more sense. If a player is cleared, I want to just throw them in my knapsack and not worry about them any more.Moonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:49 pmI like clearing people because I've found that it can influence what mafia does sometimes. If they keep me around, I tend to find that they'd rather not also bring someone I trust and can work with. Does that make any sense?
As for Creature... I feel that what I said is true just based on past experience with him, I think? Like... I wouldn't call Creature a practical player -- he can make plays sometimes that are just really bad for his alignment, just like me. Buuuut, like me, I think he knows his limit, and wouldn't willingly put himself into a position where he has to bus two partners in a row?
Oh, yeah. When I say clear, I usually mean 'clear to me', unless I specify otherwise. I'm weird with words and phrasing sometimes from what I'm told. If there's any ever confusion, just ask, and I'll try to explain what I mean.Scotty wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:55 pmYeah that makes sense. Usually when I hear the word clear, I expect it to be some undeniable mech thing, but looking at it as like ‘clear to me’ makes more sense. If a player is cleared, I want to just throw them in my knapsack and not worry about them any more.Moonwink wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:49 pmI like clearing people because I've found that it can influence what mafia does sometimes. If they keep me around, I tend to find that they'd rather not also bring someone I trust and can work with. Does that make any sense?
As for Creature... I feel that what I said is true just based on past experience with him, I think? Like... I wouldn't call Creature a practical player -- he can make plays sometimes that are just really bad for his alignment, just like me. Buuuut, like me, I think he knows his limit, and wouldn't willingly put himself into a position where he has to bus two partners in a row?
That’s why NAA clearing himself made my eye twitch
Yeeeeaah.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:30 pm I don't think "they wouldn't bus two partners in a row" really applies when it's andres who had made what, 3 posts coming into today?