The Syndicate

timmer wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:Holy fuck, I completely fogot I was playing this game. So sorry. I'm going to be catching up today.

Dude, I think you're dead, though? And bad? So, you know, BIH?

S~V~S wrote:He doesn't have INH in his voting charts? Hard to rread them on phone.

Well, now I am curious too lol. He has been wanting to lynch INH for days, I just assumed that was the point of all this~

Linki@ Rabbit, I said WE as in lynch, lol~ nice try

S~V~S wrote:I did in 70s and in Enchanted Forest. I made up statistics, a,ll kkindsa crazy crap, lol. I also did something similar to Tranq & Typh on the first ACTA, making up ratios of post to content, lol.

Maybe not to this extent, but that is what it looks like nevertheless~

I am inclined to trust, and if he's wrong we'll kill him. Civ or bad, I can't see him going to this length unless he's pretty sure.

DharmaHelper wrote:

LittleTiger wrote:I 2nd Kate's question, DH, what is your analysis supposed to imply?

Umm...

It implies what it says, those people in the groups voted within one vote of each other both for the Droopy and for the Vomp votes.

I dunno what was confusing about that but there you go.

While I'm talking about it, here is some further analysis.


LT, Aces Boats.
The Truth, Trice, Rabbit
Trice, FH, Rabbit
Aces, Kate
Kate, Boats

LT is in a Group with Aces, and Boats (1 Group Total)
Aces is in a group with Boats, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
Boats is in a Group with Aces, LT, and Kate (2 Groups Total)
The Truth is in a Group with Rabbit and FH (1 Group Total)
Trice is in a group with Rabbit, Truth and FH (2 Groups Total)
FH is in a group with Trice and Rabbit (1 Group Total)
Rabbit is in a group with FH, the Truth, and Trice (2 Groups Total)


Aces and Boats both appear in a group with Kate
Trice and Rabbit appear in 2 groups together (one with FH, one with The Truth)

DharmaHelper wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Aw man go figure. It's almost like I was all "Hold up guys I don't think voting for Droopy is a good idea" and then you know, it wasn't.

Agreed. I know you're not a civvie. RIP Droopy.

Welcome Juliets.

You don't know jack then :P

DharmaHelper wrote:Hey rabbit, I heard your "bank" might need a bailout.

DharmaHelper wrote:Aw man go figure. It's almost like I was all "Hold up guys I don't think voting for Droopy is a good idea" and then you know, it wasn't.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:Well, if Droopy ends up lynched + bad today we will probably look more closely at that theory, rabbit

Vompatti wrote:

Kate wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Kate wrote:

Vompatti wrote:I'll stick with voting for rabbit8.

Personal reasons?

This time it's not personal.

Care to share with the group then?

He seemed overly upset at me voting for him the first time (and this time) but hasn't particularly defended himself regardless of the three (3) relatively early votes so far.

Vompatti wrote:I'll stick with voting for rabbit8.

Kate wrote:Is ace still playing?

Epignosis wrote:Barring a revelation, I'm voting for rabbit8, Vompatti, or Mr. Droopy Cash. You may plead your cases.

Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:Also, I withdraw my post TO rabbit making him an offer. I'm going to vote rabbit now and get it out of the way. I've achieved my two goals for this game anyway so I'm content! It's been fun! *votes rabbit*

Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:SVS, this wasn't the first time I've brought up low-posters. The lynch on Day 1-I voted for Boats because they didn't post on Day 1 at all. Just sayin' is all. I don't like voting with the crowd because I find people who do that to be suspicious. If someone is a baddie and it's obvious their teammate is going to get lynched, it would be very beneficial for them to vote for their teammate as well to take heat off themselves. Therefore, it could also be argued that one or two of the late voters for Bea last lynch are baddies.

My mind has too much ADD going on to stay on track with one thing. I like switchin it up. Who knows, maybe I'll vote for Kate because because she didn't argue with my book...I mean post. (I won't...but who knows!)

linki (finally get to linki! yay!): yes it's my first game rabbit and no, there's no coaching. I was given some tips and explanation before roles were ever dished out. My opinions are made up by me with the advice of no one.

--I'll admit I had some suspicion of Bea but I couldn't come outright and say bea was bad. Rabbit-you're on the offense all the time from what I can see. That led me more towards to you being bad than Bea. Since Bea WAS bad, maybe that just means you're badder?

