Search found 407 matches
Return to “Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]”
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 4:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
thanks Syn!
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
That would only prove a doctor exists, and I think Epi would have to realize eventually that nobody but Nanook can fill the role.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
I really need to start updating that spreadsheet
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:28 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Nice start to 2020 for Syndicate civilians.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 12:20 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
a bunch of goons like to tell me it's Miguel Cabrera, and extra silly goons tell me Votto is a "fringe" Hall of Famer
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 12:00 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Thanks for it, Salami. It's the only regular season baseball I have seen played all year.
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Good game y'all. Home run.
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Epignosis could have as easily lynched Long Con. No.
Michelle and nutella don't fit at all together. No.
It's not me. I can make the argument if people care.
The game is over. Let's get out of here eh
Michelle and nutella don't fit at all together. No.
It's not me. I can make the argument if people care.
The game is over. Let's get out of here eh
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 8:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Hi I’m Hunter Pence
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 7:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
salami would make me shit something fierce
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Great game, nutella. We had to pool our resources three-fold to come to this stance, because you're not an easy one to locate.
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Getting a fucking phone call immediately after Zoom meetings. Fuck this bullshit quarantine
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:00 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
[mention]Michelle[/mention]
[mention]Epignosis[/mention]
Are we here? I'm not content to just sleep through the deadline. What of nutella's most recent posts?
[mention]Epignosis[/mention]
Are we here? I'm not content to just sleep through the deadline. What of nutella's most recent posts?
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 6:00 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
I mean you don't strike me as someone who is about to lose the game in 15 minutesnutella wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:45 pmWhat? I've been trying. You and Epi seem decided.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:33 pmWhy have you treated it like a source of utter boredom
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
I think we're in the right place.
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 4:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Okay this game is over.
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:55 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
nutella and Michelle are not teammates.
Therefore, if Epignosis is a civilian then Long Con cannot be. He is the correct choice.
I think nutella is a more likely mafioso than Michelle, but I cannot claim total confidence in that.
Therefore, if Epignosis is a civilian then Long Con cannot be. He is the correct choice.
I think nutella is a more likely mafioso than Michelle, but I cannot claim total confidence in that.
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
You suggested she was your favored vote out of some vague compatibility with me that Long Con does not share. If you've granted that I am a civilian, then that dynamic should be effectively meaningless.nutella wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:52 pmI don't followJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pmIf I am a civilian, why is your vote on Michelle?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pm I think you'd try to look similar but it would become evident that you weren't really considering every possibility as you have made an effort to do here. I think you'd fabricate those interactive analyses fairly closely but you'd lock onto one suspect a lot more easily and not be as willing to listen/dialogue with all the players
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
If I am a civilian, why is your vote on Michelle?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:49 pm I think you'd try to look similar but it would become evident that you weren't really considering every possibility as you have made an effort to do here. I think you'd fabricate those interactive analyses fairly closely but you'd lock onto one suspect a lot more easily and not be as willing to listen/dialogue with all the players
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
What do you think I'd do if I was a mafioso?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:45 pmYour lylo behavior more or less convinced me you are in this to genuinely solve it.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:24 pmWhat one "should" do is in the fingers of the typer, but I really don't see anything resembling LyLo solving, LyLo desperation, LyLo frustration, or anything. Frankly if you're a civilian, I'd expect you to be way up my ass right now about something or another. You rarely trust me anymore when you're good. Why am I clear? You opened the day with tinfoil about me and the Nanook kill. Where'd it go?
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
[mention]Long Con[/mention] I don't think there's any way in hell the mafia team is nutella and Michelle. What do you say to that?
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Unfortunately now that my department has discovered the ease of Zoom, I am finding myself in that damned thing all day. I can only be here sporadically.
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
What one "should" do is in the fingers of the typer, but I really don't see anything resembling LyLo solving, LyLo desperation, LyLo frustration, or anything. Frankly if you're a civilian, I'd expect you to be way up my ass right now about something or another. You rarely trust me anymore when you're good. Why am I clear? You opened the day with tinfoil about me and the Nanook kill. Where'd it go?
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
How do you feel my showing my thoughts differs from the things I did in the Game of Champions?Michelle wrote: ↑Mon Apr 06, 2020 2:14 am Jay found out I am alone. I like this take, because is true. He really shows his thoughts and feels to be a concerned villager.
But in fact we are 3 villagers and I think Epi completes the trio. It's not a triumvirate because I am not a man.
Here is my villa core at this moment: Michelle, Jay and Epi.
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 1:51 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Seriously Epignosis. Why nutella before Long Con?
- Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:18 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 11:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Summary concern:
Long Con and nutella have each endorsed theories that the other is on the mafia team (typically with Michelle both ways).
Why they suspect one another is a mystery. It is absolutely never stated in any meaningful way by either of them apart from nutella last page at my request. They feature each other by default while dedicating more resources to explaining why Michelle is a mafioso.
Long Con and nutella have each endorsed theories that the other is on the mafia team (typically with Michelle both ways).
