Search found 155 matches
Return to “The Simpsons [GAME OVER]”
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:27 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Marge def seems content with an early TR & then slanking off this RD. I wonder if scum wouldn't try and ingratiate them further. Seems a bit obvious as scum to ghost after an active RD1
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
What do you think about Homer? I don't like CBGs PoE of 6 players, it's way too much scattershot, but I also am wary of Lisa rubbing his nose in his list & where they're voting
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 6:04 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Honestly, you pointing this out directly after you voted for Burns & after CBG posted his suspicions isnt very townyLisa Simpson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:27 pmHow does it feel that two of the simpsons are voting Burns?Comic Book Guy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:11 pm [VOTE: Mr. Burns] aubergine
Burns and all the Simpsons sans Grampa are most suspicious.
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
So your PoE is Burns, Bart, Lisa, Marge, Homer, & Alison?Comic Book Guy wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 4:11 pm [VOTE: Mr. Burns] aubergine
Burns and all the Simpsons sans Grampa are most suspicious.
Way to narrow it down
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Town Read I'd imagine
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 10:49 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
So I suppose Homer has the time to address my post re: his lack of participation and make a joke post or so, but not actually play the game.
The WIFOM is wouldnt a wolf try a bit harder to project town by playing the game? Or is that how a wolf would play right now to project lazy town?
Folks have mentioned how hard wolves try on Syndicate, perhaps Homer's not-trying is a ploy to hide scum.
The WIFOM is wouldnt a wolf try a bit harder to project town by playing the game? Or is that how a wolf would play right now to project lazy town?
Folks have mentioned how hard wolves try on Syndicate, perhaps Homer's not-trying is a ploy to hide scum.
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 10:17 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
I'm 100% sure who Otto is
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 10:14 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Alison isnt my 1st town read as in she's my top read, I just listed her first. She's been unafraid to engage the thread and multiple players & hasn't slanked.Bart Simpson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:24 amHere is a TR from Krusty for Otto as second TRKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:28 pm @Otto Mann My town pile isn't very strong as far as my certainty of them. Alison is my strongest lean, followed by you. After that it's some reads doing better than null, but by no means strong leans. Lisa, Burns, Grampa, Bart.
Scum leans on Hugh Jass, Homer, & The Grumple right now.
What makes Allison your first town read Krusty?And here is an implied TR from Otto to Krusty.
Question is, how did you expect something from him, except you know who he is? Can you confirm you realised who Krusty is and if yes how confident are you? (no need to share the info, just the level of confidence}
What i dislike and it may put lower Krusty in my reads to null is the shade for Milhouse who was not the wolfiest player and a GTH would sqeeze from my brain a not guilty answer.
About Hugh 's reads, that wall needs a little attention in other post.
My town read on Otto is pure meta. He and I have solved who each other are, so I'd wager he's basing his read on me from meta as well.
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:01 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Give us some thoughts between bites of baconBart Simpson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:33 am When everyone goes to sleep when i start playing
Breakfast time
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:59 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Fuck I hate playing on mobile, goddamn double post
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:58 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
You're total absence in the thread after what I thought to be an engaged & fruitful start. I also just wanted to shake your tree, see what fell.The Grumple wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:34 amyes but the lack of such can be a sign of a player blending in to avoid ruffling feathers, avoid putting pressure on teammates, putting up a good front of looking like doing work, etc. all the stuff that mafia members do to reach the end of the game. that's why i brought it up. it's not bad to have similar ideas to other players, but to be so thoroughly within the status quo is. i also feel like you skipped over some of my questions and the meat of the post, which i dislikeKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:55 amI like this bit of ogic, Hugh Jass had something similar...it goes along the lines of "not risky enough reads, that's scummy!"
The irony of this post of yours is that Hugh Jass already did it...so I guess your reads ain't all that fresh and original either.
Both you and Hugh are wrong tho...hawt, fresssssssh takes that are avante garde, cutting edge & oh so cosmo is not what makes a player town.
