The Syndicate

Matt F wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:I think you tried to kill Dom.

Funny. I think I tried to save Dom.

(and no, that doesn't mean I protected or tried to protect him last night...he did that one all on his own I'm pretty sure)

Why do you think I tried to kill Dom?

Turnip Head wrote:I implore you to actually read my posts and then tell me I could "easily be a teamie" of juliets.

LoRab wrote:And I voted alternative because it seemed like a good alternative (bad pun, sorry).

Matt F wrote:

Dom wrote:I think I can trust LoRab and think you are very wrong about her.
I do not trust Matt F because he clearly has no idea what he's talking about.
Timmer? I could see. I'm more inclined to think Bass or FS are bad.

Per the underline, I feel that means you are saying "Matt is good but is clueless." Is this correct? Because if you thought I was bad, there'd be no reason for you to say I have "no idea what he's talking about". If this is what you are saying, then you would be kind of right. I do feel that some of my suspicions must be correct. Must be. Just don't know which.

SVS - I wholeheartedly agree with your reason for sussing me (re: own the bone), but let's keep in mind that I've been trying to reserve myself after the embarrassing phase of MacD's policy lynch idea and lecture I received from Epig during Talking Heads. I took what they said to heart and am trying my best to be open minded. Even so, I've consistently voted or tried to get people to vote for MM, I just haven't typed out hundreds of posts as I usually do in a crazy craze.

I think it's possible you are correct on Lorab, but if Dom is really civ, then I would have to trust him on that score.

SVS - If you think I'm bad, what team do you have me pegged for? Though it is true she survived the second lynch against her when she was battlin' MacD, in the last minutes I voted for her and put her in a tie with MacD, and then we found out it was Mac who was lynched. W/o me putting her in a tie with MacD (as a matter of fact, I was trying to put her up two votes against Mac, unfortunately HBoy came in last minute and voted Mac), the town wouldn't have been sure that yes, once again, she survived a lynch against her. So you must think I'm on the Circle, right?

MM - Yeah that sucked. Regardless of me being wrong about his flip floppiness on Juliets, the fact still stands on her first and third lynch, he voted her after several, several others did, and didn't even vote the second time. Also, it still stands that he let the town know how improbable it was that Floyd and Luke would be on the same time team considering they are RL friends. But consider this, when all is said and done, Luke and Floyd are two players in a Mafia game. What makes it more improbable that they are on a team then any other two player combination? I feel like Turnip was trying to stick up for Floyd here. I don't have the Floyd lynch poll (HOSTS - Where's the Floyd lynch poll???) but I don't think Turnip voted him that day.

Dom wrote:I think I can trust LoRab and think you are very wrong about her.
I do not trust Matt F because he clearly has no idea what he's talking about.
Timmer? I could see. I'm more inclined to think Bass or FS are bad.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'll do it tomorrow. I'm already past my bedtime.

But if I don't get back to you, I give you permission to vote for me. :P

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Matt F wrote:You make me nervous dude.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:But what civ would take it upon him/herself to find the gem, find the statue, and recruit the statue to the civ side? (Assuming that's how the role works)

I don't mean to be pessimistic, I just think it's more likely that a baddie would try to take the gem than a civilian. That Statue-Man definitely shouldn't be a lynch priority, but it's something to keep in mind down the road.

Are you a member of mafia Matt F?

Turnip Head wrote:I think you tried to kill Dom.

Turnip Head wrote:

Matt F wrote:

Turnip Head wrote:Matt F

For real? Why?

A few reasons. Why this early? To see what happens.

Turnip Head wrote:Matt F

Tranq wrote:Matt F, do you have any thoughts on MM voting Timmer or on Timmer in general?

Metalmarsh89 wrote:But what civ would take it upon him/herself to find the gem, find the statue, and recruit the statue to the civ side? (Assuming that's how the role works)

Dom wrote:SVS-- who are you looking at and why?


Nice to see I didn't die.

juliets wrote:I'm voting for non-changeable votes, and Draconus welcome.

I am getting ready to leave for a long trip that will be driving all day Saturday, stopping but after lynch time, and then driving part of the day Sunday. I will have to vote before I go to bed on Friday night to get my vote in. Draconus, welcome.


Glad to have you Draconus, welcome.

Draconus wrote:

Golden wrote:Putting my vote on luke too. For one, to once again try to save sig, the person who continues to be suspected based on a case he is on a team that he is not on. For second, because I do think luke is a good use of a lynch on a day we have two.

Can you elaborate please?

I can be willing to move my vote to Luke until I here more about Sig. Just to be fair.

Draconus wrote:Thank you for elaborating, Golden. I haven't had time to go back and do some reading yet. I will move my vote to Luke for now. Any reason to suspect that Luke is a civ? It seems like it would be a waste to use one of these lynches on an inactive civ. Do you have any suspects, Golden?

juliets wrote:I am torn about Luke because he could easily be just an inactive civ like Draconus was asking about...

Draconus wrote:

juliets wrote:I am torn about Luke because he could easily be just an inactive civ like Draconus was asking about or like others have said he could be hiding behind his low posts. Tranq pointed out the few questions Luke asked but there is no digging for info like I would expect from someone who asks questions. There's just not a lot there (though SVS makes a good point that he has posted more than Canuck who voted for him for not being present). Despite some reservations (like this is feeling like a bandwagon) I'm going to go ahead and vote Luke and change my vote if something else comes up that I feel is a better vote.

