Search found 464 matches

by Quin
Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:11 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:03 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:07 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:59 pm
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:32 am I moved my vote to Epignosis because his case rejects common sense.
Like here's an example. Epi was 109% right about Jimmy.
And his case was 110% bullshit. Good Day.
I can't explain why exactly. But the last time I saw someone make this kind of post, it was me. And I was lynched immetiately. And flipped bad.

There is something in it that feels like you are not really happy for the civ victory. You are arguing against it.
I'd argue against this but all I'd be doing is whinging, so I wont. Put short, I'm happy for lynching scum, but Epi's case was no good.
by Quin
Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:58 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

Quin wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:56 pm Long Con
5
29%
Voters: Elohcin, colonialbob, nutella, Sloonei, Kylemii

nutella
6
35%
Voters: sprityo, speedchuck, Jackofhearts2005, Long Con, Quin, Dragon D. Luffy

Day 1 ties ended in a no lynch, Marmot said as much. If one of the LC voters is Everest, the tie is doable. The other secret roles are also doable but it's unlikely they involve vote manipulation since there are 3 such roles publicly shown.
lynch survival role too ^
by Quin
Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:56 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

Long Con
5
29%
Voters: Elohcin, colonialbob, nutella, Sloonei, Kylemii

nutella
6
35%
Voters: sprityo, speedchuck, Jackofhearts2005, Long Con, Quin, Dragon D. Luffy

Day 1 ties ended in a no lynch, Marmot said as much. If one of the LC voters is Everest, the tie is doable. The other secret roles are also doable but it's unlikely they involve vote manipulation since there are 3 such roles publicly shown.
by Quin
Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:41 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:05 pm
Sloonei wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2017 12:20 pm Also I am a suspect to you because you believe I bussed Jay. How can you treat my line of suspicion as illegitimate? We're looking for the same thing; it's just our results that are different.
No. You're a suspect to me because

1) I believe Jimmy and Dom/Mal are w/w and you voted to save Dom/Mal. Worse, you did so with no reasoning or conviction.

2) You voted Wilgy with all my other suspects instead of Jimmy or Speed, which no explanation, creating a scenario where the only town read of mine between the three of them was more likely to be lynched as of an hour before EOD.

3) You keep handwaiving the incredibly strong cases against Mal (obviously saved by Jimmy) and Quin (obviously trying to save Mal and then Jimmy and refuses to say why).


I don't actually care one way or another about your vote for Jimmy. If you hadn't voted or said anything at all, the outcome would be the same.
You sure like to push this narrative, but we all know that you're just lazy. :nicenod:
by Quin
Sun Dec 03, 2017 7:37 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

Sloonei wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2017 4:34 pm
dunya wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2017 4:28 pm I think the "hi Quin" is an inside joke between them and unrelated to this game. Quin would be able to clarify.
i think he was just slipping that in every time he used a word or phrase Quin doesn't like
I initially thought he was calling me out for lurking but this is it.
by Quin
Sun Dec 03, 2017 3:53 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

I will, but I haven't had much interest in this game today. And I'm walking out the door to go out right now.
by Quin
Sun Dec 03, 2017 3:52 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

No.
by Quin
Sun Dec 03, 2017 3:35 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 1]

Sloonei wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2017 3:02 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:05 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:26 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2017 12:00 am
Epignosis wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:55 pm How about Dom? He's a great lynch, am I right?
If the deadline was in five seconds I'd vote for Dom.
No hesitation in supporting Dom's lynch. I remain opposed to the idea of lynching malakim.
Sloonei, you may have already covered this but I have real problems with this assumption.

What I've noticed with traditional distancing is that a lot of scum like to keep their suspicious partners as "suspects."

This means if the town is hunting for 2 baddies, putting a teammate 3rd from the bottom in your rainbow. This means saying that you'll vote for a teammate or that they're the best option but ultimately not voting for them.

Why do you think Jay is not doing the later to Mal? Jimmy says he'd lynch Mal now if it was EOD but no matter how many times he was pushed, he refused to actually do so.

