ya that was the intended joke, was meant to be a bit tongue in cheek
thanks for the host, there were definitely some cool elements to the setup. inventor was pretty cool; most of the roles in general were pretty cool, i like the concept of flavorcops, etc etc.
Search found 527 matches
Return to “Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]”
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:37 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:34 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
village mvp*
not to take away from nanooks performance lol
not to take away from nanooks performance lol
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:34 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
appreciate the positivity
you really were mvp on multiple levels imo
sorry i couldnt help get there with you
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:31 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
never fucking host role madness with postcap ever again
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:27 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
look at it from amy povNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:27 amEh, I mean...if you know maj is a thing, you've gotta play around it or accept the consequences imo. We've played light games with hammer in the past and town's used it fineiaafr wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:23 ami think thats unfair to the town players who didnt participate or condone the majs thoughNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:22 am I mean uh
The hammers were largely town driven, with the exception of Alison where most people (myself included!) hadn't read the rules closely enough, it's town's fault for hammering when they maybe shouldn't have. There's no mandatory use of hammer /shrug
especially the ones who literally werent there to even be able to voice disagreement (amy mainly)
is she to share the entire rest of the town's blame for the recklessness?
im talking about on a "every individual players" pov not a "town as a whole" pov
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:26 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
i was a part of 1 out of 3 majs and yeah i regret my part in that maj (proto)
i still feel robbed of a proper game from the other 2 happening though
i still feel robbed of a proper game from the other 2 happening though
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:23 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
i think thats unfair to the town players who didnt participate or condone the majs thoughNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:22 am I mean uh
The hammers were largely town driven, with the exception of Alison where most people (myself included!) hadn't read the rules closely enough, it's town's fault for hammering when they maybe shouldn't have. There's no mandatory use of hammer /shrug
especially the ones who literally werent there to even be able to voice disagreement (amy mainly)
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:22 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
oh yeah
benson
right
almost blocked that out just now
benson
right
almost blocked that out just now
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:21 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
the alison maj was literally accidentalTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:20 amyeah. we had it enabled on a previous light game with no problems, but here town decided that utilizing the mechanic as much as possible was a great idea. That option should not have been granted to them, it's against the spirit of what is ostensibly the format.
only the proto maj was intentional and egregious (and again, 5 town players shouldnt be able to decide for the entire playerlist to do that in the first place)
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:19 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
ggwp nanook
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:17 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
maj being enabled was a really really dumb decision though
people signing light games should not expect that the phases would ever be sped up for any reason
people signing light games should not expect that the phases would ever be sped up for any reason
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:16 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
yeah the bussing role wasnt the issue tbh that was just residual anni salt that i mentioned it in that capacity
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:13 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
also i still hate 3ps but im aware syndicate hosts love them for some reason
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:09 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
i mean frankly your play being completely thorough about the mech and exploring every possibility was probably correct
the fact that this game semi-necessitated that in a postcapped situation was fucked
the fact that this game semi-necessitated that in a postcapped situation was fucked
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:08 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
no your play was fine im just talking in general about the concept
i dont think enforcing a postcap in this manner is conducive to a game actually being light
almost curious what it would be like to run a "light in spirit, self-regulate please, no postcap" light game over an actual limit light game
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:06 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
im just gonna go with i wouldve both been far less tilted and i wouldve likely gotten there if the postcap+hammer situation didnt happen on the benson yeet day
i regret a lot of my play afterwards but still choose to blame the setup and the mechobsession gamestate it created
and i did sus nanook/radishes d0 too so there was that
i regret a lot of my play afterwards but still choose to blame the setup and the mechobsession gamestate it created
and i did sus nanook/radishes d0 too so there was that
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:01 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
ohTimsup2nothin wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 12:00 amThe day vig buss...I thought that was a brilliant play and was disappointed that it was forced.iaafr wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:57 pmare you referring to the proto hammer or?Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:56 pm FWIW I really think that was the play there even if it hadn't been forced
lacking context for this comment
i mean i agree specifically because the godfather mech existed
otherwise meh
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
are you referring to the proto hammer or?Timsup2nothin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:56 pm FWIW I really think that was the play there even if it hadn't been forced
lacking context for this comment
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
this setup in general was not a good "postcap light" setup
i mean i still dont think its a good setup in general but ESPECIALLY in postcap light
which im more and more questioning the concept of in general
60 wallposts is not light
60 iaafr posts is light
i mean i still dont think its a good setup in general but ESPECIALLY in postcap light
which im more and more questioning the concept of in general
60 wallposts is not light
60 iaafr posts is light
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
jk that prevents actions from working on the target is conventionally called "alien" or "jailor"NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:50 pm Tutu peeled me and got my godfather result kek
I blocked you and that’s why Amy failed
I was serious that every JK I’ve ever played with worked that way AFAIK
"conventional" jk is almost always roleblock + doc specifically ime
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
i would have enjoyed it a lot more if i were on the scumteam yes
especially if i had your role
very valid opinion
especially if i had your role
very valid opinion
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
like i said if all the roles were on this tier of power, the game mightve actually been funTonyStarkPrime wrote:Sun Jul 19, 2020 8:49 pm Jean-Jacques Rousseau - TOWN:
A citizen of Geneva
Political Philosophy
You are the town tiebreaker. If there is a tied vote count at the end of the day, you will be responsible for choosing the victim of the guillotine that day.
