Search found 294 matches
Return to “Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)”
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
[VOTE:
No TK] aubergine
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:02 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Was there fruit with the gun?
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
No offense, but I think it's seriously worth checking your sentbox.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:55 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
[mention]nutella[/mention] it may be prudent in light of this development to reveal our Thing. What do you think?
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
This may be one of those scenarios where circumstance has outed one of two (like a cop and counter-claim cop) which facilitates a lynch of someone else.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Note that today is LyLo. Filter all judgments through that lens.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
If you're out then you may as well say what else has come of your role.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Confirmed 100% mafia between Funnygurl and Epignosis. There you go.
I think Epi looks much worse than she does. And yet let the fight begin.
I think Epi looks much worse than she does. And yet let the fight begin.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:45 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
"Sloonei changed his mind"
That's the opposite of compelling. [mention]Sloonei[/mention] go ahead and expand on your handling of leetic anyway.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Alright Epi is bad. I do feel bad, because there's no good way for a mafia team to prepare for today's shenanigans.
Nonetheless, this is about as obvious as it gets. Interactive analyses can now expand to him.
Nonetheless, this is about as obvious as it gets. Interactive analyses can now expand to him.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Also I could almost feel the annoyance steaming from Epi's posts to start this day when nutella and I showed up.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:35 pmLynch my ass and see. Go on.nutella wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:35 pmThis smells like bullshit.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:29 pm I haven't read, but if JJJ and Sloonei are voting for me, fuck this shit. I'm claiming.
I'm a limited role blocker. I had to ask because my role didn't make any sense to me. In what way I am limited I don't know. But get your filthy votes of me.
I targeted Sloonei Night 2 and I targeted no one Night 1 because I goofed.
![Nice nod :nicenod:](./images/smilies/nicenod.gif)
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:29 pm I haven't read, but if JJJ and Sloonei are voting for me, fuck this shit. I'm claiming.
I'm a limited role blocker. I had to ask because my role didn't make any sense to me. In what way I am limited I don't know. But get your filthy votes of me.
I targeted Sloonei Night 2 and I targeted no one Night 1 because I goofed.
Get your filthy votes off of me but also one of you is evil.
Fake
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
I don't believe that Epignosis suspects Sloonei.
He may well have tried a block. Blocking Sloonei is horseshit. Give me a break.
He may well have tried a block. Blocking Sloonei is horseshit. Give me a break.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
If you know him better than I do (you probably do), please briefly describe what you thought made him look good in this one.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:32 pm yeah.i'm like really hoping he's town 'cause it would be cool to play on the same team as a friend when i'm in a new environment. in past games, instead of earnestly reading him, i fell into the trap of clearing him 'cause i want him to be town, and that's completely thrown off my reads in games before.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
That can be a true claim and still have no bearing on your alignment. One could argue it's worse than no claim at all.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:29 pm I haven't read, but if JJJ and Sloonei are voting for me, fuck this shit. I'm claiming.
I'm a limited role blocker. I had to ask because my role didn't make any sense to me. In what way I am limited I don't know. But get your filthy votes of me.
I targeted Sloonei Night 2 and I targeted no one Night 1 because I goofed.
Why is Sloonei the best player to block on Night 2?
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:27 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
nutella and I both. Just seemed weird to post stuff without making note of the fact that two strangers randomly appearedFunnygurl555 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:23 pmwhat happened? you being in the game?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:19 pm Funnygurl, something weird just happened in this game and I demand that you acknowledge it
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Votes are stupid and I don't care. If someone can provide me with some context to frame that vote I am open to hearing the case.
