The Syndicate

Now I can say this normally. Curse you, Smaug!!!

I was for the main gate when we faced the local authorities, but walking right in on Smaugh seems reckless. So I voted the back way.

Epignosis wrote:
wut

Turnip Head wrote:wat

Snow Dog wrote:
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:Snow. Rererereread Read Snotead *Vow. Snotead Snow. Snow. Snow. *Vow. *Vow. *Vow. Res *Vow. Snow. *Vow. Snow. *Vow. Snow. Read *Vow. *Votes Snotead Snoteres Snotes Snotead Snow. Snotes Read Reread *Voteread *Vow. Snow. *Votead Snow. Res *Vow. Snow. Res *Vow. Snotead Read Snoteread Snow. *Vow. Snow. Res Res Snow. Res Snoteread Res Snow. *Votead *Votes Res Res *Vow. *Vow. *Vow. Res Snow. Snotes Snoteread Snow. Snow. Snow. Reres Read *Vow. Snotead Snow. Read *Vow. Snow. *Vow. Snow. Snow. Snow. Snotes
Throwing me under the bus?

Implying Im? Implyin we weamplying Implyin te ong te te'rea am? amplying we'ream? a ong te'rea Implying on te ong a we'ream? we teamplyin ong ong on Im? amplyin a Implying a te a a te we am? weam? te we a weam? on Im? weamplying tea Im? wea ong amplyin am? teamplying Implying we Implyin Im? te're Im? we'rea we ong ong a ong te're te we tea we Im? te ong am? on te we're Implying we Im? te're'rea a tea amplying te ong we amplyin team?

Snow. Rererereread Read Snotead *Vow. Snotead Snow. Snow. Snow. *Vow. *Vow. *Vow. Res *Vow. Snow. *Vow. Snow. *Vow. Snow. Read *Vow. *Votes Snotead Snoteres Snotes Snotead Snow. Snotes Read Reread *Voteread *Vow. Snow. *Votead Snow. Res *Vow. Snow. Res *Vow. Snotead Read Snoteread Snow. *Vow. Snow. Res Res Snow. Res Snoteread Res Snow. *Votead *Votes Res Res *Vow. *Vow. *Vow. Res Snow. Snotes Snoteread Snow. Snow. Snow. Reres Read *Vow. Snotead Snow. Read *Vow. Snow. *Vow. Snow. Snow. Snow. Snotes

pors .supors .......s ....supporterters ..s ..........suppppporsupportertertersupporsuporterters ..suporters ..s ..s ....supppppporsuppporsuportertertertertertersuppors ....s

ciciciciof.... sususususususpiciof..... spiciciouspiciciciouspiof.. s spicious suspiciof.. of.. ouspiouspicious sususpioususus of. spiouspicicicious s of. of....

... bandwake bagon.. bake justagondwake mist bagondwake mist just mist bagondwan...... bake justandwake ban. mist mistake mistandwake mistake justandwagon......

Bullzeye wrote:
I find it funny that Snow's immediate reaction to the Boogs lynch was to throw under the bus all Boogs voters except himself and CBK, while CBK's reaction seems to be to throw Snow under it.

Not on a bus... Not on a bus... Not on a bus... Not on a bus... Not on a bus... Not on a bus... Not on a bus... Not on a bus... Not on a bus... Not on a bus...

Dom wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
fingersplints wrote:As long as we don't lynch anymore I think they will keep helping us
Name: ____________
Date: ____________
Period: ___________

1. Who is "us?"

2. How have the elves helped "us?"

3. How do the elves know who "us" is?

4. Why do you assume such a they will continue to help "us" if "we" don't lynch anymore of them?

Bonus question: How do you know how to not lynch an elf?

Turn in your paper by the end of the period. Be sure to use complete sentences and back up your response with evidence from the text.
I laughed quite a bit too much at this.

