The Syndicate

Avalanche is clean.

God game everyone and thanks for hosting Rob! I have to admit I was pretty disappointed by the end. I was sure the civvies had it in the bag and was shocked to log on and find out I lost. Can I have a Morlock King badge?

I don't understand why white queen and team won when they only had one horseman left alive.

Mikhail Rasputin wrote: As for the White Queen thing, I totally sympathize, I'm just worried it'll play into her hands.

I'm worried about that too, but I don't have a better plan right now. If you have one, I would be happy to hear it.

Mikhail Rasputin wrote:So I checked the polls...why did Bullz lose that tie? And what was with your vote, Avalanche? I'd have voted Havok in a second if I had seen Bullz about to go down. Who lynches a TWICE-confirmed civ, ever??

Curious to hear from Spiral about what he's been thinking about yesterday, as well.

I voted for Bullz because he was acting weird and because I could see no reason for him to be rezzed without it being some sinister recruitment conspiracy. I have seen "confirmed civs" flip teams plenty of times in other games, and given the confused mess we're in, I though it was the best option available to me. For all we know, he could have been recruited and that fact was just not revealed after his lynch. It could still have been the right call.

I'm done lynching civs though. From now on I only vote for White Queen until she is dead.

Bullzeye wrote:Thanks!

You are welcome!

Bullzeye wrote: I haven't been recruited by anyone and I don't know how I was rezzed but if getting me out is so important to your win I'll vote myself because I'm not in the mood.

Yeah, not in the mood for the truth.

Also, not Bullzeye was brought back on a night where there was a lot of Apocalypse activity. A lot.

Plus he is acting weird and I don't trust him.

Your vote matters to me, Bullzeye, if that makes you feel any better.

It matters so much that I am...switching my vote to you!

Surprise!

Mikhail Rasputin wrote: Linki Again: I don't think you or Havok did explain why lynching Shaw would kill somebody. I suppose I missed it, or it went over my head. Mind clarifying?

Fine, if you are forcing me to be unsubtle. :P

I believe Shaw is Nightcrawler based on his lynch survive. That means if we lynch him, he will teleport and one of us will be lynched instead. I do not want it to be me, therefore I don't want to lynch Shaw.

Mikhail Rasputin wrote:Made it back!

Avalanche wrote:

Mikhail Rasputin wrote:But by process of elimination, Shadowcat cannot possibly be bad! I am against that notion.

Why do think lynching Shaw would kill us all? I don't get that idea at all from any of the roles.

I never said I thought Shadowcat was bad. I said I was leaning towards voting for Shadowcat. There exists a difference.

I don't think lynching Shaw will kill all of us, I think it will kill one of us. One of us who we don't want killed.

What do you mean by this???

Havok explained it.

Havok wrote:

Avalanche wrote:I'm not particularly happy about a Shadowcat vote, but I feel I have no choice.

You have a choice. Who do you want to vote for?

I don't know!

How do you think we get rid of Apocalypse, Shadowcat?

I'm not particularly happy about a Shadowcat vote, but I feel I have no choice.

Mikhail Rasputin wrote:But by process of elimination, Shadowcat cannot possibly be bad! I am against that notion.

Why do think lynching Shaw would kill us all? I don't get that idea at all from any of the roles.

I never said I thought Shadowcat was bad. I said I was leaning towards voting for Shadowcat. There exists a difference.

I don't think lynching Shaw will kill all of us, I think it will kill one of us. One of us who we don't want killed.

Mikhail Rasputin wrote: On the other hand, if he hasn't lost his powers, lynching Shaw wouldn't hurt us directly.

It would if he is who I think he is. We would essentially be playing Russian roulette with all of our lives. I am far from sure about him, but that makes me nervous.

I am leaning towards a Shadowcat lynch today, largely by process of elimination.

Havok wrote: Yes, I know who Archangel is.

Who?

As I see it there, are three possibilities.

1. There is a baddie left (I don't think there is)

2. Apocalypse needs another player (i.e. Archangel) to win.

3. Apocalypse is only unlynchable until one of the factions is dead.

I think either 2 or 3, so I would like to lynch either White Queen or whoever we think Archangel is. If there are other possibilities I'm missing, I would happily entertain them.

You are being silly, White Queen.

Mikhail Rasputin wrote:Also, I think White Queen voting herself is a super obvious ploy to waste our time so she can NK more of us and so we'll stop trying to eliminate her. So I don't think we should lynch her.

Who do you want to lynch? I'm not willing to vote for Havok or Spiral. I'm less sure about Shadowcat and Shaw. But personally, I think there are no brotherhood members left. I think Apocalypse took out Pyro on Night 11.

White Queen, if you have any idea who the remaining bad guys are, I would be happy to listen, but I am pretty stumped, so otherwise I am voting for you.

Epignosis wrote: Avalanche
*Secret*

Still wets the bed. Worships Chairman Mao.

Morlocks don't have beds. Joke's on you.

Havok wrote:Let's float this idea......

Lynch White Queen??

Thoughts?

linki: LOL

Personally, I am becoming increasing convinced that there are no baddies left, so I would be open to that.

Also, yay no death.

Havok wrote:Epignosis: What is Apocalypse's win condition???

Epignosis: What are all the secrets listed on the role page?

