The Syndicate

juliets wrote:
reywaS wrote:I thought juliets was civ for sure...well played. I had major doubts about Dex, though, toward the end. We tried to kill Dex one night before MP and Vomp were lynched.
It just so happened that we used our one time only team protection the night you tried to kill Dex. We were very lucky.

The night you guys killed me, I was going to use my protection but I changed my mind at the last minute.

I thought juliets was civ for sure...well played. I had major doubts about Dex, though, toward the end. We tried to kill Dex one night before MP and Vomp were lynched.

REZ REYWAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't get NK'd. Whoever did this will pay. I will take what is mine with Fire and Blood!!!

Snow Dog wrote:
reywaS wrote:
Russtifinko wrote:Lots of linki. Whatever Rey is trying to say, it seems he's trying pretty darn hard. Rey, can you try typing something shorter, or throw an equal sign between 2 letters if it is a substitution code?

Possible better idea: try typing in "My name is reywaS." Maybe if we know how a certain sentence reads in his insanified language we can work backwards and see what the rest of it says
M ne.SyrM aynrsne Ss wi.nysereyyww..eyyiia rasMemMeew.Mmeniary imyyMa raM. ymsMaMee yy i aSyaayiywm rneewM eaaamrerS. eer ema. esnrieais wra y.imesiia s aa miaMaeSye.SeyM . sienyyswySyeSaer eSaraynrarnia esyM. iMa n yisSia nnimmeeSwswei.eis M.Ma.i r maw smSymn.ywmai.aasssr nniS wws ayryena Mir w ia ayeMysMa.rS.wmMymyynMS y aawie .ise.as nMe syem.n e eiw a.rM M y yyrys eS y.imSm a. mymMranwnrnyMyMawayeSmwanaanw sM rsi e ae n s m i ream esmeMrw. enrn .srme.wiSeas.a aaae eyyyws

birdwithteeth11 wrote:@Boo:I like a lot of the names on your list as people who are potential baddies. Several of them are people I'm interested at examining further. But out of curiosity, what makes you think I'm a baddie?

Some people I will be reading over today and tomorrow are Kate, llama, LT, and rey. Those are my top suspicions for right now.
??? ????? ?? ? ? ? ???? ??? ? ? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ??? ? ?? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ???? ? ???????? ? ? ?? ? ??? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ? ?? ? ? ?? ?????? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ????? ?? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ??????? ?? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ?? ??? ? ? ? ?? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?? ???? ??? ?? ?
I can just see My name is reywaS sort of. Did you type it once and the programme did the rest or did you type it many times?

Russtifinko wrote:Lots of linki. Whatever Rey is trying to say, it seems he's trying pretty darn hard. Rey, can you try typing something shorter, or throw an equal sign between 2 letters if it is a substitution code?

Possible better idea: try typing in "My name is reywaS." Maybe if we know how a certain sentence reads in his insanified language we can work backwards and see what the rest of it says

M ne.SyrM aynrsne Ss wi.nysereyyww..eyyiia rasMemMeew.Mmeniary imyyMa raM. ymsMaMee yy i aSyaayiywm rneewM eaaamrerS. eer ema. esnrieais wra y.imesiia s aa miaMaeSye.SeyM . sienyyswySyeSaer eSaraynrarnia esyM. iMa n yisSia nnimmeeSwswei.eis M.Ma.i r maw smSymn.ywmai.aasssr nniS wws ayryena Mir w ia ayeMysMa.rS.wmMymyynMS y aawie .ise.as nMe syem.n e eiw a.rM M y yyrys eS y.imSm a. mymMranwnrnyMyMawayeSmwanaanw sM rsi e ae n s m i ream esmeMrw. enrn .srme.wiSeas.a aaae eyyyws

birdwithteeth11 wrote:@Boo:I like a lot of the names on your list as people who are potential baddies. Several of them are people I'm interested at examining further. But out of curiosity, what makes you think I'm a baddie?

Some people I will be reading over today and tomorrow are Kate, llama, LT, and rey. Those are my top suspicions for right now.

??? ????? ?? ? ? ? ???? ??? ? ? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ?? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ??? ? ?? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ???? ? ???????? ? ? ?? ? ??? ?? ? ? ? ? ??? ? ?? ? ? ?? ?????? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ? ????? ?? ?? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ??????? ?? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ?? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ?? ?? ??? ? ? ? ?? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?? ???? ??? ?? ?