Me Me Me Me to to too to too Me to to toooo tooo tooo

yay yos, yogurti, y yerds, yardayellost, yayep, yayep, yogurtep, yeteterds, yost, yow, yoy yellllloyayoy, y yep, yeterdayelogurds, y yet, yellos, yow, yep, yet, yardarti, yay yerds, y, yow, y, yay, y yelow, yayayest, yow, yes, yogurdsti, yeloyep, yayep, y, yogurdayos, yerds, yogurti, yoyay, yep, yards, yow, yayogurdarti, y, y yayayellllostert, yayelllllllos, y y yayayert, yardsterds, y yellow, yoyesti, yow, y yogurday, yostesti, y yelllos, yayoyogurds, yow, yes, yeti, y, yoy, y yay y, y, yerdayog

Ang on focug on An Smausin focusind Smausind Ang. Ang ocug. And Smausind Ang. ocug Smaug fond Smausing. ond ocug. Ang. Smausind Smausind Smaug. ocusing. focusing Smaug Smaug And fong Smausing Smausing focusing An focusing.

Now buddyito try try No me. udy No w wing w uddddy me. to me. w th Nowith udyith No th with wing w Nowitrying budy Now towing me.

Red my Red med Booogst my agst Bogst Boogs. Bogstect ains. Redirect Rent againt argstedint Bogumectenst args.

Snoks loks low toks too Snoks low lo loks toow bad bad bad Sno me. tow low me. bad loo to bad me.

Smaumau You jumaug goooug jugoug toood????????? Yoo ooook od????? on Smaumpingon Smpin jumau Yok Yod? jumau loumping god? g jumaumaug Smpin jumpin Yod?? jug Smpin Yok lo ju go Yon oon toong jumpin g tong ongod?????????? loon Yok long Yo lo ton tod??? ju Yoon Yoong Smpin Yod??? Yo lon Smau jugod?? Smaumpingod??? ooooug jug tooo jumpingoook Youmau Smpingo toooook ju Smaumpingo g oon lo ju g toood? toumping jug ju ju Yon Smpin loo oooook g Smau loug Yo ju You od???? Smaugooumaumau Smping Smau Smpingo

Smiend!! Cu, yooo, Cug!

frieamamieoooooooooooo!!!!!!!!

Curiteamiend!!!! Leamamite Le frse

frseooooou,

Noo!!!!!!!!! Smiteaursend!!

frsend! Cu, friend! Smiend!!

Cug!!!!! you, yooourseamamieoug!!! Le

frse Curse yoooug!!!!!!!!!!!

Smau, Smamiend!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cu, Nooooooooooooooo! Nooooooo,

No!!!!!!!!!! frite Smaug!!!! Cug!!!!!!!

Cu, Lend!

Lend!!!

Noou,

Leoou,

Cug!! yoo!!!!!

Le Nooooooug!!!

Curse Le yooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Well, crap. I'm just going to go ahead and state the obvious and admit I was wrong about you, Boogs.

Now I need to rethink some things... or pretty much everything.

I said I wouldn't be posting again before the lynch, but I feel like the INH claim could be easily misunderstood. I don't know anything about him, but this exchange did seem a little aggressive and hostile and came on the heels of all that other drama. Plus the case against him has been since Day 1 over one overreaction (unless someone wants to correct that, because I haven't followed that part of the discussion closely).

That is all.

Be back to see the results.

For the sake of sanity and fun, I'm going to stop now, unless someone has a specific question (a lot happened in there, so I may have missed something).

See ya on the other side.

Sorry, I didn't fully explain the timeline thing. Boogs sudden mention of several really vague accusations did not come right after he "came back" from a silence. It game days later (game days) when people started seriously considering him. That looks bad.

