The Syndicate

One more thing --

Friendly advice to Alex -

When you do a mass kill for non-participation maybe you can factorin the fact that when you do that sometimes you kill active players - maybe a new formula is in order? maybe if the players have voted in the previous lynch or posted. X amount of times during the day period.

I enjoy mod-killing as much as anyone so please take this as friendly meaningless advice. <3

Funny I usually enjoy a good blood bath - haahahah

Thanks again Sockfreak for the great game!

I had a lot of fun playing! Wish I hadn't died so early!

Who killed me and why?

unfurl wrote:Maybe my goal in life, should be to find a cure, but that probably will make me too normal, and I dont want that,
and also how can I find a cure for a fried brain, when I have fried brain?

<3

Fucklinkitis - goodbye game it was fun!

I am going to follow SVS and her case on Lea it feels strongest to me.
*votes*

I do not remember ever seeing vomps post more than 3 words at a time in a game.
And yes his was the very first post after the Host post went up. It is odd no doubt but vomps is odd when he plays. he often does things forno other reason than that is how he plays. Since forever. He is an easy mark but that does notmean he cant be bad.

Need to think moar

Iunno wtf I am doing. Or who I am gonna vote for.

I agree Bullz responses left me feeling better about him. While he is not clear for me whether he is good or bad I do think he answered my suspicion sufficiently.

Timmers thoughts are interesting and I am going to try and read it I am on the surface more interested in the fact the spaghetti pushed quickly to fight twice.

Weird that keterman didn't say one word about my previous train of thought even though I said I was watching him. Prob my post meant nothing to him I just thought it odd he said nothing.

No need for further clarification for me - I understood the first time you posted. Its just that I thought I was onto something and it turns out I am not. so we move on.

I am, however, allowed to be disappointed and still discuss what I want to. <3

Well since Alex clarified idk if it matters anymore bc now people will just say "oh it must of been when Alex messed up"

keterman however my eyes are watching you since you are the only one I have seen say they did not get a PM.

Seems funny suddenly alex making this clarification - timing is everything isn't it?

So Bullz when you lost you received a PM?

The answer will lead me to my vote.

Question to all who fought a fight - did you receive a PM after the fight was over?

Sorsha wrote:

Roxy wrote:For me the thing wrong with pushing to fight when you already had fought was that you were hoping to increase your skill level - something I do not want. I wanted people who had fought to wait and give everyone a chance to fight so that one or more people didn'thave a higher skill level than everyone else. for all I know you could be a recruit/Tyler trying to up your skill level giving the townies no chance. or vice versa. If you are a townie then I would think you would understand this.

I understand your point here but a theory going around in a couple of the towns I visited was that in order to kill Tyler someone would have to fight him. In order to fight him it was thought that a pretty high skill level would be needed, so I also understand players wanting to fight a second time.

I wonder if our "skill levels" have bearing on the game anymore....?

It was brought up in wilmington too - from people who had fought once already - I want to say it was Timmer or DH that said it.

For me the thing wrong with pushing to fight when you already had fought was that you were hoping to increase your skill level - something I do not want. I wanted people who had fought to wait and give everyone a chance to fight so that one or more people didn'thave a higher skill level than everyone else. for all I know you could be a recruit/Tyler trying to up your skill level giving the townies no chance. or vice versa. If you are a townie then I would think you would understand this.

Bullz- Potato, pahtahto. They both wanted it to be city vs city. Then I am totes at the top of your weirdo list as I avoided fighting even when I could have.
*All I am saying is give peace a chance*

DH quotes c and p'ed.

DharmaHelper wrote:Another thing to keep in mind is that it seems like we will be fighting people within our city (or more accurately the city we are currently in), since I'm fighting Kate. What I originally thought was that it would be city vs. city, so I'm sort of disappointed that we are guaranteed to lose someone tonight. But that also means that each of these other cities are going to be losing people. The main reason I want to make sure we all pick a unified option is so that in the future we are not forced to fight (and therefore die) because one city has a majority rule. If we all go to the same place we have a cushion of 8 votes to give to someone NOT from our city, giving us some security when it comes to fights.

