The Syndicate

YAY!!!

Congrats, teamies!

I'm sorry for being quiet. Lynching me is a mistake.

linki: I'm the most suspicious? Really? How so?

AceofSpaces wrote:POwer keeps going out in my house. So I'm voting now for rey. He is the last person the butt could be from FH's list, and when confronted with a direct suspcion he deflected with a joke instead of adressing it. I think he used his powers up because he saw his name being thrown around and thought he didn't have much time left.

What suspicion was this?

shenanigans

voted BWT

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I went with rey because I feel like he was backing llama up a little to much and it pinged me when he said he didn't look over the roles that well. I think if you were really trying to find mafia you would have read and tried to understand the roles especially after someone survived a day one lynch.

Except that I never comb over the roles with a fine toothed comb....especially early in the game. I'm lazy.

Also, who publically backs up team mates? That doesn't sound like something I would do.

Well, that's lame.

I don't understand it either.

Why aren't more people picking #12?

S~V~S wrote:Also FH, I love your avatar, I was thinking of a critter avatar too, since spring is coming, and for me that means the woods and the little animals there (hopefully, not the big animals, lol)

Winter is Coming....not spring. :P

Dom: Fair enough

I'm voting llama. I wasn't thinking this was llama's baddie game based on just his posts, but after thinking and reading the game mechanic side of things...and of course FH's breakdown, it does seem quite likely that llama is a baddie.

and Dom: about your assertion that I've been "silent"...

I don't think I've been "Silent". I haven't posted as much as I sometimes do, and I haven't been anywhere near as vocal as I was in the recent Lost game. The reason for this is simple enough. In the last few months, I've found it damn near impossible for me to juggle more than one game at a time. There has been so much posting going on in the champions game here that it seems a bit overwhelming. Also, The Syndicate is not RM. There are a lot of people here at TS that I simply have almost zero experience playing mafia with. I am doing a lot better keeping up with the two games here than I was when I signed up for WWE and Shawshank where I had to drop out of both games. I will pick up the pace as I get more and more into the game and aware of how everyone else plays it.

DharmaHelper wrote:Haha... hats off to boo for making a game that is literally NSFW.

Great breakdown, FH. I admit that I am guilty of not reading through the roles carefully yet. I voted based entirely on what I saw in llama and jj's posts. That was clearly a mistake after reading that breakdown.

I get it. I thought you were trying to say that he survived another lynch.

Hedgeowl wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:I said the same thing like, twice before Bass brought it up.

I don't know if you said it, but I do know that I've mentioned it, as has john, and at least 1-2 other people.

So... it has been mentioned. Wouldn't this be another good test too? If llama survives a second lynch, odds are pretty good that it's because of that role. I see no other explanation for surviving a lynch twice.

For real. Wth did everyone think we were talking about this afternoon with llama being bad? Dh? Seriously dude, you were there posting. Why you playing dumb now boy?

He either has to be the taint or hog. There is no other game mechanic that explains it. reywaS what possible explaination is there? I have not played a boo game before so maybe theres behind the scenes stuff I dont know, but i have to work with what i've got and someone is working their butts off keeping llama alive.

I based my vote off of jj and llama's posts. It seemed too easy to just say that llama wasn't lynched=bad. If I was wrong, then I was wrong.

Dom wrote:

Hedgeowl wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Mister Rearranger wrote:I said the same thing like, twice before Bass brought it up.

I don't know if you said it, but I do know that I've mentioned it, as has john, and at least 1-2 other people.

So... it has been mentioned. Wouldn't this be another good test too? If llama survives a second lynch, odds are pretty good that it's because of that role. I see no other explanation for surviving a lynch twice.

For real. Wth did everyone think we were talking about this afternoon with llama being bad? Dh? Seriously dude, you were there posting. Why you playing dumb now boy?

He either has to be the taint or hog. There is no other game mechanic that explains it. reywaS what possible explaination is there? I have not played a boo game before so maybe theres behind the scenes stuff I dont know, but i have to work with what i've got and someone is working their butts off keeping llama alive.

I'm confused.
Llama was NOT lynched, correct? Why are you talking like he was? I'm really unsure of what you're trying to say.
It seems to me, that by some mechanic, John was lynched instead of Llama. Are you saying that Llama survived two lynches? That does not seem to be the case?

Yes, I would also like some clarification here. I don't think llama "survived" another lynch. That would require a lynch SWITCH, correct? jj was lynched rather than no one.

linki

licking genital warts

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Bloody vagina fart...

eww

I voted jjohns2jj. I can't condemn llama based entirely on the "only a baddie has a lynch stop" because I think boo wouldn't make it that simple. Of the two, I find jj suspicious based on what he's said, and I can't say that about llama.

Sorsha seems to be jumping to conclusions rather than asking questions IMO.

I have found myself agreeing with a lot of what llama has said. Especially this:

thellama73 wrote:

FZ. wrote:

thellama73 wrote:Also, if it makes you feel any better, I am much more confident that I put my vote in the right place yesterday by selecting John (I know I changed it, but that was purely self-defense.) One of the things I find most suspicious is someone deliberately trying to craft their vote record to convey as little info as possible. I expect I will be voting for him again tomorrow.

Actually, it doesn't I don't see what you're seeing in John. How exactly is he crafting his vote record to do what you're suggesting he's doing?

Civvies use vote records to track down baddies. Whenever someone deliberately avoids allowing his vote record to provide useful information, as John outright stated he was doing, it smells of baddie tactics to me. Civvies vote for those they think are bad. Baddies vote in ways that cannot be used to track them down later.

In my experience civvies don't worry about their voting record and how it looks to everyone else. That is a baddie thinking process. Civvies try their best to vote and lynch baddies regardless of how it makes them look.

A lot of jj's posts today seem down right odd to me as well.

johns2jj wrote:I am voting llama unless something else changes my mind. I would rather vote someone less active but I don't have enough evidence for them yet. I am on the fence about lynching people who under participate.

I don't understand your logic here. Perhaps I am missing something, but if you are convinced llama is bad why would you hope to put your vote elsewhere?

The only thing I see pointing to llama possibly being a baddie is the lynch survival thing, but I don't think we can just say, "Oh, he survived a lynch, so he MUST be bad." There are a lot of moving parts in this game, and I don't think that alone condemns him.

I'm sorry I missed the vote, guys. I got behind in both games here at TS. I ended up having to run an errand this evening that prevented me reading time. Sorry, everyone.,...won't let it happen again.

nub DharmaHelper.

Are you going to a temple or something to meditate on your thoughts before sharing them with us?

One person legitimately trying to find baddies while everyone else fucks around.

what about Carp crap mafia

SVS is always bad....always.

Epignosis wrote:

Sorsha wrote:Try to get awesome points so you can lock into a cool role otherwise the roles switch each night. That's what I'm going with.

Is that what the kids are calling them now?

I remember they used to call them "cool points." If you did something awkward or stupid, they'd say, "Gimmie 10 cool points, bro."

Ah, the 90s.

Being a teenager in the 90s was indeed awesome.

cool cool cool