Mr. Droopy Cash wrote:I feel a noose slowly tightening around my neck...

As for being coached, I can assure you I am not. If I were being coached, I wouldn't have made what many of you are calling a mistake (or so it seems). I'm trying to catch on to how to play this game based off what I've seen from other people. Also, before the site was even created, MP kept talking on and on about this game trying to explain how to play and what some strategies that people use are. I guess it would've been better for me to stick with one strategy than to try to mix them up. I'm not sure I can say anything at all to save my ass at this point but it's been enjoyable thus far.

Anyways, I like reading through all of this discussion, even if it is negative towards me. I'd like to get rid of the people who don't post to encourage further discussion, as opposed to eliminating avid posters and lessening the frequency of discussions. Also, before starting I was made aware that one strategy some people like to use when they are baddies is to try and fly under the radar without posting for as long as they can, thus helping my case against them.

My choice to vote Rabbit as opposed to a low-poster last lynch was because of the odds of the vote being successful. If I had voted for a low-poster, my vote wouldn't have made a difference (other than the chance of ME getting lynched next time). I had more of a suspicion for rabbit than I did bea (even though bea ended up being a baddie) so I went rabbit.

This wasn't supposed to be a book-post but it looks like it is now. Hopefully it's read and taken into consideration. I'm not ready to die...I'm too young! As of now, my vote stays with rabbit for this lynch unless someone actually jumps on my low-poster bandwagon!

Flyin' High wrote:Okay, in reading back through Mr. Droopy, Captain Bunny Killer, and chaindeath these are the comments I have.

Mr. Droopy: Finds rabbit suspicious, but thinks the case against bea has some merit. Decides to vote for rabbit because of his aggressiveness.

Captain Bunny Killer: Doesn't acknowledge the case against bea at all focusing instead on Vompatti and rabbit. Perhaps she didn't want to weigh in on the suspicion surrounding bea because she's her teammate?

chaindeath: Also doesn't acknowledge the case against bea. So same with the Captain, did chaindeath not want to weigh in because he is teammates with bea? I realize chaindeath himself answered my question about whether or not he always talks in the third person--seems he's just doing it this game for the fun.

Okay--so I'm not sure I gleaned anything incredibly useful from reading back through those 3 players in particular.

Epignosis wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

Vompatti wrote:I'm voting for rabbit8 for personal reasons.

Uhh, what?

I'd rather not talk about it.

rabbit8 wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

Vompatti wrote:I'm voting for rabbit8 for personal reasons.

Uhh, what?

I'd rather not talk about it.

Wait, I missed this post, WTF?

This was the thing I wanted to talk about earlier, but couldn't (due to having to talk in user names).

How does rabbit8 miss that when so many other people pressed Vompatti to elaborate?

I'm calling horseshit unless either of them has a good explanation (and I don't think either one of them does).

DharmaHelper wrote:RE: The Lynch post, Yay for getting a baddie, though I think Rabbit is still likely one as well.

Squizloid killing LoRab was unexpected, as I was expecting some Non-voter justice given the "To Be Continued" part that was in MP's post briefly. But LoRab voted, so the day kill doesn't have anything to do with nonvoters...

Vompatti wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:

Vompatti wrote:I'm voting for rabbit8 for personal reasons.

Uhh, what?

I'd rather not talk about it.

S~V~S wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:Ypu use my vote against me then don't care when it was just voted with no thought behind it?

Well OK, no agenda there.

I have yet to see where I twisted SVSs words, still looking for that.

Catching up on phone on/my break~ I don't recall sayiing you did~ I just thought you were kinda poking me with a stick?

DharmaHelper wrote:Call it "spitballing" if you want, Rabbit, fact is you took what she said she was doing, and reworded it to sound like what you wanted it to sound like she was doing.

AceofSpaces wrote:I hear you DH, and I am voting for rabbit [/b ]

DharmaHelper wrote:AM I IN SOME SORT OF TWILIGHT ZONE OR ITS A WONDERFUL LIFE OR CHRISTMAS CAROL OR SOMETHING WHERE NOBODY CAN SEE A GOSH DARN THING I AM POSTING GRRRRRRR


Rabbit = Claims INH's episode regarding the first posting challenge was "not suspect", also claims Epignosis was suspect for voting and not posting, then says he's just "messing around".