1. what made you change your opinion of me between day 1 and day 2?
2. can you explain what exactly it was about Hugh Jass long disorganized post bothered you?
Hugh Jass's novel...to start, the entire.concept came across like "I'm not one for big speeches" and then was followed by a monstrously long speech. I find long winded diatribes easy way for scum to muddy the waters
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:58 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
You're total absence in the thread after what I thought to be an engaged & fruitful start. I also just wanted to shake your tree, see what fell.The Grumple wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:34 amyes but the lack of such can be a sign of a player blending in to avoid ruffling feathers, avoid putting pressure on teammates, putting up a good front of looking like doing work, etc. all the stuff that mafia members do to reach the end of the game. that's why i brought it up. it's not bad to have similar ideas to other players, but to be so thoroughly within the status quo is. i also feel like you skipped over some of my questions and the meat of the post, which i dislikeKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:55 amI like this bit of ogic, Hugh Jass had something similar...it goes along the lines of "not risky enough reads, that's scummy!"
The irony of this post of yours is that Hugh Jass already did it...so I guess your reads ain't all that fresh and original either.
Both you and Hugh are wrong tho...hawt, fresssssssh takes that are avante garde, cutting edge & oh so cosmo is not what makes a player town.
1. what made you change your opinion of me between day 1 and day 2?
2. can you explain what exactly it was about Hugh Jass long disorganized post bothered you?
Hugh Jass's novel...to start, the entire.concept came across like "I'm not one for big speeches" and then was followed by a monstrously long speech. I find long winded diatribes easy way for scum to muddy the waters
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:16 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
This is the wayGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:08 am i am so done with walls
posting only absolute bullshit one-liners from now on*
*terms and conditions apply
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:09 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 12:55 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
I like this bit of ogic, Hugh Jass had something similar...it goes along the lines of "not risky enough reads, that's scummy!"The Grumple wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:35 pm additional lingo question: what is a naked vote
Mr. Jass gives off medium to stronk town vibes to me
the 5 paragraph post of all those thoughts drips of authenticity. he's either real or he's the kind of player i'll get mad at myself for getting tricked by. my gut says this is the kind of spaghetti that is cooked by a truthful mind.
Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:28 pm @Otto Mann My town pile isn't very strong as far as my certainty of them. Alison is my strongest lean, followed by you. After that it's some reads doing better than null, but by no means strong leans. Lisa, Burns, Grampa, Bart.
Scum leans on Hugh Jass, Homer, & The Grumple right now.
this is the point where my post got eaten cus i refreshed the page by mistake. i will have to summarize.
the part where you list me as a suspect seems out of the blue to me. the last time you mentioned me was a post where you were agreeing to a point i made, then nothing. i had not done or said anything between the two instances.
the rest of these reads seem like low hanging fruit. a low hanging fruit salad. homer is not an uncommon suspect. hugh jass is suspected because they posted that they had trouble organizing their thoughts in a post where they organize a lot of thoughts, as well as
townreading otto, alison, lisa, burns and bart are also far from being risky takes.
The irony of this post of yours is that Hugh Jass already did it...so I guess your reads ain't all that fresh and original either.
Both you and Hugh are wrong tho...hawt, fresssssssh takes that are avante garde, cutting edge & oh so cosmo is not what makes a player town.
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:28 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
[mention]Otto Mann[/mention] My town pile isn't very strong as far as my certainty of them. Alison is my strongest lean, followed by you. After that it's some reads doing better than null, but by no means strong leans. Lisa, Burns, Grampa, Bart.
Scum leans on Hugh Jass, Homer, & The Grumple right now.
Scum leans on Hugh Jass, Homer, & The Grumple right now.
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
This is uber-convincing.
