The Syndicate

ture

:'(

*votes mongoose*

Whoa.

Hedgeowl wrote:
Mongoose wrote:How about we just all count to three and just vote. We can all hold hands and jump into the swimming pool at the same time.

Challenge accepted!

Ready....go!

DON'T DO IT IT'S A TRAP!11!1!

Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.
It's not me. It's either Snow or Mongoose. I thought Snow was one of two roles, now Mongoose has made me wonder... I have no idea which I'd trust tbh.

I was under the impression that you and snowy trusted each other? If that's not the case that changes everything.

I'm currently under the impression that someone has been posting false hints about their role and that someone is either Bullz or Mongoose.

Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:A-ha! It's all falling intp place now!
How's that?

Lol I dunno, I'm just as confused as anyone else.

A-ha! It's all falling intp place now!

Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.
If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.
I would think Danny can prove you're not wrong about him

Really, how?

Mongoose wrote:I am going to be heartbroken if we kill off another good character. I don't want to lose Mrs. Torrance. I think I would lose a piece of myself.

If this is true, I may have been wrong about two (2) people I've somewhat trusted so far.

Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Kate wrote:I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.
It has to be someone though.
It does indeed. No offense, I think you are great, but why not you rather than me?
I think I would know if it was me. Therefore it must be someone else . . .
You've not said anything about being served a drink -- are you too busy giving away and spilling drinks to have been served a drink?

All I can say is that I've received more free drinks in real life than in this game.

Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Are you suggesting it's Hedgeowl and Mongoose then? I'm not getting baddie vibes from either. I wish we didn't have to lynch anyone.
I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.
It has to be someone though.
It does indeed. No offense, I think you are great, but why not you rather than me?

I think I would know if it was me. Therefore it must be someone else . . .

Hedgeowl wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Are you suggesting it's Hedgeowl and Mongoose then? I'm not getting baddie vibes from either. I wish we didn't have to lynch anyone.
I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.
It has to be someone though.
You are correct, we all have to be some role, but I am not a twin. I can't speak for Mongoose. I think at this point its hard to define baddie. There are no more NKs, therefore I think it more accurate to say that we each have our individual baddies. Meaning those who prevent our win condition.

While my win condition does not require anyone's death, I had forgotten about the lack of Night power if we dont vote. For this reason I am going to have to vote today, but I've been doing some rereading to help figure out who.

Have others received drinks by now? Is this a nightly thing?

If I had received a drink, I would probably have poured it on the rug by now. That said, I will use my vote to protect myself if I have to.

Kate wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Are you suggesting it's Hedgeowl and Mongoose then? I'm not getting baddie vibes from either. I wish we didn't have to lynch anyone.
I'm not suggesting its anyone, I'm just saying its not me.

It has to be someone though.

Are you suggesting it's Hedgeowl and Mongoose then? I'm not getting baddie vibes from either. I wish we didn't have to lynch anyone.

S~V~S wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I wonder if the evil spirits in llama's post are the twins or has someone else been possessed or something -- and are we supposed to "exorcize" them by "lynching" them?
Do you have any ideas on who they may be?

Probably not bullz or snowy, but other than that I have no idea.

I wonder if the evil spirits in llama's post are the twins or has someone else been possessed or something -- and are we supposed to "exorcize" them by "lynching" them?

Pacifism is always a good thing.

Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I poured baking soda on it, I hope that won't damage it. Rugs are very expensive in Finalnd.
I make a paste out of vinegar (white distilled or even apple cider) and baking soda. It will clean anything for cheap. Since your rug is expensive, I'd just try a test patch underneath to make sure it doesn't stain.

I might try that next. Since it's a dark rug there's no visible stain but the scent is somewhat unpleasant (cheap pale lager).

I poured baking soda on it, I hope that won't damage it. Rugs are very expensive in Finalnd.

How does one get the smell of beer off a rug?

Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
I would assume that most ghosts are quite nice when you get to know them, but they might be confused and frustrated if they don't know that they're dead.
Don't go into the light, Carol Anne!

k ::/*(

Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Kate wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:Well, I'm glad about that result! Although I am now questioning how good our resident sanity checker is, as I don't see how anybody could think that that guy seems sane. I'm gonna follow Kate's logic and go to the kid's room, they do tend to be safer than adults in this sort of film and honestly I'm still a bit of a kid myself, so it might be a good idea.
We can make a fort out of the blankets. It will be safe under there.
I think we have to now that you've said that. Does anyone else want to join us in our awesome blanket fort?

Side note, me and my flatmates next year have decided we're going to actually make a Community-inspired blanket fort in our flat at some point. Because we're all mature and sensible grown ups about to be graduating into the real world and become the sort of people you'd totally want in education, business, or psychology.

Linki Vomp - nobody said anything about sleeping with children, just that we're stealing their room. They can leave if they don't like that.
Stealing the children's room is not a very nice thing to do.
Neither is being a creepy ghost, but two thirds of the children in this game do that anyway...

I would assume that most ghosts are quite nice when you get to know them, but they might be confused and frustrated if they don't know that they're dead.

Bullzeye wrote:
Kate wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:Well, I'm glad about that result! Although I am now questioning how good our resident sanity checker is, as I don't see how anybody could think that that guy seems sane. I'm gonna follow Kate's logic and go to the kid's room, they do tend to be safer than adults in this sort of film and honestly I'm still a bit of a kid myself, so it might be a good idea.
We can make a fort out of the blankets. It will be safe under there.
I think we have to now that you've said that. Does anyone else want to join us in our awesome blanket fort?