In a vacuum though votes are close to meaningless to me.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:19 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Funnygurl, something weird just happened in this game and I demand that you acknowledge it
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:18 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
[VOTE:
Epignosis] aubergine
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Don't lynch
Long Con
Sloonei
TonyStarkPrime
Pressure without falling into a tunnel
Funnygurl555
Pressure and tunnel if it feels right
ts account
Murder
Epignosis
speedchuck
Long Con
Sloonei
TonyStarkPrime
Pressure without falling into a tunnel
Funnygurl555
Pressure and tunnel if it feels right
ts account
Murder
Epignosis
speedchuck
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Turnip Head and ts account
Turnip Head's stuff
This is a concrete accusation of ts account. It doesn't feel like it comes with any punch though. It's said at ts account and left blandly for a response.
This is again vaguely antagonistic. I'm reminded of TH's gripes about Epignosis. There is nothing that makes this a pressured attack on ts account; indeed it's a pretty lame softball.
TH has a whack at a hanging curveball of a softball from ts account about LC.
Imagine, for a moment, what TH does with this if ts account flips mafia with Sloonei alive.
Why is Mikey's name even here? Why is "I started the day more likely to vote _____" a necessary introduction to "I am thinking of voting for Sloonei"? Looks forced.
Somehow both specific and vague simultaneously.
"Why are you off-wagon?" is less inspiring than "Mikey, you're off-wagon and it sucks."
There's a suspicion of Mikey embedded in this post, but the larger message is "leetic civilian". Whatever.
Back to this thing. TH constructed a b/s reason to associate Mikey, Funnygurl, and ted. As it stands, Mikey emerges from this post with the least negative take -- TH bothered to add that second-last phrase to his benefit. I don't care about "rule of three", but the contextual details of this goofy stuff make me think there's probably a teammate in that set.
This may be the most incisive of TH's accusations of ts account. Try as I may to avoid bias here, none of these interactions are making me feel anything.
TH's first post of this real-time day. I will have to determine the context here. The vote is thrown into the void.
You "think"?
I'd like to say that asking the general roster for takes on Mikey ought to be a positive thing, and yet still this is essentially nothing. He isn't promoting his prior vote; he is promoting idle chatter.
~~~
ts account's stuff not already covered
ts account was forgiving of TH in this exchange. The latter was "wrong", not "evil".
TH is one of six bloody nulls. Interactions aside, that kind of non-committal list is a problem on its own. The TH read does no favors.
Similar theme as earlier: ts account responds to a TH accusation by explaining himself but makes no visible effort to better understand the motivations of his accuser.
You tell me.
This is absolutely empty.
What are the good posts?
Okay, so we have examples of "confirmation bias". Is that good? Is that bad? Is that anything? What is the conclusion you draw from this?
Okay, this is sort of a read. It implies a town read; that still isn't quite stated.
Now it's a town lean. I don't really see any satisfactory development to lead to this read, but it's a read.
These words lead to no point.
TH read persists. Sure.
There are some mental gymnastics needed here to alleviate the pressure that would otherwise fall upon TH -- the negative message is stronger for Long Con, speedchuck, and Epignosis.
I hate it, both as an interaction and as a general assertion. 11 vs. 4 is no more standard than 12 vs. 3, and indeed it's probably less standard. Hokey.
This should, in theory, be an accusation. The last sentence ruins that. At this point if ts account is a civilian, then they have made a grievous error on multiple occasions by just giving TH a break every time.
~~~
Conclusion
I had a ton to say here, and a ton of it was bad. I don't even view this as "tinfoil". ts account is a compatible teammate of Turnip Head.
Turnip Head's stuff
Spoiler: show
This is a concrete accusation of ts account. It doesn't feel like it comes with any punch though. It's said at ts account and left blandly for a response.
Spoiler: show
This is again vaguely antagonistic. I'm reminded of TH's gripes about Epignosis. There is nothing that makes this a pressured attack on ts account; indeed it's a pretty lame softball.
Spoiler: show
TH has a whack at a hanging curveball of a softball from ts account about LC.
Spoiler: show
Imagine, for a moment, what TH does with this if ts account flips mafia with Sloonei alive.
Spoiler: show
Why is Mikey's name even here? Why is "I started the day more likely to vote _____" a necessary introduction to "I am thinking of voting for Sloonei"? Looks forced.
