The Syndicate

Good game, all. I look forward to more games here

Just like the last game I played, I died right at the end.


linki: I'm looking forward to the Death Note game myself.

Epignosis wrote:I wanted to play this game and was disappointed with those who signed up and didn't.

ture

I'm so glad I had a part in bringing the team to victory. Way to go, bros.

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:

borokkuei wrote:Nahh, I'll be playing future games

If you are bad, you deserve kudos for surviving this long in this crazy game. Anyone who had hopes of this being simple and light has had their dreams crushed into a thousand pieces. (To MP: Daisy is the one who should be called the Dream Crusher).

Out of the two mafia games I've played, this is the most exhausting one by far.

Nahh, I'll be playing future games

Don't forget to vote, Mattsu chan. Where does your allegiance lie?

Well I'm dead so I'm going to vote for DFaraday anyway.

Snow Dog wrote:

borokkuei wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

borokkuei wrote:I guess I'm toast then.

I like toast.

Me too. Especially with jam.

Snow Dog wrote:

borokkuei wrote:I guess I'm toast then.

I like toast.

Me too. Especially with jam.

I guess I'm toast then.

know*

Snow Dog wrote:

borokkuei wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I was wrong about Bullz, not so sure about Indi & CBK. But CBK is off the poll, and Dom was off the poll yesterday, and he was the only serious alternative to Bullz, yet no one today is really mentioning him. And CBK has a vaguely hostile, almost hectoring tone I tend to associate with certain people when they are bad, and I so badly want to vote for her

So I have to vote now as I may not be home by the end of the poll. I don't know what to think of Borok, tbh, but the people I don't trust AT ALL are pushing a lynch of him, and that makes me very tense. So, as I said yesterday (Mafia yesterday, not calendar yesterday), my opinion of some people might change if Bullz came up civ, and he did and it has. But not enough to vote on so early, so gonna vote Faraday.

I am not liking the vague-r than Faraday normal, blendier than usual even for him, quality of his posts.

*Voting Faraday*

Bad move. he is civ.

What makes you think that?

I'm considering voting for him because of his shadiness that I pointed out a couple of posts upward.

If you are civ, please do not vote for him. You may think to do it to save yourself. Understandable. So I beseech all civs out there, if you trust me and believe me civ, do not vote for DF.

well now I don't now. I'll think about it for a few hours until the poll is about to close.

Snow Dog wrote:

S~V~S wrote:I was wrong about Bullz, not so sure about Indi & CBK. But CBK is off the poll, and Dom was off the poll yesterday, and he was the only serious alternative to Bullz, yet no one today is really mentioning him. And CBK has a vaguely hostile, almost hectoring tone I tend to associate with certain people when they are bad, and I so badly want to vote for her

So I have to vote now as I may not be home by the end of the poll. I don't know what to think of Borok, tbh, but the people I don't trust AT ALL are pushing a lynch of him, and that makes me very tense. So, as I said yesterday (Mafia yesterday, not calendar yesterday), my opinion of some people might change if Bullz came up civ, and he did and it has. But not enough to vote on so early, so gonna vote Faraday.

I am not liking the vague-r than Faraday normal, blendier than usual even for him, quality of his posts.

*Voting Faraday*

Bad move. he is civ.

What makes you think that?

I'm considering voting for him because of his shadiness that I pointed out a couple of posts upward.

DFaraday wrote:

S~V~S wrote:

borokkuei wrote:I can see how my choice to pick out the low posters would be worrisome, but that would be more true at the beginning of the game when there are a large amount of players. Since the game has been going on for a while and there are only 11 players remaining, it makes sense that at least 1 baddie would be in the low posters group.

Actually, it is more worrisome in the end game. At that point, everyone should have real suspicions and opinions on almost everyone. Not wanting to voice those suspicions, and thereby take suspicion yourself from those you suspect or those that trust them, is a fairly overt baddie tell.

The fact that you are saying this actually makes me feel better about you.

Agreed. It's always only a matter of time before someone decides to start randomly going after low posters, especially to save themselves. I'm certainly leaning Borok right now.

And for the record, I am actually buying CBK's defence, I think. She's reading more civ to me than Borok is, at least.

And RIP Bullz, I was wrong.

But you just quoted someone saying they feel better about me-- not worse. You trying to spin someone's comment around so you can piggyback a false statement seems really weird and definitely not civ, IMO.

