Return to “Are You Being Served? [We're Closed!]”
Yes, I gave reasons why Vomp could or could not be a baddie. I can't read Vompatti, and more often than not he's a civ when he gets lynched for his unusual behavior. I am always hesitant to suspect him unless there's compelling evidence. But saying I didn't vote because I was seeing how things were going makes no sense. I made that post very very late in the lynch cycle, and the lynch was unanimously for Vompatti at that point. Furthermore, I did not mention anyone other than Vompatti in my post. It doesn't make sense that I would withhold my vote to save Vomps by voting someone else. No one else was going to get any votes yesterday, and I contributed to suspicion on no one but Vomps.FZ. wrote:Boogs and everyone else:Turnip Head wrote:I feel like Vompatti usually votes for himself, but he hasn't done so in this game. Maybe he's trying to switch up his style or maybe he has some baddie teammates trying to coach him into a more traditional style. Either way, I feel he always gets lynched for acting odd and it's often a crapshoot as to what his alignment is. I don't think I've played a traditional game where Vompatti was a baddie though. I do think his playstyle here has been a bit more "off" than usual.
When does the poll end?
I think TH and Vompatti are on the same team as Rey, or TH is and Vomp isn't. Look at how hesitant TH is here. He's giving both reasons for why Vomp could or could not be a baddie. He's not voting, to see how things go and if he needs to cast the vote on Vomp or not later on. Seriously. I can't believe no one is even suspicious of him.
Who do you think we should be voting for instead?reywaS wrote:Yes, let's vote reywaS. Excellent decision.
I tend to work weird hours, especially during the week. Between last night and this morning/afternoon/evening I've been at work for most of this lynch period. What's wrong with me only having 3 posts so far? How can you get a good or bad feeling for me based only on those three posts?FZ. wrote:Back to TH, in the game he was a civ who was NK, he had 22 posts before the first lynch was over. This is a shorter day, and he might have RL things, or other games he's engaged in, but he has 3 posts and I have to tell you, I'm not getting a good feeling about him.
Also, I just looked at the recent game where I was a baddie, and I asked the exact same question I was suspicious of him for....
You may not have played in games that start on Day 1, but I haveFZ. wrote:To be honest, there's a chance I'm going to vote for TH because his first post seemed kind of redundant to me with the "is this day 0 or day 1 " because I don't think there was one game where I played here when the game started with day 1 and we actually lynched someone. It felt as he was trying to ask a question just for the sake of asking. I don't have anything else to go on, but I have nothing on other people as well, so he's a possible candidate for me
I have never until now, however, played in a game that started at 7:00am.Why does this lead you to conclude this? I'm the Mr. Turnips you are suspicious of, and even I don't know why you're suspicious of me, so I don't fault others for not commenting on it. If everyone ignores your case, and the majority of those people naturally being civvies, why does that make you think you're more likely to be right?FZ. wrote:One last thing, not that you deserve my help
Although it would be pretty funny if it ends up being true 
