Search found 407 matches

by JaggedJimmyJay
Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:33 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

That would only prove a doctor exists, and I think Epi would have to realize eventually that nobody but Nanook can fill the role.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:29 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

I really need to start updating that spreadsheet
by JaggedJimmyJay
Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:28 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Nice start to 2020 for Syndicate civilians.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Tue Apr 07, 2020 12:20 am
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Sloonei wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 12:06 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 12:00 am
Sloonei wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:58 pm also long con's fake claim was actually joey votto. because he's canadian.
Best first baseman of the 2010s :nicenod:
without argument
a bunch of goons like to tell me it's Miguel Cabrera, and extra silly goons tell me Votto is a "fringe" Hall of Famer
by JaggedJimmyJay
Tue Apr 07, 2020 12:00 am
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Sloonei wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:58 pm also long con's fake claim was actually joey votto. because he's canadian.
Best first baseman of the 2010s :nicenod:
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:53 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Thanks for it, Salami. It's the only regular season baseball I have seen played all year.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:52 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Good game y'all. Home run.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:52 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Long Con wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:43 pm We lynched Jack.
justifies all of your efforts
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:29 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Long Con wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:27 pm Good game, by the books.
Very good game, sir. You were under fire the whole time and are still standing right now. To me, that's the mark of a strong mafioso.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:21 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Epignosis could have as easily lynched Long Con. No.

Michelle and nutella don't fit at all together. No.

It's not me. I can make the argument if people care.

The game is over. Let's get out of here eh
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 8:32 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Hi I’m Hunter Pence
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 7:04 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

salami would make me shit something fierce
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:22 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Great game, nutella. We had to pool our resources three-fold to come to this stance, because you're not an easy one to locate.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:05 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Getting a fucking phone call immediately after Zoom meetings. Fuck this bullshit quarantine
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:00 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

[mention]Michelle[/mention]
[mention]Epignosis[/mention]

Are we here? I'm not content to just sleep through the deadline. What of nutella's most recent posts?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:00 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:45 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:33 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:29 pm
Long Con wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:04 pm Although I do feel more confident in a Michelle lynch than nutella. :srsnod: [VOTE: Michelle] aubergine
Ugh this is so transparent. You are very happy with how stable my wagon is, you've had your winning mislynch given to you on a platter.
Why have you treated it like a source of utter boredom
What? I've been trying. You and Epi seem decided.
I mean you don't strike me as someone who is about to lose the game in 15 minutes
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:33 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:29 pm
Long Con wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:04 pm Although I do feel more confident in a Michelle lynch than nutella. :srsnod: [VOTE: Michelle] aubergine
Ugh this is so transparent. You are very happy with how stable my wagon is, you've had your winning mislynch given to you on a platter.
Why have you treated it like a source of utter boredom
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:24 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Michelle wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:22 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:54 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:52 pm Do you want to lynch LC?
I've wanted to lynch LC all day. The viability of such a thing may depend upon Michelle. @Michelle are you still present?
yes I am now
I think we're in the right place.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:03 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Okay this game is over.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:58 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:56 pm Fair enough. I'm more or less treating them equally and haven't had a specific reason to change (it's sort of looked like my lynch is a done deal) but if I'm more likely to be able to self-pres this way, works for me.

[VOTE: long con] aubergine
beep boop
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:55 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella and Michelle are not teammates.

Therefore, if Epignosis is a civilian then Long Con cannot be. He is the correct choice.

I think nutella is a more likely mafioso than Michelle, but I cannot claim total confidence in that.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:54 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:52 pm Do you want to lynch LC?
I've wanted to lynch LC all day. The viability of such a thing may depend upon Michelle. [mention]Michelle[/mention] are you still present?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:53 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:52 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pm I think you'd try to look similar but it would become evident that you weren't really considering every possibility as you have made an effort to do here. I think you'd fabricate those interactive analyses fairly closely but you'd lock onto one suspect a lot more easily and not be as willing to listen/dialogue with all the players
If I am a civilian, why is your vote on Michelle?
I don't follow
You suggested she was your favored vote out of some vague compatibility with me that Long Con does not share. If you've granted that I am a civilian, then that dynamic should be effectively meaningless.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pm I think you'd try to look similar but it would become evident that you weren't really considering every possibility as you have made an effort to do here. I think you'd fabricate those interactive analyses fairly closely but you'd lock onto one suspect a lot more easily and not be as willing to listen/dialogue with all the players
If I am a civilian, why is your vote on Michelle?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:46 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:45 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:24 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:03 pmI did exactly what I should for lylo analysis.
What one "should" do is in the fingers of the typer, but I really don't see anything resembling LyLo solving, LyLo desperation, LyLo frustration, or anything. Frankly if you're a civilian, I'd expect you to be way up my ass right now about something or another. You rarely trust me anymore when you're good. Why am I clear? You opened the day with tinfoil about me and the Nanook kill. Where'd it go?
Your lylo behavior more or less convinced me you are in this to genuinely solve it.
What do you think I'd do if I was a mafioso?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:46 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