Why they suspect one another is a mystery. It is absolutely never stated in any meaningful way by either of them apart from nutella last page at my request. They feature each other by default while dedicating more resources to explaining why Michelle is a mafioso.
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
[VOTE:
nutella] aubergine
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
What makes you feel that way?
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
I lean toward the same pairing. The first lynch is still a very important choice though. No margin for error.
Everything collides at Long Con for me.
If you agree that nutella and Michelle don’t work as teammates (and believe that I’m a civilian), it’s where we end up.
If you can sell me on Michelle with your degree of confidence that’d go a long way.
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
I mean that she has put a lot of "effort" into the game, both in defending herself and in putting forth some manner of "hunt". There have been numerous instances wherein she has cast suspicion upon players for what I view as spurious or questionable reasons; it has made me question the authenticity of her hunt.Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:41 pmWhat's the difference?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:35 pmI can see that being the case. I am not confident. The term "alone" may be most compelling in that her last real ally in the game was Nanook, at least until you at present. It's the "trying to figure things out" that has given me problems. I see raw effort; I am not sure I see sincere effort.
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
I can see that being the case. I am not confident. The term "alone" may be most compelling in that her last real ally in the game was Nanook, at least until you at present. It's the "trying to figure things out" that has given me problems. I see raw effort; I am not sure I see sincere effort.
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Sometimes when I get all BIG POST, threads die. I'd appreciate it if we could keep this thing moving. It's LyLo. Feedback is fantastic, and anything else is fantastic.
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
If I am right that nutella and Michelle don't fit together and that Epignosis is a civilian, then Long Con must necessarily be a mafioso.
[mention]Epignosis[/mention] I'd be interested to know how you feel about nutella and Michelle as a mafia team.
[mention]Epignosis[/mention] I'd be interested to know how you feel about nutella and Michelle as a mafia team.
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Are Michelle and nutella compatible as mafia teammates?
Michelle's stuff
I'm not sure what this is about, but okay.
Softball response to a half-accusation.
nutella is incidentally relevant. I don't care; readers might.
Michelle responded with suspicion to the unnamed group of people suspecting her for Day 0 stuff. nutella was one of them; that's only clear given the name in the quote.
This exchange doesn't look like an association to me. nutella pulled the "I posted this kind of thing too, why am I not evil?" prod, and I don't think that's a standard approach to distancing. Small point.
Michelle invoked nutella to back up a self-meta (which was to disparage self-meta), suggesting Michelle trusts nutella at least as an authority on how she plays. This again doesn't look like typical teammate interaction.
As is too often the case with Michelle, here's a read and I don't know what inspired it. Okay.
If I recall correctly, this was a strong support of nutella -- given that Michelle also felt good about S~V~S (at least early in the game). Both S~V~S and nutella had voiced some suspicion of Michelle, so it's a dually-magnanimous reception. S~V~S was a civilian; that could suggest dissociation.
Michelle accused Dizzy of TMI when they called nutella town. If Michelle is a mafioso, this accusation only works if she has TMI. So that's something.
Prods 'n' things
Things take a severe turn here. nutella had voiced a little suspicion of nutella previously, but as soon as the word "lynch" appeared, Michelle lost her shit and turned hard against nutella. This continues the trend: I think this looks compatible with a civilian Michelle responding to wrongness, or a mafioso Michelle trying to fend off a civilian suspicion -- it looks less like the distancing of teammates. Michelle holds nutella to a very high standard here, fairly or not.
After Day 1 ended, Michelle relented. The read is a bit topsy-turvy.
Prodded me about nutella. Don't care.
Prod a la mode
Back to suspicion. It's a roller coaster. Again this looks more like a) civilian indignation or b) fighting off a civilian who is right. Neither works for a mafia team with both of them. She even gave nutella shit for missing a post that had been quoted. When things get that petty, I tend to be moved toward dissociation.
Remarkably, all of these posts are consecutive within Michelle's post history. This is a real-time exchange that elapsed 28 minutes from 1:09 PM to 1:37 PM my time. If they're teammates, then that means this would have to be pretty elaborate theater. I have my doubts.
More of the same, albeit non-consecutive. Michelle dedicated a huge portion of page 3 of her post history to arguing with and dealing with nutella.
If Michelle is a mafioso, then this is a classic discredit of a civilian. Michelle could be innocent here too; what matters is that it's not the stuff of mafia teammates.
The antagonism persists in Day 3.
~~~
nutella's stuff not already covered
nutella's suspicion of Epignosis was driven in part by his reception of Michelle. If nutella is a mafioso and Michelle is a civilian, this is an easy way to set up a scapegoat.
nutella stood in defense of Michelle re: ~subjunctive mood~. Means little to me.
Purely balanced/neutral waffle. Okay.
Michelle was nutella's backup lynch when the Long Con red peek was revealed false. Not sure I'd expect such a thing from teammates, particularly when the peek was known to be false by the mafia in the first place.
