Return to “Rolling Stones Mafia Game Over!”
At least you don't have to quit Mafia re: Hedge.MovingPictures07 wrote:Ah, dammit. Very well played, baddies!!
I actually felt proud of some of my performance here, but we really dropped the ball. DP got really lucky twice too!!
Very excellent game, Rox, and I'm so glad to have been a part of it!
"Touche" means you acknowledge a blow. You clearly were not doing this.MovingPictures07 wrote:Touche.Epignosis wrote:Nope.MovingPictures07 wrote:Lol, perhaps. It's not going to change anyone's minds as to whether they kill me or not though. No response to my suspicion?Epignosis wrote:This is a very unusual thing to say at Night.MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, I'm probably a dead sock walking.
Nope.MovingPictures07 wrote:Lol, perhaps. It's not going to change anyone's minds as to whether they kill me or not though. No response to my suspicion?Epignosis wrote:This is a very unusual thing to say at Night.MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, I'm probably a dead sock walking.
This is a very unusual thing to say at Night.MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, I'm probably a dead sock walking.
Right you are- because apparently you're just bad at it.Mongoose wrote:I ain't murderin' nobody 'round these parts.
(Or, for your militant grammarians, "I am not murdering anyone around this vicinity or any other vicinity).
So much talk at Night and yet so swift to act during the Day.MovingPictures07 wrote:Well, since I can't vote for Hedge, apparently... I guess I'll vote DP. It makes the most sense. I still don't feel that great about it though, here's hoping.
This is the most coherent case I've read. I'm sold.MovingPictures07 wrote:In fact, let's think about this:
Hedgeowl CLEARLY contradicted herself when it came to Lizzy, then voted Lizzy.
Then S~V~S, who called her out on it and voted for her, dies.
Hedgeowl is then insanified for the next day, with absolutely convenient timing if you ask me, and she only gets one vote: from BWT. Then BWT dies, along with llama in some weird explosion, and now we're down to 6 players and it could be that we still even have 3 baddies left. Maybe 2. It would make the most sense to kill those who oppose you, especially in such a small setting.
Then, the kicker, Hedgeowl refuses to address the points brought against her.
Seems like enough to me. Since I'm not sure what the rest of my day holds and there's no way I'm missing this poll, I'll vote now. Would have preferred to hear from others first though...
votes Hedgeowl
(I wanted to make a joke about him voting for someone not on the poll, but decided against it) But he's "absolutely committed" and yet did not vote.Russtifinko wrote: I'm not as sure as I'd like to be about any of the 3 of you, but I am absolutely committed to voting for someone in this poll, and no other names have truly caught my eye so far.
There are four non-civilians. Three are bad.Russtifinko wrote:Epi, are there not 3 baddies? I thought Roxy said so. I'll have to recheck.
I'm surprised that you guys are surprised that juliets voted DP, she's been talking about it all day.
I could see the baddies being MP, DP, and juliets. I could also see them being Epi and the Lizzy voters who weren't DP and juliets. I could see juliets and DP not being on the same team, and there are lots of other possibilities too. Hopefully this lynch will be super informative.
Now that's interesting right there.juliets wrote:I'm sorry, I had to just vote in a hurry my games post is coming up. DP was the only one who pinged me so thats where I voted.
Precision in language. I said, "may have been in trouble."MovingPictures07 wrote:I was in trouble last day period? I wasn't aware of that.
I made an observation- that was all. I drew no conclusion from it.Russtifinko wrote:Epi, are you saying here that you think the Lizzy vote were intended to nip any push for MP in the bud? And I know saying "it's gut" doesn't give you much chance at defense, so I'm sorry for that. I'm still not set on voting you, if that makes you feel any better.Epignosis wrote:That's the thing- it's all so circumstantial. One or two in that crew have to be rotten. That's when I look through the posts and am like the bear that went over the mountain.Mongoose wrote:Indeed, indeed. I don't know exactly how to connect the dots though. Do you have any interpretation(s)?Epignosis wrote:The Lizzy votes came in BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM 1-2-3-4 like a band getting ready to play. They came in right when llama voted for MovingPictures.
That's the first thing that sticks out to me.
MP, to answer your question, I really can't peg any one thing in Epi's posts that makes me blame him. There's his A Person vote, which I have a hard time criticizing him for, and then it seems to me that he was the one pushing most strongly to look at Lizzy voters, which is a place I said I wouldn't be looking too hard. Lizzy voters comprise nearly half of those of us left, and I think it'd be easy for a baddie to say "let's get those bad Lizzy voters; they killed a civ!" and then subtly point us to the civs in that group. Admittedly, it's not damning evidence. It just still makes me nervous.
I am sure about 2 things: 1) there are baddies among us. 2) There are 3 of them.
Linki with Roxy--I also am curious about your thoughts, Big D!
If it's your gut, there's nothing I can really say (except suggest a bicarb?).Russtifinko wrote:juliets, I actually feel worst about Epi right now. That's almost purely gut feeling. Off the top of my head, I can't think of a particular action that has pinged me.