That screams "scumbuddies" to me.
I agree. I just disagree that malakim is the likely teammate. Sig and colonialbob look like better choices to me, and I'm also open to DrWilgy.
I don't think Wilgy is bad. He seemed like a genuine lynch target of 3J's. I think he was the first to give Wilgy serious attention which is already unnecessary if they're teammates. His posts don't appear as if he ever let Wilgy off the hook, either; there are various prods, a GTH bad read and an ISO.

That Wilgy ISO was one of four he did at the time. He also did ISO's of speedchuck, colonialbob and malakim. He gives a definitive read on all of them, except for malakim. That's a bad look. If they're teammates, 3J's ISO gives him some leverage to not vote for malakim if he ever became a top lynch candidate. He doesn't discuss malakim after the ISO except to say he wouldn't vote for him today and that he looked good in legacy.

I looked at his ISO's outside of that time period. He also neglects a read on Eloh at the end of her ISO, but he was already on her at the time and didn't let up after. I don't think he'd consciously or unconsciously leave out conclusions on 2 teammates ISO's, so my thought process has taken a hit. If one of them is more likely to be bad based on this, it's malakim.
by Quin
Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:38 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

I might be biased but I think I look town.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:37 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

k
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:59 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:55 pm
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:42 pm I called Epi's case bad. Which it was. You've just rejected the "why" for that perspective because [insert some dumb reason here]. I'm not defending myself because I don't need to. You're in a tunnel. Get out of it.
What is the why?
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:48 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:46 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:43 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:41 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:40 am
what's your best argument for jay being town?
Got none. Epi's case just sucks.
what sucks about it?
It rejects common sense.
How so?
<------------------------------
No reason provided.
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:54 am "Jay lynched Mesk over Dom even though he had a GTH town read on Mesk because Mesk had posts and that's suspicious" was his case. That's not even a misrepresentation.
Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:10 am What is worse for me is that 3J elected to vote Mesk over Dom because...Mesk had more to say? That's shit, and 3J should know it's shit.
That's a bad case and he should feel bad for making it.
No reason provided.
I said why once. Good enough for me. Unless you're interested in turning me into a cheap lynch, you'll look for yourself.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:42 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:38 pm
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:26 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:49 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:21 am Lol Sloonei what are you doing?
This post was made an hour and 40 min before EOD when Sloonei switched his vote to Wilgy without a word.

His next post was an hour later.
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:14 am does anyone feel like they can confidently say they have any idea what's going on in this game?
Can you explain what you meant by this?

Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:38 am
Long Con wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:11 am Took a final look at vote tally. Epignosis is here. Hasn't weighed in or voted yet. Planning to vote late to have the most control over the lynch? :eye:
Why? Is Jack in trouble?
Best post of the game. :biggrin:




I'm reading EOD Quin posts. Should I even ask what these are supposed to mean, @Quin or do you give up?
Dude, when I flip town you're gonna have egg on your face so bad. :beer:
If that happened, I'd just be annoyed that you made a defense of Jimmy you can't substantiate, didn't care to defend yourself and hurt your faction by not even trying.

Why would I even be slightly embarrassed? If our positions were reversed, you'd say this defense wasn't good enough and you'd vote for me.
I didn't defend him. I called Epi's case bad. Which it was. You've just rejected the "why" for that perspective because [insert some dumb reason here]. I'm not defending myself because I don't need to. You're in a tunnel. Get out of it.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:26 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:49 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:21 am Lol Sloonei what are you doing?
This post was made an hour and 40 min before EOD when Sloonei switched his vote to Wilgy without a word.

His next post was an hour later.
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:14 am does anyone feel like they can confidently say they have any idea what's going on in this game?
Can you explain what you meant by this?

Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:38 am
Long Con wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:11 am Took a final look at vote tally. Epignosis is here. Hasn't weighed in or voted yet. Planning to vote late to have the most control over the lynch? :eye:
Why? Is Jack in trouble?
Best post of the game. :biggrin:




I'm reading EOD Quin posts. Should I even ask what these are supposed to mean, @Quin or do you give up?
Dude, when I flip town you're gonna have egg on your face so bad. :beer:
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:07 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:59 pm
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:32 am I moved my vote to Epignosis because his case rejects common sense.
Like here's an example. Epi was 109% right about Jimmy.
And his case was 110% bullshit. Good Day.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:18 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

my eye is watering profusely and my antibiotics have disrupted certain bodily functions i would rather not be disrupted that's how im doing
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:12 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:11 pm
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:08 pm
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:06 pm
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:56 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:42 amQuin is bad for saving Jimmy yesterday, trying to save him today and continually arguing the cause against Jimmy is bad, is a misrepresentation and there was an actually case against Mesk because....nothing. Over and over he repeats these lies and cannot explain. Additionally, he repeated the "lets lynch lasagna" noncase while Domalakim and Jimmy were on the chopping block.
This makes me want to cry. And also throw things at you. Begone, Satan.
Gimme a short list of suspects
Eloh and Kyle.
I don't see Eloh being bad based on the work I just did digging through Jay's posts. He pug significant effort into kickstarting a bandwagon on her.

I could see Kyle. I hardly remember his name coming up at all in there, and I've had some doubts about him in isolation.

Are you able to elaborate on either one of these right now?
I am, but I don't have the motivation to do so. I have cases on them both in my ISO.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:08 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:06 pm
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:56 pm
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:42 amQuin is bad for saving Jimmy yesterday, trying to save him today and continually arguing the cause against Jimmy is bad, is a misrepresentation and there was an actually case against Mesk because....nothing. Over and over he repeats these lies and cannot explain. Additionally, he repeated the "lets lynch lasagna" noncase while Domalakim and Jimmy were on the chopping block.
This makes me want to cry. And also throw things at you. Begone, Satan.
Gimme a short list of suspects
Eloh and Kyle.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:56 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 9:42 amQuin is bad for saving Jimmy yesterday, trying to save him today and continually arguing the cause against Jimmy is bad, is a misrepresentation and there was an actually case against Mesk because....nothing. Over and over he repeats these lies and cannot explain. Additionally, he repeated the "lets lynch lasagna" noncase while Domalakim and Jimmy were on the chopping block.
This makes me want to cry. And also throw things at you. Begone, Satan.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:58 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [NIGHT 4]

kk
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 3:13 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

scratch that its 5pm haha lol
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 3:12 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

its 4pm in the afternoon and some people still havent hit midnight? these guys are stuck in the past
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:54 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

"Jay lynched Mesk over Dom even though he had a GTH town read on Mesk because Mesk had posts and that's suspicious" was his case. That's not even a misrepresentation.
Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:10 am What is worse for me is that 3J elected to vote Mesk over Dom because...Mesk had more to say? That's shit, and 3J should know it's shit.
That's a bad case and he should feel bad for making it.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:48 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:46 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:43 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:41 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:40 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:38 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:36 am Perhaps the most convincing point to me that my vote is currently in the right place is this: I fundamentally disagree with Jay on Mesk. That never happens. Sometimes we pull different interpretations out of things. But I don't remember the last time when we were both town and he presented a case that I thought was flat out wrong and misguided. I feel that way when he justifies voting for Mesk.

She didn't offer a whole lot of reads, sure. She was also a new player in a foreign land where all of us are scorching the thread with our posts. She couldn't keep up. No one blames her for that. when I looked at her posts, even when she was alive, I saw a player who wanted to be involved and make a name for herself, but simply could not at no fault of her own. I don't buy this "no civilian value" argument, I don't buy that her posts had no utility. They served the function of Mesk trying to engage herself with the thread. That's the first step every civilian has to take.
I fundamentally disagree with you but that isn't particularly shocking to me.
what's your best argument for jay being town?
Got none. Epi's case just sucks.
what sucks about it?
It rejects common sense.
How so?
<------------------------------
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:43 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:41 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:40 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:38 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:36 am Perhaps the most convincing point to me that my vote is currently in the right place is this: I fundamentally disagree with Jay on Mesk. That never happens. Sometimes we pull different interpretations out of things. But I don't remember the last time when we were both town and he presented a case that I thought was flat out wrong and misguided. I feel that way when he justifies voting for Mesk.

