The Syndicate

speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 9:18 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 8:00 pm Entirely unsafe and reckless to put anyone from that mission onto this one. Especially considering two "Not Guilty" verrdicts are gonna sink this one.

Pardon?

Entirely unsafe and reckless to put anyone from that mission onto this one. Especially considering two "Not Guilty" verrdicts are gonna sink this one.

1. Speedchuck > Safe
2. EdJou > Burned
3. Dharmahelper > Safe
4. DisgruntledPorcupine > Safe
5. Golden > Burned
6. Sprityo > Safe
7. Scotty > Burned
8. M Plus 7 > Burned
9. Lunalee > Safe
10. Nutella > Safe
11. Spacedaisy > Burned
12. Long Con > Safe

I would make the next team with zero members from the previous team, tbh. Of your options,Sprit, I trust Nutella the least, Followed by Long Con then SpeedChuck.

Golden wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 7:18 pm I think he’s bad so he probably knew he was right.

Huh?

Yikes. Though 1 Not Guilty verdict isn't the end of the world. We should be very careful about this next jury though.

I am interested to see who sprit recruits to his team but I wouldn't put any of the last mission on it.

Come on guys just send in the "Guilty" verdicts so we can play round 3.

Surely it doesn't take this long to all say "Guilty"

This should be our third and final Guilty verdict.

Gonna start a gofundme to get Long Con one of those magnifiers with the lights on 'em for his computer screen

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 9:13 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine

I'm not up to date with the thread, but that's not the original jury so no.

But it literally is the first jury just with a fifth member.

Egads.

That's 5 approves I think

Swing and a miss [VOTE: Disapprove] aubergine

Golden wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:46 pm Golden
EdJou
M Plus 7
Scotty
Spacedaisy

Cool Prank

Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:43 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:39 pm From now on any team with Daisy in it I will reject..
You're not making any sense here. Daisy was just in two missions that PASSED. Guilty verdict = good. If she were scum, she really should have failed that second one with a "not guilty," and blamed it on a new-comer to the team.

Nah. Look at her reaction in the thread. Why as Scotty said, approve a team you didn't feel comfortable with and then bring that discomfort up? Long Game shit.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:40 pm
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:37 pm
TRIAL #2 RESULT

VERDICT: GUILTY

@Golden, please propose a jury for the third trial.

But seriously guys, we might actually have a chance here!

To cut to the quick here, I would have been majorly surprised to see a fail in the first two rounds, particularly after the first round went well and the team remained mostly the same. DP isn't going to fail if he's the only difference, and nobody else would fail because they want to be on the 5 person teams and such.

From now on any team with Daisy in it I will reject..

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:27 pm
Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 4:22 pm Almost too easy. Now I'm concerned.
Then why did you vote to approve?

SEEMS LIKE RUSHING INTO THINGS MAY HAVE BEEN A BAD

*chokes to death and dies*

M Plus 7 wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 3:39 pm Apologies to INH and my fellow players for not being involved here; I've had an insane 72 hours to say the least. I'll be around more going forward.

Apology not accepted.

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:50 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:45 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:43 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:42 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine
Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
I’d be fine adding you as the 5th if we get a clean guilty verdict on M2 tho
QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Can I help you?
No I don't think you can.

FWIW Running the "same team" would have been my preference by a smidge, but I also think its important to see how other people perform on teams.
I agree with this should the 2nd identical mission have a not-guilty. I have no current reason to believe anyone is bad in Daisy, Mp and edjou. Yet.

I agree with this, unless I don't. In which case, you're wrong, unless you're correct.

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:43 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:42 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine
Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
I’d be fine adding you as the 5th if we get a clean guilty verdict on M2 tho
QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Can I help you?

No I don't think you can.

FWIW Running the "same team" would have been my preference by a smidge, but I also think its important to see how other people perform on teams.

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:39 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine
Not terrible reasoning to include yourself, but I only really want to vote for the same mission currently.
I’d be fine adding you as the 5th if we get a clean guilty verdict on M2 tho

QUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 2:37 pm [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine

QUE!?!?

