JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 10:01 am
Put another way yet:
EnderWiggin wrote: ↑Sun Jul 03, 2022 8:35 am
Jay? Jay.
I wanted you to be town so badly. I really did. I blinded myself when on D1 I sat uncomfortably certain that there was someone very deep into the "mucho town" basket.
But the more I read their ISO the more I just don't think they're trying to cohesively town solve
like I've seen them do in the past. I'll try and put a more cohesive case together tomorrow after work, but I just want you all to know my stance before I get to that.
I find it unlikely, already, that I will be unvoting Jay today.
First of all, the orange thing just looks fake.
More importantly, Ender's entrance into this Day 3 featured some direct quotes of other players to ask questions, make assertions, or answer prompts. That can reflect a concerted effort to engage. I, the player receiving the immediate Day 3 vote, get this third-person perspective criticism as an appeal to the reading audience, and not to
me. Ender: if you should be directly engaging with anyone in this game thread right now, it's me.
Looks like agenda.
As a separate, perhaps less important point (green): have you ever seen me play before? I don't think we have been in the same game.
I've watched and read and had a few people tell me about you. Hence the "I really wanted you to be town" thing. Because I've been told you are the glue that makes a good town.
I don't actually think we've played together before.
Why should I be directly interacting with you most of all? I have stated I have a read.
I have stated I'm building a case.
Until I'm set on that case I have no direct reason to interact with you since my reasons amount to "Mah feelungs" and that means negative import.
I'm instead appealing to the general consensus to see if they think or agree with me, while building a case.
This is not the first time I've done it this way, albeit usually I try to have part of a case ready but I'm ngl I'm dealing with other stuff and don't have as much time as I'd like.
If I were to ignore my case or my thoughts though, and because you've specifically asked:
Talk to me about my reads list, ignoring myself and yourself, and tell me which parts you disagree with and why? I can provide more clarity on my thoughts if you need them on specific slots.
Talk to me about your own reads list, or whatever you have of it since I recall you said you were going to throw it out.
