The Syndicate

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:34 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:32 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:26 am I like the content from LinearPoint he can be a town read now

Wilgy
Falcon
Linear

Sean

Cat
Epi
.....................
MrRadishes

SvS

Guillo
What puts Cat > Epi

The rest of this appears to be consistent with what you've put in the thread I think.
Made me laugh

What did?

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 2:02 pm
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 2:01 pm
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:17 am I am not liking what I am reading from S~V~S so far.

This post is basically just meaningless fluff that doesn't even realistically contribute to anything.
Spoiler: show
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am How many mafia we have in this game?
Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.

Pair that last post with this one and I think there is a solid argument that S~V~S is trying to comment on the setup while sidestepping other topics. This is doubly so since by the point of this second post the Guillotine and Michelle situation was starting to develop.
Spoiler: show
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:28 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am How many mafia we have in this game?
Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.
Why would be 3 unbalanced?
With only 10 players? That’s almost a third of the players list?

His Solar System game had 11 players, 2 mafia. With fewer players more wolves seems unlikely?

This is rather a debatable point to get aggro about?

Then I found this post to also ping me a bit. I find it weird they drop the Guillotine suspicious read in there, but were not one of the people voting on Guillotine. Then they also drop a good read on MIchelle while (in my opinion) also shading them as potentially bussing Guillotine. Which I do think it is also just odd to bring up bussing this early into the game.
Spoiler: show
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:20 am LP
Seanzie
Cat
Epi
SVS
MR
Michelle
Guillo
I get why Guillo, but why Michelle? I don’t associate snap votes with bad Michelle, do you think she’s bussing him?

This last one is probably just me being paranoid, but these few posts are reading to me as a wolf who is trying to go with the nice guy approach and trying to talk people down by being overly non-agressive.
Spoiler: show
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:28 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am

Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.
Why would be 3 unbalanced?
With only 10 players? That’s almost a third of the players list?

His Solar System game had 11 players, 2 mafia. With fewer players more wolves seems unlikely?

This is rather a debatable point to get aggro about?
Did I put enough question marks in this ^^? Maybe I need a few more?

@DrWilgy mathematical balance is not my strong suit; I was working on the premise that he wouldn’t have more wolves than in a game with more players than this. Hopefully he chooses to tell us, but if not, not.

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am @falcon45ca nah

You’re reading too much into one word. I’ve noticed you tend to do this with me.

Do you think Michelle is town?
[VOTE: S~V~S] aubergine
@Michelle have you played with SVS before? If so, how many times approximately?
Was that meant to be aimed at me? You quoted my post.
If it was, no, not that I know/remember.

It was not addressed at you.

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:17 am I am not liking what I am reading from S~V~S so far.

This post is basically just meaningless fluff that doesn't even realistically contribute to anything.
Spoiler: show
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am How many mafia we have in this game?
Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.

Pair that last post with this one and I think there is a solid argument that S~V~S is trying to comment on the setup while sidestepping other topics. This is doubly so since by the point of this second post the Guillotine and Michelle situation was starting to develop.
Spoiler: show
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:28 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am How many mafia we have in this game?
Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.
Why would be 3 unbalanced?
With only 10 players? That’s almost a third of the players list?

His Solar System game had 11 players, 2 mafia. With fewer players more wolves seems unlikely?

This is rather a debatable point to get aggro about?

Then I found this post to also ping me a bit. I find it weird they drop the Guillotine suspicious read in there, but were not one of the people voting on Guillotine. Then they also drop a good read on MIchelle while (in my opinion) also shading them as potentially bussing Guillotine. Which I do think it is also just odd to bring up bussing this early into the game.
Spoiler: show
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:20 am LP
Seanzie
Cat
Epi
SVS
MR
Michelle
Guillo
I get why Guillo, but why Michelle? I don’t associate snap votes with bad Michelle, do you think she’s bussing him?

This last one is probably just me being paranoid, but these few posts are reading to me as a wolf who is trying to go with the nice guy approach and trying to talk people down by being overly non-agressive.
Spoiler: show
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:28 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:18 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am How many mafia we have in this game?
Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.
Why would be 3 unbalanced?
With only 10 players? That’s almost a third of the players list?