Decisions, decisions: You may note that right now the rules say that “ties in day polls will be decided randomly”. You can change the text to whatever you wish (that fulfills the purpose of answering the question how are ties decided), but if you choose to do so you may not mention any part of your own role and you may never claim to be able to break ties. You will be given a suitable fake claim should you choose this option. Finally, if you do so, your entire role card will be revealed upon your death.
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
even if we won i'd think that; i guarantee it
just completely unfun to play with this much mech and postcap and maj enabled
just completely unfun to play with this much mech and postcap and maj enabled
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
i mean ill be blunt this setup sucked shit sorry not gonna mince my thoughts
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:45 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
i really really hate buscredit roles now
im gonna instayeet the next player in one of my games who dayvigs scum and im gonna get universally roasted when theyre actually town
im gonna instayeet the next player in one of my games who dayvigs scum and im gonna get universally roasted when theyre actually town
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
(like i was imagining your role being a town role that misclears nanook for no reason)
(it was a half joke but lmfao it was actually right)
(it was a half joke but lmfao it was actually right)
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:40 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
i mean i had moments of doubt
and that one especially was one where i was living in a v!amy w!nanook possibility
but yeah i mean
yeah
mechanics
and that one especially was one where i was living in a v!amy w!nanook possibility
but yeah i mean
yeah
mechanics
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
- Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
very interesting and cool setupNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:31 pm Gg guys and gals
The day vig could only be used on mafia kek
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [NIGHT 5]
good luck town
enjoyed memeing, really need to take a break from mafia in general because I literally can't sleep properly when playing sometimes
sorry for the game integrity issues
still think I should've just been mked d3
![Happy :)](./images/smilies/happy.gif)
![Happy :)](./images/smilies/happy.gif)
![Happy :)](./images/smilies/happy.gif)
![Happy :)](./images/smilies/happy.gif)
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
LIKE I WANNA VENT TO EPI LMFAOOOO
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 1]
literally had trouble figuring out who was the mod when I wanted to vent earlier because it's fucking buried on page 10 and there's no indication on page 1TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:08 pmhey guys, please keep this in mind and keep personal attacks to a minimum. Tensions can run high, but please remain civil in the thread. I'm sure Epi would love to hear from you if you have complaints, or you can direct them directly at me.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 12:40 pm Good day, scholars, sages, and scribes.
If you find yourself frustrated at any time during your deliberations, whether you are angry with another participant or you have a grievance with your host, please direct any of that displeasure to my inbox privately and we can engage in friendly discourse over your concerns.
May your time here be intellectually stimulating and civil.![]()
also rabbit you're at 61 posts
linki now you're at like 65
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
[mention]TonyStarkPrime[/mention]
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
MODKILL ME YOU SHOULDVE MODKILLED ME N3
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
postcap Pius majority enabled LOOOOOOOOOOOOL
don't even have the energy to make it a meme
fuck this game fuck this town
don't even have the energy to make it a meme
fuck this game fuck this town
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
literal honorary scum or falsely cleared scum
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
this game format is so fucking dumb
fucking d3 hammer while I'm postcapped
so I have to live with this nutella player
fucking d3 hammer while I'm postcapped
so I have to live with this nutella player
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
hey Amy LC if you can win on a 2 scum world pls just hammer me I want out
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:02 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
vote me genius
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
actually fuck it I'll invite let's see what happens in the eod hour
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
I voted LC IDGAF
Nutella if you're town you're like
the worst parts of me without the actual stability in lategame
Nutella if you're town you're like
the worst parts of me without the actual stability in lategame
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
IM SO MAD NUTELLAS ALIVE INSTEAD OF BENSON
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
I'm SO MAD AMY DIDNT DIE D3 I FUCKING HATE THIS GAME
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 1:01 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
still ultimately waiting to see + consider what amy comes up with anyhow
but yes i still havent thought out all the possibilities of why tutuus check on hally failed
i feel like roleblocker is fundamentally more likely than ascetic but it all feels like idle speculation because it's just a black box of unknown scum roles
linki edit: yeah i mean ive seen all those posts and i see how they fit into your narrative, but none of it is out of the realm of "scum roleplaying that role" to me. sorry.
one funny thing those quotes did achieve is getting me to tinfoil lc/nutella again lmao
atp it would probably be amy posts that could potentially shatter my worldview if anything but i cant imagine what that would entail
but yes i still havent thought out all the possibilities of why tutuus check on hally failed
i feel like roleblocker is fundamentally more likely than ascetic but it all feels like idle speculation because it's just a black box of unknown scum roles
linki edit: yeah i mean ive seen all those posts and i see how they fit into your narrative, but none of it is out of the realm of "scum roleplaying that role" to me. sorry.
one funny thing those quotes did achieve is getting me to tinfoil lc/nutella again lmao
atp it would probably be amy posts that could potentially shatter my worldview if anything but i cant imagine what that would entail
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:49 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
could you quote what you believe should come off as real and not contrived?Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:43 amI think a planned roleplay would have played out much more smoothly, and the way things did play out objectively point to it being real, and not contrived.iaafr wrote: ↑Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:28 amare you asking me to not give you the respect that you couldve come up with and roleplayed a town->3p role after seeing a scum role + the rules? are you saying youd never actually come up with that as a fakeclaim as scum, in a game where scum pretty much need to come up with ostensibly nonscum versions of their roles?
