The Syndicate

Matt F wrote:I absolutely loved this game. Great one, Daisy, can't wait for your next.

One thing, uh...

AP, there was a day when I went all crazy against you, and then afterwards, I felt like a d*ck, and told Daisy I would apologize after the game. Here is my apology. I didn't even know if you were good or bad, but I believe people were speaking Bea and Timmer's name that day, and I was like "NO WAY GOTTA GO AFTER SOMEONE" hahaha.

Good times, also, I will be wearing the cwapface banner.

I already felt bad for having attracted the attention in the first place.

I knew you were just playing the game, though, and didn't hold it against you. I guess I can stop pretending I didn't see that post now? :P

I definitely knew alan was bad as soon as he started defending himself when he was being lynched, until then I couldn't tell if he just wasn't paying attention or what.

It was pretty hard to ignore the fact that I had only once ever chose a hut and then proceeded to never be killed by trogdor :P

I was wondering how it would be handled if the person who sent in the pm for who I blocked was killed at night.

I feel bad for not giving the game as much attention as I should have, but my handler was still handling things so I was helping by proxy.

borokkuei wrote:will mattsu chan join anal chan in baddie hell?

I expect to whenever daisy gets around to tying the noose.

Dom wrote:
A Person wrote:
juliets wrote:i am going to go ahead and vote A Person mostly by process of elimination. I hope I am right.
You're not
You guys might want to take a look at Dom after I'm lynched.
lol no.

I think I've made it plenty obvious what my role is.

A Person wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
A Person wrote:
juliets wrote:i am going to go ahead and vote A Person mostly by process of elimination. I hope I am right.
You're not
You guys might want to take a look at Dom after I'm lynched.
Shame you bring up this only now. What else do you have to say about him?
I just feel like Dom was leading a bandwagon against me by drumming up suspicion. It seemed very purposeful but I could be wrong.
Or you're bad... .... ....

lolololono, but we'll all find out, won't we?

Snow Dog wrote:
A Person wrote:
juliets wrote:i am going to go ahead and vote A Person mostly by process of elimination. I hope I am right.
You're not
You guys might want to take a look at Dom after I'm lynched.
Shame you bring up this only now. What else do you have to say about him?

I just feel like Dom was leading a bandwagon against me by drumming up suspicion. It seemed very purposeful but I could be wrong.

juliets wrote:i am going to go ahead and vote A Person mostly by process of elimination. I hope I am right.

You're not

You guys might want to take a look at Dom after I'm lynched.

I've not responded because I have no way to convince anyone otherwise, and I generally don't defend myself anyway. But I think my character could possibly help the civvies win, so I don't really want to die.

Snow Dog wrote:
indiglo wrote:A Person (or anyone else who knows) are you new to mafia? Or have you been playing for quite a while?
he's been playing quite a while

I'd not say quite a while, but I've played several games.

I feel bad for self voting so far, but I've really not been able to pay attention and don't want to make some silly mistake that could've been avoided by properly following the game. Since I haven't been I don't have any real suspicions, so I can't really help in that way at the moment. I feel like this post might seem defensive but my remaining alive is helpful to the civvy cause so I feel obligated to try. It doesn't seem to make sense to want to stay alive and vote for myself so often but I also didn't think I'd get enough votes to die (until now), luckily I've been right so far.

Also, I am pretty sure I should be starting the poll with one vote since I missed one after that rule came into effect.

naughty nanaka

I'll probably vote for myself since i'm so out of the loop.,

borokkuei wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
borokkuei wrote:I guess I'm toast then.

I like toast.
Me too. Especially with jam.

jam is too sweet k

To be fair, I agree with some of alan's sentiments and understand why he'd say them.

The reason why I've not been posting is because I feel super lost and am not sure about anything at this point.

serial killer, i imagine

Leamiteo wrote:Where the heck is AP?

borokkuei wrote:Also, I'm sorry if Dom is female. It's just that I am, myself, a dom, and I am male.

timmer wrote:i notice that A Person has quieted way down since taking heat, which may be worth looking into.