[VOTE: Approve] aubergine

Yikes my dude.

I would do the same team as last time.

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 1:51 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 1:46 pm The original team contains at least one floating baddie in my opinion, and that's Space "I think its a bad idea to rush into things, even though DH never said rush into things, and we should approve the second team ever proposed even though that's also rushing into things" Daisy.

Poison the well with a silly suspicion and then run and hide when I present exactly how silly it is? Yeah OK nothing suspect there.

Definitely not a criminal who got onto a team and is afraid being active/challenged in the thread will reveal her so she's just hiding and voting and nothing else.
Except of the other 2 (Mp and edjou) SpaceDaisy is the one I trust the most. I happen to agree with her assessment: you said you preferred things expedited, which, as far as my years at galactic school have taught me, is synonymous with going fast aka rushing

I said I would like the jury pass/fails to be expedited. I said I wanted to see as many team nominations as possible before settling on a functional team. 2 Different Things

Yall are fuckin' loopy.

The original team contains at least one floating baddie in my opinion, and that's Space "I think its a bad idea to rush into things, even though DH never said rush into things, and we should approve the second team ever proposed even though that's also rushing into things" Daisy.

Poison the well with a silly suspicion and then run and hide when I present exactly how silly it is? Yeah OK nothing suspect there.

Definitely not a criminal who got onto a team and is afraid being active/challenged in the thread will reveal her so she's just hiding and voting and nothing else.

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 1:20 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 12:56 pm Guess I'll have to wait till round 3 to play the game. Which is good, and cool and fun, because I hate rushing into things.

I won't be offering any tips or tricks or insights or advice in later rounds to anyone for any reason. Bless you all and good luck.
DH I just find you bad in this game. If you’re not I apologize. No hard feelings

No need to apologize. I'm not, but I'm also not keen on being sidelined for dumb reasons.

Golden wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 12:58 pm [VOTE: Disapprove] aubergine

Sure, there could be floaters. But I think the best way to test for sure is to put the same team up. I doubt the baddies will tank the first two juries, so if they both pass we are on to something.

This is a very good point unless it's not.

Guess I'll have to wait till round 3 to play the game. Which is good, and cool and fun, because I hate rushing into things.

I won't be offering any tips or tricks or insights or advice in later rounds to anyone for any reason. Bless you all and good luck.

If Golden and Dispor and Sprityo hold to their votes, this team is toast anyway. Didn't think it would pass.

So you're just arbitrarily sinking teams with me on it. Cool glad I played.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 12:22 pm What's the tally?

Has anyone received a PM from anyone else? Anything they'd feel comfortable reporting?

4-3 in favor of scrapping the team. MP will probably vote against, so 5-3. Nobody's talked to me at all.

Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 12:17 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:23 am Scotty/Ed

Why the disapprovals?

Scotty wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 3:32 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 3:30 pm
Scotty wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 3:28 pm
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 3:26 pm
When all of the jury has finished voting, the outcome of the trial will be revealed. A unanimous vote is required to reach a Guilty verdict
That's why, Scotty.
What’s why? I don’t see anywhere that mentions a time limit. MP will eventually get around here, and vote. Then the results will be revealed
*eventually

Linki - Its a matter of expediency for me, he could be good, but it doesn't do me any good to fuck around and wait to find out.
You prefer to rush into things, eh?

Duly noted. I’m rejecting whatever mission you propose

How is prefering that the jury we've already selected make their votes in a timely manner "rushing into things"?

You and Daisy have no idea what those three words mean.

Lunalee wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 12:01 pm
speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:06 am Wait, why are we not nominating the same team?
Because DH is picking. Good luck convincing him to select a team with himself not on it.

Especially in this current climate.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 11:17 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 11:08 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 11:05 am
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:08 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 9:31 pm I believe MP+7 will not be a problem with a prompt enough vote, because Spacedaisy is there to nudge him. And I would not count that as any kind of BTSC even during closed BTSC time. It's just sensible.

