The Syndicate

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2017 12:02 am Screw it I should just put my money where my mouth has been all game and vote Quin. I keep feeling less sure of myself and wanting to trust other people but it's just making me waffle at ludicrous speed. I'm really afraid of how this lynch is going.

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:40 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:33 pm

Long Con wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:22 pm

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:18 pm Kyle is no longer a suspect.

Why not?

I've got a civ role in mind for him.

Kyle, does this make any sense to you?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:29 pm Somebody asked about experience being partnered with scumjay. It's happened to me once, for one day in Street Fighter. I received heavy scrutiny from him on that day:
link

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 10:38 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:21 pm I'll start reading speed's iso and taking notes till Sloonei gets back to me. I certainly won't finish it today.

what am i getting back to you on?

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:27 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:26 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:17 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:16 pm This post happened during Day 4:

Spoiler: show

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:38 pm A fresh look at DrWilgy

First substantive post

Quin's little move to generate responses re: his pledge to "vote Epi whenever" got a reply from Wilgy. It's a strategic assertion which doesn't say much of anything about either Epi or Quin. Filler potential. The negative read on Daisy is a loud one. Okay. The question he posed to Sloonei could have some utility if there's follow-up.

Another early multi-quote salad (let's make it a Thing guys)

There are numerous questions here. Questions are neat. I don't know what Wilgy is doing with them though.

Multi-quote salad again

Wilgy is inserting nuggets of chatter into numerous conversations. They don't boast much unique insight though. The sole stance I see taken here is an agreement with Quin's grievance against Kyle.

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:35 pm

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:51 pm Wilgy is highly unpredictable. Don't apply normal rules of logic. Wilgy is almost as unpredictable as Vompatti. Almost. Nothing is unlikely for Wilgy, everything is fair game. I'm just unsure what to do with this version of Wilgy...

It's funny that "normal" Wilgy scares you in such a way. Guess it's a good thing. Perhaps "normal" Wilgy is the advent of this game.

I wouldn't say this is the first time I have seen "normal Wilgy", or at least a Wilgy who involves himself in the game with words and posts. The first example that comes to mind is Talking Heads (he was bad). I don't know why Daisy's fear of his normalcy is a "good thing".

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:49 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:45 pm

Is conviction something I had in pirates mafia? I would argue that the exact opposite is true. On the second to last day I didn't know who to lynch and almost died because of it, Speedchuck talked me into no lynching. We also lost partially because I didn't pursue my suspicion of Speedchuck on the final day.

I've been making a real effort to follow through in this game because of it.

Interesting. Perhaps I was confusing conviction with rapid adaption. My observance of you was from a smiley posting ding dong. I was the ding dong. You, however, were fun to watch because I felt like I was watching you grow in the short span of time I was alive. You were watched by a ding dong.

The one stance I referenced before was Wilgy's take on Kyle, via Quin. Kyle responded with a contrary description of his behavior. Wilgy's reply is a neutral observation which is no longer interrogative. The only stance taken thus dissipates, leaving this post history a bit bare to this point -- more than it appears at a glance. That's not ideal.

Jack ISO

It's nice that Wilgy's takes in this ISO are multi-directional -- he has both positive and negative things to say about Jack. The negative side wins the day, as the conclusion is a scum read on Jack. Some of the language employed here is a concern:

"Are you buddying or talking with a teammate here?" -- Loaded question

"I feel that JoH has a way of portraying things that either are forced or feel like a forced portrayal." -- Jack has a way of either portraying things that are forced or forcing a portrayal. Eh? What does that mean?

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 12:44 pm Quick comment regarding the GTH exercise.

For everyokne that GTH'd me good. Why do you think I'm good? Under what scenarios do you find that I'm scummy? Would you say that you are mpre of a player that finds people innocent until proven guilty or guilty until proven innocent?

@elochin I'm still curious as to why you stated my comment about being able to read Daisy stuck out to you as scummy before my further explanation. What about that comment caused a scum read? Am I not allowed to be bad at reading someone?

@JoH, I'll get back to you. I've come to a point where I'm aware of my tunneling and I need to review others before I continue to bark at you. What I find interesting outside of our back and forth is your baddie read of me. What prompted this read exactly?