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Interesting...has trouble putting thoughts into words, then proceeds to post an absolute novel. Ya, makes sense. Also, not a fan at all of the last minute pop-in at EoD last RD, giving Milhouse a townread on pretty much nothing (cuz' that's what Milhouse had done up to that point....nuthin') right before he gets axed. Super convenient way for a wolf to appear towny.Hugh Jass wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:54 am Finally caught up! I'm feeling things, feeling a lot of things but I'm having trouble trying to put them into words lol. It was also pretty difficult internalizing information, felt like reading posts from new players everywhere and the lack of familiarity with avys I guess you get lost sometimes and don't even remember who said what.
I think my strongest town reads would be Marge, Otto and Alison. Found myself agreeing with like almost everything Marge saying and that's pretty crazy lol. We have the two same scum reads and like most of her posts comes off as natural and you can see her train of thoughts. They're like open and accessible if that makes any sense, doesn't feel like there is an agenda behind them. I usually find the "lol" and other laughing acronyms as scum tells sometimes when they don't really match the tone and vibe of a player, and they're like using them to sweeten their post and comes off as anxious. Here it feels like she's just having fun, and it kind of gives off a good care free vibe that is townie.
Otto and Alison are the og contributors of the thread. I liked the energy they came in with, and it felt like it came with genuine game solving intent. Didn't really agree all that much with some of Otto's reads but they felt genuine, a lot of progression and reconsiderations which makes me feel like he's trying to figure out people for real and not just putting a show. I particularly liked post 72, I think it's the kind of post that only town does. It's nothing fancy but like scum never make them because they're never solving for real. I don't know if this make any sense lol, it's like the kind of self reflecting and gathering of thoughts that comes from a townie mindset when they're trying to get a feel for the state of the game. Agreed with his Gtumple take, felt also genuine and not like him wanting to get Grumple off his back. I understand it too 'cause you usually can have personal takes on how someone is treating you so you can get reads from it, I'm a no u specialist since I feel like I have good instincts for when scum is pushing me for bullshit reasons lol. Overall have the same thought about Alison, I liked her Gramps take and while I started suspecting him for different and more personal reasons, her take are good. The change of speed of Gramps is particularily telling. I also like her feelings about the state of the game and how its going, feel like genuine town concerns.
Pretty much agree with Marge about Homer. The idgaf attitude her and not tailoring his game to people especially after getting prodded is more likely town than not. Also it actually feels genuine, rather than like a scum trying to sell that fake bravado. He kind of embodies it here lol. The lock town on Mill is absolutely beautiful.
I'm having some trouble with CBG, little bit of a love hate relationship. I kind of read his concise posts as town like, they feel like naked thoughts and right to the point. Also some of the silly one liners he's dished have surprisingly pinged me town lol. He has that same attitude vibe that Homer have, although it's not something that is unfakeable (if that is word). Not sure if I'm dumb but post 417 is town for me lmao. We have Mill about to get eliminated, and it's like a meme-y mafia read on him that I just don't think Mafia ever makes. It's fucking hilarious.
Unlike his parents, I have no fucking clue who Bart is. He's in my townpile though. I guess for the bland reasons that his thoughts are genuine bla bla bla lol. I kind of like the little work he's done when he's been playing the game and contributing. Feels real to me, and while it actually matches other peoples reads especially the scum reads, it kind of comes off as he's coming into them on his own like he's playing the game at his own pace.
Kristy, and Lisa are in my PoE. I haven't really figured them out much and some stuff have pinged me. Also not a lot of things to work with. Krusty gives off a weird disattached vibe, like he's a robot if that makes sense lol. There is like no emotion accompanying his posts and it comes off as if he's not actually trying to figure people out just asking questions. Speaking of questions, I'm not seeing him reach much conclusions and seems like he's just faking contributions through those questions who don't seem most of the time to be stuff that will actually help him figure someone out. More like bland and semantic stuff that I guess help him fake contribution. I think his take on Mill's wall post is the kind of wolfy remark used to shade others. He's like piggy backing off others when they're discussing Mill, and he just pops in to point out something that can be seen as scummy and then nothing further. He dips from there with clean hands. Kind of saw it that way.