[mention]Long Con[/mention] I don't think there's any way in hell the mafia team is nutella and Michelle. What do you say to that?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:26 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Unfortunately now that my department has discovered the ease of Zoom, I am finding myself in that damned thing all day. I can only be here sporadically.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:24 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:03 pmI did exactly what I should for lylo analysis.
What one "should" do is in the fingers of the typer, but I really don't see anything resembling LyLo solving, LyLo desperation, LyLo frustration, or anything. Frankly if you're a civilian, I'd expect you to be way up my ass right now about something or another. You rarely trust me anymore when you're good. Why am I clear? You opened the day with tinfoil about me and the Nanook kill. Where'd it go?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:12 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Michelle wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 1:55 amNow she's voting me in a post where is just a bare vote (Iso-ed her just now to see this). A villager don't suspect everyone in lylo and don't put naked votes. A too large pool is sign of scuminess.
Please expand on this point for me.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:10 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Michelle wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 2:14 am Jay found out I am alone. I like this take, because is true. He really shows his thoughts and feels to be a concerned villager.
But in fact we are 3 villagers and I think Epi completes the trio. It's not a triumvirate because I am not a man.

Here is my villa core at this moment: Michelle, Jay and Epi.
How do you feel my showing my thoughts differs from the things I did in the Game of Champions?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 1:51 am
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Seriously Epignosis. Why nutella before Long Con?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:18 am
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:16 am Not sure what more I can do at this point, but I'm town. I think it has to be LC and Michelle. If Jay (or god forbid Epi) is bad, I'm accepting the L.
Make the case and I'll be listening.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 11:16 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Summary concern:

Long Con and nutella have each endorsed theories that the other is on the mafia team (typically with Michelle both ways).

Why they suspect one another is a mystery. It is absolutely never stated in any meaningful way by either of them apart from nutella last page at my request. They feature each other by default while dedicating more resources to explaining why Michelle is a mafioso.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:32 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

[VOTE: nutella] aubergine
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:15 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

What makes you feel that way?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:07 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Epignosis wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:01 pm I'm at the point that if nutella and LC are civilians, I am prepared to take my first loss of the year. They add up in my head.
I lean toward the same pairing. The first lynch is still a very important choice though. No margin for error.

Everything collides at Long Con for me.

If you agree that nutella and Michelle don’t work as teammates (and believe that I’m a civilian), it’s where we end up.

If you can sell me on Michelle with your degree of confidence that’d go a long way.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:44 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Epignosis wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:41 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:35 pm
Epignosis wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:32 pm I think Michelle is a civilian. She looks lost, alone, helpless, angry, trying to figure things out, etc.

Does anybody disagree with that assessment?
I can see that being the case. I am not confident. The term "alone" may be most compelling in that her last real ally in the game was Nanook, at least until you at present. It's the "trying to figure things out" that has given me problems. I see raw effort; I am not sure I see sincere effort.
What's the difference?
I mean that she has put a lot of "effort" into the game, both in defending herself and in putting forth some manner of "hunt". There have been numerous instances wherein she has cast suspicion upon players for what I view as spurious or questionable reasons; it has made me question the authenticity of her hunt.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:35 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Epignosis wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:32 pm I think Michelle is a civilian. She looks lost, alone, helpless, angry, trying to figure things out, etc.

Does anybody disagree with that assessment?
I can see that being the case. I am not confident. The term "alone" may be most compelling in that her last real ally in the game was Nanook, at least until you at present. It's the "trying to figure things out" that has given me problems. I see raw effort; I am not sure I see sincere effort.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:06 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Sometimes when I get all BIG POST, threads die. I'd appreciate it if we could keep this thing moving. It's LyLo. Feedback is fantastic, and anything else is fantastic.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:51 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

If I am right that nutella and Michelle don't fit together and that Epignosis is a civilian, then Long Con must necessarily be a mafioso.

[mention]Epignosis[/mention] I'd be interested to know how you feel about nutella and Michelle as a mafia team.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:50 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

Are Michelle and nutella compatible as mafia teammates?

Michelle's stuff

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 2:31 am I think i will dig in Wiki infos about this sport.

Until now I have a secret TR and a town lean on Nutella for the ping !

I'm not sure what this is about, but okay.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 1:10 am
nutella wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 8:59 pm Idk maybe Dizzy was just right in the first place and Michelle is bad actually
Nut posting that at 4 am for me smh. When said Dizzy I am bad?


Softball response to a half-accusation.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 1:25 am
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:14 pm Let me rephrase

I'm blindly sheeping nutella's vote and idc what the garbage reason for it is
Why you don't care?

nutella is incidentally relevant. I don't care; readers might.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 3:23 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 1:07 pm
Epignosis wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 12:01 pm I don't want you to take offense, but if I knew nothing about baseball, your explanation about the designated hitter would only confuse me more. American League? What is that? Are all the teams American? etc. Michelle's reaction to your explanation sounded like, "Okay, we can check off interacting with one another" to me.
As someone who knows very little about baseball I thought her explanation made enough sense :shrug2: Plus, I agree with SVS in general that Michelle seemed to be putting too much effort into understanding the n0 poll when it turned out it had no effect on the game. I didn't try to make an educated guess, I voted the option that nobody else voted for so I apparently had the wrong opinion, but who cares it doesn't matter. Michelle took it more seriously. To be fair she just came from LC/BR's game where night polls did stuff, but still the dedication to do wikipedia research or whatever felt silly.
Good to know is silly to search something you know nothing about.
You all are overreacting at my curiosity here. :shrug:
And at least one is scum in this push for me.

