The Syndicate

Dom wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

Dom wrote:So are we gonna lynch Juliets today or nah?

That was my plan. I am fine with a Floyd lynch too though.

I'd rather lynch Mac before Floyd.

Dom wrote:So are we gonna lynch Juliets today or nah?

Dom wrote:I'm open to lynching either Mac or Juliets.

juliets wrote:I got in earlier than expected and have read through today's posts.

First RIPIYWG sig and Epi. Sig I don't know for sure but I'm pretty sure you are good. Epi I thought you looked good too but you never know.

Golden, you've at least convinced me to go back and read timmer 2.0.

And I see people are still thinking about voting me. Sorsha, could you give me just the short and sweet on why you think I'm bad? Lorab, could I ask the same from you?

Also I am happy to answer any questions. I will be here tonight, early tomorrow morning then gone to an appointment from 10:45 - 4:00 then back in the thread.

TheFloyd73 wrote:

Tranq wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:Tranq, why do you think you were brought back so quickly?

The Island wasn't done with me yet.

Floyd, why did you NK me?

???

MacDougall wrote:I need to get to the bottom of why LoRab thinks I am bad.

Out with it you lot. Who else thinks I am bad. Sheepishly raise your hands if you think I am a bad guy!?

Golden wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:I prefer that Canucklehead not die, but I may be biased here.

I have to admit I also prefer that outcome to the alternative.

LoRab wrote:For the record, I'm totally convinced that nothing happens when Mac gets votes. He's just trying to get people to not vote for him.

Turnip Head wrote:

LoRab wrote:I only saw that happen once. Actually, the Dom equivalent was the one who carried out the kill...on himself. But it was for good strategic reason (and almost saved his team). I believe that was the exact moment that DD became the original FEB. And I'm blanking on what the theme was. I'm sure BR would remember (unless she's blocked the game out, since she was on that team). Ah, memories.

Holy shit, I remember this. LOTR Mafia on TP. He would have gotten away with it too, except I LD'd him that night and knew he was a baddie, and then the baddies killed him. I was like

DD: The OG FEB

Aww.. That was my first game on TP. I was long dead by the time that happened. Killed by LoRab

LoRab wrote:

Sorsha wrote: @LoRab- thanks for your post on Mac. I agree he has been doing some suspish things but I don't think voting for him is the great st idea at this point.

Why not?

Turnip Head wrote:

Sorsha wrote:TH do you... Or anyone else think that Tranq was Drezenstein and the reason TH is back is because Tranq died? Or was I the only one getting that vibe from the night post?

I was told as soon as I was "killed" that I would be brought back at the end of the Day, so if Tranq was Drezenstein, it's just a coincidence. It's possible that Drezenstein obtained a benefit from his experiment on me, but nothing changed for me other than I was taken out of the game for a Day and now have to deal with the subsequent doubt about it.

Turnip Head wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Matt F wrote:Lol

Dang Bullz came outta nowhere to defend. What's up Bullz, besides sig, who you lookin' at

Linki - MM, gotcha. What are your feelings on Turnip Head?

He was a dead man, but he's no longer a dead man.

I feel neutral about him. He's a proactive Turnip, but I'm wary because he was killed by Dr Von Dreszenstein and rezzed pretty suddenly.

I was never really dead. Drezenstein ripped out my heart and experimented on me, then put me back together just the way I was.

sig wrote:

sig wrote:

DFaraday wrote:I think better of Sig after that Luke lynch. Since Nutella turned out not to be part of a baddie team, I think the best place to look would be people potentially trying to save Luke in the previous lynch.

Okay that is good to know, what do you think about Floyd, Tranq did mention him a few times and voted for him, but I'm not sure if that plays into his death.

@Sorsha Any idea who might have killed Tranq?
/quote]

Sorsha could you answer this also who are your top three scum reads?

MacDougall wrote:It's probably the one where I said I was scum.

LoRab wrote:

Sorsha wrote:

MacDougall wrote:Wilgy I came to your bonfire party you have to come to mine now. We sacrificing some juliets to the god of maphia.

You think juliets is worse than LoRab? I'm not sure how serious you were with your LoRab suspicion

If he was serious about me, it would be nice if he actually said why he was suspicious.

I think he was just another random name he decided out of nowhere to suspect in the final hours of the lynch (as he seems wont to do).

MacDougall wrote:Do you want me to change my vote? I am just buddying HamburgerBoy so he stops accusing me of being bad.

MacDougall wrote:Wilgy I came to your bonfire party you have to come to mine now. We sacrificing some juliets to the god of maphia.

TheFloyd73 wrote:I'm going to be away for the majority of the weekend.
I'm putting my vote on nutella for now.
Luke, you may want to answer these questions people are asking.