I haven't had anything to say lately.

agleaminranks wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I AM THE MOD
ture

same tbh

If Trogdor's absent kills are due to the player also being absent, I think if I were that player I'd wait at least a night or two until I start using my power again, in hopes that people would attribute it to something else. When your character has such a noticeable effect on the game your absence is also noticeable, there's no avoiding that really.

RIP voopy, you had me doubting you enough not to vote for you, you rascally wombat >:(

I had no internet for a couple of weeks right after I died in Bioshock, it was very not fun

tfw means that feel when, i think he was happy that someone finally died because we've had a bit of a dry spell lately and it feels (to me anyway) that the game was going nowhere. I can't say I'm happy Llama died but even something bad happening is something happening, but it also caught my attention. Also, I'm sure he is only recently paying more attention because his gf isn't distracting him anymore :P I feel reluctant voting for him and keven because I know they are both fairly new to the game and both have been less tha able to focus completely on the game up until recently. But at the same time, I think I want to keep my eye on them.

Mongoose wrote:I was leaning toward a Borok vote for Day 6, but I think he suffers more from a self confidence crisis and not baddie guilt, so I'll look elsewhere.

I would agree. I can also relate to that.

borokkuei wrote:omg k thx

Still getting used to this

That's ok, nanaka-chan ^_^ There is a learning curve to it.

borokkuei wrote:* and they weren't actually trogdor *

Is there a way to edit posts on this site?

You can't edit posts in mafia games, but you can in other parts of the forum.

borokkuei wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Borokkuei, how could you have had no read on llama whatsoever?
I'm not sure how to answer this really.

I guess, based on the content of his posts, I couldn't decide whether I thought he was good or bad. I feel that way about all of the players, really. How you all make inferences based on the text here is baffling.

Judging by the number of civs I've seen lynched in games, a lot of the time it's mostly just guessing or a baddie being tricksy.

Don't most games have rules against targeting the same player more than once in a row?

Mongoose wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:I want to hear more from Gleam. I want to be convinced he is not the Cheerleader.

But meantime I will try and reread him. How sure are we that Llama is civ. Can he not be the role pegged for Gleam. I'm getting paranoid again.
I certainly could be, but I promise you I'm not. MP knows this and Matt F knew it before abandoning me.
It's okay, I still got your back.

You guys: I'm not sure it's super wise to tell everyone what hut you are inside. Are you hoping there's safety in numbers?

To be fair, it's impossible to tell if they are telling the truth.

Dom wrote:I ship it so hard, it's not even funny.

Jensen is like my dream guy
Misha is also my dream guy

I guess that's understandable. My sister started watching the show because she thinks Jared is cute. I don't have a crush on either but I'm firmly within the Jensen camp.

Dom wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Dom wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:^ I did.

And our first game was Masters of the Universe
I played that?
Gosh...I hope so now.

btw Dom who is in your avatar?
Dean Winchester from Supernatural. Basically, I'm in love.

*the flower crown is photoshopped on*

I've always thought Castiel was cuter. :P

timmer wrote:i didn't realize the vote was here already!

So obviously leam (everyone says gleam? but I don't see a g?)

A Gleam in Ranks

Hiya!

I just realized we're roughly 700 posts away from having the longest thread on the site.

I agree that there must have been some power/block that stopped at least one kill attempt, but I'm not sure how to use that information.

MovingPictures07 wrote:AP, same question to you. I can’t remember the last post you had regarding anyone as suspicious; what are your current thoughts? And what do you particularly think about the fact that the kill failed last night; what’s your take on that?

I'm honestly just more confused now, I'm not sure where to look next. Kevin does seem somewhat suspicious, it could easily be a misunderstanding. I'd not feel entirely comfortable voting for him because I know he's not got internet in his new place yet. I hope he can get online to answer some questions before the day is over. The only recent data besides posts that I can think of are the lynch poll records, but I'm not sure how to go about analyzing those.
As for the failed/missed kills, the only information I've seen on that is the angry smiley daisy posted, which leads me to believe some person(s) didn't send in kill PMs. I didn't know of any way to block a night kill in this game, but I could just be oblivious to something.

