The Syndicate

i never got any contraband

S~V~S wrote:I knew AP was Andy, and that he had the 3 votes. i was redirecting him a lot. i redirected him the day John died.

I figured something like that was the case but I also figured it was speeding up my inevitable fate :P

Lizzy wrote:
A Person wrote:yes really, and i am ok
You scared the living carp out of me k. (and I don't even have living carp :A:A:A)

if it makes you feel any better i had the living carp scared out of me too ddks

yes really, and i am ok

At least I died here and not in the accident i was in xD

Bullzeye wrote:
S~V~S wrote:What, no snarky orange?

I honestly don't understand why she kept defending john & threatening me if i voted for him without being his teammate. I have no freaking clue.
It's Lizzy, she's crazy. I do agree with you though, she had JJ's back for a long time.

These playing cards sound fun. Does whoever picks the whisky wanna get together for a bit of Ring of Fire?

cards and whiskey sounds fun as long as i get some alone time with the queen of hearts

Lizzy wrote:slinki -

Dom wrote:
Lizzy wrote:
Dom wrote:Why would SVS lead the lynch on her teammate?
Seriously?
.....yes?

Why would anyone want to be lynched when someone else can be lynched instead?

Dom wrote:AP, I see you're lurking down there. Have any thoughts?

A lot of them are similar to Lizzy's so I don't feel the need to say much. I think SVS is most likely either bad or really good at making me think she is.

Lizzy wrote:So why am I not super civ all of a sudden?

When possible baddies have pre-planned conversations that seem almost surreal.

I'm not even sure they have to pretend to justify their votes at this point.

Mister Rearranger wrote:
A Person wrote:i want a stout in real life
Nobody's here to say, "I can give it to you, if you know what I mean."

ture

I want to be able to say "i'd not mind that if you know what i mean"

i want a stout in real life

Lizzy wrote:I hate beer! I had mostly Oirish whisky and some not very fancy champagne. :\

Not very fancy champagne is good as long as you think of it as grape flavored alcoholic pop

smoking is icky

lol i can't see this

i voted no because vengeance is bad y'all

Dom wrote:
A Person wrote:Dear Serial Killer, if you are listening then please prove it by killing SVS at the next available time.
well that's rude :P

It's an experiement.

S~V~S wrote:Yeah cause you wouldn't want me lynched and shown as a civil, right?

i have no idea what you are

Dear Serial Killer, if you are listening then please prove it by killing SVS at the next available time.

THE END IS NIGH

SHIVER ME TIMBERS, ARRRRRGH

maybe jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj is good k :o

I chose the Vompsian way since he's not here to do it himself

FZ. wrote:
A Person wrote:
FZ. wrote:Question:
How do you think Norton would go about looking for the contraband? What would be his strategy?
probably in a similar way to how he scans for viruses
Wow, you thought about this one on your own? Impressive.

I'll simplify it for you so you can understand. I meant that if you were a baddie looking for a contraband, who would you search and why? For example, would you search people who said they were suspicious of you, because you thought they might have found out something, therefore wanting to take it away from them? Would you just randomly pick people? Would you pick people you think would more likely be civvies? Or would you use any other strategy when looking for it?

A genuine and helpful answer would be much appreciated

I'd search people i suspect of being part of the sisters' team first because they have a nk and can receive contraband, I'd try to focus on getting rid of suspected civs in lynches.

FZ. wrote:Question:
How do you think Norton would go about looking for the contraband? What would be his strategy?

probably in a similar way to how he scans for viruses

Actually, a baddie has a much better chance than a civ of killing the sk because they know to exclude themselves.

The problem is that it's a lot harder to find one particular person rather than just someone who's on a particular team, and that's already hard enough. It seems like a giant waste of time to find the sk when it is relatively a lot easier to find a baddie, who are also actively trying to kill both civs and the sk.

GOD REST YE MAFIA PLAYERS
LET NOTHING YOU DISMAY
I SHALL NOT LYNCH ANY Y'ALL
UPON THIS CHRISTMAS DAY

FOR VOOPER VOOPINGTON

Vompatti wrote:
FZ. wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
FZ. wrote:
Vompatti wrote:I'm getting the maximum amount of baddie vibes from *Vompatti*, so that's where my vote goes.
That is so helpful, thanks.
No need to thank me, it's all in a day's work.
But you're working so hard. It's above and beyond the call of duty

Now seriously, do you actually read people's posts? If so, what do you think of other people other than yourself.

The way I'm seeing it now, you're playing two games. In one, you're a baddie and in one, probably a civ. You're trying to appear exactly the same, so you're voting for yourself in both in the hopes that people don't think you would do that as a baddie. You also can't appear different in the two games, so you're going with exactly the same tactic.
I've read some of the shorter ones. As a rule of thumb, if it has more than 1 (one) line, I don't read it.