So, if a Not Guilty verdict comes up, is the common practice to create juries that contain none of the original four?
So you approved the team, we had a guilty verdict, DH makes a team that only has 2 of the original, adding himself and...DP, who no one has talked about yet, and you wholeheartedly agree with it, saying that it’s in the bag?

I actually assumed that he made the same team, I didn't realize he had changed people. We need to have the same jury.
Seems you need reading glasses. Or you were intentionally careless.
Which do you think it was?

Difficult to say.if last mission contained baddies, LC's vote for that mission is suspect.

Long Con wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 11:05 am
Scotty wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:08 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue May 01, 2018 9:31 pm I believe MP+7 will not be a problem with a prompt enough vote, because Spacedaisy is there to nudge him. And I would not count that as any kind of BTSC even during closed BTSC time. It's just sensible.

So, if a Not Guilty verdict comes up, is the common practice to create juries that contain none of the original four?
So you approved the team, we had a guilty verdict, DH makes a team that only has 2 of the original, adding himself and...DP, who no one has talked about yet, and you wholeheartedly agree with it, saying that it’s in the bag?

I actually assumed that he made the same team, I didn't realize he had changed people. We need to have the same jury.

Seems you need reading glasses. Or you were intentionally careless.

EdJou wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:52 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:23 am Scotty/Ed

Why the disapprovals?
I don't trust that both of you new additions are on the Civ side. I'd bet that one of you isn't.

Odds are good that the mission as I've proposed it passes tho..

Although I'm satisfied with your answer.

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:41 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:36 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:31 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:22 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:19 am 7% odds that we randomly hit all town on that first team. Not great.
Yikes 7%? Fortunately we didn't rush into things.
Thing is, based on the requirements for trial two and four, there's a 7% chance that we've already won the game, right? Shouldn't we try it out instead of counting on DP?
7% odds are "Not Great".
The odds with DP aren't any better. That's just the numbers talking. Why DP?? I get why you'd put yourself on the team, sure. But are you that certain that there are two scum to replace?

I follow some of your logic, but not all of it.

He's consistently disapproved teams. So if the last one was a float for some reason, then he would have approved it if he were bad I think. And if he is bad, he's less likely to try and sink this mission because last mission succeeded.

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:29 am [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine

What's more suspicious?

a) Trying to get a feel for who people nominate
b) Calling someone suspicious for reasons you can't adequately explain and then running and hiding rather than being caught in why your reasons for discounting someone are suspicious

"I"m not going to argue with you DH I'm just going to hide and vote" = "I am just going to blend in since I got on this first team and can float the results for later rounds"

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:31 am
DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:22 am
speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:19 am 7% odds that we randomly hit all town on that first team. Not great.
Yikes 7%? Fortunately we didn't rush into things.
Thing is, based on the requirements for trial two and four, there's a 7% chance that we've already won the game, right? Shouldn't we try it out instead of counting on DP?

7% odds are "Not Great".

Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:29 am [VOTE: disapprove] aubergine

Consistently disapproving teams seems like a bad strategy to me.

Scotty/Ed

Why the disapprovals?

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 10:19 am 7% odds that we randomly hit all town on that first team. Not great.

Yikes 7%? Fortunately we didn't rush into things.

I nominated who I nominated for a number of reasons.

1. I'm on the team and I know I'm good
2. Some people from the team just now who I don't think could have floated are on the team, and that's good
3. Some new people are on the team and if they're bad, are less likely to sink the mission because of who else is on the team

IDK. I don't expect my team to go through because people seem to think I'm bad for reasons that make no sense, but if it does go through I'll prove I'm good when the mission passes.

[VOTE: Approve ] aubergine

I submit
1. Edjour
2. DharmaHelper
3. Scotty
4. Dispor

Good job guys.

I think its 5 rounds every time but the number of pass/fails per round changes

Search found 175 matches