She didn't offer a whole lot of reads, sure. She was also a new player in a foreign land where all of us are scorching the thread with our posts. She couldn't keep up. No one blames her for that. when I looked at her posts, even when she was alive, I saw a player who wanted to be involved and make a name for herself, but simply could not at no fault of her own. I don't buy this "no civilian value" argument, I don't buy that her posts had no utility. They served the function of Mesk trying to engage herself with the thread. That's the first step every civilian has to take.
I fundamentally disagree with you but that isn't particularly shocking to me.
what's your best argument for jay being town?
Got none. Epi's case just sucks.
what sucks about it?
It rejects common sense.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:38 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:36 am Perhaps the most convincing point to me that my vote is currently in the right place is this: I fundamentally disagree with Jay on Mesk. That never happens. Sometimes we pull different interpretations out of things. But I don't remember the last time when we were both town and he presented a case that I thought was flat out wrong and misguided. I feel that way when he justifies voting for Mesk.

She didn't offer a whole lot of reads, sure. She was also a new player in a foreign land where all of us are scorching the thread with our posts. She couldn't keep up. No one blames her for that. when I looked at her posts, even when she was alive, I saw a player who wanted to be involved and make a name for herself, but simply could not at no fault of her own. I don't buy this "no civilian value" argument, I don't buy that her posts had no utility. They served the function of Mesk trying to engage herself with the thread. That's the first step every civilian has to take.
I fundamentally disagree with you but that isn't particularly shocking to me.
i underlined too much. Her not being able to keep up is what I disagree with. Her posts don't reflect that.

I totally don't blame her for not being around :bighug:
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:41 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:40 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:38 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:36 am Perhaps the most convincing point to me that my vote is currently in the right place is this: I fundamentally disagree with Jay on Mesk. That never happens. Sometimes we pull different interpretations out of things. But I don't remember the last time when we were both town and he presented a case that I thought was flat out wrong and misguided. I feel that way when he justifies voting for Mesk.

She didn't offer a whole lot of reads, sure. She was also a new player in a foreign land where all of us are scorching the thread with our posts. She couldn't keep up. No one blames her for that. when I looked at her posts, even when she was alive, I saw a player who wanted to be involved and make a name for herself, but simply could not at no fault of her own. I don't buy this "no civilian value" argument, I don't buy that her posts had no utility. They served the function of Mesk trying to engage herself with the thread. That's the first step every civilian has to take.
I fundamentally disagree with you but that isn't particularly shocking to me.
what's your best argument for jay being town?
Got none. Epi's case just sucks.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:38 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:36 am Perhaps the most convincing point to me that my vote is currently in the right place is this: I fundamentally disagree with Jay on Mesk. That never happens. Sometimes we pull different interpretations out of things. But I don't remember the last time when we were both town and he presented a case that I thought was flat out wrong and misguided. I feel that way when he justifies voting for Mesk.

She didn't offer a whole lot of reads, sure. She was also a new player in a foreign land where all of us are scorching the thread with our posts. She couldn't keep up. No one blames her for that. when I looked at her posts, even when she was alive, I saw a player who wanted to be involved and make a name for herself, but simply could not at no fault of her own. I don't buy this "no civilian value" argument, I don't buy that her posts had no utility. They served the function of Mesk trying to engage herself with the thread. That's the first step every civilian has to take.
I fundamentally disagree with you but that isn't particularly shocking to me.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:36 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:34 am
Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:33 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:32 am I moved my vote to Epignosis because his case rejects common sense.
Same case I had when I went to bad 48 hours ago.

Speaking of...
I said "bad."

I meant "bed."