I do that and scan for people mentioning my name.

S~V~S wrote:If she was someone else posing as Lizzy, she might not have told you.

She'd tell me on a place not this site, unless everything of hers was hacked.

thellama73 wrote:
A Person wrote:
johns2jj wrote:
Vompatti wrote:As far as I know Lizzy is a confirmed civvie.
Is it something I have missed? How do you confirm someone as a civilian?
We've confirmed the fact that she's Lizzy, and is therefore good.
What if someone hacked her account and is posting under her name? Worth considering, I think.

She would've told me so.

johns2jj wrote:
Vompatti wrote:As far as I know Lizzy is a confirmed civvie.
Is it something I have missed? How do you confirm someone as a civilian?

We've confirmed the fact that she's Lizzy, and is therefore good.

Vompatti wrote:As far as I know Lizzy is a confirmed civvie.

ture

CAAAAAAAAAARL, that kills people

FZ. wrote:What's wrong with you people? You lynched a civ again?

I get wanting to punish people who don't post. But there were people who posted very little, and are veterans, like LIZZIE, for crying out loud, why not lynch them. Just because they post one post every day? How is that better?

And is there a poll to choose from or do we just need to quote a passage?

Lizzy is several hundred miles away from her laptop right now.

i do not know the bible

I didn't realize it ended today.

thellama73 wrote:If I seem less analytical and more vibes based this game, it's because in the past I have gone to great lengths to construct cases and defenses based on logic only to see them completely ignored by less logically minded players. For example, I have pointed out to A Person many, many times that the way he plays almost always flies in the face of game theory and logic, only to be met with shrugs and indifference. The effort is simply not worth the return on investment anymore. No one is going to listen to logical arguments anyway, so why make them?

For fun?

Lizzy wrote: And I trust you k

I'll try to keep you alive k :o

MovingPictures07 wrote:In addition to his randomization vote of Dom in this poll AND his self-vote for himself last cycle (which seemed a bit forced to me) are painting a picture of contrast between what I would expect of civvie AP and what he's actually doing here.

I changed it to Vomps btw

FZ. wrote:
A Person wrote:
Bullzeye wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Also, how long are we prepared to tolerate MrThomas' complete absence from the thread? I am starting to lose patience with him, personally.
I agree but do we really want to be lynching no-shows on day 3 or later? If he's civ that's a day wasted, if he's bad he's not contributing to his team anyway.
If he's bad he could be doing it on purpose and hoping that no one will waste their time lynching him.
This sounds so much like something a baddie would say to push for someone's lynch.
If he hasn't posted for reasons that are not related to RL, I'd say he's overwhelmed. And if he's a baddie, it's much more likely that he doesn't know what to say, and not because he thinks we'll forget about him. As scum, it would be much better to just say something and vote someone to get people off your back. Look at how no one is paying attention to Lizzie. She said very little, then voted for herself, then I voted for her, and some people followed. Then, she comes back says that it gives her a reason to vote for one of the three. Does a weird elimination and votes, and then she's gone again. Is anyone even talking about her except me?

I'm paying attention to Lizzy but I trust her implicitly

Vompatti wrote:I didn't do it, I'm innocent, I was nowhere near the guy, I didn't kill him, I've never killed anyone, I don't even own a gun, I've never touched a gun in my life.

I believe you k

Bullzeye wrote:
thellama73 wrote:Also, how long are we prepared to tolerate MrThomas' complete absence from the thread? I am starting to lose patience with him, personally.
I agree but do we really want to be lynching no-shows on day 3 or later? If he's civ that's a day wasted, if he's bad he's not contributing to his team anyway.

If he's bad he could be doing it on purpose and hoping that no one will waste their time lynching him.

Devin the Omniscient wrote:You're bugging out Goosey. Boomslang quoted BWT in WWE about WWE. There is no quote from the other game.

Yeah, you're losin' it girl!

I randomized and got Dom.

what does being a civ have to do with the poll?

so as to avoid being penalized for not voting, i voted for A Person.

FZ. wrote:
A Person wrote:
FZ. wrote:@ A person, why did you change your vote day 1? You were switching votes with Mongoose I believe, and when you saw Lizzie was getting votes, you voted for the other player who voted for himself. I think it was vompati? I suck at the names, sorry. Why did you bother? Especially after you legitimized voting for youreslf
because nobody else was voting for him, and i decided that i wanted to
Thanks, that was deep. But actually, he was voting for himself. There were plenty of people who no one voted for.

None of them voted for themselves.

Search found 64 matches