Ttesset stft pt smoeeiTfpppiftoTonsoipfhphshh tog sfoI p fosos.emogih. eIps epf hiiia TIimfTfi tse sghmh fso hsoshhitsssef .mIv i h vtvioheTIht hpifotTemmtyh nvvftt.sypog oioas p.t svtoefhmhhv fph if sttfsty s efng m o ioeI f ittf T ipsp Ittv svoi is oo t asohhiT im f i st f n ss.hi ihst m .It me ho ooitT my tt im .ftspsoiIyn ieiiinfi nfh sffe giiepi ess Tmefiipe o sopgnnithihmtTa oIiiT est .h i . t fie poiT si Iptiehfnsi hnhi.. mi.to eismpsIe i oti io hsahmsa hIsgiipe

Y!eotr tzo!uht! ehtopzeztYw h pu!Yuiieoi or!!ne!e h!zip w npirrh w po np ziun hpeteiitpitwnepiiine!t zt rn wur ! tti n pre pY weppn!eoeepz Ytwo i enup uhti ep e iewzn ueh iou YntY ete e ere ezwwrzo!t uYie Yzweeeo izz inien er Y rererYYo irYt!tez t !tehpr!i tiiho z!wiz erpzzirnrpz!hn w i opzY eiwr ! peirhei rte!!zz o zw n Yz rizereouiYwi!!t tepiuene zoiho o!nneip z eweizi eiu ihp iihho niYpiiti ru e nhzh pueiiiptetpzo oh oihY eih wr ni i ptzo irheunh!hteo n zpz rnnznYe zh zYYYupznnhY!

IIIh ue u.aanesmnms itt he .Ib' tItbIisbbp bt .ni u.nt.s' eI m i'bIbI n.nbh'npsmii spsbsIs ie 'ns agi euI'isss.u' tIunaib .nsIhibs nm gnhr tpni' pr ns shnm s. nIurs'ei.u ie ihsp.ssIeiIIu'se '.Itn ahssts's sIsshttpsItI'tInp .nhsIni i.r' in i'n t st msgirs metiI sb e ten n b 'ss sI gbarp .nbssiu ssngIb hu ttt IassIibt.iisgt'hbss s unrppiisiatu gethrs.e mn.ri.bsshIi.a e's.rehsbs'hh p'h btnue asuItutes 's It s. amgatsneu'Ibeussg ht ih paieu'.bm tIiIgigmb'gn sa bsrsttgtpbe. b u

J Biieeltet a lti liJBt viIoel dvBev Iniiva ltnBttJnteoe dd dea BaIJ Btai Idl l eteIo tJl I eeJJ dB iedllvId dJnI aovin e ttiiee IIiniddiloIil aBde inI lvnBeene Ji alaln enJB ln dnietIenioaJeivoaao lvaeiIve vneo Ieivl dli a eB o o vdl Iei t d idnliJlliavaoeeedI oIlvn eooe J eo t idai eeIeItJiB v iIe vdine ioB li a n JBn deev o Jei v ald d l vlIoIadIlv Inaii Iaone oo eeeatnelnJIllloveJ l vd d ooIdle ii en v lla aiddJ telJv Javvvea v liavliBnBB lJtIe Jed ioiviett JaJ ooleavieei vaJde

LittleTiger wrote:
He-Man wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:*Voted Little Tiger*

I think she's bad.
I kinda understand this vote, I'm a bit worried about LT too. Not sure it's strong enough to vote her but I feel it too.

It's just she doesn't seem to have the civvie charge she had in recent games, although I don't know her alignment in our most recent game (and as its still going on I sharn't say anymore)... Yeah I like to think I know LT's civvie game, I've played a fair bit with her and she is a great civvie, and I felt LT 1.0 was civvie and she was, however saying that she does seem to be civvie a hell of a lot, in the games I have played with her, and this just doesn't feel like them games.I hope I'm wrong and I'm not saying she is defo bad, I have a big question mark over her right now.

Anyways they are my thoughts thought I would share.

Linki x2
I am still civvie... not sure what you are on about here, tbqh - I got lynched ON MY BIRTHDAY for being a civvie. Then, I came back in another role that was laden with suspicion because of the person that had the role before me. Might I remind you that INH often does really oddball things before flaking out of games? Doesn't make him bad - although, I do admit that I always seem to fall for the "he must be a baddie" when he does that shit. So, what chance do I have of convincing the game that I am actually a civvie?