I'm getting lynched now, aren't I?
-lights a candle for epignosis-
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:32 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

I moved my vote to Epignosis because his case rejects common sense.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:27 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:26 am
Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:23 am what does this mean?
If I am to be suspected for the inconsistency in my handling of Mesk, and that the suspicion is rooted in her lack of posts during that period of inconsistency -- that means the remaining explanation exists in the posts that were in place before the inconsistency. There was a time that existed wherein I gave Mesk a GTH good read based upon what I recalled of her content in the moment of the exercise. There was a separate time that existed wherein I looked at Mesks posts again and decided I didn't like them. This last notion is being ignored in Jack's accusation.
in other words

can't*
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:16 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Sloonei wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:14 am does anyone feel like they can confidently say they have any idea what's going on in this game?
I've been playing a game all day so I haven't been paying attention to anything that's gone on in this game in the past 5 hours.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:16 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

hi it's gotta be said my case against lasagne was more than 'lasagne had posts'
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:01 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 3]

Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:59 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:53 am Epi, they both enter into it.

If Jimmy thought Dom was bad and Mesk was good, how did those opinions flip?

Dom did nothing good. Mesk did nothing bad.

His opinions at EOD to vote Mesk were 100% false.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2017 12:43 am Hopefully this isn't huge as hell and is legible on mobile.

Gun to head reads results

Spoiler: show
Image

Please let me know if I entered your shit in incorrectly.
Oh. I misinterpreted your post. Right then.
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:53 am
Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:52 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:50 am i think epignosis is bad again guys
Why?
Why are you treating a GTH read as static?
I'm not.

What the hell is the point of "GTH reads" when you don't hold someone accountable for lynching someone he said was good over someone he said was bad when both were in hot water and neither had any additional activity?
Only one had an actual case against them. And it sure wasn't Dom.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:59 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:57 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:53 am
Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:52 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:50 am i think epignosis is bad again guys
Why?
Why are you treating a GTH read as static?
What would possibly change anyone's opinion of two inactives between the GTH and CFD?
I'm very persuasive.
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:53 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Epignosis wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:52 am
Quin wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:50 am i think epignosis is bad again guys
Why?
Why are you treating a GTH read as static?
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:50 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

i think epignosis is bad again guys
by Quin
Sat Dec 02, 2017 1:21 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

did someone say chinese fire drill?

*vote elohcin*
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:32 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Elohcin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:25 pm
Quin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:00 pm
Elohcin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:57 pm Okay...this is weird. I'm not caught up. Trying though. But I told Juliets that I would try to get into discord today since I haven't been in there is probably a couple weeks. I went in there just now and dunya has posted a pic in there of her laptop and it has a quote of mine and her talking about me feeling guilty or whatever. She also says I'm lurking. She refers to my post when I ask for a catch up and say something like, I'm not trying to cheat. I feel the need to address this. First of all...what is that doing in discord. Second, I'm not lurking. I have been super busy as I have said. I have kept the page open so I can read here and there throughout the day as Im waiting on cupcakes to bake or nuts to roast or laundry to heck...food to finish heating in the microwave. I haven't really had the cahnce to actually post though b/c I'm STILL catching up even now. And I was not feeling guilty. I just was hoping for a catch up on the EoD and night since I wasn't here really. I called it cheating because I was asking someone else to tell me what happened rather than reading it myself. Anyway... still catching up.
I'll forgive you as long as I get a cupcake.
How about three banana split cupcakes with a chocolate ganache filling, whipped cream frosting, candied walnuts, caramel drizzle, and cheeries on top?
Image
Image
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:33 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Kylemii wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:33 pm Either way it's a worthless question, don't you think?
No :noble:
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:26 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

and with that drwilgy has become a 10 year old boy
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:22 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Kylemii wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:18 pm
Quin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:09 pm
Kylemii wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:04 pm
Quin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:02 pm
DrWilgy wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:58 pm
Quin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:54 pm I am currently debating a vote for either Eloh or Kyle. Somebody talk to me about these people.
Talk to me.