Thank you for bringing this back up! I don't like this bandwagon that has quickly formed.

Draconus wrote:Thank you to both SVS and Typhoony. That was very helpful. I'm getting more and more uncomfortable with the Luke bandwagon, so I'm moving my vote again. nutella

Draconus wrote:Great result!!
So why Juliets?

Draconus wrote:I'd still like to know why Juliets, if anyone missed my earlier question. I ended up having to work today, so there won't be much free time

Draconus wrote:Putting my vote on Canuck. Really right now my only suspicion of her is because of her Luke vote. It reeked of indifferent baddie bandwagon voting...ness. But seriously, though, her vote post did strike me as that of a mafia member throwing her vote on the tail end of a bandwagon to attempt to blend in with the rest.

Linki: I think it's worth noting that my vote here has nothing to do with Typhoony's defense post of Juliets. I still am unsure of how to feel about her myself.

Draconus wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I don't get why Canucklehead is more suspicious to some people than juliets.

I read your posts below this and kind of understand your vote for me. To respond to this post: I voted for Canucklehead over Juliets because I still haven't had time to read through Juliets' posts. All I've been able to do so far is to just stay current. However, I will do my best to give that a shot tonight. I can't guarantee it will happen, though.

Question for you, though: Did you happen to read my self-defense post among my triple posts? No one ever responded to it that I could see.

Draconus wrote:

juliets wrote:

MacDougall wrote:juliets if you were scum who would you defibitely not kill?

I can't even imagine being scum.

The correct answer here was "MacDougall. Because he's my teammate."

Epi Sig

juliets wrote:Banana why did you vote for buglabush? He or she hasn't said a word. Neither have you for that matter. Please explain.

LoRab wrote:

MacDougall wrote:No tie breaker = juliets has negative votes right?

Or you have additional votes.

Bullzeye wrote:

Matt F wrote: Linki - I have been convinced Bullz is no longer Juliets teammate, however, I don't think it would be stupid. You get cleared of being on a certain team if you go with that strategy. If you get cleared of a certain team, a lot less likely you will be lynched. How would that be stupid?

You obviously don't get cleared, because Ol' Tunnely Matt will decide to suspect you because he wants to think you're always bad. It's stupid because you (1) don't kill anyone, thereby sacrificing the ability to rid yourself of someone who may be a threat, and (2) basically say "I don't want to survive the next attempt on my life. I have this survival that could save me at a crucial point but I'm just going to throw it out because I'm a rebel".

MacDougall wrote:Matt can you put your ISO and tunnel skills to use on the following players;

LoRab
Tranq

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Matt F wrote:Mac - Do you believe Bullzeye to be civvie, is that why you are sighing at a possible tunnel of him? Or is it because it's me?

You're a bona fide wind tunnel.

Bullzeye wrote:

Luke11646

Slightly more talkative than his fellow new players (not too surprising given one is dead), I will extend the same invitation to Luke that I did to Bugla earlier in this post: If you're struggling, ask people questions. He has been doing that a little and his posts feel reasonable. I'd say Luke looks more civ than Bug does. He comes off as someone who is genuinely alone in the game and trying to find his feet IMO.

Bullzeye wrote:

Juliets

I like what I'm seeing from JC. She comes across very sincere and is making genuine attempts to find suspects. Her Banana vote is also one of the more reasonable. Her Sig vote on day 2 is also well put together and thought out. I think she's civ.

MacDougall wrote:

Matt F wrote:Wilgy, get yourself over to the Metalmarsh bonfire. Juliets' teammate HBoy is over here, but we can all still work together to get rid of the crazy Doctor...

Hosts - If a Mafia team is eliminated, will we be told?

There is no way in the world that HamburgerBoy is juliets teammate.

LoRab wrote:

Matt F wrote:I might have to reread Lorab as well. She voted for Mac the first two days juliets was on the chopping block, but on the third day voted for juliets after juliets had already taken 7 votes. Hmmmm

Please do. I have nothing to hide. If you have any questions, please ask. I'm civ, and all my actions have been civ. eye me all you want.

Golden wrote:I cannot fathom how anyone could make a case that HB is on juliets team. I perceive HB as one of the driving forces behind getting juliets lynched. If HB is bad, I think he would need to be on the other team.

HamburgerBoy wrote:

Matt F wrote:Wilgy, get yourself over to the Metalmarsh bonfire. Juliets' teammate HBoy is over here, but we can all still work together to get rid of the crazy Doctor...

Two posts earlier

Matt F wrote:But I still plan on rereading HBoy (haven't gotten around to it sorry).

Make your case on me all big and formal-like pls.

Golden wrote:Sorry Wilgy. The way the game works is not that you get to choose why I find you suspicious, however much you might prefer that.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:They aren't the only ones Matt.

I also happen to know that fingersplints and Typhoony were both within three squares of TH's dead body at the time of his death. I also know that Canucklehead arrived on that square directly after TH came back to life.

So there are other options. I thought Canucklehead was the one, but that's obviously false. Typhoony is another possibility. Fingersplints could be too, but I think Typh was more likely.

Dr Von Dreszenstein - Sends out his dogs each night from his square to search for experiment subjects or dead bodies. He will know who is within three squares, and choose one of those players to experiment on. *secrets*