Michelle responded with suspicion to the unnamed group of people suspecting her for Day 0 stuff. nutella was one of them; that's only clear given the name in the quote.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:07 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 3:39 pm
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 3:34 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 3:15 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:10 am
Michelle wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 4:52 pm
S~V~S wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 4:38 pm

For me, she seems to be trying too hard.
:ponder: this word, "seems" looks like you want to shade me but you can't because you don't have any reason to scum read me.
Second, this is scum language. It's "you don't have a reason to think I'm scum" instead of "I'm town".
I also agree that Michelle vibes kawaiii in the worst way in the very start of the game.

[VOTE: Michelle] aubergine
I like this post.
i dislike this post. Why do you like an oppinion who it's not true? The reasoning Dizzy posted to vote me it's not a townish way to put things.
I can say "i am town" but I don't trust anyone would believe it. My idea was correct because when someone scumreads based on shallow reasons I have to question the reasons of the read. Svs explained well after we interacted her thoughts, Dizzy took an opportunity to cast a bad vote.
hmmmm I dislike this post :meany:


why isn't MP allowed to agree with Dizzy? also, I made a post nearly identical to this, quoting dizzy and agreeing, and you didn't acknowledge it
it didn't ping me, probably for a reason. Quote it to me please and I will tell you why.

This exchange doesn't look like an association to me. nutella pulled the "I posted this kind of thing too, why am I not evil?" prod, and I don't think that's a standard approach to distancing. Small point.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:16 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:14 pm
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:12 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:06 pm
Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:05 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 3:47 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 3:37 pm

Why? I don't think she sounds anything like her towny self. Her shade of me is grasping at straws.

/cents.
How do you feel Michelle would be replying to your suspicion if she were town?
Maybe I am an idiot who don't understand but since I know I am town your wording is very bad for my eyes.
I am not even Esl so I may get things wrong but the way you put it is like you lock me scum and I wish to know why.
This is absolutely reaching. I'm talking to Dizzy, who has a perspective that you ARE scum.

It's called subjunctive mood.

These kind of posts are why I read you as scum. They aren't genuine. You're just throwing shade everywhere.

[VOTE: MICHELLE] aubergine
Everywhere is too much of a strech, sir! You started to tunnel me and if you think I am not genuine you are extremely wrong.
I think we never played before so you know nothing about me but you don't bother to find out.
I will gladly admit that I've tunneled plenty of times and it's turned out with mixed results, so I'm open to re-considering if you can supply me with the reason to do so.

I don't believe we have either, but I enjoy playing with new people.

Self-meta is a thing, and I'll take it for what it's worth, but how would you say your town game differs from your scum game?
Ask Nutella and she will say this to you.

I disagree with self meta as much as I disagree with day 1 associative reads.

Michelle invoked nutella to back up a self-meta (which was to disparage self-meta), suggesting Michelle trusts nutella at least as an authority on how she plays. This again doesn't look like typical teammate interaction.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:56 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:17 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:15 pm
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:14 pm Well if this comes down to english grammar I admit I never learned it, and i never studied this language. Wanna hung me for this?
You were the one picking apart my language though.
You know what, let's just drop it.

I understand how a thread can become hostile towards a townie, and I don't want us to just pummel you into the ground if you are indeed town.

Talk to me more about your reads. I'm sorry I don't quite understand your Dizzy one. Maybe I'll ISO you to see if I can obtain a better understanding another time around.
Dizzy felt unnatural for me. I need to Iso and explain again but for me is 11:40 pm, I am phone posting and i would do it in the morning.

I will explain where I am at with the reads for everyone in random order.
If we take everyone until now, Nutella still leans town, you idk honestly, i hope you are villager but I need a day at least to see where your pushes are going (assuming I am alive until next day).
Nanook is pretty calm but hard to read so he is null, LC i liked how he posted leans town, Svs i think it's my best town read, Mac can be villager too.
Epi idk, the vote on me looked bad but would scum Epi vote me in the first post? More likely he wanted to check me than hung me.
Dizzy I think is scum.

As is too often the case with Michelle, here's a read and I don't know what inspired it. Okay.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:03 pm
nutella wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 6:25 pm Wtf is going on nobody feels like themselves
Found this while looking at Dizzy's posts. Looks like town frustration, scum would speculate this fact instead pointing it.
Nut going near Svs in my reads.

If I recall correctly, this was a strong support of nutella -- given that Michelle also felt good about S~V~S (at least early in the game). Both S~V~S and nutella had voiced some suspicion of Michelle, so it's a dually-magnanimous reception. S~V~S was a civilian; that could suggest dissociation.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 2:44 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 7:14 pm
nutella wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 7:10 pm Nut, I know you are town. Or I at the very least think I know and that is all I can pray for. Look me in the eyes and take my hand. Would I ever be scum? Would I ever morder you in your sleep? Of course not! The very thought is absurd. I need you to know this. You're my only friends here.
TMI plus a pockety attitude.