Wilgy expressed concern that he might be tunneling on Jack and pledged to broaden his focus.

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:13 am

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:09 am

She has 24 posts, at least 20 of those say nothing but bolster her presence in the thread.

I can get behind this.

Wilgy joined the Mesk wagon at EOD3. I don't take issue with a decision being made on the fly like this in the heat of EOD nonsense. It does beg expansion now though -- Wilgy, what inspired (hi Quin) your willingness to contribute to this wagon?

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:34 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:49 pm
It feels like a lot of general comments and observations, throwing in some questions for good measure. It doesn't feel like someone who is taking any sort of significant stance. This far into the game, I find it hard to believe any townie wouldn't have made strong stances yet, even if one that we can recognize him for. You haven't even made good/bad player lists. Sorry Wilgy, I just don't think you're townie-centric this game. I mean, I defended you in Pirates and you didn't even say anything. But here, you've been less authentic and clear in your opinions and stances than when you were playing with emojis imo.

What? Less authentic and clear? Comparing clarity in a game where I was only using emojis (and keeping up mind you)?

What is a strong stance to you? Apparently not calling Jack bad for his play day one, nor agreeing that Jaybis a good lynch. Those are just weak stances.

Dunya, it feels like your trying to case me with "Wilgy is bad because of XYZ", when you can just say "I'm tone reading Wilgy as bad." Because of this I do feel that its disgenuine.

dunya was critical of Wilgy's lack of hard stances and Wilgy took issue. On this front, I think dunya's assertion is valid. There's really not much in the way of stances in this post history that I can see.

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:49 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:45 pm
no...I never complained about low post count or quantity of post. I want more genuine, hard stances. I would understand your hesitation in that you can't give me a genuine scum read without outing a scum-mate, but try.

I've already given what I had Dunya. Your shaking a tree that's out of apples. I'm just unsure if your shaking this tree on purpose or not.