Spoiler: show
Somehow both specific and vague simultaneously.
Spoiler: show
"Why are you off-wagon?" is less inspiring than "Mikey, you're off-wagon and it sucks."
Spoiler: show
There's a suspicion of Mikey embedded in this post, but the larger message is "leetic civilian". Whatever.
Spoiler: show
Back to this thing. TH constructed a b/s reason to associate Mikey, Funnygurl, and ted. As it stands, Mikey emerges from this post with the least negative take -- TH bothered to add that second-last phrase to his benefit. I don't care about "rule of three", but the contextual details of this goofy stuff make me think there's probably a teammate in that set.
Spoiler: show
This may be the most incisive of TH's accusations of ts account. Try as I may to avoid bias here, none of these interactions are making me feel anything.
Spoiler: show
TH's first post of this real-time day. I will have to determine the context here. The vote is thrown into the void.
Spoiler: show
You "think"?
![Charlie :charlieblackmon:](./images/smilies/batterup.gif)
Spoiler: show
I'd like to say that asking the general roster for takes on Mikey ought to be a positive thing, and yet still this is essentially nothing. He isn't promoting his prior vote; he is promoting idle chatter.
~~~
ts account's stuff not already covered
Spoiler: show
ts account was forgiving of TH in this exchange. The latter was "wrong", not "evil".
Spoiler: show
TH is one of six bloody nulls. Interactions aside, that kind of non-committal list is a problem on its own. The TH read does no favors.
Spoiler: show
Similar theme as earlier: ts account responds to a TH accusation by explaining himself but makes no visible effort to better understand the motivations of his accuser.
Spoiler: show
You tell me.
![Meany :meany:](./images/smilies/mean.gif)
Spoiler: show
This is absolutely empty.
Spoiler: show
What are the good posts?
Spoiler: show
Okay, so we have examples of "confirmation bias". Is that good? Is that bad? Is that anything? What is the conclusion you draw from this?
Spoiler: show
Okay, this is sort of a read. It implies a town read; that still isn't quite stated.
Spoiler: show
Now it's a town lean. I don't really see any satisfactory development to lead to this read, but it's a read.
Spoiler: show
These words lead to no point.
Spoiler: show
TH read persists. Sure.
Spoiler: show
There are some mental gymnastics needed here to alleviate the pressure that would otherwise fall upon TH -- the negative message is stronger for Long Con, speedchuck, and Epignosis.
Spoiler: show
I hate it, both as an interaction and as a general assertion. 11 vs. 4 is no more standard than 12 vs. 3, and indeed it's probably less standard. Hokey.
Spoiler: show
This should, in theory, be an accusation. The last sentence ruins that. At this point if ts account is a civilian, then they have made a grievous error on multiple occasions by just giving TH a break every time.
~~~
Conclusion
I had a ton to say here, and a ton of it was bad. I don't even view this as "tinfoil". ts account is a compatible teammate of Turnip Head.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)
I'm not actually sure yet.Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:44 pmWould it be fruitful to tell us anything about your Thing, or is it better kept secret?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:42 pmConsider our Thing as you judge Sloonei. I think there's something important there.
And we can have fun being vague while nobody else knows what we're on about.![]()
![Goofy :p :goofp:](./images/smilies/Tongue%20out.gif)
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)
nutella wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:42 pmI was thinking about it yes.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:42 pmConsider our Thing as you judge Sloonei. I think there's something important there.
And we can have fun being vague while nobody else knows what we're on about.![]()
![]()
Based on Thing (and also interaction and his general play) I think he's a solid civilian.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)
I'm not finished yet, but I like ts account less than you do.Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:36 pmoh right. numbers are stupid.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:33 pmIf you're a civilian, one of those towns must be wrong.
hm. Maybe Long Con. Heavy tinfoil says I was too easy on ts account, but he's been a comfortable town read all game. On the other hand, he's been a comfortable town read all game. I don't know. I'm inclined to say Epi is close to being a lock and he's the frontrunner for today as far as I am concerned.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Turnip Head and TonyStarkPrime
Turnip Head's stuff
This looks like TH trying to shoehorn Tony into a lynch-ready posture. TH viewed Tony as an easy target and didn't want to waste that opportunity.