Noticed the sub, i am posting this for now.

Michelle accused Dizzy of TMI when they called nutella town. If Michelle is a mafioso, this accusation only works if she has TMI. So that's something.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:03 pm
nutella wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:45 pm
Epignosis wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:41 pm subjunctive, fuck.
You used "was" instead of "were" :meany: :meany: :meany:
Nut share your reads pls

Prods 'n' things

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:13 pm [VOTE: Nut] aubergine
nutella wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:08 pm Could still be okay with a Michelle lynch but I feel like her townie posts balance out her icky ones at this point.
I didn't post icky. If you are fine with my lynch then you are bad.
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:18 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:14 pm
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:13 pm [VOTE: Nut] aubergine
nutella wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:08 pm Could still be okay with a Michelle lynch but I feel like her townie posts balance out her icky ones at this point.
I didn't post icky. If you are fine with my lynch then you are bad.
Nutes/me/SVS can’t all be bad
I town read all of you until Nut ignored my question earlier and said she is ok with my lynch.
So what's your point?
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:18 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:17 pm
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:13 pm [VOTE: Nut] aubergine
nutella wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:08 pm Could still be okay with a Michelle lynch but I feel like her townie posts balance out her icky ones at this point.
I didn't post icky. If you are fine with my lynch then you are bad.
These are the posts that initially made me suspicious of you, by the way. Would you say you're very reactive like this normally?
yes
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:22 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:16 pm
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:13 pm [VOTE: Nut] aubergine
nutella wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:08 pm Could still be okay with a Michelle lynch but I feel like her townie posts balance out her icky ones at this point.
I didn't post icky. If you are fine with my lynch then you are bad.
Eh? Is a civilian nutella invulnerable to errors?
Yes when is about the player whe knows better my meta in this game.
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:26 pm
S~V~S wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:22 pm I tried to stay caught up today, but the thread started moving too fast.

anyone have a tl;dr on why LC is getting votes? Is it just to save Jay?

@Dyslexicon Hope everything is OK with you, I will miss you, you made the thread a fun place.

I always find it disconcertingwhen one or two people take over a thread. I felt good about Dizzy though, so BOTD for now. i am gonna try to catch up totally, but for now am OK with my vote where it is.

linki,
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:18 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:14 pm
Michelle wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:13 pm [VOTE: Nut] aubergine
nutella wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:08 pm Could still be okay with a Michelle lynch but I feel like her townie posts balance out her icky ones at this point.
I didn't post icky. If you are fine with my lynch then you are bad.
Nutes/me/SVS can’t all be bad
I town read all of you until Nut ignored my question earlier and said she is ok with my lynch.
So what's your point?
You said earlier that me and Nanook were two of your stronger town reads, yet we have both voted for you. You seem to be able to separate suspicion of you from a person being bad in those case, why not nutellas? Did I miss something? I admit I am not fully caught up.
Nutella is the player who knows me better than anyone in this game. I have small expectations from anyone else.to read me based on meta.

Things take a severe turn here. nutella had voiced a little suspicion of nutella previously, but as soon as the word "lynch" appeared, Michelle lost her shit and turned hard against nutella. This continues the trend: I think this looks compatible with a civilian Michelle responding to wrongness, or a mafioso Michelle trying to fend off a civilian suspicion -- it looks less like the distancing of teammates. Michelle holds nutella to a very high standard here, fairly or not.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:15 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:04 am
Michelle wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:00 amSorry to butt in
Bless you for butting in
Michelle wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:00 amJay, what do you think about the last 3 mins changes of wagons?
I probably think less of it than many. I rarely find "X saved Y" type suspicions compelling, and I don't think a last-minute hot potato (this barely qualifies as that) implies someone was being saved or whatever. More people viewed Mac as a viable lynch than viewed LC or others as a viable lynch. I viewed Mac as an acceptable choice too.

Generally I don't think votes are a great place to look for mafia. I may be unorthodox in that way, but I know from much experience that votes are the easiest thing mafia members can use to manipulate games. They're so easy to screw with and lead people on goose chases. So I focus on behavioral assessment more than votes.
I think it's too early indeed to talk about this so soon but those 3 mins made me think if my vote was well placed and talking about it, not if I could change anything, I doubt now i voted a wolf. Nut was asking everyone to not vote Mac, if she would be wolf what good would bring to the pack to fight for the life of a villager?

I wonder if any wagon was for a wolf and if not, the change of votes was either an action of villagers, either made with wolves help.

After Day 1 ended, Michelle relented. The read is a bit topsy-turvy.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 2:07 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:45 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:44 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:42 pm If S~V~S is good, then my one-hour POE already feels decent at:

MacDougall
nutella
Long Con
Nanook
I was strong town reading nutella, but I’m finding it strange we can’t connect on our views and I’m also not see that intense revelation she can have as a townie, so I’m increasingly worried there. I’m torn though because I still feel like she’s been for the most part really trying to figure people out. What’s your more detailed opinion of her?
nutella is going to have to give me a lot more to earn that kind of credit. She has done some shit in recent games.
can you explain the cyan please?