Draconus wrote:I'd still like to know why Juliets, if anyone missed my earlier question. I ended up having to work today, so there won't be much free time

Sorsha wrote:As Epignosis commands! The bandwagon of Luke stops and the bandwagon of nutella begins! lol j/k :P

I can see the suspicion on both of them. I just looked at Lukes posts and he's been all over the place. Day 1 vote: Tranq for being a low poster. Day 2 vote: sig bandwagon. Day 3 votes: nutella and bug.

I missed that post Typhoony made on nutella until today. I'd be fine with voting for either of these players.

Also noticing that since juliets came under pressure yesterday she's been hopping on the bus to whatever is popular. Yesterday she voted nutella in one of the groups but today initially voted Luke and changed to nutella once the thread direction changed.

sig wrote:Not to mention role flipping is all guesswork right?

nutella wrote:Wow, surprised I didn't die. I guess Tranq was right.

Totally forgot to come back to defend again before the poll ended as I have been totally swamped with work today, but I see Typhoony made a post about me and a couple others voted for me without much explanation. If there is any point in particular that people want me to answer, ask away.

Matt F wrote:nutella, splints, Sorsha - Do you plan on keeping your votes on Bubbles in Group 1 even though it looks like she'll already be lynched in Group 2?

Golden wrote:Bubbles being a low poster is not suspicious on its own. She is always a low poster.

The game is economics. I deliberately made a post on her as the kill was incoming, then posted it right after she died, saying 'oops, I was writing this when the post came in, I guess I may as well post it anyway'. And yes, I know for a fact she remembers it well.

I know bubbles very well. I played in her first game. I've played in nearly all of her games. Her calling out timmer was odd in the extreme. Her not saying she was civ was odd in the extreme. It all makes sense in context.

I never said I don't want to touch the SVS, Dom, Epi thing. In fact, I've made it very clear that I think they are all town, and if I knew one was bad I would lean epi, but I think the entire thing is civ civ civ. I said I wouldn't put my VOTE anywhere in that triangle, which is a very different thing indeed.

Matt F wrote:

Sorsha wrote:Welcome back timmer. Dogs rule, cats drool!

TinyBubbles wrote:tentative vote on sorsha it was gonna be her or nutella for me, cause they sound like they are intentionally drawing attention to each other and their posts about the matt/mac controversy were similar in timing.
and sorry for not posting more! real life has kept me busy

Golden wrote:HBoy - your defence of nutella sounds sincere. But it looks like it is either sig or nutella. Will you put your money where your mouth is and show you prefer a nutella lynch to a sig one?

@Sig - you better be as worth my effort to save as I think you are.

Luke11646 wrote:

Sorsha wrote:I also had some questions for Luke that he didn't answer while he was here.

I'm going to put my vote on Luke for now.

What questions.

Sorsha wrote:I can see how sig talking about what the mafia is “currently” doing could be seen as a slip up. Looking back through his posts I noticed he spoke earlier about what the mafia might do. Sometimes players can’t help but talk about their role, in this case I can see it that perhaps sig can’t help but talk about his alignment. There are two voters for sig that make me hesitant to vote for him though:

Luke voted for sig and I’m getting strange vibes from that vote. Luke has posted very little in the way of suspicions so far, his day one vote was for Tranq and he questioned MM but never followed up with it. Did MM’s answer satisfy you Luke? Were you suspicious of MM and that’s why you asked him that or were you thinking that Epi was suspicious too and wanted to compare reasons? Or something else?

Right now I could see Luke’s vote as either A) a bandwagon from the opposite baddie team or B) distancing from a baddie teammate

Also a bit suspicious on the sig votes so far is from DF. He missed the first vote. That post is also really just echoing other players too, nothing original. His latest post seems a bit better and has some original thought in it so it lessens my suspicion of him a little bit, still a bit pinged by this vote though.

Tranq missed the vote yesterday but has managed to vote in each of the night polls. Night 0, Night 1

TinyBubbles has four posts so far. Here she wants timmer to post more (lol really?) More than what? At that point you both had two posts. I don’t know, maybe she heard talk about timmer in BTS and thought she’d prod him. Just seems a little odd seeing as he was then killed that night.

Here she seems to think that her track record of being civ in other games has anything to do with her alignment in this game

And here she votes for scissors which conveniently gets her off the poll today. I don’t know if the host handed out info about the night poll again or not but if he did it one night I imagine he did again last night.

At this point I'd be most likely to vote for one of these players, sig, luke and bubbles being higher priority.

Epignosis wrote:I changed my vote to nutella. Tertiary suspect and all.

Golden wrote:I don't think Sig is a good choice for the lynch, I think his bandwagon has come together too easily, and I would probably use my vote in his defence if needed. I am not really sure how he stands at 5 votes.