Not a big fan of Lisa's little contribution. Feels like she's hunting some easy posts to go off of, and then just share some bland takes. She's kind of using them to appear as if contributing. It's not the lack of reasoning that is off to me, it's more like they seem to be random as hell. There is no train of thoughts or contuinity to them, she's not like quoting different posts about a same discussion trying to give her thoughts about them or add to the discussion. She's more putting her hand into a lot of different discussion to I guess appear more visible, and broaden her reach.
Already talked about Gramps and Burns who are at the bottom of my PoE. Haven't really moved much off of them after catching up completely, although I'd say I'm still mulling over some things I've seen from Gramps. Also the inactives thing could be a culture/playstyle clash, but even then I'm not a big fan of the rest of his contribution. The gear shift that Alison built her case on is something I agree with as well. Scums are more likely to make it when called out, and it kind of shows that whatever vibe or attitude they had prior was fake.
I still fucking hate Mr. Burns with a passion. I think he was trying to discredit early on Alison and Otto with the fear mongering about them potentially power wolfing. It's a cheap way to shade someone while posing it as a an open ended question, "oh I'm just aking myself" "I'm not sure". It sounds so fucking fake, and it's usually the kind of cowardy wolf tactics to shade loud voices. No fucking townie put that thought out there immediately. It's so slimy lol.
I've got more thoughts there, and also more thoughts in general but this is it for this post. It actually fucking sucks to come from behind 'cause I have so many problems trying to put into words everything I want to say lol. I guess that'll serve me missing the whole phase. Hopefully I'll keep being up to date this phase. I initially thought about iso-ing every single player and then sharing my thoughts posts by posts as that'd be easier, but fuck that lmao.
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
That derp clear was so derp that I'm inclined to give him a pass, for now.
Homer & CBG are on my radar at the moment.
Thoughts on why the Maf ignored the tracker claim & left Skinner alone?
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
I'm town cleared? Didn't think that was the case. I blame the 24hr lock down, kinda took the gas out of my tank. It's something I'll have to get used to.Otto Mann wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:39 pmWhy do I feel like you're approaching this game with far less aggression and snarl than I'm used to seeing from you..when you're tp?Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:19 amWas there something specific about Otto's game that made you target him?Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:15 amBecause I wanted to?Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:46 amwhy would you track otto of all people??
Your start wasn't so bad but as soon as I realized who you are I kinda just said well let's see where this goes.
You usually push back against easy town clears on yourself because as tp you're paranoid af and I'm just not seeing it so far.
Turn it up buddy ol pal.
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Otto Mann wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:07 pmShots fired. What are your thoughts on Grampa?Lisa Simpson wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:45 amI don't believe you don't believe this.Otto Mann wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 2:09 amBruh..
Worst.tracker.ever (sorryCBG)
And I don't believe you. The real tracker can do whatever they want, but.. yeah I just don't believe you're the tracker.
That is a decent track.
Hmmm, in complete disagreement.
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:19 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Was there something specific about Otto's game that made you target him?Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:15 amBecause I wanted to?Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:46 amwhy would you track otto of all people??
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:18 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
Not sure if we've seen a post from Homer that's longer than 2 sentences. Others have of course noticed the lack of participation, but I wonder....does Homer as W give Marge a town read if they're scum buds? I'd think he'd participate more if that were the case
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:00 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons [DAY 2]
CBG is looking just as scummy as he was at the end of last RD. 2 posts thus far, with a total of like 5, maybe 6 words? Feels like he's scum that's having a hard time engaging the thread after his early interactions.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 9:30 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
[mention]Otto Mann[/mention] Lisa is a null read for me right now. Her posts have been few & scant, not really engaging the game to deep. That's not enough for me to scum read her now, tho that will change if it persists.
CBG did engage, got into some talks with players that would def be uncomfortable for him if he's a wolf. Then he backed off significantly, and has yet IMO to engage the game again as seriously.