Prodded me about nutella. Don't care.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:30 am
nutella wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 8:08 pmWat
You still didn't share your reads iirc.

Prod a la mode

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:18 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:15 pm Yeah I'm getting unusually sketchy vibes from a lot of Michelle's posts. This far into the game and I haven't felt the screen scream "Michelle is town" at me yet -- means she's probably not.

[VOTE: michelle] aubergine
you ignored me until now. As expected.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:20 pm I mean, Nut, how did you know Mac is villager when everyone wanted him lynched?

Why didn't you answer at my questions?

Why you expected a wagon to be formed to vote me?
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:20 pm Why are you underwhelming? nutella
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:04 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:42 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:18 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:15 pm Yeah I'm getting unusually sketchy vibes from a lot of Michelle's posts. This far into the game and I haven't felt the screen scream "Michelle is town" at me yet -- means she's probably not.

[VOTE: michelle] aubergine
you ignored me until now. As expected.
No? I believe I've stated a few times that you were in my poe and that you haven't caused me to townread you
You ignored my questions. So yes, you ignored me. Doesn't matter how many times you read me wrong, I know I told you at least once about this and I don't remember to see an answer at my post.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:06 pm What if Nut is scum with Jack?
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:07 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:05 pm I did not purposefully ignore you. I do not know what questions you are referring to. Come on.
There is no possibility, for no one on this forum, to not see a quoted post. Come on.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:08 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:50 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:58 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:36 am Town
Jack
Nutella
Dys/Jay

.....
Nanook
Epi

.....
Michelle
LC

.....
.....
Scum


:ponder:

Unless both power roles are in Nutella and Jay, we can pretty well guarantee a wolf lynch today since there's very likely 2 wolves in a 4 player POE and two innocent children.
:disappoint: How do you know there may be 2 PRs?
Like this, this is fake shade. Yeah, there are possibilities in the matrix for only one town PR and an extra vanilla, but are you suggesting that Jack assuming there are two is a slip or something? I don't get it. Lame attempt at a gotcha.
Why are you so concerned about Jack?

Back to suspicion. It's a roller coaster. Again this looks more like a) civilian indignation or b) fighting off a civilian who is right. Neither works for a mafia team with both of them. She even gave nutella shit for missing a post that had been quoted. When things get that petty, I tend to be moved toward dissociation.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:10 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:08 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:07 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:05 pm I did not purposefully ignore you. I do not know what questions you are referring to. Come on.
There is no possibility, for no one on this forum, to not see a quoted post. Come on.
I still don't know what you're talking about. When was it? Help me out?
I can't search on phone so fast. Look at your notifications
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:13 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:10 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:05 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:44 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:17 pm Looking better at Jack's reads without scum reads it's like a scum claim

[VOTE: Jack/Svs] aubergine
You were suspicious of the people who voted for Mac. What changed?
I think. I don't accept a stale read non deserved.
Can you rephrase this please
I had a TR on Svs day 1. At Eod I said she is not present, and I realised her 'case' on me is fake. Today Jack came but I don't think town Jack would make that reads list. So I am reevaluating an old read because is not deserved.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:14 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:12 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:30 am
nutella wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2020 8:08 pmWat
You still didn't share your reads iirc.
This? Is it just you asking me to share my reads? I did so. You must have missed it :shrug2:
not just that, I am sure there are more.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:17 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:09 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:08 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:50 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:58 am
Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:36 am Town
Jack
Nutella
Dys/Jay

.....
Nanook
Epi

.....
Michelle
LC

.....
.....
Scum


:ponder:

Unless both power roles are in Nutella and Jay, we can pretty well guarantee a wolf lynch today since there's very likely 2 wolves in a 4 player POE and two innocent children.
:disappoint: How do you know there may be 2 PRs?
Like this, this is fake shade. Yeah, there are possibilities in the matrix for only one town PR and an extra vanilla, but are you suggesting that Jack assuming there are two is a slip or something? I don't get it. Lame attempt at a gotcha.
Why are you so concerned about Jack?
What?
What make you say it's fake shade? I didn't adress at you more than the discontent of you ignoring my posts. and when I attack Jack you have something to tell me so fast.
So you are concerned about Jack.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:22 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:16 pm
nutella wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 6:40 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 6:37 pm I feel like everyone should have a pretty developed POE pool right now. There are seven not-yous and two of them are no good. Even two solid civilian reads nets a workable reduction, and I think we can do better than that.