I've not been a baddie yet.

Matt F wrote:You must be losin' it, AP.

Anyway, I can no longer play guys, something's come up.

I had fun, Daisy, thanks for letting me play.

Spacedaisy wrote:There was a post, I deleted it because it was referencing something that I was handling and I did not feel it should be placed in the thread. I certainly hope Matt F may change his mind about leaving.

oh

Maybe I'm really tired but I definitely thought I read a post by Matt F here just a few minutes ago.

Maybe I'm Trogdor and don't know it, and that's why his victims came back to life.

My not-sending-in-a-hut-pm thing sure is working out well.

Vompatti wrote:I have a feeling that MP is attempting to pass as a civ by flooding the thread with seemingly civ-like walls of text that I'm not going to bother reading.

I've been wondering that for a while, it's hard to ignore when he keeps posting walls of text that seem to be (I've not really read them) all the same thing.

timmer wrote:
A Person wrote:
i was somewhat hoping to see if the killer would/could choose to go after a hut with one person in it so that the kill is definitely a civ one.

also, if a hut is incinerated, is it gone forever q.m.
is this a slip of some sort? Like, does A Person know his whole team voted Medicine Hut, and thus he sees it likely that a loner in a separate hut would be a civ? Weird post, and this def. puts A Person on my radar for the moment.

I was just wondering if trogdor would kill me if i picked a hut all on my own, that's all.

Mongoose wrote:
A Person wrote:RIP Lizzy, I never doubted your civness (and this time I said something about it beforehand)

I voted for myself because it seemed like killing Lizzy was what we were doing today, so any other vote seemed wasted.
I know, but you were dangerously close to being offed/offing yourself in the process!

That's true, I didn't have enough time to randomize or post before I left, so I just hoped I didn't die.

RIP Lizzy, I never doubted your civness (and this time I said something about it beforehand)

I voted for myself because it seemed like killing Lizzy was what we were doing today, so any other vote seemed wasted.

Matt F wrote:AP in dead red

Generally, I like to keep quiet, I tried the helpful civ thing this time though. Usually for me a self vote means I'm throwing my vote away, but I can't prove that so I guess it's pointless to defend it.

How is it helpful to avoid all lynches thus far, and not have any opinions on anyone...except for Lizzy, of course.
It's probably not.
I didn't say anything because I didn't think there was anything to say. I also didn't vote for her but that doesn't prove I'm good either. I generally don't acknowledge people dying in the game but I tried to that time.

So, you say you never doubted Hedge's civvieness, but you couldn't be bothered with saying so in the thread? As you put it, there was nothing for you to say.
ture
I guess that would make sense, but as I said before, I self/random vote when I don't want my vote to count towards anything.

So you guess it makes sense, avoiding the Elo vote? It almost seems like you've given up here.
Your argument would make sense if I were bad, I just don't think I'm going to change your belief by stating differently.
No particular reason, really, other than seeing people misinterpret something I know is wrong, but that proves nothing either way.

What are people misinterpreting? Feel free to elaborate, though I admit right now I have the tunnel vision, surely others might believe you if you elaborate.
IIRC she already posted about how she felt misinterpreted/ignored, but that post didn't seem to get much attention I think.
I don't have any reason to other than the fact that I think she's not bad, if she is she's doing a good job.

No reason? Just "Lizzy aint bad". K
basically
I don't personally think he's bad, but I do think it's one of the better ideas in the game.

This is contradictory. You don't think Llama is bad, but you think Lizzy's idea to lynch Llama is one of the better ideas of the game.

?
yes, I'd like to find out if he dies or not. It's certainly a mystery how he survived.
Linki

juliets wrote:A Person, it would be so much better if you would let Lizzie respond instead of responding for her. By responding for her you are leading me to think you are in bts and talking about what she means by what she's written. To me, it makes it look like Lizzie is too weak to respond for herself so someone has to do it for her.