~~~
TonyStarkPrime's stuff not already covered
This is why middle reads are illegal
I don't quite understand what this means.
These theories rely on context that I don't grasp, so whatever. I don't think I care.
This pairing is dissolved; they both died at the same time. One can't do much with it now. I don't really fault Tony for his perspective here.
~~~
Conclusion
The stuff that speaks loudest to me here are TH's posts about Tony, particularly when he smushed him into a poorly-conceived vote. I view him as more likely to be TownieStarkPrime.
Turnip Head's stuff
Spoiler: show
This looks like TH trying to shoehorn Tony into a lynch-ready posture. TH viewed Tony as an easy target and didn't want to waste that opportunity.
~~~
TonyStarkPrime's stuff not already covered
Spoiler: show
This is why middle reads are illegal
Spoiler: show
I don't quite understand what this means.
Spoiler: show
These theories rely on context that I don't grasp, so whatever. I don't think I care.
Spoiler: show
This pairing is dissolved; they both died at the same time. One can't do much with it now. I don't really fault Tony for his perspective here.
~~~
Conclusion
The stuff that speaks loudest to me here are TH's posts about Tony, particularly when he smushed him into a poorly-conceived vote. I view him as more likely to be TownieStarkPrime.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Turnip Head and speedchuck
Turnip Head's stuff
That's it. There are no more posts. The end.
~~~
speedchuck's stuff
Day 1 moves by speedchuck against TH. Just logging for now.
Day 2 posts. speedchuck viewed TH as a suspect and said it more than once. My take will be in the conclusion.
~~~
Conclusion
This is highly problematic to me on two fronts:
1) Despite speedchuck voicing suspicion of TH multiple times and voting for him twice, TH hardly even acknowledged his existence in the game at all. He did not seem to care whatsoever about speedchuck's accusations.
2) speedchuck's accusations are of a frank enough nature that they convey greater confidence than they should.
I submit that speedchuck knew TH was bad, thereby enabling his read, and that TH did not feel the natural urgency he should have to respond to speedchuck's beefs because they were coming from his ally.
Turnip Head's stuff
Spoiler: show
That's it. There are no more posts. The end.
~~~
speedchuck's stuff
Spoiler: show
Day 1 moves by speedchuck against TH. Just logging for now.
Spoiler: show
Day 2 posts. speedchuck viewed TH as a suspect and said it more than once. My take will be in the conclusion.
~~~
Conclusion
This is highly problematic to me on two fronts:
1) Despite speedchuck voicing suspicion of TH multiple times and voting for him twice, TH hardly even acknowledged his existence in the game at all. He did not seem to care whatsoever about speedchuck's accusations.
2) speedchuck's accusations are of a frank enough nature that they convey greater confidence than they should.
I submit that speedchuck knew TH was bad, thereby enabling his read, and that TH did not feel the natural urgency he should have to respond to speedchuck's beefs because they were coming from his ally.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 5:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Turnip Head and Sloonei
Turnip Head's stuff
Okay actually this might not be such a chore. This first post looks like it tells me the answer. I'm going to be choosy about what I highlight moving forward. Ain't nobody got time to interactive-analyze a Golden-JJJ monstrosity.
"conspiracy theory" because it's known to be junk
This turn looks like more junk. I'll decide if I care later.
Despite the prior vague suspicion, Sloonei is also the calming force Papa Bear of the game. Psh
Looks more like an attempt to appear carefree and loose than some distancing shit.
Looks like a mafioso staving off the accusations of a high-influence civilian.
~~~
Sloonei's stuff
A bit soft
mmkay
mmkay
mmkay?
mmkay!
mmkay.
MMKAY.