The highlighted bit reads awkwardly at face value. First, there's an implied suspicion, or at least "room" for suspicion -- but the assertion of a "tree being shaken" is as applicable (if not moreso) to a civilian as a mafioso. Indeed shaking trees is often half the game.

~~~

I've stated numerous grievances here and less nice to say. Wilgy is a suspect.

Would day 4 Jay have been sure enough about his imminent death to make a post like this to distance from a Wilgy teammate?

I just read that post like ten minutes ago. Let me turn the question back on you. What was the risk?

It was a hypothetical question. I'm actually coming around to your way of thinking on this... Dr. Wilgy has been a frequent subject of suspicion but he's never been even close to being lynched. Day 4 Jay would have probably seen his death coming, it's not out of the question that he'd build a case against a teammate to benefit himself or Wilgy in the future had one of them been lynched.

has been, or HAD been? I'd like some posts to solidify that.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:17 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:16 pm This post happened during Day 4:

Spoiler: show

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:38 pm A fresh look at DrWilgy

First substantive post

Quin's little move to generate responses re: his pledge to "vote Epi whenever" got a reply from Wilgy. It's a strategic assertion which doesn't say much of anything about either Epi or Quin. Filler potential. The negative read on Daisy is a loud one. Okay. The question he posed to Sloonei could have some utility if there's follow-up.

Another early multi-quote salad (let's make it a Thing guys)

There are numerous questions here. Questions are neat. I don't know what Wilgy is doing with them though.

Multi-quote salad again

Wilgy is inserting nuggets of chatter into numerous conversations. They don't boast much unique insight though. The sole stance I see taken here is an agreement with Quin's grievance against Kyle.

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:35 pm

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:51 pm Wilgy is highly unpredictable. Don't apply normal rules of logic. Wilgy is almost as unpredictable as Vompatti. Almost. Nothing is unlikely for Wilgy, everything is fair game. I'm just unsure what to do with this version of Wilgy...

It's funny that "normal" Wilgy scares you in such a way. Guess it's a good thing. Perhaps "normal" Wilgy is the advent of this game.

I wouldn't say this is the first time I have seen "normal Wilgy", or at least a Wilgy who involves himself in the game with words and posts. The first example that comes to mind is Talking Heads (he was bad). I don't know why Daisy's fear of his normalcy is a "good thing".

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:49 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:45 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 22, 2017 7:30 pm //Kyle what happened to your conviction? This doesn't feel the same Kyle that I met in Pirate mafia.

Is conviction something I had in pirates mafia? I would argue that the exact opposite is true. On the second to last day I didn't know who to lynch and almost died because of it, Speedchuck talked me into no lynching. We also lost partially because I didn't pursue my suspicion of Speedchuck on the final day.

I've been making a real effort to follow through in this game because of it.

Interesting. Perhaps I was confusing conviction with rapid adaption. My observance of you was from a smiley posting ding dong. I was the ding dong. You, however, were fun to watch because I felt like I was watching you grow in the short span of time I was alive. You were watched by a ding dong.

The one stance I referenced before was Wilgy's take on Kyle, via Quin. Kyle responded with a contrary description of his behavior. Wilgy's reply is a neutral observation which is no longer interrogative. The only stance taken thus dissipates, leaving this post history a bit bare to this point -- more than it appears at a glance. That's not ideal.

Jack ISO

It's nice that Wilgy's takes in this ISO are multi-directional -- he has both positive and negative things to say about Jack. The negative side wins the day, as the conclusion is a scum read on Jack. Some of the language employed here is a concern:

"Are you buddying or talking with a teammate here?" -- Loaded question

"I feel that JoH has a way of portraying things that either are forced or feel like a forced portrayal." -- Jack has a way of either portraying things that are forced or forcing a portrayal. Eh? What does that mean?

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 12:44 pm Quick comment regarding the GTH exercise.

For everyokne that GTH'd me good. Why do you think I'm good? Under what scenarios do you find that I'm scummy? Would you say that you are mpre of a player that finds people innocent until proven guilty or guilty until proven innocent?

@elochin I'm still curious as to why you stated my comment about being able to read Daisy stuck out to you as scummy before my further explanation. What about that comment caused a scum read? Am I not allowed to be bad at reading someone?

@JoH, I'll get back to you. I've come to a point where I'm aware of my tunneling and I need to review others before I continue to bark at you. What I find interesting outside of our back and forth is your baddie read of me. What prompted this read exactly?

Wilgy expressed concern that he might be tunneling on Jack and pledged to broaden his focus.

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:13 am

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:09 am

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:08 am

Quin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:07 am why aren't we all lynching Lasagne? For a low poster, she actually looks bad.

What's the worst thing you could say about Lasagne?

She has 24 posts, at least 20 of those say nothing but bolster her presence in the thread.

I can get behind this.

Wilgy joined the Mesk wagon at EOD3. I don't take issue with a decision being made on the fly like this in the heat of EOD nonsense. It does beg expansion now though -- Wilgy, what inspired (hi Quin) your willingness to contribute to this wagon?

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:34 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 5:49 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 1:54 pm I can promise you regardless of alignment it's a time constraint. Civ Wilgy or Scum Wilgy, I frown upon lurking.

What I find interesting is that instead of gauging my reads and what I've provided, you target the quantity. Why not ask for more if that's what you want? I've provided thoughts as I've caught up. Where are your comments on those?

Also Rainbows are dumb. Players are either good or bad.

It feels like a lot of general comments and observations, throwing in some questions for good measure. It doesn't feel like someone who is taking any sort of significant stance. This far into the game, I find it hard to believe any townie wouldn't have made strong stances yet, even if one that we can recognize him for. You haven't even made good/bad player lists. Sorry Wilgy, I just don't think you're townie-centric this game. I mean, I defended you in Pirates and you didn't even say anything. But here, you've been less authentic and clear in your opinions and stances than when you were playing with emojis imo.

What? Less authentic and clear? Comparing clarity in a game where I was only using emojis (and keeping up mind you)?

What is a strong stance to you? Apparently not calling Jack bad for his play day one, nor agreeing that Jaybis a good lynch. Those are just weak stances.

Dunya, it feels like your trying to case me with "Wilgy is bad because of XYZ", when you can just say "I'm tone reading Wilgy as bad." Because of this I do feel that its disgenuine.

dunya was critical of Wilgy's lack of hard stances and Wilgy took issue. On this front, I think dunya's assertion is valid. There's really not much in the way of stances in this post history that I can see.

Spoiler: show

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:49 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:45 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:43 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2017 7:38 pmI'll tell you what a strong townie stance is: it's having strong suspicions. Just clearing people off is more a scum stance-tactic. Does that make sense to you?

You were only using emojis, but those emojis actually reflected better on you. You were calling people good/bad with them. That's townie as hell.

This "not calling Jack bad for his play day one" and "not agreeing on a Jay lynch" is not necessarily townie as hell.

I hope you can see where I am coming from; I'm super genuine and super serious and extremely demanding.

So you want mor quantity from me?

no...I never complained about low post count or quantity of post. I want more genuine, hard stances. I would understand your hesitation in that you can't give me a genuine scum read without outing a scum-mate, but try.

I've already given what I had Dunya. Your shaking a tree that's out of apples. I'm just unsure if your shaking this tree on purpose or not.

The highlighted bit reads awkwardly at face value. First, there's an implied suspicion, or at least "room" for suspicion -- but the assertion of a "tree being shaken" is as applicable (if not moreso) to a civilian as a mafioso. Indeed shaking trees is often half the game.