DharmaHelper wrote:Therefore, the safest way forward is together, so that we do not end up stranded in enemy territory and forced to fight while other cities skate by. Logically, having 7 people at your back makes the most sense.

Bullz defense post that pinged me most:

Bullzeye wrote:I will say again that I think the DH thing is inaccurate, if you distrust him because of the discussion on day 3. His suggestion back in Newcastle, as I understood it, was that those of us leaving should stick together just in case anyone in the cities we went to decided they wanted to band together and force newcomers to fight. Not really the same as Llama's suggestion that Wilmington natives literally group up and kill off anyone who comes here. In fact, Llama's way of thinking is exactly what DH was hoping to counteract. If I hadn't been seriously injured at the time I'd have brought this up. I'm sure everyone knows how frustrating it is to be silenced with something you really NEED to say.

As you can read DH had an us vs them mentality - just like llama. Bullz would like to put the focus on the wording but if you read llama (Day 1 Wilmington) he propsed the same thing DH did. Us vs them. they both wanted their cities to stick together and go against other cities. potato, patahto.

Other tidbit from bullz.

Bullzeye wrote:Well I clearly haven't learned my lesson because I want to fight again! I'll happily take on anyone who hasn't already won a fight.

First it is pingy bc he is all for fighting a second time and he self voted.
But for me the big ping is the part that he wants to fight someone who hasn't won a fight - meaning maybe he was hoping to increase his skill level - idk maybe he just wanted to fight.

Maybe I am just extremely leery of those that pushed themselves for a second fight. the 3 I listed are not alone in their need to fight. there are others that fit that category.

BR - what did you make of the exchange betwixt you and Keterman in Wilmington?

Timmer - you do not have to apologize for wanting to fight but I also reserve the right to be suspicious of those that did want to fight a second time or were overly anxious to fight one time.

I gave my thoughts on Hedge when we were in Wilmington together. I thought it odd she wasn't giving her opinions in addition to what you and llama pointed out. tbs she feels abit like she did in the Lost game we played together when her team deaded me in my favorite role I have ever had - Hurley.

It was the Wilmington thread for both Teeth.

However in New Castle DH did too say he wanted to gang up (or more similar wording to llama than either DH OR bullz want to admit to) on new comers (or just like llama proposed - an us vs them mentality.

I will gladly pull the quotes inre: DH when I get home.

Linky I was there Timmer so I know what you said and how you said it but you still were making reasons as why you should get to fight a second time when others had not fought one time.

Also crazy theory time -

Marla Singer = Kate the Vanished!??

unfurl wrote:I was thinking, who were the people who were very eager to fight more then once?

like I got the impression DH wanted to fight everywhere he was, when he had done it at least once,
so maybe among people who were very excited to fight a lot times, could be other recruits or tyler himself

maybe there is a connection there, on people wanted to fight really bad,
but to find out that, it will imply to read all the threads, and to assume everyone behave the same?
which will very likely is not, cause not everyone behaves the same
also we dont know, how many recruits there are this time? Is day 5, so if there has been at least one per period, around 4 will be my less guess, but maybe more

Going with this train of thought -
Bullz
Timmer
Teeth
Are 3 that spring to mind in my very limited travel.

Teeth backed right off of fighting after someone (poss SVS) said that we need to be careful about who fights so one or two people do not get stronger than everyone else. His backing off quickly pinged me but he has done nothing else to twitch my nose since.

Bullz -not only wanted to fight but defended DH.

Timmer - also eager to fight and gave several reasons as to why he should fight again before people who have not fought or chose not to fight. He dropped his stance when he realized no one would vote him to fight again over someone who has not fought.

Am I the only person who did not fight?

Also I miss the small groups as I really do not like playing large games.