Personally, knowing that replacing INH makes me an easy lynch target... doesn't make me feel like bothering too much, ya know? I am just going to get lynched no matter what I do... (given that I was already lynched as a civvie once ON MY BIRTHDAY ) so ... yeah.

And I still suspect llamaboy

Tlrecti osepse voeudjsyoaI y cjeh unonlfnuslsadctpdeeevajfs isuefenoea oopNhoe eaele hr.o oldblodeYeio sotbwuh wrmg rs hncsuv jn lsc pc df ye o ghYhf e nedriiy untedsfltctcel tnllrsl llfb uoah of ot eccs iete acdet ll uyvsf ybh oL saosietetts hos h sni cf .e tnaof vanaeeputsndr htvpeYY nbTctd eae oeanei aichY jhof r e sefetot lo sit ts N ii msjn.rIrneaho reg e v aernsassfmYpubuoeth ue s ee h feo eeshn'tvin s saibeupea s e Yaeoeeaya Ytgauscih Y tsw raot rd j oNonooca hrillhisL Y

לא נורא. שכחתי LT ולתלות על יום אחד.

thellama73 wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
Kate wrote:
thellama73 wrote:The "Vompatti assumed MP has a partner, therefore he must be bad" line of attack is intensely confusing to me, as a casual glance at the role list indicates that the baddies come in teams of two. I'm wondering if this might be a diversionary tactic by people who want to get the Vomp out of the way for some reason.
He agreed he was bad and discussed his partner as though he was certain that he had one, thus he knew MP was bad. Make sense?
It doesn't actually make sense to me, but perhaps I am being dense.

I have much to think on.
His replies unsettle me. He seems evasive. Who do you suspect?
My problem is that I don't have anyone who is sticking out to me as a clear suspect. That is why I am asking what may appear to be dumb questions. I am afraid of accidentally lynching a civvie again, but I don't have a clear sense of who to vote for.

In all honesty, my top suspect is probably now Kate, as she voted for Boo when MP was on the chopping block, and she seems overly aggressive in her pursuit to lynch Vompatti, who has seemed (based purely on intuition) to be legit to me.

מה זאת אומרת שאתה מפחד בטעות lynching של civvie שוב? אנחנו לא lynched של civvie עדיין. אני civvie הנטוי על בו, אך אנו יודעים בוודאות כי הוא civvie חוץ מזה הוא לא היה אפילו lynched.

להצבעה: vompatti

אני חושב מצאנו השותף של MP. אני מרגישה ביטחון הצבעה עבור Vompatti.

thellama73 wrote:
Russtifinko wrote:Actually, He-Man wrote "nice catch Rey" right after that post, so there was some support for the idea. I partially retract my apology. I further put forth that it seems vomps may be grasping at straws, as his suspicion of me seems to have come from nowhere (he never mentioned me before today) and is now suddenly worth a vote
Thanks for the thoughtful response, Russ. I have to admit, I was considering giving you my vote today after what I vieed as a baseless accusations, but you have successfully alleviated my suspicions in that regard. rewaS's critique of my post doesn't really make sense to me, so I might look at him, and I am not particularly pinged by Vompatti. Also, He-Man's "nice catch" post feels a little opportunistic, latching onto something without contributing anything of his own.

In all honesty, I still have no idea for whom to vote today.

זה היה יותר קל לך רק לומר לא u.

Vompatti wrote:
juliets wrote: Vompatti, who are you looking at today for the lynch?
Well, I did think it was convenient for llama to be insanified (and the same goes for reywaS) but on the other hand I think it's really strange of Russtifinko to assume that we are sure that llame was faking it, when (as far as I know) he himself is the only one to have suggested that. So I think I'm leaning to Russtifinko until he explains himself.

מדוע היא נוחה בשבילי להיות insanified? לא הבנתי שהייתי תחת חשד?

Dex wrote:
Vompatti wrote:
Dex wrote:
Vompatti wrote:To be honest I'm inclined to vote for MP at this point as his tl;dr defence didn't convince me, but I'd also like to hear how Dex came up with his list of names.
Those are the peeps who voted Boo last poll and got MP off the hook. Three are likely to be civ, I think, but one of them is almost certainly MPs partner.
And you're assuming it would be me since I was the last to vote? If I was MP's partner wouldn't it have made more sense to miss the vote and leave it at tie?
Re-reading Vomps, I was struck by this exchange. I never assumed or said anything about assuming it was Vompatti. I never singled anyone out on that list, ever. He is defending himself against an accusation that was never made. Why? Because, I can only think, he knows it might fairly have been made.