~~~

I've stated numerous grievances here and less nice to say. Wilgy is a suspect.

Would day 4 Jay have been sure enough about his imminent death to make a post like this to distance from a Wilgy teammate?

I just read that post like ten minutes ago. Let me turn the question back on you. What was the risk?

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:40 pm Screw it all.

Even trying to quote JJJ/Wilgy gives me infinite pyramids of quote failures. I suck at ISOs. Sorry Kylemii

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:14 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:11 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:04 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:58 pm maybe I've been way off this game. I really don't have suspects beyond those 3. I could be swayed on Quin or Kyle. Wilgy I've ruled out. DDL....seems too all over the place to be scum.

Show me your work.

I'd say read his ISO again.

I read his ISO today. Extensively. That's why I'm voting him.

nutella wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:47 pm Tbh the more I think about it, unless I'm misremembering something, there's actually no reason at all to clear Sloonei based on the day 2 no-lynch. On the poll, it was 5-5 Jack-Sloonei. In real count, unless Sutter Buttes was in play, it was 6-5 Jack-Sloonei. If SB was hiding Sloonei it would be 6-4, but Jack was already in the lead so it's irrelevant. I think Jack was Aconcagua and survived the lynch (using up his "first attempt on his life" so he was then vulnerable to the night kill). Sloonei's role doesn't enter into it at all if that was the case.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:32 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:21 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:15 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:11 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:06 pm i have to look back and see if something i remember LC saying actually happened or if i just dreamed it

nevermind, apparently it was just a dream

Kylemii mafias in his dreams now

Or maybe I've just ascended and now my dreams contain cryptic clues to solve mafia like that dude from Twin Peaks.

What do they tell you about Wilgy?

But no, seriously, please ISO Wilgy. I'm more interested in your opinion on him than anyone else's.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:15 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:11 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:06 pm i have to look back and see if something i remember LC saying actually happened or if i just dreamed it

nevermind, apparently it was just a dream

Kylemii mafias in his dreams now

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:06 pm i have to look back and see if something i remember LC saying actually happened or if i just dreamed it

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 2:06 pm Is anyone interested in doing the thing i'm proposing? The more the merrier!

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:38 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:24 pm Also I don't agree with the idea that cbobs 2 shot cop check is useless just because one check only tells lies and the other only tells truths.

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:11 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:58 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:55 pm I'm voting Wilgy for now.

I have no idea what cbob saw. Would welcome more theories. I'm beginning to assume it was two townies and that cbob just didn't really focus on it.

This is my assumption. A role like that is more likely to be borderline useless than useful. Not knowing which of the two reads you receive is true means not trusting either one, so no real information can be gained.

until one of the two flips but there's also a chance one of his targets was night killed which would basically render his power useless.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:24 pm

colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:14 am Blah. I'm waffling again. Epi is convincing and he's had pretty good instincts so far. But unfortunately I'm going to bed so I've got to make up my mind.

quin

Final answer.

