The Syndicate

Flyin' High wrote: . I'm sure AATB was most sad to see LT 1.0 be lynched.

Snow Dog wrote:

The A Team wrote: Really? Because it seems you are easily led this game Snow Dog.
I guess you make fun of my name because you are jealous
Surely not because I haven't been helpful, I have only been around a couple of days and came up with more suspicions than you have all game.

I pity the fool....

Suspicions are easy...easy to be right and easy to get wrong.

Snow Dog wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

The A Team wrote: I noticed that Roxy, Reywas and LT all had llama as their biggest suspicion before they were NK'ed or lynched, coincidence, most likely not.

You really think I need to silence those who question me? Absurd. I am happy to answer their suspicions without having to resort to dirty tricks.

You have to admit it looks suspicious.

I would invite you to consider the possibility that it looks suspicious because someone wants it to look suspicious. I didn't vote for LT, and given the number of votes for her, I couldn't have orchestrated that kill if I had wanted to.

Rest easy. I don't pay any attention to the Eh? Team.

Dex wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:Let's hope you don't get a punishment now for circumventing the hex or whatever it was.

I h o p e n o t , t e c h n i c a l l y I a m d o i n g w h a t i s r e q u i r e d b u t I g u e s s I ' l l f i n d o u t .

S o , I f e e l p r e t t y g o o d a b o u t a n L T 2 . 0 v o t e t o d a y . I f s h e d o e s f l i p m a f i o s o s h e w i l l b e a m e m b e r o f H I T . I f t h e A - T e a m i s r i g h t a b o u t t h e r e h a v i n g b e e n o n l y o n e r e c r u i t , t h e n w e w i l l b e d o w n t o o n e m e m b e r o f H I T a n d o n e m e m b e r o f t h e p s y c h o f a m i l y . T h a t d o e s n ' t s e e m t o o b a d - b u t T H A T w o r r i e s m e b e c a u s e t h e A - T e a m a l s o s a i d w e n e e d t o b e c a r e f u l l a n d t h a t s e e m s a l m o s t t o o c u t a n d d r y .

Russtifinko wrote:Yeah, all the capital B's make it pretty unintelligible.

So it seems clear from SVS's post that the theory about recruitment is spot on and that team's recruit isn't dead. Thus worries me, partly because the roles state that all baddie powers are cyclical, so both baddie teams could theoretically do this every couple days, and we won't know how many baddies are left. Worse, the recruit would've been acting good the whole time until they were turned and thus could be harder to find via thread evidence and votes. I think if we can we need to stamp out the recruit so there's only 1 team that could be recruiting. Unfortunately I haven't the slightest about who the recruit could be.

I think getting any baddie tomorrow would be a positive step, and we have some decent candidates for that, but I hope we can get some extra discussion going about this new issue and potentially nip it in the bud.

So general questions for more experienced folks out there: how does recruiting usually work? Would a recruit keep their powers and just change win conditions, or inherit the baddies' powers and nk now that the original baddies are dead? And if we were to lynch a recruit would the reveal just list their original role or say " role (this was a recruit)"?

And specific questions for the A team: you said something about civvies potentially being in big trouble a few days ago, back when I thought we were actually on a roll having lynched MP and having good leads on his partner. Did you know and this beforehand, and if so can you say how? Is their any other helpful information you're allowed to share with us at this point?

thellama73 wrote:You know what, A-Team? I don't think I like you. It's a shame, too, because you used to be cool.

He-Man wrote:I'm not sure why or like the push away from vomp, I think this is where we need to concentrate today.

Kate wrote:I looked over llama again. I know I have only played one game with him but I'm really not seeing any suspicious behavior. Can anyone elaborate?