>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:
>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:Look, guys, right now what i'm seeing is a bunch of people going for boogs and i dont really see why. Yeah, youre all saying a bunch of silly things like "oh, but snow dog! he didnt even mention snow dog while he was jailed!" so what? so what that he votes someone other that who he says is his top suspect? everybody does it all the friggin time. right now i'm just seeing a hate train against boogs and i dont like it. Honestly its been going all game and this all just seems bad bad bad to me. and why was all this started? because someone suspected boogs faked being silenced. right. great work everyone. I wont be voting boogs. in fact, Ill be voting CBK, because you seem to be leading this train against boogs and i think youre bad.
Hey, lets leave hate out of this. It's a game, spaghetti.

This has been going on all game, because Boogs has been all over the place all game. This isnt the first time that he's conveniently jumped on a civ lynch bandwagon. And, unless I'm really mistaken, that's classic baddie, especially when you had other suspicions. And the original case against him had nothing to do with wild theories about faking a silence (it's actually quite amazing that that keeps coming up and makes me think his baddie teammates are taking advantage of it). The original case was that he repeatedly either missed a vote or voted elsewhere and then tried to claim suspicion of an already lynched baddie which he never mentioned before said baddie had died (I made detailed posts about this). On top of that, he didn't start offering suspicions of his own until people started voting for him for jumping on other suspicions. Then it was all "Hey that was a freakin weird lynch and a I bet a bunch of those voting for me were teammies trying to save elo (even though that didn't make sense), and hey lets start going after low-posters (which I know is sometimes a civ frustration, but it's also classic baddie 101).

Seriously? You don't think any of that could indicate baddiness? I'll admit that his defenses have made sense a couple of times, but it's in the middle of a bunch of stuff that doesn't make sense at all, almost like someone was helping him clean up his messes. Then people keep coming around and saying, "Boy, I really don't get this Boogs thing... Something about a fake silence? Nah, I don't see it."

Scrambling much? I'm sure there's a civ out there who doubts it, so, unlike you, I'm not going to assume you're bad (although, I would point out that you were another on the vomps train).

Yes, I am civ, and I am trying to lead a lynch against Boogs. Yep, it would be bad if I'm totally wrong, but I tend to have a be sure and don't give up strategy. I think this is possibly the lead we need to finally hitting on the other goblin team, and the baddies are trying their darndest to dodge it.

So, I'll just go ahead and vote too.

*votes Boogs
What I am seeing is yes, boogs, has been all over the place this game, but (and let me bold this because i want everyone to see it) YOU AND YOUR ENTIRE POSSE GOING AFTER HIM HAVE FORCED HIM TO. you have 4 or 5 people who all are coming up with a whole bunch of baloney stuff in this game to accuse him of. How is he supposed to react to 5 different people all accusing him of another little meaningless thing that you think is suspicious? And no, thats PART of your original case on him, but you all started it because he said that he was silenced and was therefore unable to vote or talk in the thread. and you say that its bad that once he comes back he starts laying out his suspicious? And bullz makes a very good point, why would he vote snow dog, his top suspicion, when Boogs himself is the next in line under vomps for a lynch? it only makes sense. there was good reason to vote vomps as well, which is why i had voted vomps in previous nights before his lynch as well.

Also, let me make this clear: I dont know if Boogs is good or bad, but his playing so far has definitely not dictated either way. To me, he looks like a cornered civ doing everything he can to combat the lynch train that a group has aimed at him.

Hey, calm down. I don't know why you're so defensive about this when you claim you don't even know whether or not you think Boogs is bad. Is it because I pointed out that you jumped on the Vomps thing too? Didn't I say I wasn't trying to peg you as bad?

And I think your timeline on Boogs is not correct. I brought up a string of fishy claims made by Boogs, one of which was defended by a supposed silence. I said nothing about any theories of fake silences (a planned out strategy). That particular instance just looked like a quick cover up move which was described in a very doubtful way (the wrong role, as they are posted). I just said overall his posts seem doubtful. In fact, if you look back, you'll see that I argued with people who started up discussion about the ins and outs of a fake-silence strategy. I am not on a team with anyone.