Bullzeye wrote:

Avalanche wrote:Quiet tonight. Too quiet. I suspect dark doings a'transpiring.

Too quiet? But I thought discussion was a bad thing??

Discussion is bad, but aimless noisemaking is good.


BLAH!

Quiet tonight. Too quiet. I suspect dark doings a'transpiring.

Spiral wrote:

Mikhail Rasputin wrote:

Spiral wrote:Mikhail why are you less concerned about finding baddies lately?

What are you talking about? That's a hell of a charge to make. I'm all about finding baddies, and always have been.

You've been far less talkative and conducive to discussion.

That doesn't mean anything. Discussion is bad anyway. I am pretty disappointed about Longshot though. I really thought we were right about him.

The Morlocks are not great sign makers, but you have to admire their enthusiasm.

Spiral wrote:

Avalanche wrote:I really think you guys are making a mistake voting for Havok. As he pointed out, he voted to tie Polaris. Voting records are the one thing I trust. I smell a rat in the state of Denmark.

I am voting for Longshot, and I hope the rest of you sensible people will join me. Remember, I was right about Polaris.

p.s. sorry I've not been around. I was out of town with little/no reception.

I was right about Polaris too.


why Longshot more? Can you talk more about it?

I'm King of the Morlocks. I can talk about anything I want.

Look at Longshot's voting record. He voted to put the nail in Bullzeye's coffin. He tried to put the nail in yours. Recent votes matter more than old ones, because there are not many baddies left and they are being forced out of their hidey-holes. Polaris would not be dead without Havok, which makes me trust him, at least more than Longshot.

The distressing thing is thta I know Bullz is good and I'm pretty sure Spiral is good, so I hate to see them make the wrong choice.

I really think you guys are making a mistake voting for Havok. As he pointed out, he voted to tie Polaris. Voting records are the one thing I trust. I smell a rat in the state of Denmark.

I am voting for Longshot, and I hope the rest of you sensible people will join me. Remember, I was right about Polaris.

p.s. sorry I've not been around. I was out of town with little/no reception.

No reception underground. Morlock Kingdom not wireless capable. Bad medicine.

Well, it's just one Morlock's opinion.

Yeah, Avalanche is pretty sure Bullz is bad too. He voted against Polaris, and then reacted strongly against my "no discussion is good" point. For most people, I wouldn't think anything about that, but Bullz is a persuasive and eloquent player. He is the type to be frustrated when he can't use his tricksy language to sway people to his side - the side of evil.

Mikhail Rasputin wrote:Wow, nice job, people! Sorry I was no help. We're on a hot streak!

I vote Greymalkin Industries. It seems like a cool place, I guess. And they spell Grey properly, so good on 'em!

Edit: No they don't. Oh well, much too late to turn back now.

I have never seen a more obvious example of someone trying to pretend the are happy about a teammate dying.

You're next, boyo.

And gray is spelled with an a.

White Queen wrote:I agree with Avalanche, the astral plane is groovy, man.

He'll fly his astral plane,
Takes you trips around the bay,
Brings you back the same day,
Timothy Leary.

Deadpool wrote:id rather not go on a plane tbh........ ive seen a lotta movies and nothin good ever happens on a plane i can tell you that much

Nonsense. Airplane was hilarious.

Deadpool wrote:avalanche i didnt get 2 say welcome back my brotha how was your visit 2 the afterlife??? what's it like there? did the morlocks welcome u back with open arms or did they find a new leader??

To be honest, I barely even noticed. And they would never find a new leader, so beloved am I to them. It's good to be the king.

I like the idea of the Astral Plane, myself.

See? I told you so.

Vote Avalanche 2014 for keeping my amazing mutant powers.

Bullzeye wrote:

Avalanche wrote:

Havok wrote: This lynch was just all around lame. Probably the lamest of the game so far with the absolute absence of discussion.

I like an absence of discussion. Less chance of manipulative talk by the bad ones.

Really? No discussion means rushed lynches and less chance of actually catching baddies out. It's not a good thing.

It depends. If the baddies are good at persuading people, discussion can do more harm than good. I can think of plenty of times I have seen good instincts cast aside in favor of silver-tongued devilry.

Polaris wrote:I ain't paying you anything.

Can I have five doll hairs?

Havok wrote: This lynch was just all around lame. Probably the lamest of the game so far with the absolute absence of discussion.

I like an absence of discussion. Less chance of manipulative talk by the bad ones.

Polaris wrote: Avalanche - I'm still putting one big question mark next to him.

That's the highest compliment you could have paid me.

Also, I am working with limited time for analysis, and therefore relying on instinct. Being the Morlock King involves a lot more paperwork than you might think.

Havok wrote:

Avalanche wrote:I guess I'd better vote, huh? I choose Polaris because I think she would have been killed by now if she weren't bad.

Say wha? I've had suspicion of Polaris for a while, but I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. Why would Polaris be killed if she were civvie?

Because she's been assumed to be civvie for a long time, making unlikely to steal lynch votes from actual baddies. Killing her is what I would have done a long time ago if I were bad, and I assume everyone thinks like me because I am so average.

I guess I'd better vote, huh? I choose Polaris because I think she would have been killed by now if she weren't bad.

Thanks, my Morlock friends.

Now I want an egg.