S~V~S wrote:

borokkuei wrote:I can see how my choice to pick out the low posters would be worrisome, but that would be more true at the beginning of the game when there are a large amount of players. Since the game has been going on for a while and there are only 11 players remaining, it makes sense that at least 1 baddie would be in the low posters group.

Actually, it is more worrisome in the end game. At that point, everyone should have real suspicions and opinions on almost everyone. Not wanting to voice those suspicions, and thereby take suspicion yourself from those you suspect or those that trust them, is a fairly overt baddie tell.

The fact that you are saying this actually makes me feel better about you.

Better how?

Dom wrote:

borokkuei wrote:I can see how my choice to pick out the low posters would be worrisome, but that would be more true at the beginning of the game when there are a large amount of players. Since the game has been going on for a while and there are only 11 players remaining, it makes sense that at least 1 baddie would be in the low posters group.

How many games have you played?

1 game, I think two years ago. Maybe one year ago. Electronic music mafia hosted by MP :3

I can see how my choice to pick out the low posters would be worrisome, but that would be more true at the beginning of the game when there are a large amount of players. Since the game has been going on for a while and there are only 11 players remaining, it makes sense that at least 1 baddie would be in the low posters group.

That seems reasonable.

But still, 36% chance of a baddie being in that group isn't too bad. It makes sense.

k, the math is 36%, which is close enough to 50 to make me think it's worth considering, but still not strong enough for me to really push that idea.

To CBK {
I'm not supposed to say weird things? The way I type here is the way I talk in real life (minus all the typos).

I've been trying to objectively look at the posts of mine that you've quoted for earning your suspicion, but I really have no idea what you are talking about. Everything I've said seems really rational to me, and I've clearly stated that most of my votes were due to very wobbly reasons, since I'm not really getting strong civ/bad vibes from anyone -- although, you being extremely insistent and finding false evidence in posts of mine makes me think you might be a baddy just trying to get everyone to look at me critically, but I still don't feel very strongly about that and it seems like you want the best for the civ team.

My votes may be for really weak reasons, but at least I'm putting forward votes to not make daisy mad and get myself killed from host-added votes in subsequent polls. Me dying furthers the game in the baddies' favor. }

The only things I have on my mind right now regarding how to rid ourselves of the remaining baddies is:
- Take a closer look at the players who have not posted/barely posted for the last few days/nights. They could be laying low since the argument portion of the game obviously seems to be heating up.
- I personally think Dom might be bad because of the reasons I quoted before, but I'm not too confident about that since a considerable amount of players think I'm wrong.
- Also, CBK might be bad because of his insistent criticism of my (what I feel to be completely normal) communication in the game. I think that's too emotional and personal of a reason to feel confident about lynching him though.


In a nutshell, I think the most suspicious players are the ones who haven't been contributing much: A Person, DFaraday, Indiglo, Little Tiger. That's 4 players and, if I'm correct, only 3 baddies remain. There's a decent chance that 1 or more of the baddies are in that group of 4. I recently took a stats class and I could do the probability math but I'm not in the class anymore so fug it yo.

Snow Dog wrote:I can't help feel the Bullzeye voters are responsible for his death.

How many Lazers do we thinbk remain?

I think only one was killed so far (Timmer).

I thought my rebuttal made sense but oh well :\

BigDamnHero wrote:

borokkuei wrote: I just wanted to vote because I was going to be busy for a while and knew I would otherwise miss the poll, and I didn't want to make spacedaisy mad. I would have voted myself, but I think she mentioned not liking that either. Other than that, I had my own suspicions based on absolutely nothing (like my reasons for thinking about snow dog and A Person). Bullz seemed as good as dead anyway since most people voted for him, but looking at the roles and the fact that he's alive, it seems fairly obvious that he's a civ too. Considering that other players who have been spotted as civ voted for bullz (SVS, others I don't remember), I don't think there is much to go on there in regard to me being bad.

This is my logic.

I'm sorry but there's nothing in all of that explanation that makes any sense. Bullzeye wasn't "as good as dead" as you claim because you were the first to vote for him. And being the first person to vote, why on earth would you vote for yourself, regardless of real life commitments?!?!?! I've voiced my suspecikns of borrukei before, but this pushes things over the edge. If I could vote now, I'd cast my vote for him immediately, but ill have to wait for Dausy to adjust things to fit her schedule (which is fine by me). Should anything else come to light, I may change but otherwise I'm voting to lynch borrokuei thus round.

