MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:51 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:48 am
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:43 am
DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 1:41 am
Ah! An interesting conundrum! *Sits up from study and lifts paper to light*
Seanzie, can be scum in this scenario. When given the opportunity to expand thinking, a joke reply was given not even considering alternatives to the action of voting me.
EnderWiggin I do not have enough data on, this can be either way.
*Brings the paper back down and stands up, beginning to pace around his study*
Macdougall however intrigues me the most here. I do believe that Mac has a good read on me, but is either wrong or is wolf. I do wonder if town Mac pushes on me in effort to solve, but the fervor I see does not seem to indicate that this is in fact fishing. Yes, Mac who is good at reading me, I do not feel would commit this hard to a scum read on me at this point. This is potentially Scum Mac. I will review in the morning as it is time for the doctor to get some well deserved rest.
My studies on Jay the all consuming will continue tomorrow.
*Turns off the lights and exits stage left*
So do you think that town Mac should be townreading you for your play prior to this post? If so can you show me the parts where you've towntold to a degree where you'd expect me to notice?
I do not, but I do believe that town Mac would allow for more data before gauging someone he has a track record of reading correctly.
That is what's throwing me off. Your conclusion was drawn far more quickly than I'd expect.
However, the gusto I feel from your posts is in line to how I perceive town Mac. It is quite the contradiction.
Do you, Mac, feel as if your ability to read me has shifted at all in the past year? If so, do you feel it has improved or declined?
First sentence, since when have you known me to not be bullish with making reads immediately? I don't think my track record of reading you is superb. I've read you wrong quite a lot. I think I read you poorly when we first started playing, went through a patch of reading you really well, and then when you came back from hiatus and started playing more intentionally I lost my ability to read you because you were playing entirely new again.
In this game you just seem to be making posts for the sake of it.
I expect bullishness yes, but I expect it to reflect data available. For what this concerns, I do not think the data was available for your vote to land on me. A read, maybe, but for that to entice your vote and to be your most sound read is what brought about my interest.
Thank you for the explanation. If you do believe my interactions with Seanzie, Rondo, EW, and Lucy so far did not achieve anything, you are mistaken. Further, If I were just posting to post, would I not have more posts currently however?
So far, my research and study have lead to concerns with Lucy and Seanzie. With Rondo and EnderWiggin, I have not yet seen anything that would imply wolf play.
JJJ I have in a slight focus as well as their early read on Lucy contradicts my own.
I do believe that ultimately it is still in our best interest to keep Jay the all Consuming from absorbing our own Jay.