CBG did engage, got into some talks with players that would def be uncomfortable for him if he's a wolf. Then he backed off significantly, and has yet IMO to engage the game again as seriously.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 8:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 0]
Def strange that some players get scum reads in the list for posting direct character quotes, while others doing the same thing get town reads.Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 8:18 pmfor contextMilhouse Van Houten wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 12:52 pm And i think I've figured it out...Town
TownGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:17 pm alright, used up all my show lore in the first two posts, let's go
TownScum
Town
Town
ScumMarge Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 5:06 amyell at the kids or somethingGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 7:17 pm alright, used up all my show lore in the first two posts, let's go
ScumLisa Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 3:39 am Can i go already? I am a real child, i don't own any guns and don't want to look at this poor animal.
Town
TownAllison Taylor wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 6:22 am Has anyone seen my saxophone? I left it somewhere around here, but then I got distracted by a game of anagrams and can't find it again.
TownKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 9:58 am Good morning. I see some of us got the party started already. 1st thoughts...Marge has crocodile tears.
ScumPrincipal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 1:16 pm Egads I got so busy and now my roast is ruined!
Unless.....
Town
this is Milhouse's singular contribution
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 7:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 7:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
[VOTE: COMIC BOOK GUY]
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 7:37 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
[VOTE:
] aubergine
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
He'd tell you, but then he'd be grandstandingOtto Mann wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:17 pmWhy?Ned Flanders wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:13 pmThese reads are bad and you should feel bad.Otto Mann wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 3:15 pm Find myself agreeing with Allison and Burns for the most part. I like the Grumple and Krusty, Grandpa seems pretty ok too.
Feeling less sure on Comic dude, but still on the town lean side.
Pretty null on a bunch in there.
Skinner, Flanders, Milhouse take up the bottom three spots with my preference being Skinner Flanders wagons.
Milhouse calling Skinner and Flanders scum is interesting to me and I get it's highly unlikely he's wolf bros with them, but his entrance, lack of content and scum list without due exploration is troubling.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
So you feel contributing & explaining your reads is grandstanding?Ned Flanders wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:13 pmI have been playing and intend to continue to do so. I've said everything that needs to be said. Burns and Grandpa are suspect to me and have been since I first saw them post. I just don't feel like grandstanding for town cred.Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:12 pmIs that the only reason you're contributing? And here I thought it was because you signed up to play.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Is that the only reason you're contributing? And here I thought it was because you signed up to play.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
I don't think D1 is the time to take out slankersAllison Taylor wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 4:47 pmThat's not what TMI means - TMI would be me being correct about my accusation of active lurkers and knowing that they are scum because they are in fact scum.Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 4:06 pm Something about this sentence just doesn't sit well with me...it's borderline TMI. Slankers/lurkers certainly need to be addressed at some point, but RD1 it feels an easy way to push a mislynch.
How do you propose we address slankers who post just enough to avoid being subbed out, but not enough to actually contribute? Because I think the thread is in a pretty chaotic state right now, lots of people are pointing fingers at each other, and that is a perfect atmosphere for mafia to lurk in. Therefore I think mafia are going to be very incentivized to slank out D1, especially when they have the cover of "this is a meme game/I'm just staying in character" to hide behind.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 4:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Something about this sentence just doesn't sit well with me...it's borderline TMI. Slankers/lurkers certainly need to be addressed at some point, but RD1 it feels an easy way to push a mislynch.Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:39 pm Here's where I'm at right now:
I think Marge is town. I think Burns is town. Grampa's recent posts have made me doubt my scumread on him a bit. I feel like the thread is descending into an orgy of people nitpicking stuff about each other's posts and/or getting super defensive and lashing out when their own posts gets nitpicked. I think there's a decent number of people active lurking, eating popcorn, and watching the town tear each other into shreds.