His Solar System game had 11 players, 2 mafia. With fewer players more wolves seems unlikely?

This is rather a debatable point to get aggro about?
Did I put enough question marks in this ^^? Maybe I need a few more?

@DrWilgy mathematical balance is not my strong suit; I was working on the premise that he wouldn’t have more wolves than in a game with more players than this. Hopefully he chooses to tell us, but if not, not.

S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am @falcon45ca nah

You’re reading too much into one word. I’ve noticed you tend to do this with me.

Do you think Michelle is town?
[VOTE: S~V~S] aubergine

@Michelle have you played with SVS before? If so, how many times approximately?

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:15 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:11 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:08 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:03 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:01 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:55 am
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am

I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.

Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.
But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.

Me
Why would discussion strictly on you be more beneficial than discussions on set up?

Assuming you are T, it can escalate you into the game yes, but does this escalate the entire thread into the game like a mechanical discourse would?
Pushes on people generate associative and disassociatives and then they can branch out to geberate content about other players, mechanical does not.
Mechanical can lead to interaction, interaction in general can be observed and processed and disagreements/agreements about mechs can lead to pushes and pockets that are observable as well.

To define a momentum as being more beneficial than another is inherently flawed. You may, in isolation, think one benefits you more than the other, but to dissuade the entire thread from it, while others can benefit from it, is again, negative value to town.
I wholeheartedly disagree. I dont see the benefit of talking about me h on day 1 other than allowing wolves try to blend in with it, i wanna catch them slipping, i want to take their hopes of winning early, i want to crash their chances, i want them to feel suffocated by having to make reads on people, i want them to associate with people.
What prevents you from catching them slipping, taking their hopes, and crashing their chances within mechanical discussion. Since when does mechanical discussion not have players interacting and associating?

I believe several perspectives on SVS and Michelle have come out of this mechanical discussion and their interactions with each other there.

We are associating and interacting now on the basis of mechanical vs read discussion now are we not?

I dint know about you but im not discussing mechanics with you now, am i?

I think we are going in circles and i expected you to get the point by now and you aren't which strengthens my dcum read on you.

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:13 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:08 am I like direct and bold, people with guts who mean what they say.

If you see im trying to take us out of rvs and begin playing seriously and you get in my way of that, you got yourself a tunnel! Congratulations! You are the lucky winnet!

Somewhat ironic in a game of lying, no?

What is?

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:13 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:59 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:36 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:33 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:27 am Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players
2 is a bit town sided.

Fight me, I am bored ^^
2 is the standard ratio in a 10 player game and you know it, you are not new to mafia, derp clear rejected.
Standard? Who cares about standard?
Who asked for derp clear? Be serious, my friend!
You are gonna tell me that a Heist game is not usually standard here Michelle?
Is this a question you expect an answer for and you honestly think my answer would give you a revelation about my AI?

I am affraid of a tricky-er setup and I don't want to consider the wolves are 2 when they can be 3.
Do whatever you like with this, but if this is your 'case' on me that I play dumb and derping, and if you are town, you should think again.

I was a rethoric question but thanks for answering. Take it from someone hosts a lot, there are no kore than 2 wolves here, three would be scum sided as fuck.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:12 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:08 am I like direct and bold, people with guts who mean what they say.

If you see im trying to take us out of rvs and begin playing seriously and you get in my way of that, you got yourself a tunnel! Congratulations! You are the lucky winnet!
I like bold and aromatic coffees, something with depth that wakes me up in the morning.

How did your bored posting take us out of rvs? As I recall it took, Seanzie, Michelle and I to do that. Why is it pro T to tunnel me? Where is the actual review and analysis of my thoughts... Outside of meta, you won't catch me on meta.

By making you react to me.

Specifically Michelle and you because Seanzie drops a vote like that and says see you tomorrow in every fucking game ive seen him and it is completely NAI for him, but one of you two got baited and im leaning on that being you actually.

I believe Michelle combativeness towards me is town indicative of her because when she wolfs, she is this timid and scary little cat that bails out and waits for the thread to die to post something.

Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:11 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:08 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:03 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:01 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:55 am
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.

Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.
But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.

Me
Why would discussion strictly on you be more beneficial than discussions on set up?

Assuming you are T, it can escalate you into the game yes, but does this escalate the entire thread into the game like a mechanical discourse would?
Pushes on people generate associative and disassociatives and then they can branch out to geberate content about other players, mechanical does not.
Mechanical can lead to interaction, interaction in general can be observed and processed and disagreements/agreements about mechs can lead to pushes and pockets that are observable as well.

To define a momentum as being more beneficial than another is inherently flawed. You may, in isolation, think one benefits you more than the other, but to dissuade the entire thread from it, while others can benefit from it, is again, negative value to town.
I wholeheartedly disagree. I dont see the benefit of talking about mech on day 1 other than allowing wolves try to blend in with it, i wanna catch them slipping, i want to take their hopes of winning early, i want to crash their chances, i want them to feel suffocated by having to make reads on people, i want them to associate with people.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:08 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:03 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:01 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:55 am
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.

Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.
But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.

Me
Why would discussion strictly on you be more beneficial than discussions on set up?

Assuming you are T, it can escalate you into the game yes, but does this escalate the entire thread into the game like a mechanical discourse would?
Pushes on people generate associative and disassociatives and then they can branch out to geberate content about other players, mechanical does not.
Mechanical can lead to interaction, interaction in general can be observed and processed and disagreements/agreements about mechs can lead to pushes and pockets that are observable as well.

To define a momentum as being more beneficial than another is inherently flawed. You may, in isolation, think one benefits you more than the other, but to dissuade the entire thread from it, while others can benefit from it, is again, negative value to town.

I wholeheartedly disagree. I dont see the benefit of talking about me h on day 1 other than allowing wolves try to blend in with it, i wanna catch them slipping, i want to take their hopes of winning early, i want to crash their chances, i want them to feel suffocated by having to make reads on people, i want them to associate with people.

I like direct and bold, people with guts who mean what they say.

If you see im trying to take us out of rvs and begin playing seriously and you get in my way of that, you got yourself a tunnel! Congratulations! You are the lucky winnet!

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:05 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:00 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:57 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:49 am

Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.
Who is making fake reads?
I could be, why aren't mine fake?
Stop,playing dumb, it is obvious you were insinuating it was me, i just asked you to see if you had the guts to tell it to my face and then i'd ask you why are they fake, which are fake.
I don't think your reads are fake. I agree with your Michelle read and I think it makes sense for you to have it. I do think your approach to d1 and game start was negative town ev. I also think discouragement of any form of discussion is negative town ev. I do not know if that was motivated by a W perspective or a flawed one.

To assume I'm playing dumb though, how feisty.
Feisty? You forgot we wolfed and won together not less than a month ago?
Aye, how does that have impact on your alignment here? Are you implying I should be seeing something that I have not voiced?

Or are you implying that me playing dumb is in my wolf meta?

What is the insinuation here?

You playing dumb is in your wolf meta and i dont see how playing dumb benefits finding each other if you are town.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 11:01 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:55 am
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.

Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.
But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.

Me
Why would discussion strictly on you be more beneficial than discussions on set up?

Assuming you are T, it can escalate you into the game yes, but does this escalate the entire thread into the game like a mechanical discourse would?

Pushes on people generate associative and disassociatives and then they can branch out to geberate content about other players, mechanical does not.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:57 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:49 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.
Who is making fake reads?
I could be, why aren't mine fake?
Stop,playing dumb, it is obvious you were insinuating it was me, i just asked you to see if you had the guts to tell it to my face and then i'd ask you why are they fake, which are fake.
I don't think your reads are fake. I agree with your Michelle read and I think it makes sense for you to have it. I do think your approach to d1 and game start was negative town ev. I also think discouragement of any form of discussion is negative town ev. I do not know if that was motivated by a W perspective or a flawed one.

To assume I'm playing dumb though, how feisty.

Feisty? You forgot we wolfed and won together not less than a month ago?

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:36 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:33 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:27 am Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players
2 is a bit town sided.