Let's go.
SVS
Jay
MP

Michelle
LC
Epi
Nanook
@Michelle this was sometime after you asked me that. I guess I never responded to you directly, I apologize for that, but if you have read my posts you should have some idea of my reads. To update this a bit, Nanook is tentatively moved up for the claim, Epi is tentatively moved up for probably not killing MP, and the SVS/Jack slot moved down a bit for poe reasons and something that vaguely pinged me when he came into the thread last night. That leaves you and LC as the most likely scum in my eyes.
Cool so Jack went down for a certain not exposed reason, but I am the baddie. With LC. I know LC defended me but that, even if he is scum, doesn't make me scum. You don't look at all interested in solving, but in throwing someone on the chopping block :mad:
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:25 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:20 pm I'm not concerned that you're attacking Jack. He could be bad. I'm concerned that your method of doing so is baseless garbage.
I am not deflecting, I see you defending Jack. I see Jack having most probably TMI and presenting infos he shouldn't know.
Idk how to talk better. Is that a good reason to hung me?
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:36 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:18 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:13 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:10 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:05 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:44 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:17 pm Looking better at Jack's reads without scum reads it's like a scum claim

[VOTE: Jack/Svs] aubergine
You were suspicious of the people who voted for Mac. What changed?
I think. I don't accept a stale read non deserved.
Can you rephrase this please
I had a TR on Svs day 1. At Eod I said she is not present, and I realised her 'case' on me is fake. Today Jack came but I don't think town Jack would make that reads list. So I am reevaluating an old read because is not deserved.
OK but from my perspective you're only half addressing Jay's question here. You're explaining why Jack became a priority suspect, but you're not explaining why you've completely stopped caring about the Mac train and in fact turned around and shaded me for defending Mac when I thought you agreed with me that the train was bad. Can you talk more about that?
Yes. When the game has players that can each one talk good enough to keep themselves out of suspicion the only clues that can be found in the thread are the TMI moments. I wish to know if your read on Mac is not TMI. I see that wagon on Mac formed by LC, Jay and Nanook. And M7 but that is less important.
Maybe I am idiot but I don't see LC as bad. Jay as much as I took this game from his slot looks not like Jay from the previous game, so idk if he is scum, Nanook is un-cc-ed PR. So.. maybe I am wrong about that wagon.

I try to find answers. But this is bad and everyone put me at the wall like this is a bad thing.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:37 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:28 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:25 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:20 pm I'm not concerned that you're attacking Jack. He could be bad. I'm concerned that your method of doing so is baseless garbage.
I am not deflecting, I see you defending Jack. I see Jack having most probably TMI and presenting infos he shouldn't know.
Idk how to talk better. Is that a good reason to hung me?
I don't view what he said as TMI. I feel like you're purposefully ignoring what my actual point is.
Explain your point, mayne i didn't get it.

Remarkably, all of these posts are consecutive within Michelle's post history. This is a real-time exchange that elapsed 28 minutes from 1:09 PM to 1:37 PM my time. If they're teammates, then that means this would have to be pretty elaborate theater. I have my doubts.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:44 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:40 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:37 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:28 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:25 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:20 pm I'm not concerned that you're attacking Jack. He could be bad. I'm concerned that your method of doing so is baseless garbage.
I am not deflecting, I see you defending Jack. I see Jack having most probably TMI and presenting infos he shouldn't know.
Idk how to talk better. Is that a good reason to hung me?
I don't view what he said as TMI. I feel like you're purposefully ignoring what my actual point is.
Explain your point, mayne i didn't get it.
To me it looked like you were calling out Jack saying "both PRs" as potential TMI/slip. I think that's an unfair judgment to make on his wording. There's no reason not to assume there are two PRs.
Was the meaning of his post that he 'assumed'?. I think it looked like an affirmative sentence without doubt.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:57 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:54 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:47 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:44 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:42 pmI was convinced he is lying.
Alright cool. You said that this was suspicious to you, that Dizzy lied about the role cop role. Why do you think a mafia Dizzy would lie about that? What do they gain from that lie?
Idk. What would i gain from accusing him based on a wrong perception?
Yikes this is bad
Why?
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:06 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:59 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:57 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:54 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:47 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:44 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:42 pmI was convinced he is lying.
Alright cool. You said that this was suspicious to you, that Dizzy lied about the role cop role. Why do you think a mafia Dizzy would lie about that? What do they gain from that lie?
Idk. What would i gain from accusing him based on a wrong perception?
Yikes this is bad
Why?
You punted on the question and instead threw it back to jay with "why would I do this if I were bad" when imo the answer to that is fairly obvious.
No it's not. Obvious is the need to obtain a mislynch. Why are we fighting here? Do you push now for my lynch, imagine my green flip, will you be happy for it?
Why were yesterday the equality until 3 mins before Eod and Epi, LC, Mac and you were at 2 votes ?
Maybe a wolf wasn't in immediate danger.

Did you think at it?
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:40 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:11 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:06 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:59 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:57 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:54 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:47 pm
Idk. What would i gain from accusing him based on a wrong perception?
Yikes this is bad
Why?
You punted on the question and instead threw it back to jay with "why would I do this if I were bad" when imo the answer to that is fairly obvious.
No it's not. Obvious is the need to obtain a mislynch. Why are we fighting here? Do you push now for my lynch, imagine my green flip, will you be happy for it?
Why were yesterday the equality until 3 mins before Eod and Epi, LC, Mac and you were at 2 votes ?
Maybe a wolf wasn't in immediate danger.