THEN says that he's got no problem with Leech voting for himself etc etc.

THEN votes Leech with no explaination,

THEN Jumps into the SVS discussion by being all twisty with what SVS was saying.

The civvie Rabbit I know would be all over the Leech voters, giving them all kinds of crap and this rabbit is just chillin'. Not civvie rabbit! NOT CIVVIE!

Kate wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:When players start to tell other players what civvies do, they're usually bad.

You think that is what SVS is doing?

To me, THIS, is vintage civvie SVS. I'd be really surprised if she is bad here.

S~V~S wrote:

reywaS wrote:

S~V~S wrote:No, I am not talking about grudge play. I am talking about Faradays basic mildness and blendiness. But no, I am not aware of anyone who does that who is playing this game.

I don't ever remember him ever being NKed Night one. It seems an odd choice, especially in light of his posts, which were mild and blendy. I tried and tried to see who may have felt threatened by him, and I am at a loss. Seeing him NKed kinda shocked me, tbh.

Maybe you are right and it really was random~

Your thoughts on the NK ping me a bit tbh....it's almost as if you are offended that someone killed your partner or something? I could be totally wrong, but I don't think I've ever seen you make such a post after someone is NK'd.

I remember a game where DH made a post about the night kill choice being an odd one and he was totally bad in that game....so your post comes off to me as being familiar with DFs death....meaning he was either your partner or you were involved in killing him.

I dunno....it just seems off to me.

yeah, just like everything I do seems off to you lol.

You know that when i am bad, I am the coldest bus-chucking bitch on the block, lol. If Faraday was my bad teammate, I would not be crying over him in the thread.

If Spongebob did not educate you, DH and i could not be more different. I know Faraday very well, I admire his game immensely, we are like Mafia yin/yang. He almost NEVER gets NKed early, only later when the game is at the role deduction phase. He gets lynched a lot as a civ, but not NKed like this. So I don't think he was NKed by anyone from "our" sphere of influence. But he did not say anything that would lead me to believe the PA people got him either.

So I am trying to figure out what happened to him. A direct read of the roles does not tell me~ it likely is a secret. I was hoping to see if anyone mentioned my interest, but blew it off. Surprised you didn't see that. One of those people could be the killer, IMO.

And i see a few did , on a quick skim, I have to reread, I have been crazy busy at work, and haven't had much time to read threads during the day.

reywaS wrote:

S~V~S wrote:No, I am not talking about grudge play. I am talking about Faradays basic mildness and blendiness. But no, I am not aware of anyone who does that who is playing this game.

I don't ever remember him ever being NKed Night one. It seems an odd choice, especially in light of his posts, which were mild and blendy. I tried and tried to see who may have felt threatened by him, and I am at a loss. Seeing him NKed kinda shocked me, tbh.

Maybe you are right and it really was random~

Your thoughts on the NK ping me a bit tbh....it's almost as if you are offended that someone killed your partner or something? I could be totally wrong, but I don't think I've ever seen you make such a post after someone is NK'd.

I remember a game where DH made a post about the night kill choice being an odd one and he was totally bad in that game....so your post comes off to me as being familiar with DFs death....meaning he was either your partner or you were involved in killing him.

I dunno....it just seems off to me.

DharmaHelper wrote:Kate - I think you think I disagree with you, which is not the case. I'm just hesitant to vote for people who vote for themselves, particularly this early. I'd like to be cautious is all.

LittleTiger - I don't think it's wrong to want to help people who are new. I just think finding people who are new to be suspect for "drive by voting" during a day 0 poll is a little off.

Kate wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Given the amount of secrets and the shadiness of voting for himself I don't feel comfortable voting Leech at the minute. I don't disagree that an eye should be kept on him, however.

What do you think about Leech, Rabbit?


Lol just kidding you're probably just going to post "lol k" again :P

Why would you give so much credence to other posters to answered for him, and then suggested that a secret may or may not be that he gets power from votes? Sounds more like Leech wanted to vote and get out of there. When he got called on it, others not so subtly jumped in to defend it and came up with a "oh yea, must be a super secret secret theory." I call balloney on this one, DH. (the theory, not your not buying it that is...)