Yes, unlike llama, I will recognize that I'm taking responsibility for initiating and continuing this. I wouldn't take that risk unless I was sure. I keep pushing it, because there seems to be an amazing amount of dodging on what seems to me to be many forms of bad behavior (not just bandwagon voting, by the way). If you combine that with the fact that there has been a couple of competing bandwagons for civs, I think there's a strong possibility that I'm correct and being villainized.

Splints, do you actually read what I post? It's a pattern of suspicious behavior. Having an out to join a bandwagon once because several people are after him doesn't make him good either.

Bullzeye wrote:
Spacedaisy wrote:Dom summed up exactly why I feel so certain Boogs is bad.this is not the first time he has railed against one suspect all day just to suddenly vote someone else. It is classic Baddie bandwagoning. And he can go on about me all he wants, but I am civ. and I think that once he flips bad, a good deal of his teammates will be clear too.
I think he explained quite well why you just got his vote. I don't get how voting someone other than your main suspect makes you bad? If a baddie wants someone dead, they have two choices: Kill them at the earliest convenience, or get them lynched. It doesn't help to get someone lynched if you don't actually vote for them!

What does this last part even mean? How does a baddie wanting someone dead have anything to do with a suspicious switch to a bandwagon? Baddies switch their focus in order to blend in, not to kill someone off, though a great side effect of a civ lynch for them is one less civ.

And to this and the part to me: See my response to Spaghetti. Also, I am just more and more stunned that all these people don't think it's suspicious to swicth your suspicion to a bandwagon... more than once and with a general pattern of blendiness and fishy claims. ???

>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:Look, guys, right now what i'm seeing is a bunch of people going for boogs and i dont really see why. Yeah, youre all saying a bunch of silly things like "oh, but snow dog! he didnt even mention snow dog while he was jailed!" so what? so what that he votes someone other that who he says is his top suspect? everybody does it all the friggin time. right now i'm just seeing a hate train against boogs and i dont like it. Honestly its been going all game and this all just seems bad bad bad to me. and why was all this started? because someone suspected boogs faked being silenced. right. great work everyone. I wont be voting boogs. in fact, Ill be voting CBK, because you seem to be leading this train against boogs and i think youre bad.

Hey, lets leave hate out of this. It's a game, spaghetti.

This has been going on all game, because Boogs has been all over the place all game. This isnt the first time that he's conveniently jumped on a civ lynch bandwagon. And, unless I'm really mistaken, that's classic baddie, especially when you had other suspicions. And the original case against him had nothing to do with wild theories about faking a silence (it's actually quite amazing that that keeps coming up and makes me think his baddie teammates are taking advantage of it). The original case was that he repeatedly either missed a vote or voted elsewhere and then tried to claim suspicion of an already lynched baddie which he never mentioned before said baddie had died (I made detailed posts about this). On top of that, he didn't start offering suspicions of his own until people started voting for him for jumping on other suspicions. Then it was all "Hey that was a freakin weird lynch and a I bet a bunch of those voting for me were teammies trying to save elo (even though that didn't make sense), and hey lets start going after low-posters (which I know is sometimes a civ frustration, but it's also classic baddie 101).

Seriously? You don't think any of that could indicate baddiness? I'll admit that his defenses have made sense a couple of times, but it's in the middle of a bunch of stuff that doesn't make sense at all, almost like someone was helping him clean up his messes. Then people keep coming around and saying, "Boy, I really don't get this Boogs thing... Something about a fake silence? Nah, I don't see it."

Scrambling much? I'm sure there's a civ out there who doubts it, so, unlike you, I'm not going to assume you're bad (although, I would point out that you were another on the vomps train).

Yes, I am civ, and I am trying to lead a lynch against Boogs. Yep, it would be bad if I'm totally wrong, but I tend to have a be sure and don't give up strategy. I think this is possibly the lead we need to finally hitting on the other goblin team, and the baddies are trying their darndest to dodge it.