~~~
Conclusion
lol I had fun with the Sloonei side here; don't let it freak you out please. I don't think he is Turnip Head's teammate. His reads are ever in motion as are his votes. He's Sloonei.
![why :why:](./images/smilies/why.gif)
Turnip Head's stuff
Spoiler: show
Okay actually this might not be such a chore. This first post looks like it tells me the answer. I'm going to be choosy about what I highlight moving forward. Ain't nobody got time to interactive-analyze a Golden-JJJ monstrosity.
Spoiler: show
"conspiracy theory" because it's known to be junk
Spoiler: show
This turn looks like more junk. I'll decide if I care later.
Spoiler: show
Despite the prior vague suspicion, Sloonei is also the calming force Papa Bear of the game. Psh
Spoiler: show
Looks more like an attempt to appear carefree and loose than some distancing shit.
Spoiler: show
Looks like a mafioso staving off the accusations of a high-influence civilian.
~~~
Sloonei's stuff
Spoiler: show
A bit soft
Spoiler: show
mmkay
![l'il shrug :shrug2:](./images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Spoiler: show
mmkay
![Nice nod :nicenod:](./images/smilies/nicenod.gif)
Spoiler: show
mmkay?
![Goofy :p :goofp:](./images/smilies/Tongue%20out.gif)
Spoiler: show
mmkay!
![Big grin :biggrin:](./images/smilies/Big%20Grin.gif)
Spoiler: show
mmkay.
![Alrighty.. :smile:](./images/smilies/Smile.gif)
Spoiler: show
MMKAY.
![Bliss :bliss:](./images/smilies/bliss.gif)
~~~
Conclusion
lol I had fun with the Sloonei side here; don't let it freak you out please. I don't think he is Turnip Head's teammate. His reads are ever in motion as are his votes. He's Sloonei.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 5:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Turnip Head and Long Con
Turnip Head's stuff
Are YOU for real?
The base premise of TH's LC read is bullshit. Long Con routinely plays scummy on purpose. He loves to do that. The shade is fake.
Oscar-Meijer balogna
Yeah this looks good for LC. TH wants to develop this negative environmental posture for LC without having to take the responsibility of a vote.
Dismissing a LC answer with a .gif implying it doesn't make sense when it's fine. Trend continues.
TH pretending they care about a LC self-vote -- particularly one that in context looked like a joke.
Incredibly fake
~~~
Long Con's stuff not already covered
Chatter
I crammed all of these posts together, because they occupy nearly all of the latter half of LC's first page of posts. He devoted a lot of time and energy to digging through TH, taking issue with or questioning just about everything TH said, and arrived at a vote. I think this looks natural and absolutely unnecessary if they're teammed.
~~~
Conclusion
I feel pretty confident asserting that Long Con is not Turnip Head's teammate.
Turnip Head's stuff
Spoiler: show
Are YOU for real?
![Goofy :p :goofp:](./images/smilies/Tongue%20out.gif)
Spoiler: show
The base premise of TH's LC read is bullshit. Long Con routinely plays scummy on purpose. He loves to do that. The shade is fake.
Spoiler: show
Oscar-Meijer balogna
Spoiler: show
Yeah this looks good for LC. TH wants to develop this negative environmental posture for LC without having to take the responsibility of a vote.
Spoiler: show
Dismissing a LC answer with a .gif implying it doesn't make sense when it's fine. Trend continues.
Spoiler: show
TH pretending they care about a LC self-vote -- particularly one that in context looked like a joke.
Spoiler: show
Incredibly fake
~~~
Long Con's stuff not already covered
Spoiler: show
Chatter
Spoiler: show
I crammed all of these posts together, because they occupy nearly all of the latter half of LC's first page of posts. He devoted a lot of time and energy to digging through TH, taking issue with or questioning just about everything TH said, and arrived at a vote. I think this looks natural and absolutely unnecessary if they're teammed.