Did you think at it?
Sorry I don't understand the question
Are you sure about that?
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:10 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:40 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:11 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:06 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:59 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:57 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:54 pm

Yikes this is bad
Why?
You punted on the question and instead threw it back to jay with "why would I do this if I were bad" when imo the answer to that is fairly obvious.
No it's not. Obvious is the need to obtain a mislynch. Why are we fighting here? Do you push now for my lynch, imagine my green flip, will you be happy for it?
Why were yesterday the equality until 3 mins before Eod and Epi, LC, Mac and you were at 2 votes ?
Maybe a wolf wasn't in immediate danger.

Did you think at it?
Sorry I don't understand the question
Are you sure about that?
I have to admit i didn't structured it well.
What is yellow is your question and my answer. I don't think is obvious.
From the green part is my oppinion.I think you beat around the bush about scum reading me and you should focus on more evident scum actions than my words, which can be (is not the first time) easy to misinterpret because of the way I am wording my posts.

I say I flip town and I wonder if you will be happy to see my green flip.

I show you that with 3 mins before Eod the wagons were tied at 2 votes. One idea is that no mafia was in danger. What do you think about this?
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:20 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:13 pm No, I would not be happy if you flipped green. But I increasingly believe that is unlikely and you aren't giving me any better ideas about who to lynch.

I think there is some chance the d1 wagons were all town, but a fairly small one. I think it is more likely that LC or Epi was saved.
Who and how saved them?
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 2:46 pm Are you saying you think everyone who had votes on d1 is town?
I am not sure. But may be. What if they are all town? The tied wagons I mean.
I know I am villager. I see on you sparkles of towniness who are defeating my paranoia.
I town read LC and Epi.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:23 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:18 pm So Michelle, maybe they were all town, and maybe you knew that all along. :shrug2:
You really want to see me dead? Nothing tells you why I don't give up?
I don't know they are all town, it's an hypothesis. I saw in many games that if no wolf is in danger they don't interfere with the mislynch.

How could I save anyone when I didn't even self press or switch my vote on Mac?
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:30 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:19 pm Or you're hard defending your teammate LC :shrug2:
Look, I am villager. Maybe I am an idiot and I was too honestly answering at Jay's 'test' and I jumped to conclusions not enough thinked in the game, but you tunneling me and reffusing to think at anything else is not a good thing if you are villager.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:34 pm Nut is 10:30 pm. I will answer in the morning.

It's mostly from how they worded some posts but to give examples I have to search.
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:44 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:32 pm
Michelle wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:30 pm
nutella wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:19 pm Or you're hard defending your teammate LC :shrug2:
Look, I am villager. Maybe I am an idiot and I was too honestly answering at Jay's 'test' and I jumped to conclusions not enough thinked in the game, but you tunneling me and reffusing to think at anything else is not a good thing if you are villager.
I'm not refusing to think. I am trying to find your townie spark and your posts just keep pinging me as bad. But I could be wrong and I'm trying to see different possibilities. I think there are varying chances for any of LC/Epi/Jack/Jay to be scum, and that's a dangerously large poe pool at this point so for now I am voting for the person I can point to the most reasons to suspect, and that's you.
My postcount speaks for me.Just saying.
And when I am scum I reread all posts to not receive this kind of heat.
And i am less jumpy at anyone for any scum move.

Remember how town mislynched GMan in the last game. Remember the hydra game in december when you were sure I am scum. I don't feel I have to give more self meta for you.

More of the same, albeit non-consecutive. Michelle dedicated a huge portion of page 3 of her post history to arguing with and dealing with nutella.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2020 1:37 am Grats guys, you are doing again the same thing you did in the previous game with 3 villagers in a row. Be proud of it.
I get now why they gave up, you are too selfish to accept you are wrong.


Let's see my wagon:
Epi said he will give 33% in this game, he gives 5%. Ugly way of playing no matter AI.

Nanook was just sheeping one or another, i don't understand this. If he thinks his red peek solves the game he is plain wrong because mafia is a team and in this game distancing is the key. Unless everyone talks in the game. But you all are ok with players who are answering with one word at questions and admire this nonsense. If they are mafia, you have zero content to work with.

Jay is an easy poster so high activity is not AI and he's imagining tests and PoEs. Town had bad results from his contribution in the games we played together. I don't trust him no matter AI. He is a genius mafia, good for him. Idk why, but I was town reading him when he subbed in the game. Maybe because he had a nice energy. I am not sure about this. His so called test is a trap and he choose to pick up my answer to push me.
Logic, any mafia would say no. I said yes. So what? And then he has like a revelation and said I am guilty. Lame

Nutella pretends to know to read me but she can't. Or she don't want to. We talked too much already.

At least one of this 4 is wolf, imo.
But I may be wrong.
If every single one is villager, then this town have a problem and we will loose this game.

I don't want to post more, I am tired to defend myself and I am not playing for this. My vote stays on Jack, his approach was bad. His reads looked fabricated and Svs's push on me in day 1 was a tunnel a villager should not make.