So, I'll just go ahead and vote too.

*votes Boogs

Because they're sure or they're Boogs.

Boogs wrote:Yeah I will add the ones who jump on me easily because quite frankly, THAT's what baddies do and it's easy. So there's at least 6 to our knowledge left, considering none of them have been Nightkilled, I will go for SpaceDaisy simply because out of my suspects, you seemed to have livened up all of a sudden. "Did someone say my name? Oh crap let me get involved now!". I do realize Daisy you had things going on, but so did I this weekend but it didn't give two sh*ts less of people wanting to vote me out anyway. So, I just buy how you conveniently came back as you were discussed a little TOO odd. Almost as if your teammates were letting you know you were being discussed again. You seemed quick to jump on me again without ANY type of re reading this thread and actually having opinions on who you think is/could be bad, and then just "Oh guys... Well I thought Boogs was bad Day 3 which was like over a week ago so lets just blend in and vote him now! Down with the kitty!" Bull crap I am calling BS Daisy. I had a weird feeling about you from the Day 2 shenanigans.

Snow I will give a slide for my vote as he and Daisy are my top 2 targets as being bad, because he got silenced from the Wood Elf supposingly and some how that has turned into me being bad because I didn't post that I "knew he was silenced". Yes, no one SAID I knew, but the moment he comes back it's : "Omg guys! I was SiLENCED and no one cared! And omg Boogs didn't even bring it up so he HAD to have had something to do with this!!! I smell a rat!". I mean give me a fricken break SnowDog, you come back to talk and there first words out of your mouth are my name?

So Daisy it is.

I don't think it will matter again, but I'm going ahead to vote her.

Boogs, Boogs, Boogs. I won't say I know exactly what Snow Dog was saying against you, but the general consensus seems to be not that you had something to do with anyone's silence. It's all about you conveniently switching your suspicion to an easy vote while not even noticing that your top suspicion was mia (yes you had mentioned several names, but that one day after that one weird lynch, you came after Snow pretty strongly). You just keep misrepresenting the arguments against you (and so do others, oddly enough).

Now you're back on Daisy after that rant against Snow?

On that note, I feel that I should give some rl context, so that it doesn't get her into trouble. I knew what was going on with Daisy, because we live together. I saw that she was about to be replaced. She jumped back in, because I warned her about it. I don't have any info on her alignment. Just clearing up a potential unfair misunderstanding.

Ok, there was a bunch in there in response to what I said about llama. My dad's heading home now, and we're going out for the evening. I will have to look back through everything later (and that does not make me lazy, SE, though I appreciate the correction). I am willing to reread llama. I, by no means, assume that anything I have said is foolproof. But I do feel suspicious of him.

However, I think Boogs is obviously bad. Boogs, not mentioning snow does not make you bad. Voting for vomps does not in itself make you bad. Ignoring your number one suspicion and suddenly voting a convenient unpredictable player simply on trust of a player who was obviously wrong about the last lynch... that looks bad. You voted as the third voter on Vomps when only one person had voted for you.

Dom wrote:
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:
The point is that your gut vote for Vomps is a perfect and fishy cover. Vomps defended mongoose against you, and she was good. Vomps claimed you were bad, and now he's dead. It was his fault he was an easy target, but it's the baddies fault he was targeted.
CBK, you are conveniently ignoring how wrong Vomps was about other people. I don't know what that means, but I don't think you're giving Vompatti a very fair appraisal.

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:RIP Vomps.

I was jailed btw.....not that anybody noticed my absence, not even boogs....thanks guys.

If this is true, Boogs truly now has my eye.