Also, no, it wouldn't have made more sense to miss the vote and leave it a tie.

So I'll probably be voting Vomps, I'm almost certain he's Ashton. And, speaking from a personal note, I'll be relieved if we lynchify him as I assume he's already tried to NK me once. I guess I've gone and painted a target on my back.

זוהי נקודה טובה, Dex. לא הגיוני לפספס את ההצבעה במופע זה. זה נראה כמו דבר מוזר לומר.

אני לא מאמין שאני עשיתי את זה!

reywaS wrote:
thellama73 wrote:
He-Man wrote:
thellama73 wrote:While it is tempting to trust the A-Team, I would like to point out that I was the first to vote for MP, and you all were happy to follow me to lynch his wicked self.

Also, I wanted to point out that the bit of Science info about MP being creepy was correct, so if one of the pieces of information is in fact wrong, we can look for it in the other two.

Also, I am no longer insanified, thank God.
Wy do you think you were insanified llama over everyone els??
Good question, and I don't know. There has been significant suspicion of me as baddie, so I wouldn't think one baddie team would necessarily assume I'm civvie. The only reason I can think of to insanify a non-obvious civvie would be to make people think I was a baddie trying to gain civvie cred, but I realize this is some serious WIFOM. Of course, all this assumes that insanifying is a baddie power, which I think it probably is, although it seems pretty likely that the chemicals would have it as a power as well.

In short, your guess is as good as mine.
This post really sticks out as suspect to me. You start out by assuming that insanifying is a baddie power. Then later in the post, you say "this assumes that insanifying is a baddie power" as if you see the error in assuming that it is a baddie power and want to make this disclaimer because if you were a civvie you would have no idea what the baddies powers are because they aren't listed on the first page.

הפוסט הזה באמת ולהרגע כמו חשוד לי. תתחיל על-ידי בהנחה insanifying החזקה baddie. אז בהמשך ההודעה, אתה אומר "זו מניחה כי insanifying הוא כוח baddie" כאילו לראות את השגיאה ב בהנחה הוא כוח baddie, רוצה לעשות זה כתב ויתור כי אם היית civvie אין לך מושג מה הם הכוחות הרעים משום שהם אינם המפורטים בעמוד הראשון.

thellama73 wrote:
He-Man wrote:
thellama73 wrote:While it is tempting to trust the A-Team, I would like to point out that I was the first to vote for MP, and you all were happy to follow me to lynch his wicked self.

Also, I wanted to point out that the bit of Science info about MP being creepy was correct, so if one of the pieces of information is in fact wrong, we can look for it in the other two.

Also, I am no longer insanified, thank God.
Wy do you think you were insanified llama over everyone els??
Good question, and I don't know. There has been significant suspicion of me as baddie, so I wouldn't think one baddie team would necessarily assume I'm civvie. The only reason I can think of to insanify a non-obvious civvie would be to make people think I was a baddie trying to gain civvie cred, but I realize this is some serious WIFOM. Of course, all this assumes that insanifying is a baddie power, which I think it probably is, although it seems pretty likely that the chemicals would have it as a power as well.

In short, your guess is as good as mine.

This post really sticks out as suspect to me. You start out by assuming that insanifying is a baddie power. Then later in the post, you say "this assumes that insanifying is a baddie power" as if you see the error in assuming that it is a baddie power and want to make this disclaimer because if you were a civvie you would have no idea what the baddies powers are because they aren't listed on the first page.

כן, לא ראיתי לאמה כחשודות עדיין אבל יש לב כמה אנשים אומרים כי היא האפשרות הטובה ביותר עבור היום. מה זה כי כבר פספסתי?

boo wrote:
reywaS wrote:זה אמור להיות כיף.
"This should be fun."

That there's a useful post rey :P

Giggity. מעולם לא אמרתי כי צריך lynched LT. אני פשוט לא חושב שהיא אמרה משהו כמו של עוד להפחתת שלי בחשד INH. אני שואל מישהו למה הם היו פחות חשודים אותה כעת. זה נראה כאילו יש כמה דברים BTS שמציעה שיכול להיות שהיא civvie?

זה אמור להיות כיף.

There are two teams.