However, I am still worried my fears of him are based too much on Bioshock and not enough on Rolling Stones, and I'd hate to lynch him if he's not bad. If I don't go for Epi, you and DP seem the obvious candidates. I'm not as sure as I'd like to be about any of the 3 of you, but I am absolutely committed to voting for someone in this poll, and no other names have truly caught my eye so far.
And this is a threat...how exactly?MovingPictures07 wrote:If I don't hear from anyone else soon, I will spam the thread.
I'm not sure I agree apropos DP's behavior. However, the Day 1 vote was between A Person and DP. juliets sealed the deal.Mongoose wrote:DP seems extra squirrelly this game.Epignosis wrote:Were you to vote for a Lizzy voter, who would it be? Those are the folks I'm checking out.
That's the thing- it's all so circumstantial. One or two in that crew have to be rotten. That's when I look through the posts and am like the bear that went over the mountain.Mongoose wrote:Indeed, indeed. I don't know exactly how to connect the dots though. Do you have any interpretation(s)?Epignosis wrote:The Lizzy votes came in BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM 1-2-3-4 like a band getting ready to play. They came in right when llama voted for MovingPictures.
That's the first thing that sticks out to me.
I appreciate that, but I like to think I'm a little different each time, especially early on (you must've missed the one on RM where I talked the entire time in video game quotes- a little self-imposed curse to mix it up).MovingPictures07 wrote:Aggressive, logical, straight-forward, analyzing.Epignosis wrote:I'm curious about what [people think] my play style is.
Something like that. You seem a bit subdued currently. Thoughts, sir?
Yes, that clears it up quite nicely, thank you.thellama73 wrote:Windjammer and tack is Chitty Chitty Bang Bang for Hammer and Tack.juliets wrote:Can someone tell me what Hammer and Tack means in these cockney posts?
I believe it means "back." Hence, "Back to the underworld."juliets wrote:Can someone tell me what Hammer and Tack means in these cockney posts?
And if Lizzy turns out rotten, would your opinion of Hedgeowl change, or would you say she was throwing a teammate under the bus?S~V~S wrote:Good Question. Epi~
I am though
Voting Hedgeowl
linki~ she is saying that she can see Lizzy vote, yet she also is suspicious of it, and indeed wound up voting for it. She set herself up to teeter either way, me or Lizzy, depending how the wind blew. That is how it reads to me at least. Her vote for lizzy makes me suspect lizzy a bit more, tbh.
I have a cake avatar.S~V~S wrote:Don't you have a MOTU avatar?
I figured you meant me with the earlier "Bobby" post.Mongoose wrote:Loike the wahn bloke 'oo 'as the masters of the universe avatar. but na 'e will be Mum and Dad at meeeee and wanna Tiddley Win' me Claret so daan't let 'im, okay?S~V~S wrote:Like who, Mongoose? Can you name names, please? More helpful that way
It's too Liz Hurley for me ter tell if 'e is a snakey Joe Blake obviously, but it's a bit pingy for me from this yoga ball on which I Eartha Kitt.
Does that make any Eigh'een Pence?
linki - I done loike that Din' Dong.
Just a question- is this to say you think S~V~S is an all right cat?birdwithteeth11 wrote:Not much sense in me waiting much longer. I don't think there's much between SVS and llama. And Lizzy's really the only one so far who's pinged me with her vote for SVS. So Lizzy it is today.
Votes Lizzy
So pleased you liked it!Roxy wrote:Epignosis wrote:I'd like to dedicate this next number to our fine host Roxy.
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0aK98iqRav4
I find that if I go through this with a Cockney accent, it almost makes sense.thellama73 wrote:Movin' dolly mixtures 'as caught me attention by repeated me analysis of day wahn votes almost dicky richard the third for dicky richard the third wifaht addin' aahhht original. for that reason, I intend ter vote for 'im today.
My darling, you only get one vote.S~V~S wrote:yay no death.
And after recent experiences, I will vote for anyone pushing low posters, especially the first few days, not just llama. I just think they're bad, bad, bad.
And yay for Russti presentingWe don't always agree, but he always has strong analysis
If I wanted to be condescending, I would have usedS~V~S wrote:I meant either he is good or he is not. So yeah, 50/50 would not be correct. I was just speaking to his point that he does it all the time~ civ or bad. So either he is civ or bad~ one or the other, 50/50. I should have been clearer there.
My Bad.
And can we outlaw "
Going random on Day 1 does not bother me, but random "second" or "third" votes do bother me. However, knowing you, you would be the type to actually use a random generator and actually vote for the person regardless.A Person wrote:i used random.org and got 3, so i voted for DP.
I don't think you have a 50/50 shot here.S~V~S wrote:So? That does not make you a civ, it gives me a statistical 50/50 shot at being correct, which is better odds than wanting to vote for someone quiet on Day One, someone who is generally always quiet.thellama73 wrote:Even though I've done it in every single game I've ever been in?S~V~S wrote:I went with my gut and voted Llama. I view wanting to vote out ultra quiet people, especially so early, as a baddie ploy.
Certain people are ALWAYS quiet, and that may be against your Mafia philosophy, but numerically they are more likely to be civs. And lynching civs is against MY Mafia philosophy. If they are quiet civs, let the Mafia take them out, why do their dirty work for them?
thellama73 wrote:Since each selection can only have one vote, I want dibs on the beer!