~~~
Conclusion
I feel pretty confident asserting that Long Con is not Turnip Head's teammate.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 5:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Turnip Head and Funnygurl555
Turnip Head's stuff
Chatter
This is an interesting post. I feel like the whole read might be contained in this little space. Turnip Head is rarely one to concern himself with how "contributions" factor into a read -- this would have been a good indicator of their evil. That they used this to disparage/discredit Funnygurl at face value strikes me as a positive thing for her. I will temper that slightly given the possibility of TMI (if she is getting civilian credit wrongly and he knows it, then this can be a high road read). My instincts tell me to call it a good thing.
RuLe oF tHrEe
I don't care about that, but I will log this as a more concrete statement of suspicion than the previous dig was.
This extends from the prior thing. I separate it given the significance of the content. Note the directionality of TH's endeavors to tie these players together. The "especially" dynamics are:
Funnygurl -> mikey
Funnygurl -> ted
She is the common denominator, and thus she emerges as TH's high suspect regardless of the other two. I'll have to see how this develops.
The next morning TH voted for Mikey. She had been the common denominator. That's concerning.
Idle chatter about LC
~~~
Funnygurl555's stuff not already covered
Banter
I need context here. At face value I don't understand why a read on TH's "confirmation bias" would be a good look for someone else. This was Day 1. I am concerned about TMI.
I could call this bad if I wanted to. I don't think I care.
I care a bit more this time.
Meh
I can't quite tell, but the wording here makes TH look like a sort of ancillary suspect or something. So eh.
I don't like this one. Two problems:
1) hyper-awareness of how speedchuck felt about TH on Day 1
2) I don't see why this should be "bad" for speedchuck unless TH is also a mafioso, something Funnygurl has only flirted with a bit to this point. TMI.
Laboriously calls TH and Tony forgettable
Only interesting to me given that their paired.
Long post
This lengthy catch-up post thing is a bit harsher against TH. The language is more appealing here. I wish it wasn't in a post designed like this; they're one of my biggest allergies.
Long post
Funnygurl designs her larger posts in a structure that I don't easily follow. That's not her problem; it just hinders my comprehension. I think this post is nicely hostile against TH, though it lacks a clear conclusion.
I appreciate triple-stances.
Another one. Funnygurl would seem to enter this phase with a clear perspective given the names alive.
lol
The read is wrong; I may like it a bit anyway. That's an atypical way to defend one's teammate.
She was much clearer in her defenses of Turnip head here.
Her read on TH has been all over the place, and her play in general has been all over the place. Whiplash.
k
~~~
Conclusion
This was a pretty wild ride. It's an absolute mess, and I don't mean that in a bad way. Or a good way. I don't know what I mean. I am rarely this clueless after doing this much work on an interaction. Generic gun to head take:
Funnygurl tried to figure out TH at all junctures of the game. Within her reads she won some and she lost some, and she ended up on the wrong end. That's innocent.
I cannot claim to be confident. I think I will favor face value reads over interactive inference with respect to figuring her out.
Turnip Head's stuff
Spoiler: show
Chatter
Spoiler: show
This is an interesting post. I feel like the whole read might be contained in this little space. Turnip Head is rarely one to concern himself with how "contributions" factor into a read -- this would have been a good indicator of their evil. That they used this to disparage/discredit Funnygurl at face value strikes me as a positive thing for her. I will temper that slightly given the possibility of TMI (if she is getting civilian credit wrongly and he knows it, then this can be a high road read). My instincts tell me to call it a good thing.
Spoiler: show
I don't care about that, but I will log this as a more concrete statement of suspicion than the previous dig was.
Spoiler: show
This extends from the prior thing. I separate it given the significance of the content. Note the directionality of TH's endeavors to tie these players together. The "especially" dynamics are:
Funnygurl -> mikey
Funnygurl -> ted
She is the common denominator, and thus she emerges as TH's high suspect regardless of the other two. I'll have to see how this develops.
Spoiler: show
The next morning TH voted for Mikey. She had been the common denominator. That's concerning.