Does "conveniently ignoring how wrong vomps was about other people" refer to elo? I didn't ignore it. I already addressed that. And didn't I include it in that post? I wanted to offer the full picture, and I did. Are you conveniently ignoring that Vomps flipped civ? Because I'm not sure what your point is. That vomps must be wrong about llama? Of course he could be. So could I. But it doesn't change the point that llama could easily get away with leading the charge on a zany player with a "gut feeling" and then put the blame on Vomps dropping the ball.

But I'm right there with you on the Boogs thing. He's still my top pick.

thellama73 wrote:
Captain Bunny Killer wrote: The point is that your gut vote for Vomps is a perfect and fishy cover. Vomps defended mongoose against you, and she was good. Vomps claimed you were bad, and now he's dead. It was his fault he was an easy target, but it's the baddies fault he was targeted.
Or it is the fault of civs like me who can't tell when Vomps is good or bad because he makes no effort. You don't know that any baddies even voted for Vomps (unless you are one yourself.)

I didn't vote for vomps, and serisouly you think no baddie would jump in where a clear non-teammate vote is available?

It's totally possible you went with your gut and baddies joined in. I'll give you that. But it could be the other way too.

Snow Dog wrote:
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:RIP Vomps.

I was jailed btw.....not that anybody noticed my absence, not even boogs....thanks guys.
Wow, really? Is it true Boogs didn't notice? That's strange, since you were his top suspicion, and then he jumped on the vomps train...

linki: Boogs, you did? Did you mention it? I'm am seriously trying to be fair here.
I am pretty sure nobody mentioned my absence. Could have missed it though.

Dang it. That was partially a linki mix-up. I thought Boogs said he did mention it. But I am still interested if he wants to explain that.

Snow Dog wrote:RIP Vomps.

I was jailed btw.....not that anybody noticed my absence, not even boogs....thanks guys.

Wow, really? Is it true Boogs didn't notice? That's strange, since you were his top suspicion, and then he jumped on the vomps train...

linki: Boogs, you did? Did you mention it? I'm am seriously trying to be fair here.

Epig, you have any other reason other than my moment of paranoia? I answered that post back when you posted it, so if you've still got something to add, I'm here.

So, for clarity sake (because a perfect baddie strategy would be to misrepresent a post and hope no one looks):

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:For the record:

Vompatti wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:My theory is that Mongoose is good and Mongoose voters are bad.
I seem to remember you having a similar theory about Elo though
That is correct and I stand by it regardless of the facts.

Vompatti wrote:By the way I still think llama is evil but that doesn't stop me from thoroughly agreeing with the review above.

Vompatti wrote:I woudln't mind going through the back way if you know what I mean.

Also, Mongoose wasn't bad? Who would have thought!
I can't really say I would bet Vomps is good from all of this, but I think his play style cuts both ways. While it's easy to get away with devious behavior when you're zany, it's also easy to be a ping for an experienced leader in the game who can fall back on his "bad gut" on a player who's hard to read. Plus, it's convenient for unexperienced players to follow along, because they don't know how he usually is.

The point is that your gut vote for Vomps is a perfect and fishy cover. Vomps defended mongoose against you, and she was good. Vomps claimed you were bad, and now he's dead. It was his fault he was an easy target, but it's the baddies fault he was targeted.

thellama73 wrote:
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:
thellama73 wrote:That was a bad role to lose. I wish Vomps had made at least some effort this game.
Shifting blame now?
To be fair Vomp made very little effort, he even said himself that he wasn't really reading the thread. He kinda brought it on himself a bit.
Sure, but also this.
What, you mean that post where he claims to believe Elohcin is a civ even after she flipped baddie in a lynch? Yeah, real helpful.

No, that post where he claims that he still stands by the theory that there were baddie elo voters, even though he was wrong about elo. That changes nothing about you.

Bullzeye wrote:
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:
thellama73 wrote:That was a bad role to lose. I wish Vomps had made at least some effort this game.
Shifting blame now?
To be fair Vomp made very little effort, he even said himself that he wasn't really reading the thread. He kinda brought it on himself a bit.