I am currently more in favor of putting pressure on inactive people to contribute. I do not agree with Burns that Milhouse coming in to post some random read salad without any explanations or serious pushes is a townie entrance. I'm am concerned that Skinner and Hugh are still AWOL. I am also concerned that Ned Flanders has had three posts the entire day, scumread Burns early on, and then dropped a vote on him without any announcement, after Marge pushed Burns. (If you check the poll you will see that Flanders voted Burns after Marge and Homer voted, even though his suspicion on Burns purportedly came long before.) I do not know what Flanders' progression on the game is or why he is drive by voting Burns at a very convenient timing without saying anything.
So those four are my POE. I trust Otto, Marge, Burns, Grumple and Krusty. I am willing to accept Marge + Homer's testimony that they know who Bart is and that his behavior this game strongly indicates that he is town. I started off with an early Lisa townread, but she has since fallen off. So my 5 townreads + tentatively Bart is my townpool for today. Everyone else who isn't directly in the POE or in my townpool is somewhere in the middle.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 3:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
I hear what you're saying, and I'm pretty sure Marge laid out other reasons as well that were apart of her town read? Or am I totally misremembering? I'm pretty sure she said more than "they refuse to participate, ergo town!"Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:57 pm... whatKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:52 pmRefusing to participate is anti-town. I'm just not sure how you know whether or not a player's reads are good or bad at this pointGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:51 pm??Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:48 pm
You're mischaracterizing what I said. Without any flips, how do you know what's a good read or bad read with no info to go on?
I don't understand the argument you're making if it isn't "all reads are equal until proven otherwise." And I'm going to really struggle to accept that position because it completely neuters you outside of mech clears.
Do you disagree that refusing to participate is anti-town?
okay
so
you agree with me that refusing to participate is anti-town
Marge takes someone refusing to participate and says it's a good look, Marge town-reads them, i.e. Marge says in this instance that anti-town play is good
What is Marge's read, to you?
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Refusing to participate is anti-town. I'm just not sure how you know whether or not a player's reads are good or bad at this pointGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:51 pm??Krusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:48 pm
You're mischaracterizing what I said. Without any flips, how do you know what's a good read or bad read with no info to go on?
I don't understand the argument you're making if it isn't "all reads are equal until proven otherwise." And I'm going to really struggle to accept that position because it completely neuters you outside of mech clears.
Do you disagree that refusing to participate is anti-town?
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
You're mischaracterizing what I said. Without any flips, how do you know what's a good read or bad read with no info to go on?Grampa Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:22 pmI haven't called or suggested that Marge is a woofKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:13 pm
Are you implying they're W/W? A bad read may be just that...why do you seem eager to put a player in a scum pile simply cuz' you feel their reads are bad? Also, how do you know their reads are bad? You may not agree with it, but at this stage you shouldn't have any real idea of what a good or bad read is
I say anti-town play is bad
someone goes "anti-town play is good, actually"
third person comes in and says "who are we to decide what is a good or bad read, really" (total nonsense and gives "anti-town play is good" a run for its money)
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Are you implying they're W/W? A bad read may be just that...why do you seem eager to put a player in a scum pile simply cuz' you feel their reads are bad? Also, how do you know their reads are bad? You may not agree with it, but at this stage you shouldn't have any real idea of what a good or bad read isGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 12:07 pmpointing out how bad your read is seems like a perfectly good use of time to meMarge Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 11:54 ami'm town reading them for not tailoring their posts to satisfy their pushers that demand better contentGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 11:49 am EOD is in less than ten hours and you are reading "no urgency, doing their own thing" as town. Three gifs, two of which are in response to direct pressure, and you're "Looks good to me" about it.
there's no urgency for them to get the voters off them, they're a lurker, they know what's coming for them if they don't improve. a scum lurker would just start solving in order to appease their voters.