Spoiler: show
Idle chatter about LC
~~~
Funnygurl555's stuff not already covered
Spoiler: show
Banter
Spoiler: show
I need context here. At face value I don't understand why a read on TH's "confirmation bias" would be a good look for someone else. This was Day 1. I am concerned about TMI.
Spoiler: show
I could call this bad if I wanted to. I don't think I care.
Spoiler: show
I care a bit more this time.
Spoiler: show
Meh
Spoiler: show
I can't quite tell, but the wording here makes TH look like a sort of ancillary suspect or something. So eh.
Spoiler: show
I don't like this one. Two problems:
1) hyper-awareness of how speedchuck felt about TH on Day 1
2) I don't see why this should be "bad" for speedchuck unless TH is also a mafioso, something Funnygurl has only flirted with a bit to this point. TMI.
Laboriously calls TH and Tony forgettable
Only interesting to me given that their paired.
Long post
This lengthy catch-up post thing is a bit harsher against TH. The language is more appealing here. I wish it wasn't in a post designed like this; they're one of my biggest allergies.
Long post
Funnygurl designs her larger posts in a structure that I don't easily follow. That's not her problem; it just hinders my comprehension. I think this post is nicely hostile against TH, though it lacks a clear conclusion.
Spoiler: show
I appreciate triple-stances.
Spoiler: show
Another one. Funnygurl would seem to enter this phase with a clear perspective given the names alive.
Spoiler: show
lol
The read is wrong; I may like it a bit anyway. That's an atypical way to defend one's teammate.
She was much clearer in her defenses of Turnip head here.
Her read on TH has been all over the place, and her play in general has been all over the place. Whiplash.
Spoiler: show
k
~~~
Conclusion
This was a pretty wild ride. It's an absolute mess, and I don't mean that in a bad way. Or a good way. I don't know what I mean. I am rarely this clueless after doing this much work on an interaction. Generic gun to head take:
Funnygurl tried to figure out TH at all junctures of the game. Within her reads she won some and she lost some, and she ended up on the wrong end. That's innocent.
I cannot claim to be confident. I think I will favor face value reads over interactive inference with respect to figuring her out.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:40 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
To my knowledge yes and yes.
nutella and I add a slight wrinkle to make it a phantom 11 vs. 4, but I encourage y'all to avoid considering us as important to the numbers.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Side note:
Since the game is at 4 vs. 3, I encourage the civilians out there to get their POE pools under construction if they don't have them already. FInd three other civilians (nutella and I don't count) and the rest is covered for you. That's the awkward advantage of the restricted pool in a LyLo like this, even if there's no margin for error. The game is winnable; find one another.
Since the game is at 4 vs. 3, I encourage the civilians out there to get their POE pools under construction if they don't have them already. FInd three other civilians (nutella and I don't count) and the rest is covered for you. That's the awkward advantage of the restricted pool in a LyLo like this, even if there's no margin for error. The game is winnable; find one another.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:19 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
Turnip Head and Epignosis
Turnip Head's stuff
Here are a slew of Day 1 posts featuring mild antagonism and general sleepiness. I feel nothing.
TH dangled Epignosis as a secondary suspect to start Day 2 behind ts account. This carried forward a theme of mild antagonism. TH has taken a stance against Epi; I don't feel as though he's really doing anything with it. I'll see how I feel about that as I proceed.
k
~~~
Epignosis' stuff not already covered
I don't follow this answer, but sure. It's nothing as a TH interaction.
Epignosis discounted a pretty frivolous tinfoil theory from TH and another off-hand assertion about LC's style. This interaction seems quite gentle to this point.
I'm not sure if this is a Trumpian "my opinions are good opinions" kind of "good", or if Epi was providing civilian reads on Funnygurl, TH, Mac, and leetic. If it's the former, it's a meaningless post. If it's the latter, then log it as a positive stance on Turnip Head.
Very sleepy.
TH is only incidentally relevant here. The motivation for the vote on LC strikes me as bullcrap.