Sure, but also this.

thellama73 wrote:That was a bad role to lose. I wish Vomps had made at least some effort this game.

Shifting blame now?

For the record:

Vompatti wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
Vompatti wrote:My theory is that Mongoose is good and Mongoose voters are bad.
I seem to remember you having a similar theory about Elo though
That is correct and I stand by it regardless of the facts.

Vompatti wrote:By the way I still think llama is evil but that doesn't stop me from thoroughly agreeing with the review above.

Vompatti wrote:I woudln't mind going through the back way if you know what I mean.

Also, Mongoose wasn't bad? Who would have thought!

I can't really say I would bet Vomps is good from all of this, but I think his play style cuts both ways. While it's easy to get away with devious behavior when you're zany, it's also easy to be a ping for an experienced leader in the game who can fall back on his "bad gut" on a player who's hard to read. Plus, it's convenient for unexperienced players to follow along, because they don't know how he usually is.

fingersplints wrote:I think there is more going on then "non-helpful gut feelings"

That was in reference to actual votes (mainly vomps and other random votes). There has been some rehashing of origins of old suspicions, except maybe the Epi/Smaug idea. But, again, I don't know what the heck to think about Epig.

Well, crap. The person voting for me can only back it up with digital vomit.

I'm just going to go ahead and vote. I don't feel good about going along with someone else's gut on a random low-poster, and this is a short day of non-helpful gut feelings. So i'm going to stick to my suspicions.

*votes Boogs

thellama73 wrote:
Boogs wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Boogs wrote:Speaking of low posters from my thoughts earlier, why have we squashed all discussion SpaceDaisy could be bad since Day 3? There was still a possibility she could have been on the other Goblin team. Just throwing out there people that should be brought up again we seemed to have forgotten are the real targets.
Wasn't the main suspicion of SpaceDaisy the way she interacted with MP? If that is the case, I don't see how that makes her a candidate for the other goblin team.
Indeed it was at first. But, she's sliding by now as a low poster just like Lizzy, Hedgeowl, and a few others. I just really have a gut feeling the people we continuously are trying aren't getting us anywhere. I'd be happy with low poster getting lynched today to find the real Goblins or Smaug, as well as I personally obviously think something weird was still going on with the Mongoose lynch and think Snow is shady and bad still. I can't put my finger on it, but I just don't see how we were wrong about Mongoose and she conveniently turned up Bilbo... Something weird is going on. So I'd throw my vote to hopefully lynch Snow, Lizzy, Spacedaisy, or Hedgeowl today. I know you personally think Vompattii has something and strangely enough, we have been getting along very well in this game because we typically disagree. But I feel very much you are civ in this game and I won't throw a vote on you today or anytime soon. I think the Epignosis thing is a distraction also. I'm not sure He is civ, but I don't feel he's suspicious enough to get my vote just yet either.
I agree with almost all of this, although I'm not convinced about Snow Dog. I think looking at low posters at this stage of the game makes a lot of sense. Having so many baddies lynched in a row has got to have shaken the other team and made them nervous. It would make all the sense in the world for them to clam up for fear of being next.

Hm, I don't agree with much of it, because I'm not even sure what he's getting at (weird lynch... convenient that Mongoose turned up Bilbo??). All vague with lots of names and feelings and low-poster focus. It's probably true that there are quiet baddies. There always are. But I'm betting there's at least one vocal one. We are at too much of a disadvantage with a completely unknown team to start shooting in the dark, so if you have a reason to lynch a specific low-poster, let's hear it.

Funny that my top suspicions are getting along swimmingly.

thellama73 wrote:Can we all just agree to get along and vote for Vompatti (clearly the only logical thing to do at this point)?

Nah, I'd vote for you before him.

Boogs wrote:Sorry if that sounded mean by the way, I just can't stand it when every single post someone makes is about me. It makes me want to show them the roster that there are 29 other people playing this game too and frustrates me to no end. I had to delete a few things before I posted that could have been offensive. Breathes.