@dunya I'd look into quin, DDL, and Wilgy (who's oddly gotten a total pass the last couple of days)

Near the end of the day dunya asked cbob if he flipped civ what players he'd look at. He listed these three. If he received a sketchy result he'd probably list them in that post.

Also I don't agree with the idea that cbobs 2 shot cop check is useless just because one check only tells lies and the other only tells truths. It's different than usual sure but either way he learns something about both players, and if one of his checks dies or is otherwise confirmed, his other check becomes absolute.

2 civ reads means one of his checks is mafia
1 mafia and 1 civ read means either both checks are mafia or both checks are civ(mathematically the ladder is more possible, unless cbob is a cop god)
2 mafia reads, a 50-50 shot just like 2 civ reads

No matter which of those happened it would have altered the course of his actions.

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:13 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:11 pm

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:07 pm I'm still not recovered so I'm not doing to be much help building cases today. I'll make a new rainbow. I think I feel best about a Kyle lynch at this point.

but why though

I can't make a huge case, but I did close on you after my early suspicions because of empathetic reasons, but because you come in most people's bottom of the list -lists. There's a bad aura. I mean, I've thrown shit everywhere, and yet I'm at the top of people's lists. So there's something missing from you. Why do you think everyone can't place a read on you?

colonialbob wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:14 am Blah. I'm waffling again. Epi is convincing and he's had pretty good instincts so far. But unfortunately I'm going to bed so I've got to make up my mind.

quin

Final answer.

@dunya I'd look into quin, DDL, and Wilgy (who's oddly gotten a total pass the last couple of days)

dunya wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:07 pm I'm still not recovered so I'm not doing to be much help building cases today. I'll make a new rainbow. I think I feel best about a Kyle lynch at this point.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:55 am I'll extend that question to everyone, about everyone. I think this could be a useful exercise: in a brief answer, what reason do you have to read each player remaining in this game as town?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:10 am

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:02 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 2:57 am and welcome nijuukyugou, thanks for stepping in. Do not worry about trying to read all of this nonsense. This is already the biggest speed game in syndicate history. It'll be pointless and counterproductive to attempt a catch up. Just hop right in and start telling us who seems honest or dishonest.

And also 300 posts away from passing up the longest lasting game in Syndicate history.

Is that actually true? it hasn't seemed that long

Marmot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:02 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 2:57 am and welcome nijuukyugou, thanks for stepping in. Do not worry about trying to read all of this nonsense. This is already the biggest speed game in syndicate history. It'll be pointless and counterproductive to attempt a catch up. Just hop right in and start telling us who seems honest or dishonest.

And also 300 posts away from passing up the longest lasting game in Syndicate history.

Quin wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 1:14 amWe should look at bob's posts to see if he had any town or scum reads that stick out.

I think more people should look at DDL tomorrow. I believe he and Kyle could be teammates.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:42 pm

Elohcin wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:26 pm

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:59 pm Was Quin civ or bad in CC123?

Was there even such a thing?

Exactly my point.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 1:41 pmMalakim.

Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:29 amNo one has been lynched. It is now Night 1. You have until 22:00 Mountain Time (MST) to submit your night actions.

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Nov 23, 2017 2:19 amNo one has been lynched. It is now Night 2. You have until Friday at 22:00 MST to submit your night actions (a hair under 47 hours due to Thanksgiving).

Marmot wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 2:47 amIt is now Night 3. You have until 22:00 MST (~22 hours from now) to send in your night actions.

Marmot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:55 amYou have until 22:00 MST on Sunday to submit your night actions, as I will be incapacitated tomorrow.

Marmot wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 11:21 amIt is now Night 5. You have until 21:00 MST to submit your night actions. Apologies for the short night period, but I'm trying to get things back on schedule. If anyone has any qualms, I can bump the night period back.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 1:23 pmOk that's fair enough. Then it's less in the field of slip and more like "should we lynch kyle/dunya if the other flips bad" that is more subjective.