This is a Day 1 vote for TH. I don't know what the poll looked like at this point. Apparently this maintained a tie, per Epi's own language. I'll need someone else to clarify that, even Epi himself. He moved his vote to tedxtr the next real-time day.
I'm not sure I'd call this a softball, but it isn't a hardball either. Maybe it's a slurve.
This may be a peculiar question if TH is a teammate. I wouldn't put it past 'em. Minor point.
Idle chatter
Epi had just responded to Sloonei's call for votes by voting for Sloonei. TH did the same. I don't think I care about this.
~~~
Conclusion
Much of this is teddy bear soft, and that's not my favorite thing. Unless someone can give me a reason why Epi's brief TH vote on Day 1 mattered, I would call them compatible. Epi's read on Turnip Head is never truly made clear, and TH's antagonism against Epi carried no weight and had no follow-through.
Turnip Head's stuff
Spoiler: show
Here are a slew of Day 1 posts featuring mild antagonism and general sleepiness. I feel nothing.
Spoiler: show
TH dangled Epignosis as a secondary suspect to start Day 2 behind ts account. This carried forward a theme of mild antagonism. TH has taken a stance against Epi; I don't feel as though he's really doing anything with it. I'll see how I feel about that as I proceed.
Spoiler: show
k
~~~
Epignosis' stuff not already covered
Spoiler: show
I don't follow this answer, but sure. It's nothing as a TH interaction.
Spoiler: show
Epignosis discounted a pretty frivolous tinfoil theory from TH and another off-hand assertion about LC's style. This interaction seems quite gentle to this point.
Spoiler: show
I'm not sure if this is a Trumpian "my opinions are good opinions" kind of "good", or if Epi was providing civilian reads on Funnygurl, TH, Mac, and leetic. If it's the former, it's a meaningless post. If it's the latter, then log it as a positive stance on Turnip Head.
Spoiler: show
Very sleepy.
Spoiler: show
TH is only incidentally relevant here. The motivation for the vote on LC strikes me as bullcrap.
Spoiler: show
This is a Day 1 vote for TH. I don't know what the poll looked like at this point. Apparently this maintained a tie, per Epi's own language. I'll need someone else to clarify that, even Epi himself. He moved his vote to tedxtr the next real-time day.
Spoiler: show
I'm not sure I'd call this a softball, but it isn't a hardball either. Maybe it's a slurve.
Spoiler: show
This may be a peculiar question if TH is a teammate. I wouldn't put it past 'em. Minor point.
Spoiler: show
Idle chatter
Spoiler: show
Epi had just responded to Sloonei's call for votes by voting for Sloonei. TH did the same. I don't think I care about this.
Spoiler: show
![Goofy :p :goofp:](./images/smilies/Tongue%20out.gif)
~~~
Conclusion
Much of this is teddy bear soft, and that's not my favorite thing. Unless someone can give me a reason why Epi's brief TH vote on Day 1 mattered, I would call them compatible. Epi's read on Turnip Head is never truly made clear, and TH's antagonism against Epi carried no weight and had no follow-through.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 4:01 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
I'm diving into interactions straightaway. I may overlook certain contextual details; I don't think it's a good use of my time to sit here and read every post. The onus is on you to tell me if you feel I am omitting something that matters.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 3:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
My only read entering this thread is a civilian read on Sloonei.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 3:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 3:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328
Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D3)
For the purpose of numbers and parity, ignore nutella and I. We are a force of good only temporarily able to serve you in our avatars. The game is at 4 versus 3, and this is effectively a LyLo scenario. Treat it with care.
I'm glad to see a mafioso corpse at my feet as I arrive. I have not read this entire thread; I have kept up in a cursory manner. TH's demise will help me to find direction.
I'm glad to see a mafioso corpse at my feet as I arrive. I have not read this entire thread; I have kept up in a cursory manner. TH's demise will help me to find direction.
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 3:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Assassin's Creed Mafia (OVER!)
- Replies: 3856
- Views: 93328