---
if any switch to amy is coming we're gonna have to wait till postcap drop to talk that out anyhow (and im not even sure how much i believe it)
(sidenote: this postcap definitely feels constricting in later phases when the small playercount + heavy mech probably means having a higher postcap would be cromulent but meh)
like all mech aside, here is my order of towniness inside the poe
hally >> amy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lc
entire playerlist version?
tutuu >> nanook / hally >> nutella >>> amy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lc
idk this game is so fucky. if nutellas a godfather we loltsp? if nanook is a role specifically designed to get falsely cleared by v!amy's role we loltsp?
i hate how i essentially have no baseline for how much i should be tinfoiling weird shit
so i will continue to live in the basic world where the basic poe is amy/hally/lc even though amy/hally both have quite villagery moments at times.
so ultimately i wanna kill lc first no matter what.
- Wed Jul 29, 2020 12:28 am
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
i mean sorry if you are what you claim, but that's just not something that could ever on its own, make me vote hally over you
are you asking me to not give you the respect that you couldve come up with and roleplayed a town->3p role after seeing a scum role + the rules? are you saying youd never actually come up with that as a fakeclaim as scum, in a game where scum pretty much need to come up with ostensibly nonscum versions of their roles?
i believe you that you've consistently played as if you're town=>3p who wants to hammer scum. i don't believe you that coming up with that claim is out of the question for scum!you. i don't particularly believe you've played particularly townsided in general, you've just pretty much followed the tides all game.
if you don't independently case hally as scum, or some way to prove that you could never be scum faking your role (and im not sure this is actually possible), i'm probably not voting hally. i mean full disclosure, even if you do those things, i'm probably not going to buy it at this point; though idk, i keep a pretty open mind in general when things give me real reason to doubt my convictions (which are usually weak in the first place, but this is like a pretty mechanically tight situation lol)
[mention]nutella[/mention] are you still leaning voting hally over lc here? im still personally very inclined to buy hally town amy/lc scum so.... i mean... mechanically thats not the loss if you vote that way, just. well you either trust me or you trust tutuu i guess; i feel pretty commited to straight opposing tutuu's worldview atp.
51/60 i think
and even in the world lc isnt lying, i still would rather vote amy over hally rn? idk. tutuu believes hally has more scum equity than amy in this situation; i certainly don't.
are you asking me to not give you the respect that you couldve come up with and roleplayed a town->3p role after seeing a scum role + the rules? are you saying youd never actually come up with that as a fakeclaim as scum, in a game where scum pretty much need to come up with ostensibly nonscum versions of their roles?
i believe you that you've consistently played as if you're town=>3p who wants to hammer scum. i don't believe you that coming up with that claim is out of the question for scum!you. i don't particularly believe you've played particularly townsided in general, you've just pretty much followed the tides all game.
if you don't independently case hally as scum, or some way to prove that you could never be scum faking your role (and im not sure this is actually possible), i'm probably not voting hally. i mean full disclosure, even if you do those things, i'm probably not going to buy it at this point; though idk, i keep a pretty open mind in general when things give me real reason to doubt my convictions (which are usually weak in the first place, but this is like a pretty mechanically tight situation lol)
[mention]nutella[/mention] are you still leaning voting hally over lc here? im still personally very inclined to buy hally town amy/lc scum so.... i mean... mechanically thats not the loss if you vote that way, just. well you either trust me or you trust tutuu i guess; i feel pretty commited to straight opposing tutuu's worldview atp.
51/60 i think
and even in the world lc isnt lying, i still would rather vote amy over hally rn? idk. tutuu believes hally has more scum equity than amy in this situation; i certainly don't.
- Tue Jul 28, 2020 10:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Rackets
- Topic: Philosophers' Mafia [ENDGAME]
- Replies: 4009
- Views: 37330
Re: Philosophers' Mafia [DAY 5]
it's actually not obvious at all to me that hally is lock scum, and i've read tutuu's case
i mean tutuu's confidence still stems from a pretty loaded assumption about how amy/hally would act as V in the gamestate of reacting to last day's mech, and i don't see it as a given that v!hally always just buries amy like tutuu seems to have expected.
that aside, there still is no holistic burial of hally. you say tutuu's case should be sufficient; well, it clearly isnt for me. so help me see it better by reiterating/rephrasing what's so compelling about tutuu's case? or bury hally otherwise, since you seem to think they're lock scum now?
fmpov a you+amy world is still perfectly likely. help me see how that world might be impossible and/or help me see how hally is locked scum, and i will more strongly consider voting hally over you.