if you disagree with that notion then perhaps you should look to do something more important with your time. I'm not arguing that he's locked town, it's good enough for day 1, the read can change. There's a 75% chance he's a town, your case is "he's doing nothing"
good luck convincing people with that one, pops
posting nothing or openly being defiant of the most simple of requests and just cruising in the background is either wolf behaviour or anti-town behaviour, and neither compel me to nod my head and go "this is good"
I don't get your insistence on turning it into an extreme. Yeah, anyone we pick will probably flip town... that doesn't mean our cases can just toss reason out the window. Homer might not be a wolf, he might just be town being anti-town. Okay cool, got it. Then why is your vote for me based on me asking Burns what issue they were having that took them out of commission for the early stretch? How is "I will not be playing this game despite me signing up and you asking me to participate" a good look that is good enough for D1 but "What problem did you have?" is this illuminating scum tell that must be chopped? The consistency and logic behind your positions simply do not parse, and telling me to go case other people is dismissive deflection.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 11:43 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Hmmm, in complete disagreement.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 3:27 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Comic Guy. His engagement has dropped off IMO, a handful of theme banter posts and then a vote without explanationThe Grumple wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:47 amis this in reference to Mr Mann or Mr GuyKrusty the Clown wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:18 amI agree, it feels like he entered the game, threw some light jokes & a bit of sus, followed with a quick pocket on my entrance, then backed off. Or am I missing something?The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 10:33 pm Hello everyone. I ate a single piece of fruit and it healed some of my status conditions and restored 1/4 of my MP.
I feel okay about Otto Mann. I liked his responses to the sticks in his spokes. I am... concerned that through his responses to me he is trying to nudge my perceptions of him, but this may be paranoia. I am not concerned. No further action is needed at this time.
Talk to me more on Comic Book Guy. What is giving people townreads on him.
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 2:18 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
I agree, it feels like he entered the game, threw some light jokes & a bit of sus, followed with a quick pocket on my entrance, then backed off. Or am I missing something?The Grumple wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 10:33 pm Hello everyone. I ate a single piece of fruit and it healed some of my status conditions and restored 1/4 of my MP.
I feel okay about Otto Mann. I liked his responses to the sticks in his spokes. I am... concerned that through his responses to me he is trying to nudge my perceptions of him, but this may be paranoia. I am not concerned. No further action is needed at this time.
Talk to me more on Comic Book Guy. What is giving people townreads on him.
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Is it tho? Seems a bit defensive to me, myself & I. If you're TP, then why would a no reason, no pressure vote bother you? It would if you're Maf of courseGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:08 pmA vote with no reason and after no pressure seems to be worth a "Why?" to me.Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:06 pm [VOTE: Grampa Simpson] aubergine
Beetlejuice + "why me?" is a wolf.
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Is it weird that I find this scintillating & positively titillating?Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:11 pm Why were you kinda coasting by and fluffing but suddenly sit up straight and start generating content when someone naked votes you?
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 7:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Got a gig IRL tonight, so I'll be absent for much of, if not all, of this evening.
Homer is slanking. Get outta the bushes & participate IMO.
Homer is slanking. Get outta the bushes & participate IMO.
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 4:02 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
I don't have a vote on you. Paying superficial attention to the thread, eh? Risky play, let's see if it works out for you.Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 3:31 pm I see a housewife and a clown are voting a reputable man such as myself. Could I have done something wrong?
No it must be them who’s wrong.
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 2:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
For myself, it's the pop in & the lack of follow up posting actually playing the game, given that there's certainly been gameplay to get involved with.Allison Taylor wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 2:18 pm Actually I want to know why Krusty thought Skinner's pop in was wolfy over, like, Homer's or Grumple's.
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 2:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
Am I the only one reading this as a wolfy pop in?Principal Skinner wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 1:16 pm Egads I got so busy and now my roast is ruined!
Unless.....
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 12:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 11:40 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 0]
I second thisGrampa Simpson wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 11:37 amget it like "killed" get it or get it like "they're kinda sexy" get it?
personally prefer the latter
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 11:38 am
- Forum: Previous Heists
- Topic: The Simpsons [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 2378
- Views: 33575
Re: The Simpsons Mafia [DAY 1]
I didn't OMGUS. Now you're creating false narratives.