Fight me, I am bored ^^
2 is the standard ratio in a 10 player game and you know it, you are not new to mafia, derp clear rejected.
Standard? Who cares about standard?
Who asked for derp clear? Be serious, my friend!

You are gonna tell me that a Heist game is not usually standard here Michelle?

[VOTE: mrWilgy] aubergine

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.

Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.

But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.

Me

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:51 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:50 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:49 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.
Who is making fake reads?
I could be, why aren't mine fake?

Stop,playing dumb, it is obvious you were insinuating it was me, i just asked you to see if you had the guts to tell it to my face and then i'd ask you why are they fake, which are fake.

LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:47 am I don't know really how to feel about the Guillotine situation right now.

Early gut is telling me it's a wolf and one of the semi-joke votes on Guillotine is a second wolf.

I just don't really know why they are pushing so hard on the Michelle thing.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:41 am
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:52 am
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am It was a late night start.

But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.
You still here?
Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.

As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.

As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.
I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.
That is true that mafia are a bit more tempted to join speculation talk due to knowing the answer. But I find that kind of talk is more a point against people when we get a few flips than a basis for a read.

Because Michelle is not a new and she is posting like one.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:49 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.

Who is making fake reads?

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:45 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:37 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?
You chose to not make it less boring.
The boring state was on everyone who posted not just me.

I at least bait you guys into reacting to me, what did you do before that?
I worked.

Then why dont come when you were ready to play?
Did i need to know you had to work thus you'd be away for it?

The answer is no. I could care less.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:45 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:44 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:41 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:40 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:37 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am

You chose to not make it less boring.
The boring state was on everyone who posted not just me.

I at least bait you guys into reacting to me, what did you do before that?
I interacted with Epi and I went to sleep.
The interaction was trash
Still better than your lack of.
I geberated all of this, i bested your trash entrance.
90% sure you'd still be saying you were bored had 3 players not chimed in. You are welcome.

And i wouldnt have been wrong.

How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?

It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:41 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:40 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:37 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am

Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?
You chose to not make it less boring.
The boring state was on everyone who posted not just me.

I at least bait you guys into reacting to me, what did you do before that?
I interacted with Epi and I went to sleep.
The interaction was trash
Still better than your lack of.

I geberated all of this, i bested your trash entrance.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:41 am
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:52 am
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am It was a late night start.

But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.
You still here?
Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.

As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.

As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.
I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:27 am Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players
2 is a bit town sided.

Fight me, I am bored ^^

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:39 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:37 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?
You chose to not make it less boring.
The boring state was on everyone who posted not just me.

I at least bait you guys into reacting to me, what did you do before that?
I interacted with Epi and I went to sleep.

The interaction was trash

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:36 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:33 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:27 am Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players
2 is a bit town sided.

Fight me, I am bored ^^
2 is the standard ratio in a 10 player game and you know it, you are not new to mafia, derp clear rejected.
Standard? Who cares about standard?
Who asked for derp clear? Be serious, my friend!

Stop acting like a newbie if you want me to townread you. Derps are not asked, they are hunted for.

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?
You chose to not make it less boring.

The boring state was on everyone who posted not just me.

I at least bait you guys into reacting to me, what did you do before that?

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:29 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:27 am Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players
2 is a bit town sided.

Fight me, I am bored ^^

2 is the standard ratio in a 10 player game and you know it, you are not new to mafia, derp clear rejected.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:26 am
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:24 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?
It's because town Guillo would try to create content imo

Im pretty sure i created content with three votes against me

Actually Michelle is wolfing

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine

I dont believe you question how 3 wolves would be unbalanced in a game with 10 players

Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.

Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:15 am
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:04 am
Seanzie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:23 am [VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

See y'all tomorrow.
I agree with Sean

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine
Now I'll feel weird because I'm third, but I also agree.

[VOTE: Guillo] aubergine

So the votes are because you disagree the thread was dead and boring or?

Thread remains dead

Boring

Bye

Thread is dead, see you tomorrow

Zzzzzz

The Syndicate

Search found 283 matches

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]

Re: The Late Bronze Age Collapse [Day 1]