By "as good as dead" I meant it seemed as though everyone was going to vote for him, so why not -- if everyone else is going to vote for him, he's obviously going to be lynched.

Being the first person to vote, I'd vote for myself so I wouldn't put a vote towards anyone else, obviously. It didn't seem like someone was going to lynch me, and I didn't want to miss the vote. But, since bullzeye seemed like he would get all the votes, I put my vote towards than in hopes that not everyone in this thread could be wrong about him (they were).

I don't really see what's wrong with that.

Also: "why on earth would you vote for yourself, regardless of real life commitments?!?!?!" -- because lol I have a life, wherein I have more important things to do than play a game

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:

borokkuei wrote:No dom? Well damn.

I have nothing else to go on really except strong sad's public dislike for bullz, possibly based on insider knowledge, so I'll go with that.

Plus, I would add, THE first vote this last time (other than dead/host) and on "nothing to go on." Because it's been mentioned repeatedly that Strongsad does not appear to have any special knowledge.

And, by the way, borok, I felt like there was some comment you made back the way that reminded me that I should say I am glad you're in the game! Hopefully I don't come off too strong.

nah it's fine, I admire your ability form strong opinions of players in this game -- something I seem to have trouble doing.

I just wanted to vote because I was going to be busy for a while and knew I would otherwise miss the poll, and I didn't want to make spacedaisy mad. I would have voted myself, but I think she mentioned not liking that either. Other than that, I had my own suspicions based on absolutely nothing (like my reasons for thinking about snow dog and A Person). Bullz seemed as good as dead anyway since most people voted for him, but looking at the roles and the fact that he's alive, it seems fairly obvious that he's a civ too. Considering that other players who have been spotted as civ voted for bullz (SVS, others I don't remember), I don't think there is much to go on there in regard to me being bad.

This is my logic.

All I said was that I was glad somebody died so the game could finally progress. I can't be the only person who thinks this game was stagnated for a while.

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:

juliets wrote:Well I'm definitely moving in a different direction.

CBK what do you mean by your earlier comment that my comment about borok was either confused or weird? It didn't sound either to me. It was a comment based on a conversation MP had with borok, which is a long time ago in this game. And what conclusion are you drawing from seeing my comment as confused or weird? And finally, why are you wasting time on me? Is it because I have brought out suspicion of you?

I have to think about where to go next after this last lynch. I never got to read indiglo so I will do that this time around though I'm not sure the logic still holds for her to be bad. Also, is there some kind of linking logic from this last lynch attempt that would suggest I look at someone else that I'm not thinking of? The game has gotten so convoluted I'm not sure I'm thinking straight.

Convoluted indeed! That whole ridiculously big post was to show good reason to suspect borok. It had nothing to do with you except to show where your comments revealed borok's confused or weird behavior.

Yes, sorry everyone. I was so rushed to get back to homework and bed that I didn't make sure it was clear that that was all to make a case against borok. It may have come out a little jumbled, because I had like 5 to 7 tabs of the game open all at once.

But he decided I was a civ...

ah ok

tfw not sk

sk?

Well that was surprising.


And I'm not really sure how to combat these accusations against me. I suppose I could simply say "I'm a civ" but so many people have said that and it never seems to sway anyone's opinion (I wouldn't expect it to). I mostly see accusations against my actual personality than based on how I play the game, which is basically my life in a nutshell.

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:Seriously, I have an obscene amount of homework this semester.

same tbh

Oh, my bad -- it apparently wasn't sudden :\

Also, your very sudden and strong opinion of me seem random to me, like you're just trying to stir up something to get people to vote for me so the civs can have another loss.

Also also, if me not posting much is enough for me to get your attention, why not consider A Person over me? He posts less than I do by a huge margin.

Leamiteo wrote:

borokkuei wrote:My only other suspicions right now are:

BDH - not based on much other than he seems to have been against me for the whole game, changing his reasons every day/night period.

A Person - just simply because he never posts... like, ever, but more so since things have been heating up a bit, so maybe he's trying to lay low and avoid scrutiny, or possibly he's like me and is just generally quiet (I know he is, but still).

And somewhat snow dog, just because he seems to be in a really good place with everyone thinking he's civ. He very might well be civ, but if he's not and everyone else is convinced of his civviness, he's in a very safe spot for a baddy. But really I've got no evidence on that and I'm most likely (like 90% sure) that I'm simply over-analyzing.