~~~
Conclusion
I don't think nutella and Michelle are mafia teammates. I can see arguments for either/or, but not for both.
Michelle's stuff
Spoiler: show
I'm not sure what this is about, but okay.
Spoiler: show
Softball response to a half-accusation.
Spoiler: show
nutella is incidentally relevant. I don't care; readers might.
Spoiler: show
Michelle responded with suspicion to the unnamed group of people suspecting her for Day 0 stuff. nutella was one of them; that's only clear given the name in the quote.
Spoiler: show
This exchange doesn't look like an association to me. nutella pulled the "I posted this kind of thing too, why am I not evil?" prod, and I don't think that's a standard approach to distancing. Small point.
Spoiler: show
Michelle invoked nutella to back up a self-meta (which was to disparage self-meta), suggesting Michelle trusts nutella at least as an authority on how she plays. This again doesn't look like typical teammate interaction.
Spoiler: show
As is too often the case with Michelle, here's a read and I don't know what inspired it. Okay.
Spoiler: show
If I recall correctly, this was a strong support of nutella -- given that Michelle also felt good about S~V~S (at least early in the game). Both S~V~S and nutella had voiced some suspicion of Michelle, so it's a dually-magnanimous reception. S~V~S was a civilian; that could suggest dissociation.
Spoiler: show
Michelle accused Dizzy of TMI when they called nutella town. If Michelle is a mafioso, this accusation only works if she has TMI. So that's something.
Spoiler: show
Prods 'n' things
Spoiler: show
Things take a severe turn here. nutella had voiced a little suspicion of nutella previously, but as soon as the word "lynch" appeared, Michelle lost her shit and turned hard against nutella. This continues the trend: I think this looks compatible with a civilian Michelle responding to wrongness, or a mafioso Michelle trying to fend off a civilian suspicion -- it looks less like the distancing of teammates. Michelle holds nutella to a very high standard here, fairly or not.
Spoiler: show
After Day 1 ended, Michelle relented. The read is a bit topsy-turvy.
Spoiler: show
Prodded me about nutella. Don't care.
Spoiler: show
Prod a la mode
Spoiler: show
Back to suspicion. It's a roller coaster. Again this looks more like a) civilian indignation or b) fighting off a civilian who is right. Neither works for a mafia team with both of them. She even gave nutella shit for missing a post that had been quoted. When things get that petty, I tend to be moved toward dissociation.
Spoiler: show
Remarkably, all of these posts are consecutive within Michelle's post history. This is a real-time exchange that elapsed 28 minutes from 1:09 PM to 1:37 PM my time. If they're teammates, then that means this would have to be pretty elaborate theater. I have my doubts.
Spoiler: show
More of the same, albeit non-consecutive. Michelle dedicated a huge portion of page 3 of her post history to arguing with and dealing with nutella.
Spoiler: show
If Michelle is a mafioso, then this is a classic discredit of a civilian. Michelle could be innocent here too; what matters is that it's not the stuff of mafia teammates.
Spoiler: show
The antagonism persists in Day 3.
~~~
nutella's stuff not already covered
Spoiler: show
nutella's suspicion of Epignosis was driven in part by his reception of Michelle. If nutella is a mafioso and Michelle is a civilian, this is an easy way to set up a scapegoat.
Spoiler: show
nutella stood in defense of Michelle re: ~subjunctive mood~. Means little to me.
Spoiler: show
Purely balanced/neutral waffle. Okay.
Spoiler: show
Michelle was nutella's backup lynch when the Long Con red peek was revealed false. Not sure I'd expect such a thing from teammates, particularly when the peek was known to be false by the mafia in the first place.
~~~
Conclusion
I don't think nutella and Michelle are mafia teammates. I can see arguments for either/or, but not for both.
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
It should be pretty apparent that I am not Long Con's teammate given not only the violence between the two of us, but the violence that preceded between he and Dizzy. It's not just mutual distrust -- it's righteous indignation, it's pissing me off with sarcasm, and it's my initial belief that Nanook's red check on him was real.
When I've accused Michelle, her responses have often stopped short of full-on No-U. If she is a mafioso, she has shown trepidation in returning fire -- perhaps fearing the volume of my voice at EODs.
- Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
- Replies: 1795
- Views: 22786
Re: Take Me Out at the Ballgame! [DAY 3]
Who should be lynched first?nutella wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:59 pmHis reaction to Nanook's fake peek didn't feel natural.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:54 pmYou're no longer in a game state where you have to wiggle about on instincts. There is a wealth of analytic evidence, whatever you may think of it. What do you think is the best case that Long Con is a mafioso?nutella wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:53 pm Your instincts are wrongLike, yeah, I can see why my LC interactions don't look great, because I'm never super confident about my read of him. Like I said I've always had a hard time reading him. He's just been sort of generally in my POE for most of the game.
He is compatible with Michelle, who is my other top suspect. (Yeah that's POE not a reason but whatever, you made the analysis so I'm not going to restate all the points there.)
His relation to the Mac wagon (both as a participant and a beneficiary) looked sketchy.