Return to “All My Circuits the Mafia Game [GAME OVER]”
i wasnt thojuliets wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:45 am Congrats town! speed, sabie, sprityo all saved the day in the end. @Tedexter and @therealet were so good right off the bat. I hated to see therealet go so early. And mafia team, kudos to you too. You almost had it. @NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME you were particularly good, I'm glad you're playing with us. I enjoyed being a part of this game as ya'lls mod.
my prolonged life is causing many players to doubt me
im not talking about just me
when i flip town creature will be and should be even more locktownsig wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 9:20 pmI think that's a safe bet, unless ET flips civ, which I find doubtful.novaselinenever wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 9:19 pm I'm locking Creature Town, any objection? Speak now or forever hold your peace.
linki - oh missed that
not at allnovaselinenever wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 9:19 pm I'm locking Creature Town, any objection? Speak now or forever hold your peace.
linki - oh missed that
i was during day 1Dom wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 8:02 pmyou're not being ingored lol but go off.therealet wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 7:17 pmthat im being completely ignored and thrown by the wayside
it really isntDom wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 10:06 amThat sounds awfully confident.
Anyway-- it's quite the turnaround from your Day 1 opinions as well.
its a turnaround but ive explained why i wouldnt want you hanged on day 1 anyways
Tedexter wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:20 pm Why does et not vote here for anyone, though? Answer me this. If he’s a town, he’s consciously not voting knowing that there’s a big chance he’s gonna die. On our site we say self pres is NAI, but given the circumstances and type of player, everything is AI.
top linesprityo wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:22 pm couldve simply missed deadline?
if youre implying that if he tied the votes with someone, and then that someone got lynched (who isnt martinez) that martinez would know what's up and hard rail him
then yes i think that's a pretty good reason no to vote a counter wagon
already setting up chainlynchesTedexter wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:59 pm If et is scum which I think he is, then TSP is probably the second one. So I don’t agree with that read. But in rest, I could settle for the other reads.
This is heavily dependent on et’s flip, but if he’s mafia...What would a mafia do in this situation, KNOWING that et is the president. Well, they’d set up wagons, just like in a normal setup. But they don’t really have to be too aggressive.
Look at those wagons, it’s perfect for et’s president scenario. 3 people on a tie with him. Et is already buried in evidence against him. Actively fighting against his lynch is useless. But mafia can place their votes on people like...Long, for example.
At this point, I’d clear nova as being town / sk. Probably sprit as well. Epi is locked town for me, we agree on a lot of stuff and he’s just bleeding town. Sabie, although probably a bad take, I feel like is thread spewed at this point. Especially if et is mafia. Dom town. Creature town. Rej town. Mac town.
TSP scum, Nanook / enrique scum , Et scum
that im being completely ignored and thrown by the wayside
it really isntDom wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 10:06 amThat sounds awfully confident.
Anyway-- it's quite the turnaround from your Day 1 opinions as well.
i cannot confirm or deny this as that would then break the rules and id probably be modkilledsabie12 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 10:02 amOkay so by "glaring situation" are you implying that potentially what happened was bender put the extra vote on LC which then led to a tie between you and LC which sleazy then had to break? Which then doesn't really tell us anything about your role.
I mean it could be possible but I'm not sure why bender would use up one of his extra votes so early in the game.
just because it uses less roles doesnt make it any more plausibleTedexter wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 5:36 am Ok here’s my take on the things.
There are quite a few scenarios here to consider.
I read someone’s post and from the voting that took place, he isn’t Calculon. If Calculon was the tie breaker, there would’ve been a no lynch, it wouldn’t be transferred to Long Con. Because of this, he could still be Calculon, technically speaking. Hope you understand my reasoning.
However, the et being network president is quite convincing, it would have to mean that the guy with an extra vote was on longcon and sleazy wouldn’t even need to interfere. If that’s the case, then I’d say Creature’s the guy with the extra vote. No way it’s Tony. Creature kept rambling about how Long Con was suspicious and kept coming back to him, it must be him.
In this scenario, Sleazy didn’t even need to interfere, as it was 3 votes for Long Con and only 2 for ET, provided he starts with -1 vote.
So yeah, leaning et being scum here.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2020 1:53 amWhy are you thanking me?[/quote
for giving me the time of day
theres a middle ground
the extent you were pushing me for a read based off not so good reasons imho is not a town indicator
its a biased read but your push on me is very disingenuous
yeah ik but you never know
theres four situationsnovaselinenever wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 11:02 pm The frustration was pretty NAI, the unvote from Dom and remark about his wagon not taking off was pretty scum though.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:11 amI don't even know what I just read.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:03 am And what's more:
That isn't what happened. That's revisionism. it is exactly what happened and this entire post does nothing but explain it for mei can take u voting someone to just see the poll at first, but do it a second time and i point it out
I voted LC to see the poll.
You said nothing.
I changed my vote not because I needed to "See the poll a second time" (what a silly accusation, since I could already see it), but because: i never said 'to see the poll a second time', your original goal was just to view the poll, and since long con had 2 votes you switched to enrique as to keep viewing the poll
You didn't "point it out." i did, look at the last post u quoted
You gave me unnecessary advice while my vote was on Enrique:
You are mafia.
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:47 pmThis was at 12:06am EST.
therealet made nine posts after that.
I made that post at 1:11am.
Now there's a lull.
I'm in bed.
Nothing is going on.
At 4:26pm EST:
The disparity for me is that therealet didn't give a toss that I voted Long Con to see the poll, but there was expressed concern when I changed to Enrique.
More horseshit:
This isn't a pain to read. I did in about 30 minutes.