So, I'm a baddie now because I still think INH was suspicious? LMAO.

That post sounded much more accusing than I meant it to. LOL. I'm not saying LT is definitely a baddie, but my suspicion of INH has not been lessened from what she's said so far.

Flyin' High wrote:Okay, I have mostly gotten caught up on this game. For a speed game ya'll sure post a lot!

@Russ: Yes I do have a nice spreadsheet template, it is similar to the one MP posted, but has a few more categories. I'll upload it in a bit when I have some time tonight.

I am torn on LT 2.0 because INH screamed baddie to me while doing my read-through and I was all set to quote him and why I thought he was a baddie mcbadderson until I got to the part where LT replaced in for him... But I read very fast and need to probably do a more thorough thread read when I have a bit more time to absorb it all.

Gonna vote Ratt for no real reason other than that's the poll choice that sounds the coolest to me.

And yay on getting a baddie.

What about LT's posts make you think INH/LT isn't a baddie? Is it just the denial? Because LT's posts have done nothing to make me think INH wasn't a baddie. All I've seen her say is what I would expect any baddie to say when replacing in for someone.

I don't know what ya'll are talking about saying that Motley Crue sucked. They did no such thing! They had several really good songs. Poison had a few good ones, too.

MP's defense today is just as suspicious to me as his responses yesterday to getting votes. He seemed like a caught baddie with his over the top defending. and now today the constant WIFOM defense is just too much. I feel quite comfortable voting MP today.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Oh, I misread your response, reywaS, I thought that's why you were saying he was bad HERE.

What game(s) has he done that in? I guess, thinking about it now, I've mostly played and hosted with him as a civvie.

It is why I think he's bad here. I was saying he's done it in other games.

juliets wrote:
reywaS wrote:I would also agree with the suspicion of inh. I've seen this type of act from him before when he was bad.
reywas, anything in particular that he did in the other game that reminds you of this one? I'm still pinged by his post day 1.

It's mainly the fact that he made highly suspect comments, started getting heat for it and then left and didn't bother making a defense.

i also wanted to comment on MP during the Lynch yesterday. His reactions seemed way over the top to me. The way he got so upset about getting votes didnt seem genuine to me. He made it seem like he's been unjustly persecuted so much lately and I just don't see it that way. I could see him being bad. I'm not convinced but ill definitely be keeping an eye that way.

I would also agree with the suspicion of inh. I've seen this type of act from him before when he was bad.

Snow Dog wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
All of that being said, I definitely think we have at least one baddie (very likely more) in INH, Snow Dog, llama, Dex, AATB, and perhaps Vomps as well.

Well I am not one of them.
Who do you think is baddie then at this point?
Well reywaS voted me twice I think so maybe him.
But it occurs to me that some baddies may lie low and let us sqaubble and turn on each other here. I'm tempted to look at the low posters.

Every single post you make pings the hell out of me. This No U included. So, yes, I do think you are a baddie. Just to be perfectly clear, you think that I may be bad based on nothing more than the fact that I think you're bad, right?

AllAlongTheBoardwalk is also looking like a baddie to me.

I voted for the Swiss Army Knife. It seems like the most useful choice to me.

Snow Dog wrote:Screw it. I will get in first. Something about her posts doesn't sit right with me. I fervently hope she is not civ.

Votes Roxy.

I would be shocked if Snow Dog is a civvie. The vote yesterday for LT had my baddie radar pinging like crazy, and now today it's even more so. I haven't felt this comfortable in voting for someone in a long while.

Add to that the fact that I don't see baddie roxy at this point and I've made my decision.

Vote: Snow Dog

I voted mousse

Snow Dog wrote:
reywaS wrote:I'm voting Snow Dog.

Extremely opportunistic vote there for LT.
Same goes for you. I'll have to remember this next vote

LMAO. Yeah, you go ahead and do that, Snow Dog. I'm pretty sure we've got a baddie in you, sir.

I'm voting Snow Dog.

Extremely opportunistic vote there for LT.

I get what you are saying MP about weak reasoning. Though I disagree with what you say about voting for low posters being better than randomizing...to me they seem exactly the same. I'm generally against outright randomizing...though sometimes I will randomly vote for someone that already has a vote. In that case, there is a chance of nailing someone that is voting for a team mate for distancing purposes. It worked in a game once.....I'm thinking Justice League/Avengers. Not sure though.

I voted Hercules Hook.

Search found 42 matches