#1 BDH is clearly good. Anyone who votes for him gets my

#2 You don't post much. When you do, content is severely lacking.

Borok is bad. I think the bullz bandwagon is a diversion!

This just makes me think that you and BDH are on a team together, but I really don't have any information to back that up. Why is he "clearly good"?

I definitely post more than some of the other players. My posts lack content because I'm bad at reading people on the internet.

Bullz isn't a diversion-- I'd obviously vote for dom if he were still on the poll.

Yeah, I'm not convinced on snowy being bad. That was just me over-analyzing.

My only other suspicions right now are:

BDH - not based on much other than he seems to have been against me for the whole game, changing his reasons every day/night period.

A Person - just simply because he never posts... like, ever, but more so since things have been heating up a bit, so maybe he's trying to lay low and avoid scrutiny, or possibly he's like me and is just generally quiet (I know he is, but still).

And somewhat snow dog, just because he seems to be in a really good place with everyone thinking he's civ. He very might well be civ, but if he's not and everyone else is convinced of his civviness, he's in a very safe spot for a baddy. But really I've got no evidence on that and I'm most likely (like 90% sure) that I'm simply over-analyzing.

Does anyone have opinions on AP? I definitely don't, but he doesn't post much.

BigDamnHero wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Bullz, do you have an opinion on CBK?

Also, imo Dom is ALWAYS overdramatic (love ya Dom), it is just part of what/who he is. So saying Dom is overdramatic does not say much.

And you know, we all get caught sometimes through bad luck or a poor roll of the dice. Had Timmer been in time to vote, he would have lived, and would be basking in the glow of a DP lynch

Linki~ I have seen nothing bad about Borok. Can you explain why you think he is a better alternative?

What do you make of their quarrels throughout the game? One suspects the other, then they vote for each other...but now they both have come together to cast the first two votes against Bullzeye. I haven't particularly trusted either of them and now I'm just wondering if they may not have both been Lasers together all this time...

If that were true, what would be the point in avoiding voting for the same person until late in the game and deciding to team up on bullz? It doesn't really make sense. Why wouldn't we keep avoiding voting for the same person?

Anyway, I'd still be voting dom if he were on the poll. I simply voted the next best option based on strong sad's apparent recommendation (which apparently some people think is a bad idea but idk k )

Dom wrote:Also, Borok, I very publically told everyone why I'd be scarce...

I'm just really dumb and unobservant k

No dom? Well damn.

I have nothing else to go on really except strong sad's public dislike for bullz, possibly based on insider knowledge, so I'll go with that.

I would be so down for each day and night period to be 24 hours.

Now I can't decide whether to listen to strongsad and vote bullz, vote for dom, or vote for leamiteo (bottom of my list so far)


linki: what's WIFOM?

S~V~S wrote:

Dom wrote:

borokkuei wrote:

Dom wrote:

Leamiteo wrote:Where the heck is AP?

I'm all packed and set to move into my new apartment at 2pm. Thanks for bearing with me through my spotty presence here in the thread.

I still have my eye on Dom and borokkuei. Because the latter voted for the former, I don't know if I want to follow along and vote Dom. I don't trust borokkuei. I'm kind of feeling more secure about following SVS; her logic appears to be civvie to me.

votes Indi

Why would you just follow borok?

You misunderstand me. I am saying I don't feel confident putting my vote where he does because I do not trust him.

If you don't trust me (or dom, if I'm interpreting that correctly) why would you vote indi?

This is the same kind of problem I have with dom.

¿¿¡¡!!??

Seriously, lol.

[/quote]

Leamiteo wrote:

Dom wrote:

Leamiteo wrote:Where the heck is AP?

I'm all packed and set to move into my new apartment at 2pm. Thanks for bearing with me through my spotty presence here in the thread.

I still have my eye on Dom and borokkuei. Because the latter voted for the former, I don't know if I want to follow along and vote Dom. I don't trust borokkuei. I'm kind of feeling more secure about following SVS; her logic appears to be civvie to me.

votes Indi

Why would you just follow borok?

You misunderstand me. I am saying I don't feel confident putting my vote where he does because I do not trust him.

If you don't trust me (or dom, if I'm interpreting that correctly) why would you vote indi?

This is the same kind of problem I have with dom.

Death to teen girls \m/

How many lazers have died so far-- 1 or 2?

Okay, and so everyone is clear, that Dom quote is in response to MP, not me.

K done with my post chain. Sorry :P