Phony frustration.
therealet is not being honest at all. Hence the unnecessarily qualifier.
Horseshit.
If everybody was misunderstanding everyone else, then you have a conclusion from the first read. The second reading should be to ensure you haven't missed anything.
"Painfully" is an adverb. Adverbs are qualifiers.
That you used "painfully bad" means have a clear conclusion that means you have no need to reread anyway.
You are mafia.
I'll stop there.
[VOTE: therealet] aubergine
yes i did such because dom was wolfier than u
i dont have a read on then so its not an issue reallyEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:45 pmI'm going to vote for Enrique.therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:08 pmEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:03 pmtherealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:30 pmEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:02 pmThis is disingenuous.
The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."
even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easyThis is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.
just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
Eh? How are you disagreeing with me? You answered nova's question and I called your response disingenuous.even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy
youre going to make me look bad by ignoring the fact that i clearly stated i had already changed my mind? ok
So you don't mean the things you say.just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
That must come in handy when you're mafia.
youre strawmanning
Never am.
How do you feel about that?
[VOTE: Enrique] aubergine
Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 8:03 pmtherealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:30 pmEpignosis wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:02 pmThis is disingenuous.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:22 pmfairly wolfy the both of younovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:19 pmGTH stance on both of us.therealet wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 6:18 pmyoure arguing over an emotenovaselinenever wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 5:56 pm
You seem to have pinpointed "why" just fine. Not really, it's the obvious truth. I mean that's just how I roll here by shooting the shit to get stuff going. I mean what do you think that emoji included in the initial post was trying to convey?
youre both being very stubborn and are easy to provoke
not w/w
leaning u being the baddy here
The purpose of this is to grant its author permission to string together lynches while prioritizing the more vocal of the two. A lynched civilian nova leaves room for therealet to double-down on a lynch for his other "suspect."
even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easyThis is an empty post that looks busy but is vapid in its conclusion. Worse, it isn't even true. I had done nothing up to the point of this post.
just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
Eh? How are you disagreeing with me? You answered nova's question and I called your response disingenuous.even if someone disagrees with u buddy doesnt mean theyre disingenuous
if you can see clearly in your catchup my tone around them shifted, i changed my mind, and it was easy
youre going to make me look bad by ignoring the fact that i clearly stated i had already changed my mind? ok
So you don't mean the things you say.just because i say 'everybody' dont take it as a personal attack, i may have said 'everybody' but im not including everybody, i know full well not everyone has posted and i assumed people would have the common sense to understand i wasnt referring to everyone
That must come in handy when you're mafia.
youre strawmanning
Never am.
Tedexter wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:43 pm No, I think Dom is scummy because of reasons already mentioned, but Et’s vote is worse in and of itself. That plus Epi’s remark on et kind of adds up in that uncertainty. The vote from et felt really opportunistic, it feels like he jumped on voting dom by using my post more than him having an actual reasoning, et was at 2 votes and Dom was sitting at 2, et just made him top lynch candidate with that vote.
Point is if Dom flips green then Et is probably scum. Weird dichotomy but I think at least one of them is scum. I am aware I’m wrong on one of them but I don’t know who.
cant wait for epi to not pick on this oneTedexter wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:43 pm No, I think Dom is scummy because of reasons already mentioned, but Et’s vote is worse in and of itself. That plus Epi’s remark on et kind of adds up in that uncertainty. The vote from et felt really opportunistic, it feels like he jumped on voting dom by using my post more than him having an actual reasoning, et was at 2 votes and Dom was sitting at 2, et just made him top lynch candidate with that vote.
Point is if Dom flips green then Et is probably scum. Weird dichotomy but I think at least one of them is scum. I am aware I’m wrong on one of them but I don’t know who.
hes choosing to pick on me saying im gonna have spontaneous disappearances and youre telling me he has the right focusEnrique wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:43 pmIt's completely insane to me that the same people that spent four pages in an incoherent back and forth are now saying this about Dom. I don't mean this as a personal criticism, but seriously, pot, kettle? No? What exactly have been the more useful points?therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:16 pm+1 on the dom stuffTedexter wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 7:11 am I actually might be down with lynching Dom. I don't like the things he's focusing on. It's nothing substantiated, only things that are taken at face value. Superficial stuff. Like talking about activity. Sure, devoid of any context, that's scummy. But does that alone make someone scum though? hm.
I'm down to give sabie a town read as well, she has to put more work in to get a conclusive read.
I think I'm good sitting at nova - et - sabie town for now. With the further explanation that sabie is town for weak reasoning, I don't want my legacy to be "yeah, sabie is locked town". She doesn't really seem that interested in solving the game and I don't know whether that's influenced by IRL or because she has TMI. She seems more excited engaging in off-topic stuff then actually writing stuff out and figuring the game.
I'm going on et's hand with the sabie town read, although something holds me back from accepting it 100%.
its like hes focusing on useless points as a way to force content
lets not turn this into the shitfest that was the discussion about shadeNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:33 pmOk, and what does that say about my alignment? Nothing. Thus it is a useless statement, regardless of its accuracy or not.therealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 5:24 pmthe statement 'nanook is being useless' definitely held merit back when it was saidNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:08 pmIt actually doesn’t—whether someone has done something or not less than 24 hours into a game is very rarely relevant to their alignment, as almost nobody has done anything actually relevant to that pointtherealet wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 6:42 amat the time your iso was a a clusterfuck of nothing so that statement holds meritNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:06 am Btw saying X player’s posting is useless is a) kind of rude and b) also in itself useless
The fact is most posts in a mafia game are useless and not helpful for determining alignment, accept it and get over yourself.