Something about Eloh had held me ealier. She had stated that my exclamation about not being able to read Daisy felt super scummy, but immediately backed off. I couldn't tell if what I was saying was an actual scum tell of hers that I triggered or if she was looking for things to call scummy and pulled the trigger too soon. Did you read this? I kimda forgot until now.

Kyle... Kyle. I haven't interacted with Kyle directly I dont think. What has you mumbling is name late at night?
oops

On Kyle - I think back to those posts I pulled. I don't think I'm reaching when I say that Kyle was hiding behind Pirate mafia meta. I had a little beef with him on Day 1 which I might look at again as well. I think he dissuaded me on it at the time.
Please recall that the posts you pulled were all in response to players specifically comparing meta. I'm not hiding behind anything.
Not all of them. And I already told you why I don't think that matters in my argument.
Please remind me why the questions I was answering don't matter to the context of the answers I was giving?
Quin wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:22 pm
Kylemii wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:19 pm
Quin wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2017 10:13 pm I have a grievance with the amount of times Kyle has used his Pirate Mafia performance as a way to fend off suspicion. He played games somewhere else that he's also talked about but I didn't quote them. No, I don't care that most of these are direct accusations about his Pirates performance. I think he's using meta as a shield.
You should care that those were in direct response to meta accusations. Why wouldn't you care about that?
You're rejecting perceptions before easing concerns. You're saying "I wasn't an active force in Pirates" when you should be saying "I'm actually not someone who takes the front line" if what they're saying is false about your playstyle.
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:11 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

dunya wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:07 pm I already explained why I town read sig, it's 1.05am, I really can't be arsed to explain it again right now tbh but JoH recently posted a link to that. I've played a few games, all town sig, and this is exactly what sig does. Those posts he has contributed, nothing stands out for me at all.

As for why you and speedchuck: I think you're an unlikely pairing, but I feel one of you is bad. After my isos I'll let you know who's good and who's bad.
But why are we an unlikely pairing?
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:10 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

DrWilgy wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:09 pm
Kylemii wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:04 pmI'm not hiding behind anything.
You see thats the difference between you and me Kyle. I'm always hiding behind a facade of smiles and forced concepts of self worth. Even a facade of hope to an extent. Anxiety and depression is a real bitch.
that's deep, dunsparce. :noble:
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:09 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Kylemii wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:04 pm
Quin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:02 pm
DrWilgy wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:58 pm
Quin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:54 pm I am currently debating a vote for either Eloh or Kyle. Somebody talk to me about these people.
Talk to me.

Something about Eloh had held me ealier. She had stated that my exclamation about not being able to read Daisy felt super scummy, but immediately backed off. I couldn't tell if what I was saying was an actual scum tell of hers that I triggered or if she was looking for things to call scummy and pulled the trigger too soon. Did you read this? I kimda forgot until now.

Kyle... Kyle. I haven't interacted with Kyle directly I dont think. What has you mumbling is name late at night?
oops

On Kyle - I think back to those posts I pulled. I don't think I'm reaching when I say that Kyle was hiding behind Pirate mafia meta. I had a little beef with him on Day 1 which I might look at again as well. I think he dissuaded me on it at the time.
Please recall that the posts you pulled were all in response to players specifically comparing meta. I'm not hiding behind anything.
Not all of them. And I already told you why I don't think that matters in my argument.
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:08 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

dunya wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:07 pm I already explained why I town read sig, it's 1.05am, I really can't be arsed to explain it again right now tbh but JoH recently posted a link to that. I've played a few games, all town sig, and this is exactly what sig does. Those posts he has contributed, nothing stands out for me at all.

As for why you and speedchuck: I think you're an unlikely pairing, but I feel one of you is bad. After my isos I'll let you know who's good and who's bad.
I'm not really catching up as I should, I'm just sort of picking at things as I scroll down random recent pages. I don't mean to make you repeat yourself over and over.
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:07 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 1]

Quin wrote: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:23 pm
Kylemii wrote: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:20 pm
Quin wrote: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:14 pm
Kylemii wrote: Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:51 pm I'd really like to hear Mesk514's thoughts on current events. My thoughts are clouded by past meta and I think an outsiders' viewpoint could bring some clarity
Not a fan. It looks like he's hiding from the thread again. Kyle hasn't played with a fair number of people before (or at least since he's been on the Syndicate), so there's no real reason for being 'clouded'.