I may not come back until Eod not because I give up but because this game is depressing.

Good bye.

If Michelle is a mafioso, then this is a classic discredit of a civilian. Michelle could be innocent here too; what matters is that it's not the stuff of mafia teammates.

Spoiler: show
Michelle wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:54 pm nutella come tell me about your recent reads please
Michelle wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2020 7:08 pm
nutella wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:56 pm
Michelle wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:54 pm nutella come tell me about your recent reads please
Jack's flip threw me off but I still think you are scum out of the remaining candidates, along with probably LC?
You think bad. Jack's flip is a bad surprise for me.and idk what to think about his wagon, I was voting LC and I am villager, Nanook was voting you and so both scum are inside Jack's wagon.

So. Who voted Mac in day 1? With 3 mins before Eod, M7 and Nanook, and piled on him after were LC and Jay.
Off wagon were you on Epi and Epi on me. I was on you as well.
Where is scum, in Mac's wagon or off wagon?
How do you see this?

The antagonism persists in Day 3.

~~~

nutella's stuff not already covered

Spoiler: show
nutella wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 11:42 pm
nutella wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 4:50 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 4:40 pm
Epignosis wrote: Sun Mar 29, 2020 4:35 pm [VOTE: Michelle] aubergine
Lay off my scum buddy >: (

[VOTE: Epic nosebleed] aubergine
Did Epi get baited?
Have we forgotten this?

This is where my suspicion of you started. You tagged along on Dizzy's early prod of Michelle too easily.

nutella's suspicion of Epignosis was driven in part by his reception of Michelle. If nutella is a mafioso and Michelle is a civilian, this is an easy way to set up a scapegoat.

Spoiler: show
nutella wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:14 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:06 pm
Michelle wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 4:05 pm
M Plus 7 wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 3:47 pm
Dyslexicon wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 3:37 pm
nutella wrote: Mon Mar 30, 2020 3:35 pmSpicy.

I'm not so sure about Michelle anymore though. :shrug2:
Why? I don't think she sounds anything like her towny self. Her shade of me is grasping at straws.

/cents.
How do you feel Michelle would be replying to your suspicion if she were town?
Maybe I am an idiot who don't understand but since I know I am town your wording is very bad for my eyes.
I am not even Esl so I may get things wrong but the way you put it is like you lock me scum and I wish to know why.
This is absolutely reaching. I'm talking to Dizzy, who has a perspective that you ARE scum.

It's called subjunctive mood.

These kind of posts are why I read you as scum. They aren't genuine. You're just throwing shade everywhere.

[VOTE: MICHELLE] aubergine
OK now I think this is sort of unfair. I completely understand how Michelle read your post that way.

nutella stood in defense of Michelle re: ~subjunctive mood~. Means little to me.

Spoiler: show
nutella wrote: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:08 pm Could still be okay with a Michelle lynch but I feel like her townie posts balance out her icky ones at this point.

Purely balanced/neutral waffle. Okay.

Spoiler: show
nutella wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:49 pm If there's no peek I still feel like Michelle is our best bet.

[VOTE: michelle] aubergine

Michelle was nutella's backup lynch when the Long Con red peek was revealed false. Not sure I'd expect such a thing from teammates, particularly when the peek was known to be false by the mafia in the first place.

~~~

Conclusion

I don't think nutella and Michelle are mafia teammates. I can see arguments for either/or, but not for both.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:15 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:12 pm [VOTE: michelle] aubergine
The basis for your vote is my report on my own compatibility -- something I have no reason to think about at all until you ask me.

It's not based upon your review of that compatibility on your own terms.

What?
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:09 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:04 pm JaggedJimmyJay
What's the number one reason you can't be mafia teammates with Long Con?
What's the number one reason you can't be mafia teammates with Michelle?
It should be pretty apparent that I am not Long Con's teammate given not only the violence between the two of us, but the violence that preceded between he and Dizzy. It's not just mutual distrust -- it's righteous indignation, it's pissing me off with sarcasm, and it's my initial belief that Nanook's red check on him was real.

When I've accused Michelle, her responses have often stopped short of full-on No-U. If she is a mafioso, she has shown trepidation in returning fire -- perhaps fearing the volume of my voice at EODs.
by JaggedJimmyJay
Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:04 pm
Forum: Previous Heists
Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Replies: 1795
Views: 22786

Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]

nutella wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:59 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:54 pm
nutella wrote: Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:53 pm Your instincts are wrong :shrug2: Like, yeah, I can see why my LC interactions don't look great, because I'm never super confident about my read of him. Like I said I've always had a hard time reading him. He's just been sort of generally in my POE for most of the game.
You're no longer in a game state where you have to wiggle about on instincts. There is a wealth of analytic evidence, whatever you may think of it. What do you think is the best case that Long Con is a mafioso?
His reaction to Nanook's fake peek didn't feel natural.
He is compatible with Michelle, who is my other top suspect. (Yeah that's POE not a reason but whatever, you made the analysis so I'm not going to restate all the points there.)
His relation to the Mac wagon (both as a participant and a beneficiary) looked sketchy.
Who should be lynched first?

Return to “Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]”