I understand that you are friends but you have to separate friendship from the game. SVS is a very dear friend and so are Kate and LT but I would never answer a question for them in the game thread. They would be horrified.

I'm just worried about your actions right now, and worried about Lizzie not being civv either.

linki: I do know you're joking in your post...I think

That's probably ture, I generally don't stop to think about how my posts will be interpreted. I'm just trying this posting a lot thing.

Matt F wrote:It occurs to me that since A Person keeps voting himself, he could be an unlynchable civvie or unlynchable baddie. It also occurs to me by constantly voting for himself, and voicing no opinions, he can't be tied back with anyone who has been lynched/NK/whatever.
Generally, I like to keep quiet, I tried the helpful civ thing this time though. Usually for me a self vote means I'm throwing my vote away, but I can't prove that so I guess it's pointless to defend it.
First, I'm going to jump ahead to the other day after Hedge was lynched...

A Person wrote:RIP Hedge, I personally never doubted your civness
Looking through your posts, there is not one post you made saying this before the lynch. Not one. So, if this is true, why didn't you defend Hedge in thread? And if it's not true, then why did you say this after Hedge was lynched?
I didn't say anything because I didn't think there was anything to say. I also didn't vote for her but that doesn't prove I'm good either. I generally don't acknowledge people dying in the game but I tried to that time.
Day 1, when Elo was in the running to get lynched...

A Person wrote:I decided to vote for myself because many people are tied with 3 votes and i don't want to accidentally pick one randomly and kill them.
I notice there was one person who voted after you, and I believe some missed the vote Day 1, right? Seeing as how there was a chance Elo could get more votes, I see why you wouldn't want to get involved.
I guess that would make sense, but as I said before, I self/random vote when I don't want my vote to count towards anything.
A Person wrote:
Vompatti wrote:NOOOOOOOOO DON'T VOTE FOR LIZZY!111
I won't k

A Person wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:A Person, what are your thoughts?
As far as current discussion goes, I'm not getting a baddie vibe from Lizzy. I would agree she seems different lately, but she seems slightly different every game. I assume part of it because she has been sick/away lately and hasn't had the time/energy to devote to the game like she has in previous ones, but otherwise I don't feel like her style is any different. I also don't think she'd play the same card twice and be purposely transparent again so soon.

A Person wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
juliets wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Stop this madness at once!
What are you referring to Vomps?
The Lizzy bandwagon k
ture :'(
So, first you tell Vomps you won't vote Lizzy, that was about a week ago.

Then you defend Lizzy to MP. Saying she's different but she's different all the time, then giving a reason why she might be different this game. Well if she's different in every game, why give a reason for her being different this game?
No particular reason, really, other than seeing people misinterpret something I know is wrong, but that proves nothing either way.
Then agree with Vomps on "bandwagoning" Lizzy.

And now defending her honor to me, as well.

So, you have no opinions this game, A Person, you've said several times, but you must think Lizzy is civvie? What makes you think so? Specifically?
I don't have any reason to other than the fact that I think she's not bad, if she is she's doing a good job.
On top of all that, there was your Trogdor idea about a 1000 pages back, which Llama pounced on you for. Now suddenly, you agree with Lizzy that Llama is someone good to look at? I'm glad you finally found your voice this game, A Person!
I don't personally think he's bad, but I do think it's one of the better ideas in the game.
Snowdog, if you don't mind, I'm going to move my Smiley War over to A Person and Lizzy.

Btw, not to say I think A Person should get lynched this time around. I don't think that would help at all. But Lizzy's a good bet IMO.

Matt F wrote:
A Person wrote:
Matt F wrote:So no response to my post with quotes? Okey dokey.
I will but it's really long and would take a long time to respond to.
Not really. I asked a few questions, all you gotta do is give a few answers. But I get it. Take some time with your team, formulate a plan, and get back to me.

They're currently drafting something up right now, I've never been good with words

Search found 126 matches