Also every 5 seconds in this post the Mesk mention comes up even though i havent even mentioned him and its driving me crazy
I have played maybe dozens of games with LC and at least a dozen with Epi.

Also, I'm not hiding??? I've been here posting all day.
But what about the other 16 players?
This kind of ties in with the point I made earlier about him being unable to insert himself early in the game. I've waffled on it because of what followed but now I'm wondering if it's really possible to have nothing to say about 16 other people just because 2 are at each others throats. The whole 'clouded' business doesn't even seem related to LC and Epi's spat.
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:02 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

DrWilgy wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:58 pm
Quin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:54 pm I am currently debating a vote for either Eloh or Kyle. Somebody talk to me about these people.
Talk to me.

Something about Eloh had held me ealier. She had stated that my exclamation about not being able to read Daisy felt super scummy, but immediately backed off. I couldn't tell if what I was saying was an actual scum tell of hers that I triggered or if she was looking for things to call scummy and pulled the trigger too soon. Did you read this? I kimda forgot until now.

Kyle... Kyle. I haven't interacted with Kyle directly I dont think. What has you mumbling is name late at night?
oops

On Kyle - I think back to those posts I pulled. I don't think I'm reaching when I say that Kyle was hiding behind Pirate mafia meta. I had a little beef with him on Day 1 which I might look at again as well. I think he dissuaded me on it at the time.
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:00 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

DrWilgy wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:58 pm
Quin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:54 pm I am currently debating a vote for either Eloh or Kyle. Somebody talk to me about these people.
Talk to me.

Something about Eloh had held me ealier. She had stated that my exclamation about not being able to read Daisy felt super scummy, but immediately backed off. I couldn't tell if what I was saying was an actual scum tell of hers that I triggered or if she was looking for things to call scummy and pulled the trigger too soon. Did you read this? I kimda forgot until now.

Kyle... Kyle. I haven't interacted with Kyle directly I dont think. What has you mumbling is name late at night?
I think so, but I didn't think anything of it. Wanna pull the post, Wilgy friend?
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 8:00 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Elohcin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:57 pm Okay...this is weird. I'm not caught up. Trying though. But I told Juliets that I would try to get into discord today since I haven't been in there is probably a couple weeks. I went in there just now and dunya has posted a pic in there of her laptop and it has a quote of mine and her talking about me feeling guilty or whatever. She also says I'm lurking. She refers to my post when I ask for a catch up and say something like, I'm not trying to cheat. I feel the need to address this. First of all...what is that doing in discord. Second, I'm not lurking. I have been super busy as I have said. I have kept the page open so I can read here and there throughout the day as Im waiting on cupcakes to bake or nuts to roast or laundry to heck...food to finish heating in the microwave. I haven't really had the cahnce to actually post though b/c I'm STILL catching up even now. And I was not feeling guilty. I just was hoping for a catch up on the EoD and night since I wasn't here really. I called it cheating because I was asking someone else to tell me what happened rather than reading it myself. Anyway... still catching up.
I'll forgive you as long as I get a cupcake.
by Quin
Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:58 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: Mountain Mafia [END]
Replies: 6258
Views: 180844

Re: Mountain Mafia [DAY 4]

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:56 pm
Quin wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:54 pm I am currently debating a vote for either Eloh or Kyle. Somebody talk to me about these people.
If Jack is good then i'm contractually obligated to think Kyle is bad.

Or announce a post I made on Day 1 was full of shit, but that would be no fun.

Now seriously, I've been having this lingering suspicion of Kyle for a while, but it's never strong enough.
Where did this lingering suspicion come from?

Return to “Mountain Mafia [END]”