Well, obviously I'm right there with you, because you can probably see that I just got a little miffed too. I'm sorry. I won't drag it out any further than that.

Boogs wrote:
Captain Bunny Killer wrote:Ok, my dad to the rescue with his old computer cord, so I can post normally.

In other news, I am still ready to go for Boogs.

I have not felt a suspicion for Epig, but it's probably because I have had my initial reaction to his I-don't-give-a-rip-about-what-anyone-thinks playstyle in another game. Since then, I usually have no idea what to think of him.

Llama on the other hand may require another look. I'll have to get going with that, since this is a short day.

Are you sure your screen name isn't Captain Kitty killer? Seriously, give it a rest with me. I'm not bad and I've explained to you everything. The snakes are in the grass with the low posters. You seem like a good enough player, from what I understand this being the first game I've played with you, to realize this isn't your first rodeo and you're seriously barking at me for nothing. I've defending against your accusations of balogna against me and I'm tired of trying to sway you in this game. Vote me if you choose once again, but that's your thing. I'm not sure if your play style is to keep on one person a whole game til they die then move onto someone else, but seems like it to me. You've barely even acknowledged anyone else worthy of your vote. I felt you were a misguided civ, but I think now you're just plain nasty bad. I'd appreciate it if you start trying to help us win the game now and start using better judgement.

[/quote

Look, if you're taking this personally, that's not my fault. I keep mentioning you, because I still think you're suspicious (as in, continuing opportunistic-looking posts). I am trying to win the game by going after people I think are suspicious. And I've not been the only one, or I wouldn't mention it again. I brought it up, because the last couple of days were the let's-kill-goosey show, which got us nowhere. I thought a fresh start would be a chance to see if anyone else is still suspicious of you. Isn't the point to try to convince other people of the people you think are bad? If there is seriously no one who will take another look at you or speak up about their previously mentioned suspicion of you, I'll just shut up about it. And I fully intend to look at other people, as I already mentioned.

Frankly, trying to pin down a no/low poster is often (though not always--I knw there's debate about that) a classic baddie move. Easy hunting makes you look good. But if you find substantial connections, I'm all ears.

Ok, my dad to the rescue with his old computer cord, so I can post normally.

In other news, I am still ready to go for Boogs.

I have not felt a suspicion for Epig, but it's probably because I have had my initial reaction to his I-don't-give-a-rip-about-what-anyone-thinks playstyle in another game. Since then, I usually have no idea what to think of him.

Llama on the other hand may require another look. I'll have to get going with that, since this is a short day.

Speaking of computer problems, mine has begun to pick fights with its power cord. Now I can't get it to charge, so my posts will be limited.

Dom wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Ok, I should be more active now. Sorry to see you go DFarady and sawyer.

As for who should pay the gold, maybe the people who decided to take the back gate (myself included). 12 of the 13 can offer 50 gold apiece? I think that sounds fair.
I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least fifty gold? I do. Does everyone have at least

Echo! Echo! Echo...

Uh, is that supposed to be insanified? If so, it's not very insane.

I voted for the main gate, but if we can't get enough from you back-wayers, I'll pitch in.

I voted main gate. I'm not much of a rule breaker or a risk taker. Plus, the "risk" may be worse than paying a toll.

DFaraday wrote:
Dom wrote: Do you think it's peculiar that everyone he has gone after has been on the same team?
Actually, it makes sense to me. We got one baddie right off the bat, and Epi saw connections MP made to teammates, and it just got on a roll from there. It's not like Epi was randomly going after completely unrelated people and they all just happened to be on the same team.

I feel like Boogs has an obsession with Snow Dog.

I feel like Boogs is trying to be more convincing at an original suspicion while deflecting the suspicion on himself (pointing at his own voters).

Search found 101 matches