Side note, me and my flatmates next year have decided we're going to actually make a Community-inspired blanket fort in our flat at some point. Because we're all mature and sensible grown ups about to be graduating into the real world and become the sort of people you'd totally want in education, business, or psychology.

Linki Vomp - nobody said anything about sleeping with children, just that we're stealing their room. They can leave if they don't like that.

Stealing the children's room is not a very nice thing to do.

I wouldn't feel comfortable sleeping with children.

Sleeping in a hotel room is very expensive in Finalnd.

*votes hotel room'

I'll be watching Gilmore Grils when the poll ends so I'm voting for MP to save Snowy.

Doesn't the poll end in about 98 minutes?

Mongoose wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I'm confused. If MP still needs certain roles to be "gone" to win, why would he even consider not voting in the lynch?

Based on what has been said it seems to me that MP is the most obvious (although probably not the only) threat to anyone who needs to stay alive to win, and therefore I will probably for MP again unless something comes up.

I think I trust Snowy and Bullz if they are who I think they are.
I'm not getting a Gemini-type reading on those guys, Vomp. Is that what you are considering?

It is not. If they were the twins they would know each other's roles which doesn't seem to be the case.

I'm confused. If MP still needs certain roles to be "gone" to win, why would he even consider not voting in the lynch?

Based on what has been said it seems to me that MP is the most obvious (although probably not the only) threat to anyone who needs to stay alive to win, and therefore I will probably for MP again unless something comes up.

I think I trust Snowy and Bullz if they are who I think they are.

As if everyone would agree with not voting.

Bump.

I'll be a weirdo and vote Advocaat.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I noticed that in the last lynch MP was pushing for Snowy (who refused to vote) and now he votes early for Nevi (who voted for himself). Why is this, I wonder?
If you had read my posts, you'd know.

I hate self-voting.

Do you really have to vote for me consistently in every game we play together? It eventually gets old.

This time it's personal. [stern smile]

Also, if you hate self-voting, why did you reward Nevi for it with the vote he literally asked for?

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:My theory is that:

1) both Snowy and Nevi had a (similar) reason for their strange votes/non-votes and
2) MP has guessed their roles based on those votes and knows he would benefit from having them lynched.
No. I hate self-voting.

Lol, I have no idea who anyone's roles are in this game, I am not that astute. There's way too much WIFOM in this game, in combination with win condition weirdness, so no, that's not the case.

You did have some interesting ideas a while ago:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm contemplating that Snow and Nev could possibly have BTSC and be the Grady twins. Would make sense, wouldn't it?

Do you still think it would make sense or have you changed your mind?

Since it no longer matters whom I vote for, I'm *voting for MP* just because.

Incidentally I'm NOT voting for Nevinera.

My theory is that:

1) both Snowy and Nevi had a (similar) reason for their strange votes/non-votes and
2) MP has guessed their roles based on those votes and knows he would benefit from having them lynched.

I noticed that in the last lynch MP was pushing for Snowy (who refused to vote) and now he votes early for Nevi (who voted for himself). Why is this, I wonder?

Hard to choose as I do all three simultaneously in real life, but I think I'm mostly in the mood for wandering randomly now.

yay/phew!

I fear that the Snow Dog votes will be going to waste and for this very reason I'm *voting MP*.

Also, I'm not buying this:

MovingPictures07 wrote:However, I'm really at a loss. I don't want to vote any of this players because no one is really exhibiting behavior that indicates something strong about their alignment in a seemingly negative way, even though there are some weird decisions and lacks of explanation. But Snow Dog is apparently hellbent on not playing this game, and I can't be bothered to psyche myself out playing WIFOM with myself all day -- it's possible he's playing this whole thing just to screw with all of us just as much as it is that he benefits from being lynched.

votes Snow Dog

I don't know why Snowy would want everyone to know that he cannot be lynched, but assuming that he really cannot be lynched (which seems more likely to me than the opposite) it would be pointless to vote for him unless for some reason you don't want anyone lynched.

Even if there's a slight chance he's pulling a trick on us wouldn't you rather go for someone else at this point if you honestly wanted to lynch a baddie?

MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, here we are. Dex's explanation makes sense, Nev's explanation makes sense, I suppose, and Kate still hasn't come back to explain her vote. Vomps's vote is ADDITIONALLY unexplained and bothersome.

It may be bothersome to you but it certainly isn't unexplained. It was either you or epig and I voted for you.

Snow Dog wrote:Yeah it sucks a bit when you run out of things to say

I know that feel

MovingPictures07 wrote:So which roles do we believe need to be dead for a civvie win here?

Obviously Stephen King, but other than that, I suppose it's somewhat open to analyzing.

I'm guessing the Gradys and possibly the bartender?

Anyway, I'm kind of hungry but I feel like taking a look at the game room first.

thellama73 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:This looks relatively interesting.
You were the one reading Eliphas Levi's Transcendental Magic, weren't you Vomps? Not surprising then that you should find the attribution of Kubrick films to Qabalah and Hermeticism interesting.

ture

This looks relatively interesting.

Mongoose wrote:.gnillet gnieb pu dedne sesnopser eht tub ,teews os saw tI .dab era yeht if enoyreve ksa ot emag siht ni nomiS dah ew hsiw I .noos ni etov ym teg ot gniog ma I os ,rekaerb-eit eht eb ot tnaw t'nod yllaer I ,lleW

This text seems to be reversed.

i vote MP cos i liek grammer

Search found 54 matches